User talk:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sandbox899: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Bob Moncrief (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Just three non-professional ideas on design from someone who's horrible at design. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 07:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC) | Just three non-professional ideas on design from someone who's horrible at design. {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig5}} 07:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
:Will do, thanks. I had picked the 3 different scales because it de-emphasizes the declining population (which people were not liking with the current SZI graph), while making it easier to see the data in the tail region. It gets squished if I use the bigger scale. On the downside, it takes a moment to realize why the data jumps a bit. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 16:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC) | :Will do, thanks. I had picked the 3 different scales because it de-emphasizes the declining population (which people were not liking with the current SZI graph), while making it easier to see the data in the tail region. It gets squished if I use the bigger scale. On the downside, it takes a moment to realize why the data jumps a bit. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 16:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
::I quite like having the three different scales, but agree that the key should be at the top of each third. I also think a little wider would be good (1/3 of the page width?), since the text to the right would only occupy maybe 1/2-2/3 of the total page, assuming strategic linebreaks. Otherwise, love this layout! {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 16:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:00, 6 May 2020
Really nice
Nice stuff!
Might I suggest two small things? I like the population scale being at the top so you don't have to scroll down to the bottom of a graph to see what the numbers are over time. And just personally for me, I think it would be cooler if the numbers were the same scale across all 3 graphs?
The graphs could probably afford to be 'wider' too.
Just three non-professional ideas on design from someone who's horrible at design. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 07:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Will do, thanks. I had picked the 3 different scales because it de-emphasizes the declining population (which people were not liking with the current SZI graph), while making it easier to see the data in the tail region. It gets squished if I use the bigger scale. On the downside, it takes a moment to realize why the data jumps a bit. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- I quite like having the three different scales, but agree that the key should be at the top of each third. I also think a little wider would be good (1/3 of the page width?), since the text to the right would only occupy maybe 1/2-2/3 of the total page, assuming strategic linebreaks. Otherwise, love this layout! Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 16:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
