UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2011 12

Template:A/VBsub

This page is for the reporting of vandalism within the Urban Dead wiki, as defined by vandalism policy. On this wiki, the punishment for Vandalism is temporary banning, but due to security concerns, the ability to mete out this punishment is restricted to System Operators. As such, regular users will need to lodge a report for a Vandal to be banned from the wiki. For consistency and accountability, System Operators are requested to note on this board their actions in dealing with Vandals.

Guidelines for Vandalism Reporting

In dealing with Vandalism, time is often of the essence. As such, we ask that all users include the following information in a Vandalism report:

• A link to the pages in question.

Preferably bolded for visibility. If the Vandalism is occurring over a sufficiently large number of pages, instead include a time range of the vandalism attempt, or alternatively, a link to the first vandalised page. This allows us to quickly find the damage so we can quickly assess the situation.

• The user name of the Vandal.

This allows us to more easily identify the culprit, and to check details.

• A signed datestamp.

For accountability purposes, we ask that you record in your request your user name and the time you lodged the report.

• Please report at the top.

There's conflict with where to post and a lot of the reports are missed. If it's placed at the top of the page it's probably going to be seen and dealt with.

If you see Vandalism in progress, don't wait for System Operators to deal with it, as there may be no System Operator online at the time. Lodge the report, then start reverting pages back to their original form. This can be done by going to the "History" tab at the top of the page, and finding the last edit before the Vandal's attack. When a System Operator is available, they'll assess the situation, and if the report is legitimate, we will take steps to either warn the vandal, or ban them if they are on their second warning.

If the page is long, you can add new reports by editing the top report and placing your new report above its header in the edit screen.

Before Submitting a Report

• This page, Vandal Banning, deals with bad-faith breaches of official policy.
• Interpersonal complaints are better sorted out at UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration.
• As much as is practical, assume good faith and try to iron out problems with other users one to one, only using this page as a last resort.
• Avoid submitting reports which are petty.

Vandalism Report Space

Administration Notice Talk with the user before reporting or accusing someone of vandalism for small edits. In most cases it's simply a case of a new user that doesn't know how this wiki works. Sometimes assuming good faith and speaking with others can avoid a lot of drama, and can even help newbies feel part of this community. Administration Notice If you are not a System Operator, the user who made the vandal report, the user being reported, or directly involved in the case, the administration asks that you use the talk page for further discussion. Free-for-all commenting can lead to a less respectful environment. Administration Notice Warned users can remove one entry of their warning history every one month and 250 edits after their last warning. Remember to ask a sysop to remove them in due time. You are as responsible for keeping track of your history as the sysops are; In case of a sysop wrongly punishing you due to an outdated history, he might not be punished for his actions.

Spambots

Spambots are to be reported on this page. New reports should be added to the top. Reports may be purged after one week.

December 2011

User:Generaloberst (2)

• Generaloberst (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Incomplete
Action taken	None Yet

Shitting up the V/B page?--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks ^{Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens} 18:13, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Lol you mean taking Thad's shitty advice out of context and starting a case on hisself. Yeah, that is pretty much shitting up an admin page. It's happened before. ~ _{18:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)}

User:Generaloberst

• Generaloberst (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Incomplete
Action taken	None Yet

Editing another user's userpage. Let's see what this does. User:Generaloberst/signature 17:55, 08 December 2011 (UTC)

In my defence, this. Let me guess what you guys will say now... "It's allowed to resize other users images, but only on the talkpage! Outside of that it's considered vandalism!"

Come on, I'm just around playing with this wiki, it's amazing. User:Generaloberst/signature 17:57, 08 December 2011 (UTC)

Picking on Thad? You really don't understand this place. --Like Moss and The Dude..... 18:03, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

"It's allowed to resize other users images, but only on the talkpage! Outside of that it's considered vandalism!" Again, it's Thad's call. That was pretty stupid by the way. ~ _{18:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)}

"Impersonation accussation. Resizing images is not considered impersonation, there is plenty of precedent to back this up. End of story." Seems like the sysops don't completely agree with eachothers. I won (again). User:Generaloberst/signature 18:13, 08 December 2011 (UTC)

Thad's not an op. Plus he's kind of an idiot. ~ _{18:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)}

I'd second that. --Like Moss and The Dude..... 18:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

User:EmPathetic_Bill

• EmPathetic_Bill (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Incomplete
Action taken	None Yet

