UDWiki:Moderation/Deletions/Archive/May-2006

From The Urban Dead Wiki
< UDWiki:Moderation‎ | Deletions‎ | Archive
Revision as of 01:23, 25 January 2008 by Zombie slay3r (talk | contribs) (Protected "UDWiki:Moderation/Deletions/Archive/May-2006": Scheduled [edit=sysop:move=sysop])
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Deletions Archive
2005 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2007 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2008 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2009 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2010 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2011 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Q3 Q4
2013 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2014 Jan-Jun Jul-Dec
Years 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

This is an archive page for Moderation/Deletions. This page represents all Deletions archived in May 2006.

Image:Dogdoo-746387.jpg

Reason:Innapropriate image. Conndrakamod T W! 06:07, 17 May 2006 (BST)

  • Delete Why would Phish dude upload this shit? –Xoid S•T•FU! 08:23, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete Hmm... I looked at his user page, but I just can't tell. Not. At. All. That's right. I have no idea. Maybe it's a self-commentary? :P --Cyberbob240CDF - U! 08:27, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - WTF? --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 22:12, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - But I really like that picture, how the dog looks right at the camera. Perfect. --Banana¯\(o_º)/¯Bear 01:48, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - But it would make a great "This suggestion has been spaminated" image. --Mookiemookie 16:10, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - off topic. --hagnat mod 04:02, 23 May 2006 (BST)
  • WTFZOMBIES!Keep YAY! This is so awesome I'm going to use it. Mattiator 04:59, 24 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Spamming it all over the suggestions pages. --Cinnibar 01:52, 26 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Zeroed out. –Xoid S•T•FU! 04:36, 31 May 2006 (BST)

WTFCENTAURS the Movie

Criterion 2: Blatantly off topic. --Grim s-Mod 02:00, 16 May 2006 (BST)

  • Kill - belongs in a User space if anything… though I had considered voting Keep just to annoy Grimmy ^^ --SirensT RR 02:03, 16 May 2006 (BST)
Ok… Can I have it moved there? Sonny Corleone WTF 02:08, 16 May 2006 (BST)
I dont think it should be kept anywhere on this wiki. Its nothing but useless spam, and in my opinion, an abuse of the wiki. --Grim s-Mod 02:14, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - WE. ARE. THE. FUN. POLICE. YOU. MAY. NOT. HAVE. FUN. --Jorm 05:47, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Huff - Just have whoever made it put it inside their userspace. –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:05, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I'm going to say keep but if it's really a big deal I can move it to a userspace, whatever that is. --Sonny Corleone WTF 12:28, 16 May 2006 (BST)
    • The user namespace is User:User's Name, you can make it a subpage of your own page, or put it on your own page. –Xoid S•T•FU! 13:27, 16 May 2006 (BST)
    • Just fill in User:Saromu/WTFCENTAURS_the_Movie as the new address in the "new title" text box when you hit move. --Vista W! 13:36, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - --Brizth mod T W! 21:19, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Same reason as before. Thanks, Vista. --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 00:01, 18 May 2006 (BST)Keep - Looks like it's in someone's userspace now. --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 22:07, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • delete -BobHammero, this a vote on specific page, not specific content. The content is now in a user page also, but the actual page is stil there. as the content is dubbled this version is redundant.--Vista W! 22:16, 17 May 2006 (BST)
    Um... okay, now I feel stupid. Thanks. --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 00:01, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Now that it's in Sonny's Saromu's userspace... --Cyberbob240CDF - U! 22:32, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete Keep - <3 Sonny --Undeadinator 01:43, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - hagnat mod 01:57, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Laugh it up, fuzzball! --Niilomaan 22:01, 19 May 2006 (BST)
    • Delete - Oh.. It has moved. Well this one is no longer needed then. (Never vote while having weird drunk levels.) --Niilomaan 06:03, 20 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete! - Moved. Mattiator 17:58, 26 May 2006 (BST)
    • Was it that hard to use a bullet? –Xoid S•T•FU! 18:03, 26 May 2006 (BST)

Moderator - Deleted. --A Bothan Spy Mod WTF U! 09:35, 30 May 2006 (BST)

WTF Centaurs

Again, Blatantly off topic, and qualifies under criterion 2. --Grim s-Mod 05:39, 16 May 2006 (BST)

  • Keep - WE. ARE. THE. FUN. POLICE. YOU. MAY. NOT. HAVE. FUN. --Jorm 05:48, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Destory - Just have whoever made it put it inside their userspace. –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:05, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Come on. How about deleting group pages with only 1 member that hasn't been updated since November? At least this is active. Sonny Corleone WTF 12:12, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - --Brizth mod T W! 21:19, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Sonny does have a point. While it's not really an UD thing, it's at least something that deals with the UD wiki and is somewhat entertaining. If anything, those 1 memeber groups need to be weeded out before something like this. Tirion529 21:46, 17 May 2006 (BST)
    • That is completely irrelevant to THIS vote. If you want to get rid of those, then go and find them and submit them for deletion. Mods arent here to do all the work for you. --Grim s-Mod 23:53, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - This is wiki related, and funny as well. --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 22:09, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Off topic garbage, and part of an unfunny line of such garbage that is spamming up this wiki. --Grim s-Mod 23:53, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - --Lucero U! T 02:43, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Velkrin 08:34, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Relates directly to matters of the Urban Dead Wikipedia. If the votes turn ugly and this ends up getting deleted, I'd appreciate it if somebody could let me know ahead of time so as I might save it under my User page. --Undeadinator 01:42, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - The humour, she is okay by me. --Jimbo Bob ASS 01:44, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - WCDZ set precedent for off topic entertaining things staying on the wiki. I heard Kevan hates these pages. --Banana¯\(o_º)/¯Bear 01:47, 19 May 2006 (BST)
    The WCDZ is still a group in game and has been listed in the stats. so it's arguable not off topic.--Vista W! 08:43, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - What Undeadinator said. --Cyberbob240CDF - U! 01:53, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - heck, why not ? --hagnat mod 02:06, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - When I saw this page listed for deletion, my reaction was WTFCentaurs? --Ron Burgundy 05:32, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - The New Sterner Wiki??? --Maggot Therapy 01:55, 24 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - There is some actual information in there. --McArrowni 04:21, 25 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Tis Funny and should stay. --HamsterNinja 19:36 26 May 2006 (BST)

Moderator - Kept. --A Bothan Spy Mod WTF U! 09:36, 30 May 2006 (BST)

WTFCENTAURS

Redirect to the above. --Grim s-Mod 05:39, 16 May 2006 (BST)

  • Keep - WE. ARE. THE. FUN. POLICE. YOU. MAY. NOT. HAVE. FUN. --Jorm 05:47, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Annihilate - Just have whoever made it put it inside their userspace. –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:05, 16 May 2006 (BST)

Regarding all the above. This is the Urban Dead wiki. Lets try not to fill it with shit like that shown above. --Grim s-Mod 05:39, 16 May 2006 (BST)

Having it here at all may be an abuse of the wiki, but if they move it to their user space it's a permitted abuse. Until policy changes, we are technically at their mercy. –Xoid S•T•FU! 12:07, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Come on. How about deleting group pages with only 1 member that hasn't been updated since November? At least this is active. Sonny Corleone WTF 12:12, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - It's not active, it's a redirect. An unneeded redirect. The other page may have some value as a 'joke' but this page has nothing than a link. Who is going to search the wiki for this, other than those who learn it exists through the direct links the WTFcentaurs put up themselves? --Vista W! 12:37, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - --Brizth mod T W! 21:19, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - One page is enough. --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 22:11, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Begone redirect! Velkrin 08:33, 18 May 2006 (BST)

Moderator - Deleted. --A Bothan Spy Mod WTF U! 09:36, 30 May 2006 (BST)

Declarations

Reason: Created for the purpose of objective inter-group communication, but is largely unused. Kripcat 10:52, 14 May 2006 (BST)

  • Delete --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 20:02, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Should be kept for at least archive reasons. --Karlsbad 20:25, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete--Duce Nauks 21:20, 15 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - the last real edit on this page was just over 6 weeks ago; that's not long enough (IMO) for it to be "unused".--Jorm 08:45, 16 May 2006 (BST)
    • I'll point out that the last real edit for this is only a about week older than the last real edits for Malton DEA and Barhah Brigade. Time is a different factor in wikidom. This is stupid; leave the page. --Jorm 09:44, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - It may have been only recently (relatively speaking) that the page became disused, but I'd like to point out that the only user to actually use it for the purpose it was intended was the author and as such (not counting the author), it has never been used. As for archive purposes the lone "declaration" can be moved to that group’s wiki page. Kripcat 12:21, 16 May 2006 (BST)
    • Well, I'm glad that you're here to decide how people can use the wiki for me, because I was under the impression it was a "community" thing. Glad to get that cleared up.--Jorm 17:49, 16 May 2006 (BST)
    • I'm not sure if you've noticed or not but, I am the only contributer to the page (with the exception of avery brief entry by Duce Nauks) and as no one else has taken a shine to my concept I figured it might as well go. Kripcat - I.U.S.S 08:02, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - --Roybot 16:39, 17 May 2006 (BST)

Moderator: Deleted. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 08:16, 29 May 2006 (BST)

Dev/null

Reason: obscure joke for anyone not well versed enough on the various 'nix platforms. Any joke that really needs to be explained in great detail just doesn't cut it.

  • Keep - I wasn't aware that so many people actually got it. Perhaps I should've given the UD community some credit. –Xoid S•T•FU! 07:32, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Uh… is space that big much of a premium that you can't spare a few lines for this? Considering that I've seen far stupider jokes lying about on this wiki (mostly on user pages), I don't see why there is an oppressive need to take this down. --Xavier06 09:47, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - User pages have greater autonomy. --Vista W! 14:22, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Roybot 16:11, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - People convinced me otherwise. --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 06:39, 16 May 2006 (BST) Delete - It's funny, but pointless. --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 19:59, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - This vote section probably takes up more space than that page. --Ron Burgundy 01:33, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - It's a group page. If we delete this one, I better see all the unconfirmed groups put up for deletion too. Really, this sets a bad precedent: Groups that people don't "get" aren't worthy to be on the wiki. Leave it alone. --SirensT RR 01:44, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - What Mia said. It may be an obscure joke or even a not-very-funny joke, but it's still a group. Come to that, who declared the wiki a humor-free zone? --Fred Dullard 02:06, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - WE. ARE. THE FUN-PO-LICE. WE. SHALL. SEE. YOU. BURN. HA-HA-HA-HA-HA. --Jorm 04:28, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - BANDWAGONING WOOOO --Jimbo Bob ASS 08:01, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - *Hops on* Room for one more? --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 08:49, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - It's pretty funny. --Abi79 The Abandoned 14:21, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - 2 legit 2 quit! --furtim 00:57, 19 May 2006 (BST)

Moderator: Kept. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 08:16, 29 May 2006 (BST)

