Difference between revisions of "UDWiki talk:Administration/Undeletions"

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 12: Line 12:


==[[DDR]]==
==[[DDR]]==
I guess sysops no longer have to acknowledge policy ''or'' the people of the community. Nubis, you're a good guy, but all of you - there has been such a blatant disregard for policy than what I'm seeing here (no matter how petty you may see this case as). As Gnome said, a keep vote puts it to voting, no matter what the criteria say. Therefore, this page was deleted without following proper procedure and should be restored and put to voting, along with #redirect[[AHLG]] and (no idea why this is still existing) #redirect[[Nallan]]. I don't see how you could deny this, policy is pretty clear.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 23:28, 25 October 2008 (BST)
I guess sysops no longer have to acknowledge policy ''or'' the people of the community. Nubis, you're a good guy, but all of you - there has been such a blatant disregard for policy here, worse than anything else I've seen (no matter how petty you may see this case as). As Gnome said, a keep vote puts it to voting, no matter what the criteria say. Therefore, this page was deleted without following proper procedure and should be restored and put to voting, along with #redirect[[AHLG]] and (no idea why this is still existing) #redirect[[Nallan]]. I don't see how you could deny this, policy is pretty clear.--{{User:Nallan/sig}} 23:28, 25 October 2008 (BST)

Revision as of 22:28, 25 October 2008

Archiving

I really think the Archiving protocol on this page needs to be changed, as it stands, archiving should take place immediatly after action is taken on a page, but then the person who requested the undeletion would need to go to the archive to view the resolution, instead of the regular page.

I suggest that all undeletion requests be archived a week after action has taken place, instead of right after action has been taken. Thoughts? – Nubis 14:01, 26 August 2006 (BST)

A week sounds reasonable to me. –Bob Hammero ModB'cratTA 18:14, 26 August 2006 (BST)
The page has been updated with this in mind. Looks more like speedy deletions now. – Nubis NWO 14:44, 27 August 2006 (BST)

Restoring pages that have already been recreated

What happens? I tried to bring back the old Hambargar Halparz page, but there was already one there. When I undeleted, the screens said that if there was already a page there, the old ones would be in the edit history... but they're not, as far as I can see! Did I stuff up? -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 03:51, 18 April 2007 (BST)

Ah, no worries, it was there after a forced refresh (shift + reload) of the page history -- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 03:56, 18 April 2007 (BST)

DDR

I guess sysops no longer have to acknowledge policy or the people of the community. Nubis, you're a good guy, but all of you - there has been such a blatant disregard for policy here, worse than anything else I've seen (no matter how petty you may see this case as). As Gnome said, a keep vote puts it to voting, no matter what the criteria say. Therefore, this page was deleted without following proper procedure and should be restored and put to voting, along with #redirectAHLG and (no idea why this is still existing) #redirectNallan. I don't see how you could deny this, policy is pretty clear.--Nallan (Talk) 23:28, 25 October 2008 (BST)