User:DCC/Archive

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

"....Vitiate"

Do I care?

Do I seriously care what you think? Nope, can't say that I do. Call me whatever the hell you want, I still found it amusing.--Doggie ^W! 20:40, 4 April 2008 (BST)

You came all the way here to tell me you don't care what I think about you? WOW YOU SURE FUCKING SHOWED ME! --DCC 23:55, 4 April 2008 (BST)

Cut him some slack?

Hey, would you mind taking that picture making fun of Major Striker‎ down? you've had your fun, can't you cut the guy some slack? Thanks.--'BP^Tmz 01:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
This picture?

Yes, that is indeed the picture I was talking about. Will you take it down?--'BP^Tmz 04:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Um. No. But I am interested to see what you do as his rep in an "arby" case. Is it going to be the classic - DCC hurt my feelings and he's an asshole defense or the good old "I don't really care what you think about me but I'm going to whine because you aren't saying nice things"? And I hope he at least offers you a reacharound for all the fucking white knighting you are doing for him. And how much of a hypocrite is he that he made a retaliatory image about me that he deleted? It's fucking pathetic that he can't take it nor dish it out! GET OFF MY PAGE - FUCKHEAD.--DCC 04:49, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your time. Also I wont be opening an arbies case, which you can read all about on major's talk page, which it appears you have read. I case very similer to this did happen a few months back if I recall, the picture was deleted, but it really doesnt matter, since major left. one more thing however, you added "(not made by DCC but he endorses this statement)", " (DCC APPROVES OF THIS COMMENT)" and "(DCC wishes he had posted this)" to the end of existing comments, not made by you. I strongly urge you to get rid of these, as anyone could put you up for vandalism, but that is your choice.--'BP^Tmz 16:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I'm terribly sorry, did I say something funny?--'BP^Tmz 20:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Everyone forgets the nice things Hitler did

SA VS. UD and the Wiki Circlejerk.

Typical wiki user: I though(t) survivors were supposed to have the upper hand, and Zack(zombie?) was supposed to have to band together to stand any chance of supremacy. Please, bring something in to counter Ruin, something to really dissuade the Zed Heads from attacking.

Because as batz pointed out - the zombie movies where the survivors had the upper hand were all classics! Like...uh....well, that one ... with the shark ...hrmmmm--DCC 09:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Never go to Arbitration, by the way

Because of this one statement at the top of the page:

    Disclaimer

These are only guidelines, not rules that must be followed by the letter. The arbitrator is free to choose not to follow all steps of the the arbitration procedure described in this article. There are some steps, though, that the arbitrator MUST follow for better maintenance practices in this wiki.

Can we get a wiki restraining order against the mods?

This is why your little WIKI is complete shit

http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Suggestion:20071008_Change_Free_Running

This is a suggestion to change free running and make it so there is a slight chance that the survivor could fall and get hurt. The WIKI Community that is SO FUCKING IMPORTANT to the game killed this suggestion:

Kill - Percentages are wrong, to my mind. Also, there shouldn't be damage through a failed attempt.--Seventythree^Talk 22:57, 8 October 2007 (BST)

Yay guys - no one should get hurt in a zombie apocalypse! Now come on! If you fail someone should be there to hug you and kiss your boo boo. But, at least everything is spelled correctly. :downsclap:

Kill - Currently, choosing which buildings to Ruin (and which Ruins need to be maintained) involves carefull strategy, observation, analysis and planning. You watch the survivors as they come and go. The ones that actually live in a particular suburb (as opposed to those that are "just passing through") will tend to follow predictable paths with predictable regularity. Smart zombies can check these paths for "choke points" where the free-run corridor is restricted to just one or two buildings. Ruin the choke points, maintain that Ruin. The survivors will be forced to go outside and face being eaten, or burn their AP kicking you out of the Ruin (and probably face being eaten in the process). Your suggestion would make Ruining ALL buildings more beneficial, but where's the clever planning, strategy and fun in that? --Steakfish 01:54, 9 October 2007 (BST)

This comment is just to asinine to even comment on.

Kill - Most suggestions that try to nerf already existing stuff dont fly. This doesn;t either Taint 02:31, 10 October 2007 (BST) 9:27 9 Oct. 2007 EST

My isn't your face red now.

Kill Movement shouldn't have a % success. It's annoying enough swinging an axe ten times and not hitting once, imagine spending 10 AP trying to get into a building next door, failing, and getting stranded in a ruin filled with zombies. --Jon Pyre 16:28, 10 October 2007 (BST)

You shouldn't be in danger in a game filled with zombies! Come on guys! /whine

Spam I don't like the name...-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 21:51, 9 October 2007 (BST)

This is leadership.