Project UnWelcome

this might be fun, this might be only parody, but i think this is not the kind of things we want here in the wiki. It was fun while only a joke, now i see one of its members using a link to this page in his signature, the same way people in the Project Welcome do. Either keep it as a joke, or it is time to end this. --hagnat mod 19:08, 12 May 2006 (BST)

this also includes anything related to this page, like the smallUnwelcome2 template and the Un-Welcome image. --hagnat mod 19:08, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Its a wiki group regarding conduct on this wiki. It may not be friendly conduct (Just the opposite, in fact), but its still all legal. --Grim s-Mod 19:29, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - As Grim said. There are some users who are happy to help, and some that would rather say "screw off". Both are valid. --SirensT RR 19:37, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I was wondering exactly how long this would take. The U! in my signature is a joke, but if it scares newbies off from talking to me then that's probably a good thing — at the very least it's the fair warning that they currently don't get when I'm confronted with acts of blatant n00bery. (I'm going with this definition of n00b, by the way.) –Xoid S•T•FU! 20:05, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -mehh, It's just a parody, and not a particulary inspired one. I can't get worked up over that. certianly not with all the real drama we have.--Vista W! 20:15, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Kuh-yeep - Honestly hag, put away the pitchfork =P. --Lucero U! T 21:31, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I don't mind it. After all, Undeadinator's in it! How bad can it be? </slander> -Wyn (talk!) 21:36, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep It's a cute parody, and as long as everyone involved understands that... -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 02:55, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - The point at which this would stop being a joke is if members actually started implementing the policies of harassment detailed on the page. As this does not appear to have happened, nor is it ever likely to, trying to delete this page is premature at best, and authoritarian at worst. Punish people or delete pages for things they actually do, not for things they jokingly state they intend to do. --Jimbo Bob ASS 03:59, 13 May 2006 (BST)
    • Note - Xoid already has been. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 05:55, 14 May 2006 (BST)
      • Reply - I'm afraid I'll need a little more compelling of evidence than "Whatever" to believe an allegation like that. --Jimbo Bob ASS 21:34, 15 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Bob Hammero ASS 04:23, 13 May 2006 (BST)
    For all those who are voting Keep. I believe this is not the kind of message we want people to have from us, that we support this kind of thing. Thats why i ask this to either be lett as a humorous article (and then no links for it on signatures on whatever), or be erased. --hagnat mod 05:46, 13 May 2006 (BST)
    I voted keep simply because I happen to think that it is pretty humorous. And in regards to whether or not "we support this kind of thing," I think it's controversial in the same way that player killing is controversial. It's not against the game or wiki rules, and although many people frown on it, some people might enjoy it (such as yours truly). I don't think that it's appropriate to ask for self-censorship on an obviously tongue-in-cheek humorous concept, or to ask it to be deleted, since it is directly wiki-related. Hence, the keep vote. --Bob Hammero ASS 05:50, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Added a NPOV section saying clearly that it is an irony and humorous group and shouldn't be considered a reflection of the wiki as a whole. --Karlsbad 08:53, 13 May 2006 (BST)
    Sidenote - If a page isn't linked closely from anything on the main page, wouldn't it most likely never be seen by the majority of the wiki using folk? Unless you watch the Recent Changes section as often as we all most likely do, most of the wiki is hidden to you. --Kb
  • Keep - I think it's funny and a good parody.--Jorm 05:59, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Funny, and it actually taught me how to make a sig. So usefeul too. --Hypnotoad U! 18:45, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - While it gave me a good laugh, and would recieve my vote if people didn't actually follow through with its policies, Xoid already has been for quite a while. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 05:55, 14 May 2006 (BST) Keep - Alright, alright. You guys have converted me. Or rather, Don D Crummitt has :P --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 22:12, 15 May 2006 (BST)
    Bullshit. I have not hunted down and then lynched anyone, I have not flamed people on the suggestion page, I have not edited the help documentation to be misleading, and I have not deliberately mislead any newbie. Period. The only "policy" (note the singular) that I've followed, is "Flame new users", and that has been happening less and less frequently as I've been trying to train myself not to react. Am I less that pleasant on occasion? Yes. Does that mean I'm following it's policies? No. –Xoid S•T•FU! 08:32, 14 May 2006 (BST)
    Whatever. The vote (and my opinion) stands. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 08:38, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -You're kidding, right?!? It's a parody, a joke--much better than any of those weak templates or WTF Centaurs. I'm more concerned about members of Project Welcome behaving badly; There seem to be a few...urm...unwecoming fellows in that bunch (not to cast aspersions on the group as a whole, though).--Xavier06 09:44, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I can't see why anybody wouldn't like us. We're the largest community youth-group on the whole Wiki. Really, we're like the Boy Scouts of America, only on the internet and with metaphorical flamethrowers. Like the YMCA or Jeffrey Dahmer, we take in troubled young men and give them guidance and support...even if, in our case, said guidance and support is in the direction of smashing new guys without remorse. As Rodney King once said, can't we all just...get along? --Undeadinator 05:40, 15 May 2006 (BST) (Note: Rodney King now lives in a drug rehabilitation center in Los Angeles. How rule is that?)
  • Keep - No harm, no foul. --dougward AB 03:40, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Because I'm a member. --Niilomaan 09:08, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - As the Church of the Subgenius says, "F' em if they can't take a joke" --Mookiemookie 16:08, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I'm an absolute n00b at this type of stuff, but can see this is satire, with the intent of showing what not to do to n00bs like me. Much more entertaining than reading a "please welcome new contributors" page too. --Boxy 12:03, 24 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - hagnat, maybe you're unwelcome -- Rueful 23:43, 24 May 2006 (BST)

Moderator: Kept. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 13:31, 26 May 2006 (BST)

Extravaganza/How to blow stuff up so it looks pretty

Moved from Moderation/Speedy Deletions

Criterion 2. Naturally i request a moderator other than Vista to rule on this. --Grim s-Mod 22:20, 11 May 2006 (BST)

As I see it the page is a bit of flavor attached to an ingame event and thus has some relavancy, it is also still under construction. and as such I undeleted it to give them a change to improve on it. there are a lot of pages that only excist for flavor about the game. If the entire Extravaganza deal was attached to a groups page whould that be better? (and grim, rest assured, I know better then to rule on this)--Vista W! 22:25, 11 May 2006 (BST)
Unfortunately the page is not flavour, but is in fact irrelevant excess material detailing the modification of explosives, and is quite likely in violation of the laws of many countries. Furthermore, i fail to see how instructions to modify said explosives is relevant at all to urban dead itself. Flavour about the game is all good and well, but this is just off topic nonsense. And you still edit conflicted me, for which there can only be one possible method of resolution: A Pie throwing Duel. I pick the pies, you pick the location. --Grim s-Mod 22:29, 11 May 2006 (BST)
There can only be one location for pie throwing drama... To the vandal banning talk page!--Vista W! 22:32, 11 May 2006 (BST)
BTW, What they put up there has nothing that isn't in every chemist book. just what colour certain metals burn, I agree that it isn't much at the moment, but they were slowly turning away from just firework modification to more UD centred theme..--Vista W! 22:36, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Addressing the legality, like Vista says, it can be found in many chemistry books. Also attached to a legit event in Urbandead. --SirensT RR 02:27, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - I have made my position regarding this particular chunk of off topic content quite clear. I would have voted Speedy Delete, like happened in the previous ruling not even 12 hours ago, however Mia voted keep, so there was no point. --Grim s-Mod 02:37, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Didn't I see this get deleted earlier? --Bob Hammero ASS 05:38, 12 May 2006 (BST)
    It's been restored--Vista W! 21:42, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - The Wiki is in no country other than the one where the servers are and therefore legality -in other countries- is not a concern. -Wyn (talk!) 21:40, 12 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Keeping it does no harm, therefore deleting it does no good. Rather, deleting it does harm: the guy who wrote it clearly wants it to exist. You could argue it's taking up space and, therefore, harmful to the server, but there are two problems with that route. First of all, you've got to account for all the wikidrama nonsense that goes around and takes up much, much more space and isn't deleted (see talk pages and such). Second, if space were an issue, history purges would be more frequent (I can't imagine history that old is of much use). --Ron Burgundy 07:30, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Cleary I'm for it, it encourages RPing which is the entire point of the game. If every page in this wiki must directly pertain to the game, what the hell is the humerous suggestions page doing. We intend to use the page as a springboard for launching missions into dulston and ridleybank anyhow, it's a way to get people organized that is origional and fun. -PadreRomero 16:45, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Folks, getting into details of explosives opens up a can of worms that many people would really rather avoid. Yea its pretty harmless for most people, and yes its the same info found on otehr online sources... but you really don't want the kind of scruitany that those other sites/pages/anarchist cookbooks get. Conndrakamod T W! 18:54, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - What Conndraka said--Bermudez 02:08, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Give people some credit. Nobody's thick enough to go and fire off a flare inside thier house. Labine50 08:00, 14 May 2006 (BST)
    • This vote amused me. Think, very, very carefully on that. Think of every idiot, every Darwin Award winner, and tell me you're still sure of that. –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:49, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Ok, first of all, this game is filled with very silly people. I accept that. You should too. The entire theory of the game is to entertain yourself, and since this type of RPing is more fun for some people than any one other thing about this game, why not let them have their fun. So start accepting your general silliness and vote to keep this page, if for no other reason than to retain the silly. Jimbo Morgan 23:39, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - This was comical to read--Duce Nauks 21:24, 15 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - 'Harmless'? And I quote: "if anyone has any spare sodium lying around, we could probably do it.". And he encourages a sugar-water binder. If people do not know what kind of reaction pure sodium has with water, I encourage them to google Sodium Party: "Which brings me to a safety warning: Sodium is really rather dangerous. If we had been anywhere within 15 feet of this explosion, it would have sprayed us with molten sodium and sodium hydroxide. Even a tiny amount in the eyes would have been a serious medical emergency. That's why I built a device that let me release it in a very controlled way from a great distance: If you want to do anything even remotely like this, you should take similar precautions. While it's safe to drop a tiny piece, maybe a few millimeters on edge, into a bowl of water, if you are wearing safety glasses, the force of the explosion goes up non-linearly with size. A lot of people have hurt themselves by going to bigger and bigger pieces thinking it's just going to do more of the same. It doesn't: At some point it turns from a fizzle and flame into a real explosion, like a shotgun." If someone actually followed these instructions, they'd probably kill themselves. This is not the kind of stuff we want UDWiki to have on it. Tokakeke 21:20, 16 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Because like I said to Labine50, people are that stupid. They can and will do immensely idiotic things simply because they can. If they really want this information, they can search for it elsewhere. –Xoid S•T•FU! 11:13, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - More people need this info. It needs to be more accessible not less. --Spraycan Willy MalTel 05:09, 23 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Tokakeke makes a good point. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 05:31, 23 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - There's tons of pages out there that aren't actively viewed or used. We have a billion and one inactive human group pages. Delete the ones that are never viewed. Sonny Corleone WTF 01:55, 24 May 2006 (BST)

Moderator: Kept. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 13:31, 26 May 2006 (BST)

Elohim

Added ten days ago with very little content. Not edited since. X1M43 05:39, 26 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --A Bothan SpyCDF - WTF - U! 05:41, 26 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. There are two edits to that page. One from Stroth back in January, the other was X1M43 tagging it with {{delete}}. –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:31, 26 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 06:44, 26 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. Conndrakamod T W! 06:45, 26 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Bob Hammero T•W!•U! 07:11, 26 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion Seven. It's a group that never really got off the ground. --Stroth MotA 09:31, 26 May 2006 (BST)
Speedy Deleted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Conndraka (talk • contribs) .