Uploading sexual profanity onto the wiki. User:Generaloberst/signature 15:35, 08 December 2011 (UTC)

i bet you are masturbating to this picture as we speak--User:Sexualharrison16:17, 8 December 2011 (bst)

How old are you, to be honest? User:Generaloberst/signature 16:21, 08 December 2011 (UTC)

It's just 2 dudes kissing. And the third...well I don't really know what the third one is doing. I assume he's just trying to get a better view. There's no nudity. It really isn't all that graphic, not like the extremely graphic scenes of death that Bankerdorf guy (or whatever it was) uploaded. Not Vandalism. ~ _{17:04, 8 December 2011 (UTC)}

Does this mean I can't start that lesbian group I wanted? Not vandalism --Like Moss and The Dude..... 17:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Your tears are delicious. I took the picture from the Dutch nazi party flickr account from the page "group policies". Who are you to say that we should not celebrate dutch Nazi free love, after all its what old uniball strived for before he blew his head off as the heros knocked on his door. Also - HELLO SUCKHOLE !--EmPathetic Bill 18:56, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

User:Sexualharrison

• Sexualharrison (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Not Vandalsim
Action taken	None

Editing my posts. I know it's only resizing, but it is editing someone else's posts. And no, don't make this a "Soft Warning" this time like Cornholioo had with him, and also don't make it "Not Vandalism" like Corn had with The Colonel. I've done my homework well. Sexualharrison should know better. He's been around for a while. Besides that Corn has also been doomed several times for editing other people's posts or pages when he hadn't been around that long.

Have fun finding some stupid ass reason to vote this one "Not Vandalism" again one way or another and losing even more credibility than you guys already did. Hail. User:Generaloberst/signature 15:05, 08 December 2011 (UTC)

hate to break this to you retard. editing the the size of image in not considered vandalism. it is in fact what is considered a good edit. if you didn't agree with the change all you had to do was revert or change it back. fucking dumbass. prepared to lose yet again.--User:Sexualharrison16:08, 8 December 2011 (bst):::oh you are right about that. and you must used to be hunted. nazi bitch hunts are super fun--User:Sexualharrison16:16, 8 December 2011 (bst)

Impersonation accussation. Resizing images is not considered impersonation, there is plenty of precedent to back this up. End of story. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 16:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

It's Spiderzed's talk page. He'd pretty much have to show up and say he had a problem with it to be even considered. He'd probably have more issue with it being filled with hate speech, I'm sure. Or SH for using his likeness for hatespeech. Not Vandalism unless Spider takes issue with it. ~ _{17:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)}

I love shitty excuses. Not Vandalism --Like Moss and The Dude..... 17:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Awwwww--User:Sexualharrison17:52, 8 December 2011 (bst)

User:Nmb910 (2)

• Nmb910 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Incomplete
Action taken	None Yet

For all of the alts below.

• Axe H4ck (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
• Axe H4ckz (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
• LolUMadAxe (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
• Johnsy Gerrits (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
• Nmb9I0 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
• NmbI90 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)
• Liontamer20 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

~ _{06:54, 29 November 2011 (UTC)}

Vandalism. One for each alt? ~ _{06:58, 29 November 2011 (UTC)}

This one too:

• AllNightAndDayAxe (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Now I'm not gonna make a verdict here since my page was also vandalized here, so I'm an involved party, so I'm gonna sit this one out. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:57, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

That's fine if you feel like an involved party but I really don't agree. His vandalization of your user page was just a response to you doing your job as sysop. If we considered sysops involved during sprees like this then it would be very easy for a vandal to make every sysop "involved" by hitting every sysop user page. I don't think you have any personally vested interest in this case beyond the typical vandal alt response to having their alt banned. Unless you truly feel you can't make an unbiased ruling here, feel free to take part in the perma vote. ~ _{14:55, 1 December 2011 (UTC)}

Guess you've got a point. His reaction was due to me doing my job. Vandalism be vandalism, then. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

They're pretty obviously alts of his, so he should get an escalation for each time he's created an alt to vandalise the wiki -- boxy 11:43, 29 November 2011 (BST)

Vandalism and an escalation for each alt. I think that probably puts him on a permaban vote?--The General ^{T Sys U! P! F!} 12:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism as boxy. 7 escalations at once should lead us straight from zero to permaban vote. -- Spiderzed█ 12:09, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Permaban Vote (User:Nmb910)

For

1. Its seems it's between the choice of banning this user for a year or just going straight to perma. I'm going to go ahead and vote perma in this case. First warning was issued a week ago and in hind sight another should have been issued for the Liontamer alts. User ignored warning and created a plethora of new alts while using proxy IPs. Looks to be a career vandal. ~ _{14:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)}