Spam What part of "Don't Mess with Freerunning" do you NOT understand? ~A`Blue`Jelly^TME*V*I*L*_? 05:03, 17 October 2007 (BST)

Yeah! Come on! We don't want anything to change ever so we don't have to think about stuff. How dare you try to level things out. --DCC 20:35, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

HUGBOX YAY!

They tried to warn you!

Against - Karek has his pro's, being a good contributor and all, but I'd rather don't have this temperamental guy making the calls on anything of great importance without a comitee's backup. He's easily angered, obstinate when cornered and sometimes can't be trusted to develop an unbiased oppinion: something that made me wonder whom does this puppet belong to? when he first came to the wiki. Karek, I understood for a while now that you're actually nobody's puppet, but that you're easily mistaken as one is yet another proof of your little originality and why's everyone calling you "another Grim" on this bid. Not a good choice as a Sysop if you ask me. --Matthew Fahrenheit ^YRC☺T☺+1 06:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Against - Too quick with the nuclear option, to use the above superpower analogy. What kept the world "safe" in the cold war, rosslessness, was among other things the superpowers' ability to negotiate. Karek is obstinately intractable, and I don't think the school of wiki mgt he subscribes to is in this wiki's best interest. There are better ways to facilitate good wiki conduct that Karek's approach, which I'll wager is more often discouraging and turns potential contributors away than not. Besides, he might as well be Sonny's puppet.--The Envoy 20:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Against - argumentative, quick to anger, and sometimes insulting we need less people like this in any position of responsibility on the wiki.--Kristi of the Dead 12:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Against - too quick to delete other people's posts without an attempt to find a middle ground. This causes needless antagonism. Which is a pity, as for me it overshadows the positive things he's tried to do. Moyes^T^RPM 11:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Might you be referring to this edit?--Karek^maps?! 12:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

THAT POST WAS GOING TO DESTROY THE WIKI!!! DCC

Color me not surprised. -- Gregarious Instigator ^{SHUT UP | RIGHTS | PETITION} 21:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually I looked up the page and counted. 22 Vouch votes, 15 Against votes, and 2 Abstain votes. How amusing every point brought up in the against votes turned out to be true. --Gregarious Instigator ^{SHUT UP | RIGHTS | PETITION} 05:41, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

And seriously, how can shit like VVV be consider a good vote worthy of VOUCH--DCC 05:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

But hey - with reasons like this give him power!

Vouch - Sure. Why not?--Thari^{TжFedCom is BFI!} 12:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey look somebody read what I wrote about Karek--Kristi of the Dead 13:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

And no one took any of the critiques seriously ... Frankly, I don't have any axe to grind with karek, i couldn't care less to do so... i also have neither affection nor respect for you attention whoring SA goons... but.... I happen to agree many of the criticisms brought up in the vote... see, i was on a break from UD during the vote, a shame... anyway, i find it odd that a vote of 22 to 15 actually PASSED... That is a SIGNIFICANT number of dissenting voices... and often STRONGLY dissenting voices, to boot. Promotions aren't elections, it's kind of a job interview of sorts... or so they tell us... But this interview looks like it was mere formalities... Let's see, if it were it were, oh, say AHLG or Matt Farenheit, or gawd forbid Katthew, who got a tally like that... I don't think they'd be approved and promoted... they'd be deemed too "controversial" and lacking widespread community trust to actually promote... All very, very interesting... --WanYao 14:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

The level of censorship

Be advised if this mess ever went to ar-penetration like they keep pushing these are the types of rulings they get. Spelling errors left intact even though most browsers seem to have spellcheck:

In conclusion, double entendres are O.K, as is the occasional innuendo based joke in the history part of some of the locations pages. Jokes reffering to blatant graphical representations of sexual acts are not o.k though. So, this sentance is ok:

Cockburn Plaza was, prior to the erection of the railway station, known for its famous sperm bank, which was the subject of many an immature joke at the nearby Woolford Boulevard School in Foulkes Village.

But this sentence is not:

The sperm bank was renowned for its lack of "stimulating materials", resulting in the common rash known as cock burn.