Carry

Empty page created while author was trying to create a suggestion, apparently. no content. --Timid Dan 22:26, 24 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Brizth mod T W! 00:05, 25 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 00:56, 25 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. –Xoid S•T•FU! 01:07, 25 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Bob Hammero W!•U! 01:39, 25 May 2006 (BST)
Speedy Deleted Conndrakamod T W! 03:06, 25 May 2006 (BST)

Switzerland

This is the page for my group (I was the only member as of its dissolution. I have dissolved said group, and so it no longer needs to be on the wiki. --John Rove 21:45, 22 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 7. --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 22:04, 22 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 7. Conndrakamod T W! 22:17, 22 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 7. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 00:48, 23 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Speedily deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 10:55, 23 May 2006 (BST)

Zerger corperation

I'm pretty sure Mattitator created this page just to whine about the fact that people called him out for zerging. Useless--Mpaturet 02:40, 10 May 2006 (BST)

  • Delete And maybe send him to the chair. Sonny Corleone 02:43, 10 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Worthless. --Bob Hammero ASS 02:49, 10 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - New, and I've seen far more worthless things get kept. --SirensT RR 03:03, 10 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Remember the great humoungous or whatever? this is similar--Mpaturet 03:04, 10 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Others convinced me. No for cheaters. What Mia said. And this is not in any way similar to now-gone Great Humongous page. --Brizth mod T W! 12:44, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - ...with a vengeance. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 11:11, 10 May 2006 (BST)
  • KeepDelete - WTF delete it. Mattiator 18:00, 10 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Keep - as much as we all hate zergers, mattiator is free to create any kind of group he wishes (as long they belong to this wiki). --hagnat mod 19:06, 10 May 2006 (BST) Edit: i have to agree with grim on that. --hagnat mod 18:10, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - keep Personal like or dislike is no good yardstick for voting on a group page. Mattiator should have a chance to develop this, even if it is inane. But the fact that it encourages cheating is. Thanks grim for pointing that out.--Vista W! 20:54, 10 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Things that break the rules of the game should not be encouraged, especially not the UD Wiki. --Grim s-Mod 09:13, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - What grim said nails it. Cut this off to drift. MaulMachine 16:43, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Ditto. –Xoid S•T•FU! 18:16, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - zergging is bad, we should not encourage it on the wiki--Bermudez 20:54, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - What Grim said. --Jimbo Bob ASS 21:22, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - As Grim said. --Karlsbad 19:09, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Zerging is bad. --McArrowni 00:05, 17 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Zerging is bad enough, but proud of doing it is another matter. --Changchad 17:49, 20 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Deleted. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 03:03, 22 May 2006 (BST)

Template:GANKBUS

Reason: a copy of a group page that already exists, and only is used as a template to clutter and, in my opinion, spam the pages in which it is used. There also should be a limit on the size of templates that we use and their use; a five inch position statement is okay, but having a foot and a half of asinine repetition is useless.

  • Delete --Karlsbad 22:55, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete -IMO, It's vandalism --Vista W! 23:06, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - I'm all about the GANKBUS, but I'm genuinely unsure of what this'd be used for. Perhaps if someone could explain such? --Jimbo Bob ASS 23:50, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Rasher is bad with computers, I think he got confused here. -- Rueful 00:12, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Woo! Rasher, I still believe in you-Banana¯\(o_º)/¯Bear 00:43, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - I cry for the bandwidth that died making it. Sonny Corleone 00:44, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I'm the author. This is awesome. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a dirty bourgeiousie Rasher 01:21, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - What an artlessly self serving vandal tool. --Zaruthustra-Mod 01:59, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - *sigh* --hagnat mod 02:13, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Eh, wah? Just like to point out that this meets none of the requirements for speedy-delete. Voting speedy-delete does not make it any delete-ier. --Lucero Capell 02:17, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - GANKBUS, you guys are awesome, but this does seem a bit pointless. --Bob Hammero ASS 04:44, 9 May 2006 (BST)
    Especially since you can do the same thing by typing {{:GANKBUS}}... -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 05:10, 9 May 2006 (BST)
seriously? because thats awesome Rasher 06:17, 9 May 2006 (BST)
oh fucking lord, its even dynamic. I change my vote to delete; I am obsolete...long live the new {{GANKBUS}}Rasher 06:20, 9 May 2006 (BST)
Well, yeah. Any page can be transcluded into any other page, Templates aren't unique in this. Just that the software means that you can leave the Template: bit out when you transclude anything from the Template namespace. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 07:53, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 15:13, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 18:16, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - not because i want to keep it, but to prevent it from being illegally speedy deleted if another person misuses the speedydelete vote. If it werent for those votes id be delete like everyone else. --Grim s-Mod 20:46, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Wholly unnecessary--Bermudez 21:07, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Kill - Burning down, burning down; It's a story of deceivers. Burning down, burning down; Put the blame on the unbeliever. --Niilomaan 21:58, 19 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Deleted. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 03:03, 22 May 2006 (BST)

Black Shadows

Reason: group page. Only has two edits, one from zero death (he only has 2 edits himself), the other was me whacking {{delete}} onto it. It hasn't been touched for Over 2 months, and is nearly content free.

Moderator: Deleted. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 03:03, 22 May 2006 (BST)

You know you've been playing Urban Dead too much when

Reason: I honestly do not see a point in having this page. Seems like a waste to me. Saromu 15:57, 7 May 2006 (BST)

  • Keep - I find it amusing. And I added to it. --SirensT RR 16:39, 7 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep' - It's amusing.--The General W! Mod 16:50, 7 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Bob Hammero ASS 17:18, 7 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - This page is awesome.--Duce Nauks 17:54, 7 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Amusion! --Jimbo Bob ASS 01:41, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - AA (they're up arrows)--'STER-Talk-Mod 01:50, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - It takes what, 5 kilobytes? Come on. --Zaruthustra-Mod 02:02, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Delete? This needs to be fucking COPYRIGHTED. MaulMachine 03:11, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I contributed to that page (see number 5)! I don't want it to go away! --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 12:38, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - This was (at times) witty and amusing! Keep keep I say! -- Buncy T GBP 04:28, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - He he, this is good I reckon. I agree, it's a waste. That more people don't know about it - Jedaz 11:19, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - It's worth keeping, hopefully it can be expanded. –Xoid S•T•FU! 18:16, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - it's funny--Bermudez 20:52, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Hee hee...I added to it--Mookiemookie 16:15, 19 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - TEEHEE this is lol funny. Mattiator 05:35, 21 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Kept. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 03:03, 22 May 2006 (BST)

Awesome Central

This is a useless page. It's also and eyesore. WTFCentaurs looks intelligent compared to this. Sonny Corleone WTF 20:22, 21 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedy Delete - And now that's been done. Excellent. Delete - This should be a subsidiary page of the group maintaining it. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 20:29, 21 May 2006 (BST)
  • SpeedyDelete -The Now empty pages content has been moved to a subset of that groups pages. Conndrakamod T W! 20:46, 21 May 2006 (BST)
  • SpeedyDelete -To bad, I rather hoped we could get rid of it all--Vista W! 21:14, 21 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 21:19, 21 May 2006 (BST)

National Undead Events Helpline 0800 UNDEAD

There's really no point to it. Sonny Corleone WTF 20:22, 21 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 20:28, 21 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. Conndrakamod T W! 20:47, 21 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Vista W! 21:14, 21 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 21:19, 21 May 2006 (BST)

Anti Love Army

Reason: Unused group page. Only one edit has been made (its creation), and that was in January. Its talk page has only been edited by Xoid and myself - today. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 13:40, 5 May 2006 (BST)

  • Delete G F J 14:02, 5 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 19:18, 5 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy delete - No content.--The General W! Mod 15:38, 7 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete Pointless, has no relation to UD, and the Council of Lovers already does this better--Bermudez 21:10, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - No content. --Technerd 04:45, 13 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 21:19, 21 May 2006 (BST)

The Legion

Not sure if this should go or not. From a cursory glance, it looks like it's been trimmed down to a two-liner by a member of the group, but I might be wrong. My gut said to list this for speedy, but I'm not so sure. So I'll put it here instead. –Xoid S•T•FU! 00:48, 18 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedydelete Criteria #1. If there was even an image or something I could see keeping it, but two lines (including the discussions page) does not a viable wiki page make. I have a pretty low content standard for keeping a page, but this doesnt cut it, Delete it. Conndrakamod T W! 03:35, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - What been done said up top there. --Jimbo Bob ASS 04:48, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - See above. --Bob Hammero ASS•U! 05:57, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Alright, I'm convinced. –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:57, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - The Malton DEA has an interest in keeping this page, as they were a survivor group that we, uh, murdered to a man. Our first PK war.--Jorm 08:07, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - If you want to keep a record, move the content to a subpage off of your group page. --Cyberbob240CDF - U! - WTF 08:18, 18 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Velkrin 08:35, 18 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Speedily deleted. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 01:06, 19 May 2006 (BST)

That page

Reason: Speedy Delete criterion 1.

  • Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 14:34, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Merge. Just because something isn't serious doesn't mean it isn't of value. These pages are linked and they're entertaining. I'd say keep them. EDIT: That reasoning stands, but I like Lint's idea--that way less clutter, and if we make more example pages we won't have to go through the whole business again. Maybe all have them send to User: Example User, as someone actually took that name.--'STER-Talk-Mod 21:38, 2 May 2006 (BST)
    • RE: These things may be amusing, but they are useless. If users really want to keep these sort of pages, perhaps a special category should be made: [[Category:By Popular Demand]] or perhaps [[Category:Do Not Delete]]? –Xoid S•T•FU! 01:51, 3 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - What 'STER said. - CthulhuFhtagn 23:12, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Merge - What 'STER said. --Jimbo Bob ASS 23:54, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Merge - The only reason this page exists as near as I can tell is because it's used in an example and some people disliked the broken links. It might be more beneficial to newbies and stave off setting a precendent for future examples if we just masked them as links to something like Example Page. It would inform the user that they probably arrived at the page by clicking a link used in an example and should probably click the back button on their browser. At the bottom there can be a memorial for DaModerator, Mr Suggester, etc.'s user pages. --Lint 02:32, 3 May 2006 (BST)
    • An interesting thought just occured to me. What happens if another person takes one of the user names like DaModerator, etc, like already has happened with Example User? Keeping the situation as is may lead to confusion. (Unlikely, but stranger things have happened.) –Xoid S•T•FU! 15:21, 14 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Created Example page, made all links to point there, deleted That page--Brizth mod T W! 21:55, 17 May 2006 (BST)

Here & Talk:Here

Reason: Speedy Deletion criterion 1.

  • Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 14:34, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Merge. Just because something isn't serious doesn't mean it isn't of value. These pages are linked and they're entertaining. I'd say keep them. EDIT: That reasoning stands, but I like Lint's idea--that way less clutter, and if we make more example pages we won't have to go through the whole business again. Maybe all have them send to User: Example User, as someone actually took that name.--'STER-Talk-Mod 21:38, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - What 'STER said. - CthulhuFhtagn 23:13, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Merge - What 'STER said. --Jimbo Bob ASS 02:26, 3 May 2006 (BST)
  • Merge - See argument for merging That page. --Lint 02:32, 3 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Created Example page, made all links to point there, deleted Here & Talk:Here--Brizth mod T W! 21:55, 17 May 2006 (BST)

User:DaModerator

Reason: Speedy Deletion criterion 11.

  • Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 14:34, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Merge. Just because something isn't serious doesn't mean it isn't of value. These pages are linked and they're entertaining. I'd say keep them. EDIT: That reasoning stands, but I like Lint's idea--that way less clutter, and if we make more example pages we won't have to go through the whole business again. Maybe all have them send to User: Example User, as someone actually took that name.--'STER-Talk-Mod 21:38, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - What 'STER said. - CthulhuFhtagn 23:14, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Merge - Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that what people put on their user pages was strictly their business, barring death threats or similar extremes. Didn't see Criterion 11. --Jimbo Bob ASS 23:51, 2 May 2006 (BST)
    • RE: It's not an actual user's page. –Xoid S•T•FU! 01:43, 3 May 2006 (BST)
  • Merge - See argument for merging That page. --Lint 02:32, 3 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Created Example page, made all links to point there, deleted User:DaModerator --Brizth mod T W! 21:55, 17 May 2006 (BST)

User:MrSuggester & User_talk:MrSuggester

Reason: Speedy Deletion criterion 11.

  • Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 14:34, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Merge. Just because something isn't serious doesn't mean it isn't of value. These pages are linked and they're entertaining. I'd say keep them. EDIT: That reasoning stands, but I like Lint's idea--that way less clutter, and if we make more example pages we won't have to go through the whole business again. Maybe all have them send to User: Example User, as someone actually took that name.--'STER-Talk-Mod 21:38, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - What 'STER said. - CthulhuFhtagn 23:15, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Merge - Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that what people put on their user pages was strictly their business, barring death threats or similar extremes. Didn't see Criterion 11. --Jimbo Bob ASS 23:50, 2 May 2006 (BST)
    • RE: It's not an actual user's page. –Xoid S•T•FU! 01:42, 3 May 2006 (BST)
      • RE: Ah. Thanks. Still, I think they're amusing enough to be worth having around. --Jimbo Bob ASS 07:28, 3 May 2006 (BST)
  • Merge - See argument for merging That page. --Lint 02:32, 3 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Created Example page, made all links to point there, deleted User:MrSuggester & User_talk:MrSuggester --Brizth mod T W! 21:55, 17 May 2006 (BST)

Arkham Guard Movement

Reason - the confederacy is defunct, the message is old, and is no longer relevant. To top it all off, it's an eyesore.

