UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/Terms of Service: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
Red Hawk One (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
If this is related to the current A/VB case, then adopting the TOU officially isn't the issue, it's defining our own standards that is. The TOU explicitly refer to ''illegal'' pornography, which means for anything that isn't illegal, we as a site need to define our own consensus and standard. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 23:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | If this is related to the current A/VB case, then adopting the TOU officially isn't the issue, it's defining our own standards that is. The TOU explicitly refer to ''illegal'' pornography, which means for anything that isn't illegal, we as a site need to define our own consensus and standard. {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 23:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
:The vague legal terms are indeed going to be the biggest roadblock in adopting that policy. In order to get a meaningful consensus, we'd need to learn how Poundhost dealt with filling out those terms in the past. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 23:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | :The vague legal terms are indeed going to be the biggest roadblock in adopting that policy. In order to get a meaningful consensus, we'd need to learn how Poundhost dealt with filling out those terms in the past. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 23:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
::The ToS have been used as ''de facto'' rules for quite some time now, and I've been meaning to codify them for almost as long. The recent farce served as a catalyst, yes, but this is something that should have been handled long ago. {{:User:Red Hawk One/sig}} 00:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:02, 14 February 2011
I agree. I don't think disagreeing is even an option legally speaking. --
Thadeous Oakley Talk 23:54, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- I agree too, as previously stated.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 23:54, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
If this is related to the current A/VB case, then adopting the TOU officially isn't the issue, it's defining our own standards that is. The TOU explicitly refer to illegal pornography, which means for anything that isn't illegal, we as a site need to define our own consensus and standard. 
23:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- The vague legal terms are indeed going to be the biggest roadblock in adopting that policy. In order to get a meaningful consensus, we'd need to learn how Poundhost dealt with filling out those terms in the past. -- Spiderzed▋ 23:59, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- The ToS have been used as de facto rules for quite some time now, and I've been meaning to codify them for almost as long. The recent farce served as a catalyst, yes, but this is something that should have been handled long ago. ~ Red Hawk One Talk | space for lease 00:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
