UDWiki talk:Administration/Sysop Archives/Spiderzed/2011-11-23 Misconduct: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
My god, this was a disgrace of a ruling. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 00:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC) | My god, this was a disgrace of a ruling. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 00:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah, nah. It was a disgraceful display of personal harassment by the banned party. The sysops involved dealt with it effectively, despite going against the letter of policy, they still stayed within it's spirit <small>-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] 09:56, 16 August 2017 (BST)</small> | :Yeah, nah. It was a disgraceful display of personal harassment by the banned party. The sysops involved dealt with it effectively, despite going against the letter of policy, they still stayed within it's spirit <small>-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] 09:56, 16 August 2017 (BST)</small> | ||
::It is obscenely shortsighted, and if TOS is the issue, it doesn't solve the problem much more than just escalating him appropriately and erasing the edits... The abuse this precedent could have allowed if the wiki were still populated to a minimum degree is outrageous. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/a}} 02:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:01, 17 August 2017
My god, this was a disgrace of a ruling. A ZOMBIE ANT 00:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, nah. It was a disgraceful display of personal harassment by the banned party. The sysops involved dealt with it effectively, despite going against the letter of policy, they still stayed within it's spirit -- boxy 09:56, 16 August 2017 (BST)
- It is obscenely shortsighted, and if TOS is the issue, it doesn't solve the problem much more than just escalating him appropriately and erasing the edits... The abuse this precedent could have allowed if the wiki were still populated to a minimum degree is outrageous. A ZOMBIE ANT 02:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
