UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Archive/2012 04: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 70: Line 70:
::[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Blitz&action=historysubmit&diff=1993282&oldid=1993279 Third]. [[User:Generaloberst|Generaloberst]] 20:09, 9 April 2012 (BST)
::[http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=The_Blitz&action=historysubmit&diff=1993282&oldid=1993279 Third]. [[User:Generaloberst|Generaloberst]] 20:09, 9 April 2012 (BST)
:::See point 4 below. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 20:11, 9 April 2012 (BST)
:::See point 4 below. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 20:11, 9 April 2012 (BST)
:I refute these baseless accusations and provide the following evidence to act as part of my defense:
:I refute these baseless acc:39, 9 April 2012 (BST)
:#As Cheeseman Muncher is my main character, I am a named party on the page.
:#As an event page, the page in question is in the main namespace and hence not protected in the same manner as a group page.
:#My group, [[The Randoms]], are part of the conflict detailed on the page and as their leader and main spokesperson on the wiki am well within my rights to edit it.
:#My group are well known for their unorthodox tactics and "wacky" nature, occasionally accompanied by material on the wiki. Examples include [[The Randoms/Enterprises/Hamish|the Angry Hamish doll]] and [[The Randoms/Enterprises/Future|our forays into the future]]. My edits were intended to represent this fact.
:I also take offense to the reporting user attempting to pre-judge the case and suggests he has brought this for no other reason than to continue to spam up the admin pages and waste time. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 18:39, 9 April 2012 (BST)
::You put the rabbit on there to annoy me. Also the part that once said "This picture depicts the initial strike (click to enlarge)", refered to the image directly below the text, not to the image that is now a rabbit. [[User:Generaloberst|Generaloberst]] 19:12, 9 April 2012 (BST)
::You put the rabbit on there to annoy me. Also the part that once said "This picture depicts the initial strike (click to enlarge)", refered to the image directly below the text, not to the image that is now a rabbit. [[User:Generaloberst|Generaloberst]] 19:12, 9 April 2012 (BST)
:::The bunny is there for <s>two</s> three reasons: It's cute, I like bunnies and it shows the effect the attacks had on the indiginous population. Your latter point was due to a misreading on my part and I shall of course correct it. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:29, 9 April 2012 (BST)
:::The bunny is there for < or pokemonian evolution? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:07, 9 April 2012 (BST)
::::You put the rabbit on there to annoy me. And you can't know the effect on the population because you were in Buttonville, like you admitted yourself. Page says that the operation was ment to starve Williamsville most prominently. [[User:Generaloberst|Generaloberst]] 20:13, 9 April 2012 (BST)
:::::This is a wiki for an RPG. I imagine that there are other things that zombies and human survivors in the city. As a result, I am providing a bit of in-character padding to the event. Like there being bunnies in the various parks throughout the area. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 21:01, 9 April 2012 (BST)
 
I'm clearly an involved party. --[[User:Rosslessness|Ross<sup>less</sup>ness]]  18:36, 9 April 2012 (BST)
 
Unlike Oberst, I'm clearly an evolved party. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:00, 9 April 2012 (BST)
:Are we speaking Darwinian or pokemonian evolution? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 19:07, 9 April 2012 (BST)
::Pearl Jamian. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:10, 9 April 2012 (BST)
::Pearl Jamian. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:10, 9 April 2012 (BST)
Not Canibalism. Cute bunnies are always good faith. They're the reason for the season~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>19:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)</sub>
::So at the slightest possible chance you have to vote in my disfavor, you do it, and when there is no way around you abstain from voting? [[User:Generaloberst|Generaloberst]] 19:15, 9 April 2012 (BST)
:::The bunny made me do it. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>19:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)</sub>
This is for [[A/A|arbitration]] as the existence of a case there shows and thus '''not vandalism'''. Also, it's an event and neutrality on an event page is actually part of the content, specifically content of the page is neutral to the parties involved and the picture of the bunny fits in with the lighthearted attitude generally present in events involving the Randoms as much as the name, etc. reflects the presence of the opposing group. There is no bad faith in lightening up the event page by removing pictures that would otherwise discourage reading the article. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 21:39, 9 April 2012 (BST)
This is just disagreement about the content on a mainspace event page, and thus '''not vandalism''', but rather a case for arbies. And Oberst, if you really want to keep control of your "event" pages, just create them in your group space or user space, where you have full control over who can edit them and who can't. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 22:30, 9 April 2012 (BST)
Since there is an ongoing arbitration case about this, I believe a proper ruling cannot be met until after arbitration proceedings have been completed.  Please complete arbitration proceedings first and resubmit this case again in the future if Cheese breaks the verdict of said arbitration case.  That said, I'm sure it is quite clear that I am withholding my verdict on this case. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 04:21, 10 April 2012 (BST)
<small>Uninvolved party's comments moved to [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}#User:Krazy Monkey|talk]] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] 13:07, 12 April 2012 (BST)</small></small>
===[[User:Generaloberst]] 2===
{{v|Generaloberst|Entirely pointless}}
I've only just reTC)</sub>
Oh fuck off and stop making drama for drama's sake. Warn the faggot. Karek get down here mofo. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 01:01, 2 April 2012 (BST)
:Yup, this nonsense is done [[User_talk:Generaloberst#Warning_1-2|'''Warned''']]. If you say you're vandalizing who are we to disagree. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev#Buildings_Update_Danger_Maps|maps 2.0?!]]</font></sup></small> 07:47, 2 April 2012 (BST)
I have no regrets over anything I said or did. [[User:Generaloberst|Generaloberst]] 15:10, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
For the record, I won't rule as I have been an involved party in SH's arbies case. --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 18:56, 2 April 2012 (BST)
:which i will not comment on anymore.. get to work spidey.--{{User:Sexualharrison/sig}}<small>19:52, 2 April 2012 </small>
{{:UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots}}
</noinclude>
==Archives==
{{VBarchivenav}}