- This is a decision from 69 - no wait 73 - now a SYSOP by the Oh SO fair - vote for me hugbox method they use.- Decision in favor of Karek instead of the authors of the article. Hmm, color me surprised --DCC 07:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I forgot to add that the people that wrote that little offending comment COULD HAVE BEEN BANNED for it, but Karek was gracious enough to let them slide. BANNED for making a cock comment about a place named Cock. --DCC 07:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, Firstly, I'm not a Sysop, ok? I might be soon, and if you have anything to say either for or againgst me being one, feel free to go over to the promotions page thing and add your opinions. If you ahve a serious enougth problem, or reason that I should not be a sysop, I won't become one. I'm fine with constructive criticism, in fact I welcome it. As for that particular arbitration case, you have realy said fuck all about it exept that I got it wrong, alluding to the fact that I'm somehow siding with Karek. I've got no problem with Karek, he's a decent guy but it's common knowlege that we don't often see eye to eye on things. You have offered no evidence whatsoever that the ruling was wrong, aside from suggesting some kind of conspiracy (please! I don't have the fucking time or patience for one) and my spelling is crap. Big deal. Oh, and no-one could have been banned for making that article. It was an edit conflict, nothing else. I've realy got nothing against you guys, so please, leave it , and the daft insults here.--Seventythree^Talk 19:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

If only I could feel love

Warning

Please do not vandalise this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked.

-- boxy ^{talk • i} 04:00 28 February 2008 (BST)

cant be any worse than the faggotry your fellow important-wiki-figure conndraka is shitting up the wiki with just because some goons pissed in his cereal and now he cant sleep at night until he achieves internet victory what a faggot --Zambargh the Ravener 01:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

<3--DCC 06:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

We aren't really here

If this is a group made up of indvidual members...which looks odd considering they have almost no wiki page, various other groups that are misspelled versions, and their rate of recruitment is off the charts.

And that reply above? Just found out its from the guy who made the dead of Dunell Hills page. I also checked out the SA forums. While there was a forum area, most topics were spread days apart. A group this large would have new topics every minute! So unless I missed sonethin', there's something wrong here.

Will post more info as I get it.--MikhailA 02:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Wiki page = life. oh and SA isn't spammed therefore not real.

Oh Hagnut, Isa jus wanna be one of da good goons, massa

It's really easy for you guys to say that we are corrupt when we have to live with all the shit Katthew and her lackeys has already done in the wiki. All their edits were made in bad faith, always flaming this community users, Most of you guys being in here is not healthy for this community. If you guys are not going to show respect for others, there is no need for the administration team to be lenient with you guys, even in the most trivial cases. If not by some few users that i know and respect that came from the SA forums, i'd love to see all of you banned from here. You can call that corrupted by the power, i call it for the good of the urban dead community --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 12:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Desk Sgt. speaks up

Listen up once and for all. First... I haven't had anything to do with the Desk Sgts. in over two years. Second Your obvious issue with the DHPD stems from some time ago (obviously) so that would probably indicate a long term problem, what ever it is, get over it. Even if you are Max/Reetoric/Zerg (maybe, maybe not) I don't care and neither does the DHPD. You are a petty revenge seeking tool that is ultimately insignificant to whether we(the DHPD) exist or not. And all your rhetoric on all the boards that you choose to spread crap on drumming up support against the DHPD matters not, and won't hasten the demise of the DHPD in the slightest. Now I expect more bs from you and those you have convinced to do what you couldn't do on your own, thats part of wearing a target on you gets you. But I do know some SA folks that are good at what they do...and eventually they will succeed where other groups have failed as far as the overall status of Urban Dead goes...but it will have little to do with you. And to that effect I'll point out that being on numerous KOS is like an award to me...And I'm on a hell of a lot more lists than you are and I did it without being an assclown. Semper-Fi, Salute', Peace-Out, and fuck ya very much. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 23:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I absolutely loved this nonsensical rant. I think some people are still waiting for a version that makes sense. --Laughing Man 22:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

EVERYBODY STOP YOU'LL MAKE CONNDRAKA CRY JESUS --Kid sinister 22:41, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

re Dead of Dunell Hills

Change your vote to Speedy Delete and I'll make the page go away AS soon as we get a total of three. Conndraka^{mod TDHPD CFT} 21:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Not shown: Conndraka making a mirror of the page and then protecting it with his mod powers. (also not shown, Conndraka just being a fuckstick in general)

Karek

Well, since there's no discussion on the matter from other Sysops, and the image is now deleted, I'm going to apply the escalation.--Karek^maps?! 00:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

This little exhibit is from Katthew's billionth pointless banning. Basically, with this statement Karek took it upon herself to decide and apply a punishment since no other sysop was F5ing the wiki like she was (while flicking the bean and drooling on herself) waiting for someone ANYONE to validate her little mod powers and say - yes, ban Katthew.