  • Speedy Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 14:39, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete Vista W! 08:58, 4 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 09:31, 6 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete It's old--Bermudez 21:13, 11 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 21:55, 17 May 2006 (BST)

Malton Brewers Union

Reason - No real chance of expansion, no proof.

  • Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 04:36, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 13:58, 5 May 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 21:55, 17 May 2006 (BST)

Maoing & Talk:Maoing

Reason: Refer to Speedy Deletion criterion 1. An in-joke and useless.

  • Delete - Thank you Lint, for ensuring this crap stays for a minimum of two weeks. –Xoid S•T•FU! 13:29, 1 May 2006 (BST)
    • RE: I felt it aptly identified the tendancy to generate terms like Leaping, Islands, and Renfields. --Lint 05:16, 2 May 2006 (BST)
      • RE: Then add [[Category:Glossary]] to it, spam the link in game repeatedly until everyone uses it, and stop complaining. While it is a humorous jab at the tendency, I really am sick and tired of these sort of things in every game I play. There are enough terms that actually have a purpose; we don't need a new term to describe the affliction of creating nonsensical synonyms. –Xoid S•T•FU! 08:57, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I actually feel like these have a little bit of merit. It's kind of part of wiki history and has a bit of truth. --Lint 20:05, 1 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Useless. --Brizth mod T W! 20:18, 1 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Useless. --Vista W! 09:01, 4 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Useless. G F J 13:57, 5 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 19:04, 15 May 2006 (BST)

We're watching you

Doesn't really have a point. Sonny Corleone 05:41, 14 May 2006 (BST)

  1. Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 05:56, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  2. Speedy Delete - 1 and maybe 9 because it's just linking to a bunch of characters--Bermudez 05:58, 14 May 2006 (BST)
  3. Speedy Delete - Kill it. Kill it now. --Jimbo Bob ASS 06:05, 14 May 2006 (BST)
Done. --Brizth mod T W! 09:09, 14 May 2006 (BST)

Axehole

Reason - No real chance of expansion, no proof.

  • Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 20:16, 29 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Vista W! 20:19, 29 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 14:00, 7 May 2006 (BST)
Done. --Brizth mod T W! 09:09, 14 May 2006 (BST)

The_Amazing_Saga

Reason - Personal attack. Come on, you're almost making him look like his persecution is genuine and undeserved, with this sort of trolling. --Punchkin 01:06, 28 April 2006 (BST)

  • Delete – Nubis NWO 01:10, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Zaruthustra-Mod 01:10, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Pointless attack. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 01:12, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Unfortunately 'Pointless attack' doesn't fall under speedy deletion criterions. --Brizth M T 01:14, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Saromu 01:15, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Its funny though -¯\(o_º)/¯Bear 01:43, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Not going to deny that it's funny, but I'm going to suggest that someone make a vandal report against Saromu for the creation of that page. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 02:00, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Re- Wouldn't that require me vandalizing a page? I just created a page based on stories. It's fiction. Fure fiction. It's so much fiction it's Pulp Fiction. Not like I wrote them anyway, I only published them. Saromu 02:02, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Re There's no solid policy on making fun of other users, its just bad etiquette, not really vandalism. -¯\(o_º)/¯Bear 02:04, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Re- I'm not going to continue with it anyway. I voted to delete it. It is rather pointless. But y'all could have just asked me nicely to remove it and I would've. Saromu 02:08, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Re - The creation of the page was enough to rate being put on the vandal list as there is no way something like that can be turned into NPOV, and this, along with The Epic Battle will insult Amazing and Cyberbob240. Why can't you guys just grow the hell up? -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 02:11, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Re - I already agreed on deleting it. I don't care about it anymore. It was a stupid little joke. It's my page, no? Delete it right now. Saromu 02:13, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Re - I have no ability to delete the page, but I agree with you, it was a stupid little joke. Too bad you make it on a drama-filled Wiki. Oops! -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 02:16, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Re- I'll delete it now. And I don't pay attention to the drama. People can form their own opinions. Saromu 02:19, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I found the story very creative. MRBboy2005 02:07, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --SirensT RR 03:17, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Sigh. MaulMachine 03:22, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Vista W! 08:25, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 14:34, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete This is probably about the worst attempt at trolling against Amazing I've seen. -- Rueful 21:15, 28 April 2006 (BST)
    Re- Who said it was trolling? It was just a joke. Saromu 02:46, 29 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - What Rueful said, strangely enough. @Saromu: A joke intended to cause embarrassment and general discomfort. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 03:17, 29 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Though I should vote KEEP just to prove I don't have much of an actual persicution complex. -- Amazing 06:47, 29 April 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Mostly useless. Maybe copy names to a subpage of vandal data, something like "Moderation/Vandal Data/Morons that attempted to impersonate other users". –Xoid S•T•FU! 20:11, 29 April 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Lets get this crap of the wiki.--The General W! Mod 15:41, 7 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete -- Buncy T GBP 04:34, 9 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 12:44, 13 May 2006 (BST)

Poindexter VanPelt

I believe this is a Speedy Deletion Criterion 2, 9 or 11 violation, but I'm not sure - that's why it's here instead of Speedy Deletions. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 08:22, 13 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 9. --Bob Hammero ASS U! 08:40, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Love Potion Number 9 it is. Could be moved, however. --Karlsbad 08:41, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 08:55, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Whatever the hell this is, it doesn't belong here. --Jimbo Bob ASS 09:47, 13 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 9. --Vista W! 10:43, 13 May 2006 (BST)
Speedily deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 12:13, 13 May 2006 (BST)

Grrrh

Last edit was in November 28th. Lack in content, and members. --hagnat mod 21:54, 9 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedy Delete - Why not, it really does fit criterion 1 after all. --Bob Hammero ASS 20:56, 11 May 2006 (BST) Delete --Bob Hammero ASS 22:17, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. Both random and incoherent. --Jimbo Bob ASS 22:24, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - If there were real zombies, this would be their page, 'cause like Jimbo Bob said, it's both random and incoherent. –Xoid S•T•FU! 09:47, 10 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 13:55, 10 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Crit. 1 --Brizth mod T W! 18:03, 10 May 2006 (BST)
Speedy deleted. --hagnat mod 00:42, 13 May 2006 (BST)

How to blow things up so it looks pretty

Reason: Read it. It's useless.

  • Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 18:16, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1 and 2. --Bob Hammero ASS 20:26, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - What Bob said. --Jimbo Bob ASS 20:31, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - What the Hellass?--Bermudez 20:46, 11 May 2006 (BST)
    • Speedily Deleted --Grim s-Mod 20:47, 11 May 2006 (BST)

Link to page for messing about on

Reason: Doesn't seem to have a point. Worthless. Saromu 15:07, 7 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedy delete - pointless, useless and unexpandable content.--The General W! Mod 15:37, 7 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 12:35, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - PPP. (Pretty Pissy Page) --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 12:41, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy delete - not likely to expand, no content relating to UD--Vista W! 13:02, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy delete - I think this qualifies as incoherent content (aka. criterion 1.) --Brizth mod T W! 16:31, 8 May 2006 (BST)
  • Merge - As incoherant as this is, it might be better served moving it to User:Celt/Sandbox, as this is clearly what this is. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 05:13, 9 May 2006 (BST)
Moved to User:Celt/Sandbox, resulting redirect deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 10:20, 11 May 2006 (BST)

Another Strike

Created on March 29, it's, creator said on March 30 that it was unnecessary because they were merging with Strike For Syringes, and that it should be deleted. One week later, hagnat tagged it for deletion. And here we are.

  • Speedy Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 09:02, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Doesn't get much more clear-cut than this. --Jimbo Bob ASS 09:04, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - --Vista W! 09:37, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 09:39, 11 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - As if five speedy deletes are really needed. --Bob Hammero ASS 10:14, 11 May 2006 (BST)
Speedy deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 10:16, 11 May 2006 (BST)

Yosemite Sam

Reason: It only has one line of text and, as far as I can tell, it can not be expanded in a clear way. by the way... am I suppose to vote on this when I add it or what exactly? >< ramby T--W! - SGP 16:49, 9 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedy Delete (criterion 1 and 9) after reviewing. --Bob Hammero ASS 05:22, 10 May 2006 (BST) Keep - Looks like it was just added. Give it some time and see what happens. --Bob Hammero ASS 18:32, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • (speedy) Delete critiria 1 and 9, --Vista W! 18:53, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 19:09, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - I don't support a speedy-delete, because the author should have a chance to make some sense of this without getting in trouble for re-posting a deleted page, but as it stands this page is worthless. --Jimbo Bob ASS 21:03, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete Just found out he'll be able to keep his info. *Keep Yosmite Sam is the leader of the RAT. Just another newbie that doesn't know that you have to create a User page instead of a regular one. Sonny Corleone 21:12, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Um, shouldn't that be move & delete in that case? --Brizth

mod T W! 21:15, 9 May 2006 (BST)

  • as there are already three votes for speedy deletion under Crit 9, does it matter?--Vista W! 21:08, 10 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy delete - Crit. 9 --Brizth mod T W! 21:15, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Oh for fuck's sake… Can't the rules be bent for this obvious violation of criterion 9? –Xoid S•T•FU! 05:03, May 10, 2006
Moderator: Deleted. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 04:21, 11 May 2006 (BST)

IWM_WANTED

Reason - In an earlier vote for deletion involving this group, the majority decided that all sub-pages directly related to a group should be under that group's page in the Groups catagory, to make it clear that they are for that group in particular. This page appears to have been created to circumvent that decision. --Sindai 23:18, 26 April 2006 (BST)

Re You have only striked through your reason, not the vote. Is it still a keep vote here and a delete vote for Imperial War Machine/WANTED? G F J 17:39, 27 April 2006 (BST)
Re Yes, the original vote was delete. --Brizth W! M T 17:43, 27 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - The Vote was to Identify the page as a group POV page. I did so, CLEARLY MARKING IT IN THE NAME OF THE PAGE. The only way one would get to the page is by our page alone. There is no valid reason at all why this page should be altered, or deleted.--Duce Nauks 16:11, 27 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - The page is marked correctly and if the group wants to use it instead of Imperial War Machine/WANTED, I have no problem with that. G F J 17:39, 27 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Doesn't fit any of the deletion standards, and does not violate civility. No reason for it to be here. Ask them to move it, if they don't and a Mod doesn't overrule it, then you have no choice in the matter. -- Amazing 18:30, 27 April 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Kept. --Brizth mod T W! 18:07, 10 May 2006 (BST)

Imperial War Machine/WANTED + WANTED (redirect)

Reason: The page was not made by or for the Imperial War Machine and is rejected by the group. Furthermore, it is not used. Please also delete the talk-pages of these articles. G F J 16:24, 26 April 2006 (BST)