   Perma. Because if he is indeed Liontamer, which he indeed does seem to be, and Liontamer appeared earlier then him and was permabanned before Nmb910 joined the wiki, then it should very well be permaban evasion, no? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:24, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

   This user's first contribution was in 2009. This is the main. We're voting on whether to ban him based on multiple escalations. ~ _{01:48, 7 December 2011 (UTC)}

   Ah. I must have gotten confused in the flurry of alts this guy made. Lemme just retract this vote for now... --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 02:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Against

1. But only very slightly, and only because the user started his vandal career only recently. One month is plenty of time to cool down and become maybe, maybe a productive part of the community. However, just one more infraction (even during the perma vote), and I'll do everything to keep him off the site permanently. -- Spiderzed█ 16:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Axe H4ck

• Axe H4ck (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Impersonation/Vandalism
Action taken	Permaban

He didn't make an edit yet, but one look, and I knew he was gonna impersonate me to vandalize Snoog4's pages. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Scratch that. My banning came a second too slow. He vandalized my page. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

• Axe H4ckz (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Impersonation
Action taken	Permaban

Now this one, I was on time before the edit. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

• Johnsy Gerrits (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandalism/Vandal Alt
Action taken	Permaban

I'm getting sick of this shit. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

• LolUMadAxe (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandalism/Vandal Alt
Action taken	Permaban

Yawn. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:41, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

• AllNightAndDayAxe (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandal Alt
Action taken	Permaban

Caught by Vapor before it could edit. Damn vandal punk. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Nmb9I0

• Nmb9I0 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandal Alt
Action taken	Permaban

And again. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:21, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

User:NmbI90

• NmbI90 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandalism
Action taken	Permaban

Did the same edits as Liontamer18 and 19. I can't confirm that Liontamer and Nmb are the same person since the IPs aren't matching. In light of this, I think we should also reconsider the vandalism case against Nmb910 below. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Liontamer20

• Liontamer20 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Ban Evasion
Action taken	Permaban

See Liontamer18 and 19 below. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:06, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Nmb910

• Nmb910 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandalism
Action taken	Warning

For this. MO matches Liontamer. --VVV ^RPGMBCWS 08:13, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Check user does not show Liontamer and Nmb910 being the same person. In fact, their two locations are on opposite sides of US. There's a question I would like answered and made clear before I make a verdict for this case, so I've asked Snoog4 whether or not he authorized this edit or not. I shall make a decision when Snoog answers, or if Nmb910 heavily vandalizes the page like Liontamer. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 09:23, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

...It seems I may have unintentionally caused a bit of drama...He should have just answered yes or no to my question...Nmb910 gets a Vandalism verdict from me. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 16:02, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism -- Spiderzed█ 17:15, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism and warned. ~ _{14:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)}

We should reconsider this case. See the case above against NmbI90. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 23:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

I repeat. We should reopen this case in light of the new vandal alts with a similar name. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Yep, open her back up and count each vandal alt as vandalism. I count three so far. All proxies, too it seems. ~ _{06:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)}

I'm almost certain the impersonators are him also. Protected Angel Wings (as well as my user page) due to excessive vandalism. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 06:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Rotting Joe Cochrane

• Rotting Joe Cochrane (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Ban Evasion
Action taken	Permaban

Check user confirms it to be Johnny Rotten from a few reports below. Permabanning on grounds of ban evasion. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 01:08, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Liontamer19

• Liontamer19 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandalism
Action taken	Permaban

Edits have been rolled back and permabanning as a vandal alt. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 07:10, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Liontamer18

• Liontamer18 (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Verdict	Vandalism
Action taken	Permaban

Neither edit appears to be in good faith. --Uroguy^TMZ 17:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

All edits rolled back. IPs suggest either that Liontamer can travel from Las Vegas to Chicago in 4 minutes, or that he operates on proxies. Recommend a Perma as vandal alt. -- Spiderzed█ 18:14, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

I second the perma motion. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 20:16, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Permabanned. -- Cheese 22:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

What's up with these permabans? It's called 3ER for a reason guys and we've always strictly applied them as such, and proxies are banned separately from accounts. -- Thadeous Oakley Talk 14:37, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Vandal Alts are perma'd, however. ~ _{16:12, 22 November 2011 (UTC)}

Archives

e Vandal Banning Archive

2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4 2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Years 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020