Difference between revisions of "User talk:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sandbox899"

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
:Will do, thanks. I had picked the 3 different scales because it de-emphasizes the declining population (which people were not liking with the current SZI graph), while making it easier to see the data in the tail region. It gets squished if I use the bigger scale. On the downside, it takes a moment to realize why the data jumps a bit. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 16:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
:Will do, thanks. I had picked the 3 different scales because it de-emphasizes the declining population (which people were not liking with the current SZI graph), while making it easier to see the data in the tail region. It gets squished if I use the bigger scale. On the downside, it takes a moment to realize why the data jumps a bit. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 16:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
::I quite like having the three different scales, but agree that the key should be at the top of each third. I also think a little wider would be good (1/3 of the page width?), since the text to the right would only occupy maybe 1/2-2/3 of the total page, assuming strategic linebreaks. Otherwise, love this layout! {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 16:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
::I quite like having the three different scales, but agree that the key should be at the top of each third. I also think a little wider would be good (1/3 of the page width?), since the text to the right would only occupy maybe 1/2-2/3 of the total page, assuming strategic linebreaks. Otherwise, love this layout! {{User:Bob Moncrief/Sig}} 16:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
No mention of Borehamwood?--[[User:Rosslessness|<span style="color: MidnightBlue ">R</span><span style="color: Navy">o</span><span style="color: DarkBlue">s</span><span style="color: MediumBlue">s</span><span style="color: RoyalBlue"></span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness|<span style="color: RoyalBlue">l</span><span style="color: CornflowerBlue">e</span><span style="color: SkyBlue">s</span><span style="color: LightskyBlue">s</span>]][[User_Talk:Rosslessness/Quiz|<span style="color: LightBlue">n</span><span style="color: PowderBlue">e</span>]][[Monroeville Many|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]][[The Great Suburb Group Massacre|<span style="color: PaleTurquoise">s</span>]]<sup>[[Location Page Building Toolkit|<span style="color: DarkRed">Want a Location Image?]] </span> </sup>  20:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:41, 31 May 2020

Really nice

Nice stuff!

Might I suggest two small things? I like the population scale being at the top so you don't have to scroll down to the bottom of a graph to see what the numbers are over time. And just personally for me, I think it would be cooler if the numbers were the same scale across all 3 graphs?

The graphs could probably afford to be 'wider' too.

Just three non-professional ideas on design from someone who's horrible at design. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 07:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Will do, thanks. I had picked the 3 different scales because it de-emphasizes the declining population (which people were not liking with the current SZI graph), while making it easier to see the data in the tail region. It gets squished if I use the bigger scale. On the downside, it takes a moment to realize why the data jumps a bit. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
I quite like having the three different scales, but agree that the key should be at the top of each third. I also think a little wider would be good (1/3 of the page width?), since the text to the right would only occupy maybe 1/2-2/3 of the total page, assuming strategic linebreaks. Otherwise, love this layout! Bob Moncrief EBDW! 16:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

No mention of Borehamwood?--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 20:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)