  • Delete If they say so (and they clearly do). But actually the original page, WANTED, was created by the group. It was merely moved to Imperial_War_Machine/Wanted after it came through deletion page. But if they don't want to keep it... --Brizth W! M T 16:42, 26 April 2006 (BST) After reading what was said below, I think the Imperial War Machine/WANTED should be kept, and redirect deleted. Furthermore, the content from above case (Deletions#IWM_WANTED) should be merged with Imperial War Machine/WANTED. --Brizth W! M T 23:43, 26 April 2006 (BST) See discussion under Duce Nauks's vote. --Brizth W! M T 17:10, 27 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete Redirect, Keep Main: - This page was created due to an earlier vote for deletion of WANTED that ended with it being moved to Imperial War Machine/WANTED. It appears that the IWM decided to circumvent the intent of the VoD by ignoring Imperial War Machine/WANTED and moving the information on it to IWM_WANTED. The reasoning behind the earlier vote was that all pages for a specific group should be kept "under" the group's main page. IWM has ignored this reasoning, so this page should be kept and IWM_WANTED should be deleted. I am going to go bring it up for deletion now. --Sindai 23:14, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - These were voted as falsified pages, not created authenticly by our group. You may delete these pages, for we care not what happens to them.--Duce Nauks 16:14, 27 April 2006 (BST)
    Um, I'm quite sure the WANTED was created by your group, and you edited it, and by checking history of Imperial War Machine/WANTED, we can verify this. Note that it was moved by Novelty on 5th of April. --Brizth W! M T 16:31, 27 April 2006 (BST)
Yes, but the vote was to Delete it, and we complied. It is no longer a Valid Page.--Duce Nauks 16:41, 27 April 2006 (BST)
Well, actually the vote and mod's (Novelty's) decision was to move WANTED to Imperial War Machine/WANTED, which he did. But if you want to keep IWM WANTED, that's ok by me. DHPD is doing it on all their pages. Though personally I would use Imperial War Machine/WANTED as it is your group's subpage. Anyway, I changed my vote. --Brizth W! M T 17:10, 27 April 2006 (BST)
Moderator: Deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 18:07, 10 May 2006 (BST)

Ultimate Decretum

Reason - No real point. Sonny Corleone 22:03, 9 May 2006 (BST)

  • Speedy Delete - Criterion 1. --Bob Hammero ASS 22:19, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Promises to be updated "soon", but has no edits beyond the initial one in March. Criterion 1. --Jimbo Bob ASS 22:26, 9 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy delete - Criterion 1 as said --ramby T--W! - SGP 02:05, 10 May 2006 (BST)
Speedy deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 09:37, 10 May 2006 (BST)

Moderation/Policy Discussion/Amazing

I request that a mod other than myself delete Moderation/Policy Discussion/Amazing. This page is an abuse of the moderation system. REGARDLESS OF THE MERITS of any such proposal, votebanning is completely and utterly inappropriate and the very existence of such a page demonstrates the utter disregard that members of the wiki have for any sort of decorum whatsoever. The talk page for this "article" is also just as bad, if not worse, since it consists of an "Amazing vs. anyone else" flame war which stretches for pages upon pages of useless text. --LibrarianBrent 07:23, 25 April 2006 (BST)

  • Keep - and put it in an archive and put the archive in a box and put the box in the warehouse where they keep the archive of the covenant. -Banana Bear4 04:04, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • NOTE: Restored to Speedy Deletion page after removal by User:Grim_s. Article fufills both no-content and off-topic restrictions. The content is nonsensical when compared to wiki guidelines and banvotes are never on topic.
    • NOTE: I suggest you read the Guidelines. A keep vote disqualifies it from Speedydeletion, and this had several. Now Pardon me while i drag it BACK to Deletions and restore the votes you deleted. --Grim s-Mod 05:29, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Author Vote - Here we go with the irony again. I agree. Amazing's not so much of a problem once you learn to ignore him (and remove all pages involved from your watch list.) If this goes through, I also request that all templates involed be deleted too, one of which is Template:Crucified. --SirensT RR 12:22, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete Keep - Grim has a point. It would probably be a better decision to archive and/or protect it rather than delete it. – Nubis NWO 12:41, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - This meets NONE of the speedydeletion criteria, and even if it did, i vote keep. My reason being that petitions are a matter of historical record on this wiki, regardless of who or what the petition is about. --Grim s-Mod 12:37, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Moderator note: Moved from Speedy deletions to deletions due to ineligability for speedy deletion and reciept of a keep vote. --Grim s-Mod 12:43, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Agreement with Brent. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:32, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Grim's reasoning. --Sindai 16:09, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 16:40, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - As any good grim alt would do. --Lucero Capell 16:44, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -See above--Mpaturet 17:37, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep/archive/protect RRFgroupthink err, what grim said--Bermudez 17:59, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete I dunno if you know brent, but you're just about the only Moderator left who could delete it. Anywho, I don't really have anything against it in principle, its just doomed to failure and will only generate teh dramas. I don't see how inappropriate votebanning is. We spend all this time talking about the joys of wiki democracy, then try to kill it dead when it becomes a problem. Precedent is there. --Zaruthustra-Mod 19:43, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Vista W! 22:12, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - As master Grim commanded. MaulMachine 22:14, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Let's just dispose of this - even if it should theoretically be kept for posterity, it might just be better to bury the flogged horses and move on. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 01:08, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - While the creation of the page set a dangerous precedent, deleting it would set an even worse one. - CthulhuFhtagn 01:09, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - "Keep" voters are just my 'enemies' who are abusing this voting process now by voting to keep something based solely on their hatred. -- Amazing 02:35, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Re: Frankly, it's this sort of comment that distracts me from the good things you've done for the wiki. I may want to see you banned, but it's nothing personal. –Xoid S•T•FU! 08:28, 29 April 2006 (BST)
  • delete - let the drama end. And i find it amusing that there is users being created only to vote on that page. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 02:46, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Enough of this. --Punchkin 05:59, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Delete it with a spoon. Velkrin 09:34, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - No! We're so close to winning! Just kidding. But not really :P --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 09:36, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - --Roybot 07:16, 27 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I'd like to see it archived for future reference. –Xoid S•T•FU! 08:28, 29 April 2006 (BST)
  • Tally - 11 Deletes/ 11 Keeps (9 Keeps requested Archiving)
  • Keep - I would like to see how it turns out. --ramby T--W! - SGP 04:27, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - concur with Grim S and Cthulhu Fhtagn, above, mainly in the interests of archiving it.--Bulgakov 00:20, 3 May 2006 (BST)

Moderator: Kept. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 02:12, 10 May 2006 (BST)

Template:NoWiki

Like many others, I'm surprised this isn't already up here. The idea of hating the wiki and making a template specifically to state that (instead of, oh, I dunno, leaving) is rediculous. It's author states that it's intent was not against the wiki, but instead, against its "moron" users, something that is without a doubt a flammatory remark. It has no place here. --SirensT RR 19:12, 25 April 2006 (BST)

  • Delete - Don't like the wiki, leave. Problem solved. I mean, I don't want to see the wiki taken over by the people who are trying to force Amazing out, but really now. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 21:08, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Serves no purpose. --Sindai 21:17, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - same reasoning as Template:HailXenu--Vista W! 21:36, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Take it out back and shoot it. MaulMachine 21:42, 25 April 2006 (BST) EDITEDNow kill this fucking template so Amazing will stop flapping his gums at us. MaulMachine 22:59, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Don't like the wiki, leave it. --Tehasskickars 00:29, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Deleeeeete. BuncyTheFrog Talk GBP 01:00, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - As noted in the other set of Templates, this may only be a symptom of greater problems, but frankly treating the symptoms may go a long way to treating the cause. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 01:09, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Prosperina 1:10, 26 April 2006
  • Keep - I'm consistent, damn it. - CthulhuFhtagn 01:13, 26 April 2006 (BST) Delete - You know what? I can be consistent without voting keep on this. - CthulhuFhtagn 02:45, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • DELETE - Not your place to speak as to removing a template that states an opinion not targetted at a specific user. Lose. I moved it to my userspace, so you are free to delete this at any time. -- Amazing 02:33, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • delete - please amazing. Let this whole drama find an end.`--People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 02:44, 26 April 2006 (BST)
    Problem is it looks like most of my templates may be deleted and most of theirs may stay. Hardly an 'end' for me. -- Amazing 02:53, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Insulting. --Punchkin 05:57, 26 April 2006 (BST)
    To no one specific. -- Amazing • SGP¦McZ¦CDF¦UDPD • 06:00, 26 April 2006 (BST)
    It calls UD wiki users morons and says their work should be deleted. Would a sweeping Delete Fucking Dragonspires template be okay with you? Seriously, if Joe Q Spammer had put this up, it would have been speedily deleted by now. --Punchkin 09:48, 26 April 2006 (BST)
    I'm sorry you think the entire Wiki userbase is "someone specific". -- Amazing 06:50, 29 April 2006 (BST)
    What? You say that every user of this "fucking" wiki is a moron, I am a user of this wiki, therefore you are saying that I am a moron, you are insulting me. Which part of that don't you understand? --Punchkin 07:21, 29 April 2006 (BST)
    Playing your game for the purpose of humoring someone I know to be arguing a false case: Well, I BELIEVE you are, truthfully. But that's beside the point. The template says the wiki's full of morons, but that does not imply in any way that no other type of user exists on the Wiki. Maybe you should try a "gotcha" somewhere else where you have some kind of solid shred to work with. -- Amazing 07:25, 29 April 2006 (BST)
    Wow. You are obviously some sort of hotshot racism and religious hatred lawyer. I concede. --Punchkin 07:38, 29 April 2006 (BST)
    Now if anything ever warrented a template... -- Amazing 07:51, 29 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 11:54, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - What Punchkin said. – Nubis NWO 12:00, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - What Nubis said :P --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 12:01, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Banana Bear here, Insult the whole wiki, thats cool right? ironic, sort of, but not cool. Know what I think would be cool? If you made a template for people who look like Amazing, because I think I sort of do. -¯\(o_º)/¯ 20:42, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Proof of Amazing's willful disregard for this system and the Wiki. --Jimbo Bob ASS 02:32, 28 April 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Since Amazing wants it gone now, and there are no longer any keep votes… one more Speedy Delete and we can ram this through. –Xoid S•T•FU! 14:50, 1 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Wow this page may get a little smaller soon! --Technerd 21:54, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy delete --Bulgakov 16:21, 3 May 2006 (BST)
No longer has any Keeps, it's had 3 Speedy Deletes since yesterday, now it's 4, and this thing is still here? –Xoid S•T•FU! 04:37, 4 May 2006 (BST)
Jeeze. Are the mods blind? 3 Speedy Deletes + No Keeps = SPEEDY DELETION. There are more than what is required. Help clear up this page. –Xoid S•T•FU! 19:17, 5 May 2006 (BST)

Moderator: Deleted. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 02:09, 10 May 2006 (BST)

Template:SaveAmazing

Reason: Trolling and flamebaiting. --Tehasskickars 07:13, 24 April 2006 (BST)

  • Keep - Trolling and flamebaiting against who? It's simply thanking people who supported him. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 07:14, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • It calls anyone who wants Amazing gone a troll. --Tehasskickars 07:20, 24 April 2006 (BST)
      • If calling others trolls is in itself trolling, and you're calling Amazing a troll now, doesn't that make you a troll? --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 15:35, 27 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. -- Amazing 07:24, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • Your template is just as valid as all of ours, and more abusive than any of ours. --Tehasskickars 07:29, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • Obvious lie. -- Amazing 07:44, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • You may one day learn that sometimes, nothing more than the truth is required. -- Amazing 07:54, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Banana Bear4 13:23, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Lucero Capell 16:00, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Does not explicitly attack or defame any user. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:18, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - What Wyndal said. Besides, as long as Template:Crucified is around, deleting this would be hust plain wrong. --SirensT RR 14:33, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Not hurting anyone. MaulMachine 15:33, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep given that he's now reworded it to remove the troll accusation. --Punchkin 15:43, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Durrr. --Roybot 19:18, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I thought this one was funny, I don't see what the problem with it is.--Duce Nauks 16:44, 27 April 2006 (BST)

Template:SaveTheWhales

Reason: Yet another anti-specific user template. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 07:11, 24 April 2006 (BST)

