UDWiki:Open Discussion/Administrator Category: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:So [[User:Grim s]] would no longer be a redlink? ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>18:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)</sub>
:So [[User:Grim s]] would no longer be a redlink? ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>18:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)</sub>
:: So ? --<small>[[User:Hagnat|hagnat]]</small> 18:15, 1 June 2011 (BST)
:: So ? --<small>[[User:Hagnat|hagnat]]</small> 18:15, 1 June 2011 (BST)
I personally wouldn't mind. Can't speak for all the ops, though. Since User Pages have special ownership rules, don't know if we should require these categories. You could, you know just add all the past sysops to [[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|successful promotions candidacies category]] (it needs to be updated with [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Karek (5)|Karek (5)]] and [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/The General (4)|The General (4)]] anyway). You can also put in a request through [[User talk:Thegeneralbot/Task requests|thegeneralbot]] to extract all those pages from the category so it can be cleaned up and listed how you want. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>18:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)</sub>

Revision as of 17:53, 1 June 2011


I was trying to list every administrator we ever had here in the wiki. An almost complete list can be found in the successful promotions candidacies category, but some of them are missing there and the category list some names twice or more. What about we add a Category:Administrator to identify every user who ever were a sysop/bureaucract - past or present - and a Category:System Operator/Category:Bureaucrat to all active sops and crats ? --hagnat 18:05, 1 June 2011 (BST)

and while i are talking about categories... we could add a Category:Discussion to every one of them and simply remove the 'closed discussions' section from the open discussion page :P --hagnat 18:08, 1 June 2011 (BST)
So User:Grim s would no longer be a redlink? ~Vsig.png 18:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
So ? --hagnat 18:15, 1 June 2011 (BST)

I personally wouldn't mind. Can't speak for all the ops, though. Since User Pages have special ownership rules, don't know if we should require these categories. You could, you know just add all the past sysops to successful promotions candidacies category (it needs to be updated with Karek (5) and The General (4) anyway). You can also put in a request through thegeneralbot to extract all those pages from the category so it can be cleaned up and listed how you want. ~Vsig.png 18:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)