Oh yeah, Karek is trying to say that there were separate events that led to Katthew's banning, but really she is being punished for each individual act over one page. This is important to know! If you get in trouble over a page with a lot of

RPing Fag content and MSPaint edited pictures and lies you are going to get banned for each individual element on that page! I think that might even include HEADLINES AND BOLD TEXT! (this paragraph alone could cost me 4 - 24 hour bans applied as Karek sees fit! Probably applied one at a time since MATH IS HARD! FUCK! 5!) --DCC 06:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

(while flicking the bean and drooling on herself) DIS RITE HERE IS SOME BUHHHHH TO QUOTE HANK HILL --Zambargh the Ravener 18:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Administration

You have been banned from editing this wiki for 48 hours for vandalism. --Karek^maps?! 00:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Here you can almost hear the UNF UNF as she uses her mod powers to spank Katthew.

Cheeseman

Good point. :P There's quite a lot of them now. All this over a single page? Kind of pathetic isn't it? -- C h e e s e 00:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

This is part one of ironic things said by fucking douchebags. This asshole seems to think it's ok for someone to make a page about someone else filled with bullshit - yet he will probably be the one to whine and piss and moan when he finds User:DCC/Cheeseman is a bloody cum filled fuck pocket that needs a Ginsu enema

~~Considering the page doesn't exist, it really doesn't bother me that much to be honest. :D -- C h e e s e 22:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)~~ Ok, maybe it does. But I'm not going to throw a tantrum over it. :P Much better things to with my time to be honest. -- C h e e s e 22:55, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

~~Nobody tell him this page has been editted.--Gregarious Instigator 22:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)~~ OH LOOK DIDN'T EVEN GET TO FINISH HITTING SAVE PAGE BEFORE AN EDIT CONFLICT. Do you search your own name?--Gregarious Instigator 22:58, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean? :/ I was looking in Recent Changes to see if anything interesting happened in the last little while and remembered this was the guy who made all the pages last night so I decided to come see what was on his talk page. -- C h e e s e 23:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

The funny thing about creating that page is if I were a mod, I could simply have locked it and pretended it was for informational purposes only and no one would have done anything. But since I'm not and even worse, I'm one of those dirty SA folks, not only is the page erased but I get banned also. --Laughing Man 00:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

No, you couldn't have, that would have been misconduct, and vandalism too.--Karek^maps?! 00:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

And yet I do not see a misconduct case over what conndraka did.--Gregarious Instigator 00:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Well, if it bothers you that much: Make One, rather than having a moan on this talk page. -- C h e e s e 00:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Get off my talk page, Cheesedick.--DCC 14:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Seventythree

Can one of you please do something constructive to sort out the dispute you seem to be having with a few people at the moment? If there's an edit problem, then use arbitration, If you've an issue with a sysop please start a misconduct thing. Just please stop with the pointless arguments either way. They don't actualy sort anything out you know.--Seventythree^Talk 01:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I can not control the actions of others but I am gathering what I need to do so. Contrary to what some might say, we do have lives and we can not take a major chunk out of our day to do the work to spell it all out for you in one neat location.--Gregarious Instigator 01:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Administration

Stop shiting on administration pages. If you are not a sysop, you can't rule on vandal cases, neither strike out rulings of the administration team. This is your first and only warning on this matter. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 01:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

1. I struck nothing out. and 2. I never got the happy friendly welcome to wiki page so how the fuck am I supposed to know that only the members of the cool kids club can voice an opinion on matters that don't really involve them since it started from my page? Not all of us are born with the desire to be a WIKI mod and the elitist attitude of most of the people with a modicum of power around here makes it frustrating to try to get anything done by your rules. Which aren't really rules since you let your little play mates break them all the time. And the fact that not one mother fucking mod/sysop/cocksucker/ whatever the fuck you are said a damn thing about Karek banning Katthew for another 48 hours BECAUSE NO ONE said anything one way or the other just tells us you fuckers really don't have a clue about what fair really means. You will let one of your "own" arbitrarily enforce their will then keep bitching at us to "take it to arbitration" instead of saying - hey, Karek that was kind of a douchey thing to do. Let's stick to due process, eh?