  • Delete - No good reason, I just hate whales. --Karlsbad 01:03, 25 April 2006 (BST)
    • The Hypnotoad commands you to change your vote. All glory to the Hypnotoad--Hypnotoad 01:26, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Unless there's a User named "The Whale Hunter." I don't see any problem with this. Amazing made a nice template so I used the code from it to make my own, supporting my lifelong passion for whales.--Mpaturet 07:15, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Why do you hate blue whales? --Tehasskickars 07:16, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • I don't hate blue whales. You deliberately left the picture of Amazing on there. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 07:18, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • Do not presume to understand me! Peon! Respect the majestic blue whale.--Mpaturet 07:20, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • You either support the blue whale or you hate it. Stop killing all the whales. :( --Tehasskickars 07:22, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • If you want to start an argument on this, put it in the Talk page. I don't really, but you can if you want. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 07:22, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • 2 Simple yes or no questions. Do you support the Blue Whale? Also if you don't support this template, would you like a side order of dolphin to go with your roast dodo?--Mpaturet 07:25, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • More to the point, cyberbob, have you stopped hunting whales? --Tehasskickars 07:26, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. -- Amazing 07:25, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I like whales, and I think it's funny when Amazing orders the moderators around. :) --Tehasskickars 07:28, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Why don't they love the majestic giants of the sea? Save "SaveTheWhales"!--Mpaturet 07:29, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • Perhaps they feast on whale blubber. :( --Tehasskickars 07:30, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • How crude and barbaric! Even in this day and age, such atrocities continue! What's next? The Siberian Tiger?--Mpaturet 07:32, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • Stop it now, or I'll report you BOTH for vandalism of a public page. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 07:33, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • Looks to me like your hero, Amazing changed the SaveTheWhales Template in a completley malicious edit. I suppose double standards are all the rage these days.--Mpaturet 07:37, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • If you'll just take a look at his talk page, I advised him not to. But you are now reported for vandalism, after I asked you to stop this discussion. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 07:41, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • For what? Not stopping a discussion?You didn't have to respond. You're not a mod you know?--Hypnotoad 07:42, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • I'm warning you Cyberbob. If you post anything on this wiki again I'm reporting you!--Hypnotoad 07:49, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • Mein Gott, the Drama is melting my face. MaulMachine 16:01, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Considering the removal of Amazing's picture, I have no problem with it. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 15:47, 25 April 2006 (BST) (Vote/Reasoning changed.))
  • Keep -Banana Bear4 13:23, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Grim s-Mod 19:38, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - you evil conservatives just want to kill the whales and the rest of the environment . Haters--Bermudez 22:00, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - It's also being used in a vandel case currently. Velkrin 22:42, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Whales are endangered. Are you a whale-killer? Huh? Are you? Huh? Huh? - CthulhuFhtagn 00:46, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Reading this just made my day that much brighter. Thank you Cyberbob240. And 'I LOVE YOU' Hypnotoad!! --Technerd 01:31, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Given the discussion I've heard about this, I'm willing to bet it was changed before I got to it. In it's present form, I say keep. --SirensT RR 14:48, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - In its present form, keep. --Brizth W! M T 14:51, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Keep. MaulMachine 15:32, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Now that it's been supposedly 'modified' I'd like to mention it is completely irrelevant to UD. It should be deleted, however it's amusing enough to let it stay for now. --Roybot 19:22, 25 April 2006 (BST)

The Urban Dead Wiki:Links to disambiguating pages

Reason: Apart from the fact it's grossly out of date, now that Special:Disambiguations is working there is no reason this page should exist.

  • Speedydelete –Xoid S•T•FU!
  • Delete --Lint 22:17, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Vista W! 22:20, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Speedelete --'STER-Talk-Mod 02:22, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Velkrin 05:43, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Though, I think a redirect to Special:Disambiguations would work just as well. --SirensT RR 14:32, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 16:36, 25 April 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 16:38, 8 May 2006 (BST)

Handsome boy modeling school

Reason: Worthless page and kind of creepy. Saromu 23:38, 6 May 2006 (BST)

Image:Umbrella.JPG

Reason: This is Urban Dead, not Resident Evil. Used on only one page, the Penning Building.

User-aimed Template boxes

Frankly, these are getting pathetic. While they are probably symptomatic of larger problems, I think that in this case treating the symptoms would go a long way to alleviating some of the causes.

In particular, I'm putting the following Template boxes up for deletion (In all cases, I'm also asking for deletion of the talk page as well). Due to the large number, it's probably best for people to vote on each individually. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 06:39, 21 April 2006 (BST)

I think the positive templates should be allowed to stay. Also, the ones simply making statements, and not insulting or attacking the depicted user should stay. So, a blanket "Yes" on a few. I'll put it in the individual boxes too. --Cyberbob240CDF | Arb 07:29, 21 April 2006 (BST)

Two of the templates (Template:AmazingOhNoes and Template:ASSaultOnAmazing) created by ASS are being considered on the arbitration page as evidence, and so I think they need to be left alone for the time being. That said, I'm placing my votes below.--Tehasskickars 08:27, 21 April 2006 (BST)

Deletion takes two weeks anyway, so the point is moot. --Brizth W! M T 08:35, 21 April 2006 (BST)

I am of the opinion that these should not be templates, but that users should simply use the syntax on their pages and give others the option of using it as well. Actual templates should be reserved for things that will have enough use to warrant them as a template (Group Boxes, Arbitrator and Mod Templates, the like). I am for the removal of these templates as templates not for the removal of the information used on the template from people's user pages. As such, please consider this as a "Delete" Vote for each of the templates in this category. -Nubis A.R.S.E. 08:36, 21 April 2006 (BST)

This is obviously pro-Amazing harassment. This is PROOF that the moderators love Amazing and want to see him shine.

Gold in basket.jpg Gold in the Basket Supporter
This user or group believes that if Amazing does in fact put the gold in the basket that this situation can be resolved.

Rasher 14:32, 21 April 2006 (BST)

Template:HailXenu

  • Delete - One of the most blatant cases of flaming I've ever seen. --Cyberbob240CDF | Arb 08:14, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • As opposed to BLOWING THE FUCK OUT OF THE WIKI WITH NUKES? Why the hell isn't Template:NoWiki up here? Your hero was the first to post this shit. We just edited it--Mpaturet 08:18, 21 April 2006 (BST)
    • Because that one is not against any particular user. --Brizth W! M T 08:27, 21 April 2006 (BST)
    • I'd like to point out this little gem: its users nuked from orbit.So mass murder of wiki users, and the people near them is cool as long as we don't name anyone? Alrighty then. As a mentally sound member of 'zis wiki I say we nuke everyone used the letter g--Mpaturet 08:32, 21 April 2006 (BST)
    • Surely by now you would have realised that I don't pay much attention to your drama. I guess not. --Cyberbob240CDF | Arb 08:48, 21 April 2006 (BST)
    • You are most welcome to place the template up for deletion. This selection was chosen mainly by me going through and searching the Template namespace for particular user's names, and thus any which didn't have a user's name attached will have been missed. It is easy, however, to include a page for deletion. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 10:43, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete -calling for the death of another wiki user and his family members is not something I like to see on this wiki, and has been regarded as vandalism in the past.--Vista W! 08:22, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • So I call for the death of everyone on the wiki? Sweet--Mpaturet 08:25, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • the lack of merit of other templates has no influence on the lack of merit of this template.--Vista W! 08:35, 21 April 2006 (BST)
      • Ah but this template was intended as a parody of amazing's work of art
        • Noted and it still has no merit as it calls for the deaths of both a wiki member and his direct family--Vista W! 08:41, 21 April 2006 (BST)
          • You would have to be utterly without a sense of humor to seriously believe that. It's a joke. A JOKE. Funny. Not serious. This sets a hideous precedent for jokes being interpreted as death threats and resulting in the bannage of a user. --Undeadinator 23:20, 23 April 2006 (BST)
            • No, this sets no precendent as there already is a precendent that bans people if making death treaths even when joking. Slavik got banned after putting up a suggestion that called for the death of wiki users and their family, after that the wiki still functioned and morose, immature trolls still got to make not serious unfunny flaming jokes, they only had to limit their humour to not include, "I'm going to knife you in the back, Harhar" and their like. Again as there is already a precedent that prohibits death threats even when made as a joke. this is nothing more then plain old consistantcy. If you don't want to be banned over a joke, don't make one were you call for somebodies death, you'd think it simple, no? And no I don't believe he's serious but, yes, my sense of humour ends at death threads. Call me silly.--Vista W! 23:36, 23 April 2006 (BST)
              • Anybody who can count a request for nuclear attack as a death threat--even as a joke--is out of his fucking mind, if you'll pardon my French. If this already has precedent, it's a bullshit precedent that's philosophically and morally hollow, not to mention against the grain of all common sense. Grow up. --Undeadinator 00:21, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Has no place in wiki. --Brizth W! M T 08:27, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete What Vist said. Question, how do you flame a wiki when a wiki isn't a person. Who exactly is being attacked there? No one is harmed if a wiki is blown up, its an internet forum. Hardly a threat.--Prosperina 08:30 21 April 2006
  • Except he doesn't want to nuke the wiki...He uses the specific words"its users nuked from orbit.Twice" Which is surely a lot more devastating than 1 user and his family.--Mpaturet 08:38, 21 April 2006 (BST)
    • So why don't you nominate it for deletion?--Vista W! 08:40, 21 April 2006 (BST)
      • Because the wiki is sufficiently clogged up as it is. At the rate it's going this page will soon be like the Arbitration page.--Mpaturet 08:42, 21 April 2006 (BST)
I agree again with Vista, just nominate the thing and get it deleted if you think its a problem that's what this area is for. but on a side note, a user and his family is a lot more personal than the general term users. And how many people do you know with an orbital nuclear missle? It's unrealistic to the point of non-threat. --Prosperina 8:42 21 April 2006 (BST)
Niether is particualarly realistic or threatening, both are insulting, in extremely bad taste and as I said before close to vandalism--Vista W! 09:07, 21 April 2006 (BST)
Not arguing with you on that one, I'm just saying personally I would be a lot more pissed if anyone brought my family into things. The nowiki template seems to apply to me as well, but I guess I just don't get that threated by such things.--Prosperina 9:11 21 April 2006 (BST)
This template is threatening nobody, you humorless tarts. It's clearly in good humor, it's clearly not serious, and it's clearly not in any violation of the Wiki except your arbitrary classification of "good taste". Cracking a joke is vandalism now, Vista? --Undeadinator 23:20, 23 April 2006 (BST)
Ever since slavik was banned for making exactly that kind of joke, Jokes that call for the death of wiki members and their family is indeed borderline vandalism. As it involves only one case the precedent working isn't particular strong, as this is no court of law but a wiki. however it is there non the less. thats why I said borderline as this is not vandal report but deletion there will be no precedent working for any punishment in the future, as there will be no punishment dealt now. If anything this will prohibit further precedent working because if it is deleted it can't get to vandal report, were it might lead to further precedent working. this simply is the lesser of the evils. And now for some advice, you'll make a better case for your point of view if you show any knowledge of the facts and some resonable understanding of them. And refrain from swear words, you won't have to, but you'll be less annoying to those you speak to.--Vista W! 23:53, 23 April 2006 (BST)
Self-righteous, self-masturbatory moralistic preaching gets on my nerves, but you don't hear me complaining, do you? The reasons for banning this template are hollow, if not outright arbitrary. And your argument for deleting this template is laughable: it's "borderline" vandalism, so we should delete it to avoid setting a precedent? Deleting something based on a simple-minded concept of obscenity is ridiculous, and precedent-setting of its own accord. Show some common sense. --Undeadinator 00:21, 24 April 2006 (BST)
you should re-read my comment, I simply refuted some claims you made in error. You can agree with me or not as if it warrents deletions under current rules, my case is that we actually got rid of this sort stuff before, your case is that it is funny. And if you don't like "Self-righteous, self-masturbatory moralistic preaching" why do it yourself with added swearwords? Look I understand we think different about this but as this is derailing quickly, lets either move it to our talk pages or just stop, how about it?--Vista W! 10:18, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Rasher 14:22, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Technerd 15:34, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - We need a can of "Drama-be-gone" BuncyTheFrog Talk GBP 17:20, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - What somebody wants to post on their Wiki page is none of anybody else's goddamned business. This rationale = applied to EVERYTHING ZOMG --Undeadinator 00:22, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 12:07, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - There's a difference between obviously joking and, given the past history of someone who is not to be named, apparently serious. - CthulhuFhtagn 21:40, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Get a sense of humour.--Denzel Washington 00:05, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. -- Amazing 07:27, 24 April 2006 (BST)
Template:NoWiki What is that you said? - CthulhuFhtagn 20:51, 25 April 2006 (BST)
You're just as guilty of causing drama as Amazing is. Stop baiting him, for fuck's sake. GodDAMNit. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 20:56, 25 April 2006 (BST)
I'm asking him an honest question. - CthulhuFhtagn 20:59, 25 April 2006 (BST)
This is TEH INTARWEBZ, and he didn't delete the vote that spawned the question. You can re-read it if you need to see it again, you know. Just in case, I'll copy and paste it for you again. The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. I think that's what he said. I think you're probably looking to ask him for clarification, rather than to repeat himself, though. May I suggest that you do so? -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 21:07, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Banana Bear4 13:23, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • DELETE--Changchad 20:50, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Explicitly attacks a specific user. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:20, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --SirensT RR 19:06, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Roybot 19:09, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - If Amazing is gonna delete the NoWiki template, then this might as well go too. –Xoid S•T•FU! 14:55, 1 May 2006 (BST)
  • delete - it's offensive. --Bulgakov 16:23, 3 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Deleted, 13 votes for deletion, 6 againsts. --Brizth mod T W! 11:03, 5 May 2006 (BST)

