UDWiki talk:Administration/Sysop Archives/Rosslessness/2010-04-15 Bureaucrat Promotion

April Election

Aichon

1. Someone who I actually trust to be impartial, unbiased and otherwise fair in his rulings, all traits the last bureaucrat definitely didn't have. --Thadeous Oakley 08:26, 1 April 2010 (BST)

   It's almost like your entire existence on this wiki is geared towards making offhand and wrong comments about me. If it were anyone else I'd consider taking a hint but since it's you I'm actually flattered. --

    

    

    

    

   11:47, 1 April 2010 (BST)

   Actually, nevermind, after looking at your contributions I've realised that non-confronting me with pathetic little quips is only part of your current schedule, mixed with spamming WN at newbies and then never following up on the help they need. Shit, I stand mistaken. --

    

    

    

    

   11:53, 1 April 2010 (BST)

   Aren't these comments supposed to be under my vote? :P -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:01, 1 April 2010 (BST)

   Lol! Nice ;D Unfortunately though there is a vast difference between WN'ing newbies 5 times a day, and then making 50 constructive edits, to WNing users 5 times a day and then making 5 edits a week whingeing about a)DDR or b)nazism. Oh and you actually follow up on the newbie screwups to help wiki upkeep, Iscariot. --

    

    

    

    

   12:07, 1 April 2010 (BST)

   Ha! It's after midday, so it counts, and I have the diff so you can't take it back :P You said I made constructive edits, I'm never going to let you live that down :P -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:12, 1 April 2010 (BST)

   I don't mind admitting if it you do, you know. If things don't stop I can see us having a similar strange immediate love affair I previously shared with Cyberbob. --

    

    

    

    

   12:14, 1 April 2010 (BST)

   Remember, Iscariot is DDR approved for use in both the home and at work and is safe for your children to use! Do not operate heavy machinery while under the influence of Iscariot -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 12:20, 1 April 2010 (BST)

   For external use only. If Iscariot comes in contact with eyes wash immediately and seek medical advice. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 13:56, 1 April 2010 (BST)

   He might stop making those comments if you stop responding to them. Just a thought. Cyberbob  Talk  15:31, 14 April 2010 (BST)

   tried didn't work soz --

    

    

    

    

   15:37, 14 April 2010 (BST)

   Alright, how about not responding simply because almost every time you do you end up looking as stupid as he does? Cyberbob  Talk  15:39, 14 April 2010 (BST)

   Lol. --Haliman - Talk 03:27, 2 April 2010 (BST)

Half an hour left

I wonder who will win.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 12:57, 15 April 2010 (BST)

Baby Come Back

You can blame it all on me. --Haliman - Talk 03:33, 2 April 2010 (BST)

jerrel's question

I would like to know why I can't be Promo'd to ANYTHING!-- Jerrel tlk _{(82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!)}. 01:29, 12 April 2010 (BST)

Possibly due to your vast inactivity. A sysop is expected to be highly active so as to constantly maintain the wiki's admin tasks, and a bureaucrat is expected to be even more active so as to have a good understanding of the activity levels and reliability of the members of the community. 01:33, 12 April 2010 (BST)

Indeed. Bureaucrat positions are only available to current sysops, and sysops have to meet certain criteria in order to be promoted to that position. When last you applied for promotion to sysop, you failed to meet the minimum activity requirements in order to be eligible for promotion. While those requirements can be waived in the case of widespread community support, I'm afraid that you didn't appear to have that widespread support at the time. Check the guidelines at the top of these pages and they should explain what's necessary for promotion, in terms of raw objective numbers and other, more subjective, measures. —Aichon— 01:49, 12 April 2010 (BST)

I already explain on his talk. --

 

 

 

 

01:51, 12 April 2010 (BST)

Yes, well...I liked how I said it better. :P —Aichon— 01:56, 12 April 2010 (BST)

Or as I outlined in your last bid. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 10:26, 14 April 2010 (BST)

Have you considered the possibility that you're simply a fucking mong? Cyberbob  Talk  15:30, 14 April 2010 (BST)

+1 --Honestmistake 11:01, 13 July 2010 (BST)

+2----sexualharrison ¯\()/¯ 22:54, 3 October 2010 (BST)