If you are not a System Operator, the user who made the vandal report, the user being reported, or in any way directly involved in the case, the administration strongly asks that you use the talk page for further discussion. Free-for-all commenting can lead to a less respectful environment. This notice is in the Vandal Banning page, in faggy-red colored box, above all other vandal cases. And all wikis (actually, all communities, virtual or not) have their rules, not knowing them doesnt exclude you to be punished if you break them. It's like I am sorry Mr. Officer, i didnt knew stealing was against the law. We have more than three sysops (couting those who are more vocal on this matter... me, conn and karek), and a really strong community that is always following our steps to see if we have abused our powers in any way. Since no one... NO ONE... beyond you goons complained about our actions in this whole situation shows that the community agrees with us, and that we are in no way abusing our powers. And, mate, you are talking with a sysop who doesnt believe banning is a solution, and that all users should have a chance to reform... and even this sysop agree that this attitude of yours is not healthy and that you should be kicked away from here. You want to have fun ? Fine, have fun. But dont ruin the fun of other players of this wiki community. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 11:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No one other than us spoke out about it because most of the users on here are short bus window lickers that would rather kiss ass and eat shit than hurt anyone's feelings. And the ones that actually do voice intelligent (dissenting) opinions (see HUGBOX YAY) are ignored and overridden by the fuckalls that just want everyone to get along. Your community is so inbred with yes men and toadies that the level of contributions will never be more than "Axe Tornado" , "Rocket Launchers" and hey, more RP Beer and Beer factories please! --DCC 20:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Wow... you really dont know shit about this community. --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 14:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

You see, I deserved my 24 hr ban because I spammed the wiki. I have no issue with that - I had a time out and took a nap and whamm-o all better. FAIR Katthew was banned, then when it was up she was banned again for no fucking reason. NOT FAIR. If you can't see the problem with this I will get out hand puppets and speak S L O W L Y for you.

You just want us to take this to arbitration so that we are out of your fucking hair, but that won't work because YOU (maybe not just you hagnut) but the low level mod shits that either didn't say hey this is wrong or the fuckheads that did it ARE THE REAL problem. Not us. --DCC 14:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Katthew was punished for two distinct and seperate actions if you feel I was in the wrong you should start a misconduct case, in fact I encourage it. Running around harassing users because you think someone was wrongly punished instead of doing the, obvious, thing of actually trying to address the problem isn't the way to get anything done.--Karek^maps?! 22:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

So, while Katthew was banned she did something that was bannable? And that warranted another ban when the first ban was up? Oh, Katthew is amazing! P.S. get the fuck off my talk page. I'm not going to listen to you push these arbitration/misconduct lies so you have no reason to be here. If you actually encouraged it you would start one yourself. --DCC 06:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Then don't complain about not being heard, you're squelching yourself.--Karek^maps?! 06:21, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, because it would be so much better if we went to arbitration and let your little buddies do whatever the fuck they want to us because even by the first paragraph of the A/A/ASS page it says they can do whatever they want. It also seems like you have to choose from the list of arbs - who all seem to be pretty far up your ass. No Justice for the oppressed. Goons to the back of the wiki.--DCC 09:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Non Author Re

I had to strike it. Nothing personal. You are free to make such RE's on the talk page though. --Pdeq^Talk* 07:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

no prob - just hope the author saw it to use it....--DCC 14:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Morning

I help run a zed group in Monroeville. Someones been broadcasting for 3 days that the dead are coming to town. Are you? If so welcome, central monroeville is pretty much zombie free. May be a nice suprise.--Ross less ne s s^{Want a Location Image?} 10:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

The man userpage

yeah, dont touch it, mmkay ? not only the man's user page, but any user page whose author didnt gave you express authorization to change it. And if you are going to add <br> tags, atleast use proper XHTML formatting and use <br/> tags :P --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 03:31, 30 March 2008 (BST)

this only applies to people that are not goons, of course. Right, Hagnut? Because we aren't real people. --DCC 20:08, 31 March 2008 (BST)

Exactly. It's nice that you get it :) --People's Commissar Hagnat ^{[cloned] [mod]} 20:11, 31 March 2008 (BST)

Dude...

	Chill Pill
	Jordan Salafack has written you a prescription for one chill pill, and suggests you take it. Seriously.

Really. » JS talk contribs » 03:52, 31 March 2008 (BST)

Gosh I hope there is a suppository for this because right now I want to shove this so far up your ass I can floss your teeth with my watch strap.

Who the fuck are you ? --DCC 20:06, 31 March 2008 (BST)

I'm the mayor of Funkytown.

» JS talk contribs » 22:28, 31 March 2008 (BST)

User:DCC/Archive

Contents

Do I care?

Cut him some slack?

Everyone forgets the nice things Hitler did

SA VS. UD and the Wiki Circlejerk.

Never go to Arbitration, by the way

This is why your little WIKI is complete shit

HUGBOX YAY!

The level of censorship

If only I could feel love

We aren't really here

Oh Hagnut, Isa jus wanna be one of da good goons, massa

Desk Sgt. speaks up

re Dead of Dunell Hills

Karek

Administration

Cheeseman

Seventythree

Administration

Non Author Re

Morning

The man userpage

Dude...

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

General

Search

Resources

Wiki

Toolbox