Template:NoAmazing

  • Delete - Simply disagree on him arbitrating a case you're in. He can't be biased if people he doesn't know present a case, so you're not protecting anyone. --Cyberbob240CDF | Arb 08:07, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep.--Tehasskickars 08:19, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Wasn't this case solved anyhow? If you don't want Amazing to arbiterate, choose someone else. --Brizth W! M T 08:33, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete An arbitrator's status is voluntary and is not subject to the demands of a petition.--Mpaturet 08:48, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - redundant--Vista W! 09:11, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Rasher 14:22, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - There is nothing wrong with an opinion like this, though it's been stated that a petition to remove someone as Arbitrator is kinda silly. -SirensT RR 14:50, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Technerd 15:35, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - On the grounds that it's kinda pointless to try and stop someone from being in a volluntary position. BuncyTheFrog Talk GBP 17:21, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - A template used for a petition. Regardless of whether the petition failed, it was a legitimate movement. The template is still in use on three user pages. --Lucero Capell 21:50, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Scinfaxi 22:03, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Undeadinator 00:25, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep--Denzel Washington 21:39, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Sure. MaulMachine 03:22, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. -- Amazing 07:28, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Banana Bear4 13:23, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • delete--Changchad 20:51, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Completely unnecessary. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:16, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Roybot 19:06, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 09:14, 1 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Kept, the vote was a draw, 10 votes for and againsts. --Brizth mod T W! 11:05, 5 May 2006 (BST)

Template:NoAmazingMod

  • Delete - You'd be far better off simply voting "No" if/when Amazing puts himself up for promotion. --Cyberbob240CDF | Arb 08:09, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep.--Tehasskickars 08:20, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - I think the case was resolved when Kevan said no --Brizth W! M T 08:41, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Except by all appearences Amazing attempted to convince the other mods to bring him back, even after Kevan's vote--Mpaturet 08:46, 21 April 2006 (BST)
    • Yes, but only Kevan currently has the power to create new mods, so it doesn't matter. Also, see Kevan's talk page for further discussion on matter. --Brizth W! M T 08:49, 21 April 2006 (BST)
      • Yes you're right. A beatdown is a beatdown is a beatdown, and I don't think Amazing is going to be reinstated anytime soon. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go steal your player base. ;)--Mpaturet 08:55, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete -Amazing's not becoming moderator anytime soon after the talk on Kevan's page. Useless template--Mpaturet 08:55, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - redundant--Vista W! 09:12, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep This was made AFTER Amazing was a moderator. Rasher 14:23, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - There is nothing wrong with an opinion like this. -SirensT RR 14:50, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Technerd 15:35, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete But if he's not becoming a mod now, it has no significance. No point. ----Prosperina 16:08 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - The time has passed. BuncyTheFrog Talk GBP 17:22, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - This template was used for another petition (which was ultimately successful). It is in use on two user pages. --Lucero Capell 21:50, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Undeadinator 00:25, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep This sick wave of fake-ass moralism is hilarious. PC for lyfe!!--Denzel Washington 21:40, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep MaulMachine
  • Delete - The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. -- Amazing 07:29, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Banana Bear4 13:23, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • delete--Changchad 20:52, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Irrelevant and pointless. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:21, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Will the bashing ever stop? --Roybot 19:05, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 18:19, 30 April 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Deleted. 11 for deletion, 9 againgsts. --Brizth mod T W! 11:07, 5 May 2006 (BST)

Template:AmazingFreeZone

  • Delete - Personal templates only set the stage for personal attacks. --Cyberbob240CDF | Arb 07:30, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep.--Tehasskickars 08:22, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Use the Template:DramaLlama instead. --Brizth W! M T 08:44, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - the drama llama isn't keyed to one specific user, and better suited to what I figure is this templates goal, also users do not have the power to ban people from certain pages so it has no actual merit anyway.--Vista W! 09:09, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Users certainly have the power to "ban" people from their own pages, no? --Undeadinator 23:32, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • with talk-pages, as they are set up as a communication tool we mostly set the bar higher for what constitutes a good faith edit and what constitutes a bad-faith one. I don't think anybody will get a warning or a banning after leaving a true apology to somebody who kicked him of their talkpage. But you still can delete that apology or anything else, no problems. I think that only the user info is totally under control by it's owner.--Vista W! 20:01, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Free Speech for the Dumb. --Jorm 09:27, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Rasher 14:24, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -- Rueful 14:29, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Drama Llama does the work, and doesn't single anyone out. -SirensT RR 14:48, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Technerd 15:36, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Don't single out Amazing, it only causes more drama BuncyTheFrog Talk GBP 17:24, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - by Author Request ;) --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 21:24, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Undeadinator 00:25, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - --Denzel Washington 21:41, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I wish I had gotten to it first. MaulMachine 03:22, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. -- Amazing 07:30, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Banana Bear4 13:23, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete cyberbob said it--Changchad 20:53, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete Drama Llama. Enough said. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:22, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Roybot 18:44, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Because all the cool guys are voting Keep. -Craw 19:54, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 11:37, 30 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Grim s-Mod 11:17, 3 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Lucero Capell 07:06, 5 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: Kept. 12 votes for keeping, 11 for deletion. --Brizth mod T W! 11:09, 5 May 2006 (BST)

Template:AmazingFan

  • Keep - Positive template, not attacking anyone. --Cyberbob240CDF | Arb 07:31, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete Religiously offensive and insulting. Rasher 14:24, 21 April 2006 (BST)
    • Bullshit. Satirical and clearly a joke reference to Charles Manson. Y'all need to grow up. --Undeadinator 23:35, 23 April 2006 (BST)
No way, I had to go see my pastor over this one. Rasher 05:54, 25 April 2006 (BST)
>:( Nobody but me is allowed to do sarcasm, goddamnit. --Undeadinator 03:52, 26 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete It's a sarcastic personal attack on Amazing's beard, whether he realizes it or not. --Rueful 14:30, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep--Vista W! 14:43, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --SirensT RR 14:50, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Technerd 15:38, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete. Obviously encourages satanism.--Tehasskickars 16:50, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Why not. BuncyTheFrog Talk GBP 17:25, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Undeadinator 00:25, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • keep "encourages satanism..." Dude. I hope you are joking. Also, who the fuck cares if Amazing is a satanist as long as he doesn't burn babies and shit.--Denzel Washington 21:43, 23 April 2006 (BST)
    • Joke? We never joke! Absolutely everything we say is serious. Really. Hahaha. --Tehasskickars 21:50, 23 April 2006 (BST)
    Hahahaha, point taken ; )--Denzel Washington 00:03, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. -- Amazing 07:31, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • Why do you worship Satan? --Tehasskickars 07:37, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • Because when people like you exist, I can't believe there's a God. -- Amazing 07:46, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Banana Bear4 13:23, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • delete dispite this is not like a personal attack or stuff, but really, is this really needed? --Changchad 20:54, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • I think I'm allowed to start my own fanclub. Do you want to delet everything on the entire wiki that isn't really needed? -- Amazing 20:59, 24 April 2006 (BST)
      • ye know, i was gonna join as well :]. and no, i ment this in a entirely different sense.--Changchad 21:05, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • RE: That's like asking if all of these other templates against him aren't necessary. If people are allowed to create templates to flame/defame another user, why should he not be allowed to create one to improve his own image?
  • Keep -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:24, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - It's humorous how only members of his enemies have found off-topic reasons to vote for a delete. Seriously, this template is very harmless to the environment. --Roybot 19:00, 25 April 2006 (BST)

Template:ASSaultOnAmazing

  • OMFG! Someone doesn't agree with Amazing!--Tehasskickars 08:23, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep. People have the right to support ASS.--Tehasskickars 08:23, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete this is a template that support PK-ing a specific wiki member over and over again, people can still support ass in other ways on this wiki then this--Vista W! 08:26, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - If you want to support ASS, create a new template without mentioning Amazing. --Brizth W! M T 08:32, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep This is an ASS template, not a personal attack. Rasher 14:24, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep This template only explains the group's objective, it makes no personal attack on Amazing -- Rueful 14:32, 21 April 2006 (BST)
it is a call to continously PK a specific user of this wiki, yes that would make it a personal attack.--Vista W! 14:40, 21 April 2006 (BST)
I'm pretty sure PKing is covered by the first amendment. Rasher 15:21, 21 April 2006 (BST)
Which first amendment?--Vista W! 15:22, 21 April 2006 (BST)
Constitution doesn't apply here. At all. It's an internet forum that's privately owned. And even if it were pking would be considered harassment or you know threats and murder. And by this logic you should be voting delete on the asking Amazing to resign, template where you ask to let him be pked by you. If you're gonna make an arguement at least be consistent. Oh, and when you're group object IS to personally attack one specific player, yes yes it is a personal attack.--Prosperina 16:06 21 April 2006
Untrue. This template is not a personal attack: support for a group does not necessarily mean support for all of a group's policies, and nowhere in this template does it call for PKing Amazing. --Undeadinator 23:45, 23 April 2006 (BST)
Irony is not covered by the 5th amendment Rasher 16:36, 21 April 2006 (BST)
If I'm not mistaken, this wiki is hosted on a machine in England. The American constitution is irrelevant –Xoid S•T•FU!
Actually, that point is irrelevant. No international law exists to regulate material based upon where it is hosted. This falls into a legal grey zone. Doesn't matter in either case, because as Prosperina pointed out this Wiki is privately owned. --Undeadinator 23:45, 23 April 2006 (BST)
I find that reasoning spurious. The reason I said the American constitution was irrelevant was due to the fact that if the server was in America, and content on said server was violating thier constitution, I'm pretty sure they could have it taken offline, whether it was privately owned or not. It's a moot point anyway. –Xoid S•T•FU! 16:40, 1 May 2006 (BST)
  • So, they can support ASS...so long as they don't mention it by name? --Undeadinator 23:45, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - It's showing support for a group's actions towards the in-game Amazing, I don't see what's wrong with it. --Lucero Capell 21:50, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Hagnat, the ASSault on Amazing is their group's name, and goals. by definition, they have to use his name. It simply states that this wiki user supports an ingame policy, just like the sacred ground template.--Bermudez 22:00, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Thank you for your support, but just so you know, the name of our group is actually "Assault on Stupid Survivors" (hence "ASS").--Tehasskickars 22:28, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • By definition, you still have to use his name. Rasher 23:23, 21 April 2006 (BST)
Oh snap!, Someone just got served! --Mpaturet 00:06, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Undeadinator 00:25, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep--Denzel Washington 21:44, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Hah. MaulMachine 03:22, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. -- Amazing 07:32, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Banana Bear4 13:23, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • delete i respect that this is ASS temp, but against a specific person? Nay.--Changchad 20:56, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Promotes PKing of a specific wiki user. -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:26, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Roybot 18:45, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 09:31, 30 April 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: 9 Deletes/13 Keeps, kept. --Brizth mod T W! 11:11, 5 May 2006 (BST)