Revision as of 22:13, 20 April 2012

Administration Services

Sysop List (Check) | Guidelines | Policies (Discussion) | Promotions (Bureaucrat) | Re-Evaluations

Deletions (Scheduling) | Speedy Deletions | Undeletions | Vandal Banning (Bots) | Vandal Data (De-Escalations)

Protections (Scheduling) | Move Requests | Arbitration | Misconduct | Demotions | Discussion | Sysop Archives

This page is for the reporting of vandalism within the Urban Dead wiki, as defined by vandalism policy. On this wiki, the punishment for Vandalism is temporary banning, but due to security concerns, the ability to mete out this punishment is restricted to System Operators. As such, regular users will need to lodge a report for a Vandal to be banned from the wiki. For consistency and accountability, System Operators are requested to note on this board their actions in dealing with Vandals.

Guidelines for Vandalism Reporting

In dealing with Vandalism, time is often of the essence. As such, we ask that all users include the following information in a Vandalism report:

  • A link to the pages in question.
Preferably bolded for visibility. If the Vandalism is occurring over a sufficiently large number of pages, instead include a time range of the vandalism attempt, or alternatively, a link to the first vandalised page. This allows us to quickly find the damage so we can quickly assess the situation.
  • The user name of the Vandal.
This allows us to more easily identify the culprit, and to check details.
  • A signed datestamp.
For accountability purposes, we ask that you record in your request your user name and the time you lodged the report.
  • Please report at the top.
There's conflict with where to post and a lot of the reports are missed. If it's placed at the top of the page it's probably going to be seen and dealt with.

If you see Vandalism in progress, don't wait for System Operators to deal with it, as there may be no System Operator online at the time. Lodge the report, then start reverting pages back to their original form. This can be done by going to the "History" tab at the top of the page, and finding the last edit before the Vandal's attack. When a System Operator is available, they'll assess the situation, and if the report is legitimate, we will take steps to either warn the vandal, or ban them if they are on their second warning.

If the page is long, you can add new reports by editing the top report and placing your new report above its header in the edit screen.

Before Submitting a Report

  • This page, Vandal Banning, deals with bad-faith breaches of official policy.
  • Interpersonal complaints are better sorted out at UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration.
  • As much as is practical, assume good faith and try to iron out problems with other users one to one, only using this page as a last resort.
  • Avoid submitting reports which are petty.


fore reporting or accusing someone of vandalism for small edits. In most cases it's simply a case of a new user that doesn't know how this wiki works. Sometimes assuming good faith and speaking with others can avoid a lot of drama, and can even help newbies feel part of this community. |}

Administration Notice
If you are not a System Operator, the user who made the vandal report, the user being reported, or directly involved in the case, the administration asks that you use the talk page for further discussion. Free-for-all commenting can lead to a less respectful environment.
Administration Notice
Warned users can remove one entry of their warning history every one month and 250 edits after their last warning. Remember to ask a sysop to remove them in due time. You are

User:Generaloberst 3

Striking valid rulings as an invested party in an attempt to change the outcome of a vandal banning case in his favour. -- Cheese 20:16, 13 April 2012 (BST)

Not Vandalism. But my god, is he retarded. --Rosslessness 20:36, 13 April 2012 (BST)

Being handled via talk page. Ya know, like its supposed to be done. Don't fall into that trap. ~Vsig.png 20:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

WOW. He'll be lucky he did this in 2012 if he gets away with this. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 00:12, 14 April 2012 (BST)

It was pretty stupid, huh. Especially the part where he admitted he was just out trying to get to me. Meh, ops should just rule however they see fit. Not like he has ever listened to logic. ~Vsig.png 00:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
See right now is where I could be ruling vandalism, then voting to keep him around when the perma vote arises in the future. Oh well. When I fall, I'll weep for happiness 00:51, 14 April 2012 (BST)
I did it to get on you, but that doesn't mean that I knew it wasn't allowed. Generaloberst 8:28, 14 April 2012 (BST)

Vandalism. Tampering with vandalism votes isn't a newb mistake, and it isn't something properly dealt with with some talk page wrist-slapping. Hardball is the only viable course of action in a case as severe as this one. Principiis obsta. Sero medicina parata, cum mala per longas convaluere moras. -- Spiderzed 01:22, 14 April 2012 (BST)

God, I even explained in the describtion of the edit why I made the edit, it says "good faith edit. vapor has been demoted so the vote doesn't count anymore.)" with your "not a newb mistake". Describtion clearly says that the edit was made in good faith and that I didn't know it was not allowed. Oh yeah, this case is so severe, watch out, next time I will use gas. Better have me banned. Generaloberst 8:26, 14 April 2012 (BST)

User:Krazy_Monkey

Clearly bad faith . But obviously not vandalism. Generaloberst 18:23, 9 April 2012 (BST)

Another one. Though, as said, obviously not vandalism. Generaloberst 18:30, 9 April 2012 (BST)
Third. Generaloberst 20:09, 9 April 2012 (BST)
See point 4 below. -- Cheese 20:11, 9 April 2012 (BST)
I refute these baseless acc:39, 9 April 2012 (BST)
You put the rabbit on there to annoy me. Also the part that once said "This picture depicts the initial strike (click to enlarge)", refered to the image directly below the text, not to the image that is now a rabbit. Generaloberst 19:12, 9 April 2012 (BST)
The bunny is there for < or pokemonian evolution? -- Cheese 19:07, 9 April 2012 (BST)
Pearl Jamian. When I fall, I'll weep for happiness 19:10, 9 April 2012 (BST)