Template:AmazingOhNoes

  • Delete - Same as GrimTarget. --Cyberbob240CDF | Arb 08:11, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep. This is a purely informative template, and considering the frequency with which this happens, it seems pretty useful.--Tehasskickars 08:24, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Useless. Personal attack. --Brizth W! M T 12:53, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Rasher 14:25, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --SirensT RR 14:50, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Technerd 15:40, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete or change wording. BuncyTheFrog Talk GBP 17:27, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - whith the amount he uses arbitration, it's valuable--Bermudez 22:07, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete or change wording. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 21:33, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Undeadinator 00:25, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep--Denzel Washington 21:45, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Heh. MaulMachine 03:22, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. -- Amazing 07:34, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Banana Bear4 13:23, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Deletethis is factual, but personal attack, nay.--Changchad 20:57, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:27, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Roybot 18:41, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 09:30, 29 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Grim s-Mod 04:27, 3 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: 9 Deletes/ 10 Keeps, kept. --Brizth mod T W! 11:12, 5 May 2006 (BST)

Template:GoldInBasket

  • Delete - Need I say why? --Cyberbob240CDF | Arb 08:13, 21 April 2006 (BST)
    • As I said before you deleted my comment, Please say why.--Mpaturet 08:35, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep.--Tehasskickars 08:25, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Personal attack against another wiki user, has no point and has no place in wiki. --Brizth W! M T 08:30, 21 April 2006 (BST)
    • Call me dense, but what exactly does the template mean, anyway? –Xoid S•T•FU! 17:54, 23 April 2006 (BST)
      • What, you don't know?--Mpaturet 17:57, 23 April 2006 (BST)
      • It's saying that a bribe IRL would be required for Amazing to be left alone. --Cyberbob240CDF - Arb - W! 18:03, 23 April 2006 (BST)
        • No it doesn't. That's just what Amazing interpreted it as.--Mpaturet 18:11, 23 April 2006 (BST)
        • So… do I get an explaination or not? I have no idea what "put gold in the basket" is referring to. –Xoid S•T•FU! 15:22, 24 April 2006 (BST)
          • It refers to Amazing placing a quantity of AU into a woven container...Or does it?!
          • Since no one would answer me, I started digging:
Scinfaxi states openly (coincidence?) that he can only be dissuaded with
material goods. We'll never really know if there's any truth to that.
--Excerpt of Amazing's Wikigate scandal.
A flat out lie. The material goods is obviously a joke, but review the
GANKBUS wiki paragraph that I wrote that statement in, you'll notice it reads
"If it's old, leave it. If you don't like it, ask us to take it down. If we
disagree, take it to arbitration. If you can't do that, then you better be
ready to bribe Scinfaxi with some material goods cause' it isn't coming off
the page any other way". Amazing has, in this instance, posted a completely
false accusation (and also displayed his lack of a sense of humor).
--Scinfaxi's response.
  • Keep - Since Amazing willfully disregards the obvious intent, and has attempted to twist it's meaning. (It should've been obvious, Amazing, as it would be impossible to not understand it's intent when you read their page more often than they did.) –Xoid S•T•FU! 08:29, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep Rasher 14:22, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep This template merely explains what Amazing needs to do, it makes no personal attack on him. -- Rueful 14:33, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Non-Inflammatory joke, from my POV, I.E. Harmless humor. -SirensT RR 14:50, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Technerd 15:41, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep "meh" BuncyTheFrog Talk GBP 17:28, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Undeadinator 00:25, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - This one made me laugh.--Denzel Washington 21:45, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Keep. MaulMachine 03:22, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Though its use is to extort money from me in order to return my ability to use this Wiki and the Game, this isn't in any way actually offensive to anyone specific. -- Amazing 07:35, 24 April 2006 (BST)
Not money, gold. And while you can use money to buy gold, we dont want any nations currency, just pure AU baby! Rasher 17:52, 2 May 2006 (BST)

Template:AmazingResign

  • Delete - Promotes griefing. Plus, Amazing doesn't deserve to be killed repeatedly indefinitely. --Cyberbob240CDF | Arb 08:13, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • What Amazing deserves is not your decision, and PKing is not against the game rules.--Tehasskickars 08:26, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep. This is a valid part of our group.--Tehasskickars 08:26, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete the same as with the other support Ass Template--Vista W! 08:32, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - It's a personal attack against wiki user and has no place in wiki. --Brizth W! M T 08:43, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Fourthed! --Prosperina 8:46 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I hear that deleting peoples comments on the discussion page is a good way to get them to support your "anti harassment" claims. Rasher 14:25, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --SirensT RR 14:50, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Technerd 15:41, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete Too far. BuncyTheFrog Talk GBP 17:29, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete *sigh* --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 21:34, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep --Undeadinator 00:25, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete G F J 12:04, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete No personnal attacks, unless they actually have decent arguments in them. That's just plain stupid McArrowni
  • Keep - People get a sense of humour.--Denzel Washington 21:46, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Because he does need to be killed indefinately.MaulMachine 03:22, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - The trolling and disregard for the Wiki by these folks needs to stop, and Moderators need to grow some teeth and stop it. Now. Also, MaulMachine should be banned for that alone. -- Amazing 07:38, 24 April 2006 (BST)
Maybe you should do it...oh that's right. MaulMachine 14:58, 3 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep -Banana Bear4 13:23, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • delete--Changchad 20:58, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - Yarr --Grim s-Mod 21:02, 24 April 2006 (BST)
    • No shit. -- Amazing 21:05, 24 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete -Wyndal (talk)-(W!)-(SGP) 14:29, 25 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete --Roybot 18:38, 25 April 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: 12 Deletes/9 Keeps, deleted. --Brizth mod T W! 11:15, 5 May 2006 (BST)

Crimson Jihad

Reason: Broken redirect with an empty discussion page. G F J 11:07, 30 April 2006 (BST)

Southern Confederacy

Reason: Unused redirect; nothing appears to link to it anymore. --Natalya Zveda 18:35, 20 April 2006 (BST)

These

Reason: Refer to Speedy Deletion criterion 3. All redirect to Maoing

  • Delete - Thank you Lint, for ensuring this crap stays for a minimum of two weeks. –Xoid S•T•FU! 13:29, 1 May 2006 (BST) Speedy Delete –Xoid S•T•FU! 08:57, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Keep - I actually feel like these have a little bit of merit. Speedydelete - Really, these are fairly harmless. But these redirects can be removed. --Lint 05:16, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - Useless. --Brizth M T 20:18, 1 May 2006 (BST)
  • Delete - No t needed on this wiki --Technerd 17:16, 2 May 2006 (BST)
  • Speedy Delete - Useless redirects. --Jimbo Bob ASS 07:26, 3 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator: - Speedily deleted. Criterion 3. --Brizth mod T W! 16:34, 3 May 2006 (BST)

Node

Reason: Group specific, should be located withing group's page. Not linked to. I copied the content to author's/group leader's talk page. --Brizth W! 21:24, 18 April 2006 (BST)

  • Merge With existing Group page. --Lint 22:02, 18 April 2006 (BST)
  • Merge I agree with Lint. G F J 12:40, 22 April 2006 (BST)
  • Merge Agree with all above Crazy Hand 03:07, 23 April 2006 (BST)
  • Merge The page Node should be eaten by W.O.A.H., 'cause Charles Darwin would've wanted it that way. –Xoid S•T•FU! 14:59, 1 May 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator - Merged with the groups page. Original page has been deleted. --Grim s-Mod 01:15, 2 May 2006 (BST)

Kevan Is Cool

Reason: Not linked-to. Kevan deleted the link from his userpage after finding the link. --Brizth W! 21:24, 18 April 2006 (BST)

  • Delete Since Kevan read it and obviously disliked it, I see no reason to keep this page. G F J 11:59, 22 April 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator - Deleted. --Grim s-Mod 01:18, 2 May 2006 (BST)

Template:Zombie Trail for Roftwood

Reason: Not used, and won't be used. Was made mostly for UVA usage (which I'm a member of). --Brizth W! 09:33, 17 April 2006 (BST)

  • Delete Based on Brizth's first-hand experience with the template in question. --Lint 22:02, 18 April 2006 (BST)
  • Delete Since it's unused... G F J 15:57, 21 April 2006 (BST)
    • Moderator - Deleted, 2 Deletes, 0 keeps. --Grim s-Mod 08:41, 1 May 2006 (BST)

Deletion Schedule Requests

Deletion of Image revisions older than 3 days

Many parts of the wiki community use updating images, but of course the previous images are still kept. For particularly large images this can become quite an issue, and if the images are updated daily, it can be up to a month before a mod can freely delete them (or two weeks if a mod gets there early.

Thus, I suggest that we provide a deletion schedule to remove any Image revisions that are older than 3 days. This should provide more than enough notice in the event of vandals uploading images over others, and should (hopefully) reduce the number of large image revisions clogging up the servers. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 11:03, 13 April 2006 (BST)

  • Yea - Let's keep the servers running. --Brizth W! 11:32, 13 April 2006 (BST)
  • Yea --The General 16:37, 15 April 2006 (BST)
  • This sounds like a good idea, but not being familiar with these frequently updated images can you give me an example? --RedKnight 00:04, 16 April 2006 (BST)
    • For example Image:Dailygbp.JPG. The files listed there still exist, but only the most recent one is used (same as page history). --Brizth W! 08:47, 16 April 2006 (BST)
      • I can delete the revisions that are over a month old.--The General W! Mod 09:04, 17 April 2006 (BST) EDIT: all revisions of that image over a month old have been deleted.--The General W! Mod 09:11, 17 April 2006 (BST)
  • Nay - While I like the idea, I think that three days is a bit too short. If this passes and I vandalize an obscure image, if it's not noticed within three days then it can't be reverted. (Assuming you mods keep up on the deletion of old revisions, that is.) If the time limit was seven days then I would support it. As a side note I would also support dropping the timelimit on unused images to seven days. --RedKnight 07:36, 21 April 2006 (BST)
  • Nay - The concept is sound, but a week seems a tad more reasonable for the reasons RedKnight stated. -– Nubis NWO 11:20, 21 April 2006 (BST)

Moderator: Schedule not passed. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 14:35, 1 May 2006 (BST)

Deletion Scheduling

Deletion of Image revisions older than 7 days

Many parts of the wiki community use updating images, but of course the previous images are still kept. For particularly large images this can become quite an issue, and if the images are updated daily, it can be up to a month before a mod can freely delete them (or two weeks if a mod gets there early.

Thus, I suggest that we provide a deletion schedule to remove any Image revisions that are older than 7 days. This should provide more than enough notice in the event of vandals uploading images over others, and should (hopefully) reduce the number of large image revisions clogging up the servers. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 14:35, 1 May 2006 (BST)

  • Yea - Same as before. --Brizth M T 14:49, 1 May 2006 (BST)
  • Yea - Same as before. --RedKnight 02:01, 2 May 2006 (BST)

Moderator: Schedule approved. -- Odd Starter talk • Mod • W! 03:53, 16 May 2006 (BST)

Retrieved from "http://wiki.urbandead.com//index.php?title=UDWiki:Moderation/Deletions/Archive/May-2006&oldid=996129"