User talk:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sandbox899
Might I suggest two small things? I like the population scale being at the top so you don't have to scroll down to the bottom of a graph to see what the numbers are over time. And just personally for me, I think it would be cooler if the numbers were the same scale across all 3 graphs?
The graphs could probably afford to be 'wider' too.
Just three non-professional ideas on design from someone who's horrible at design.07:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Will do, thanks. I had picked the 3 different scales because it de-emphasizes the declining population (which people were not liking with the current SZI graph), while making it easier to see the data in the tail region. It gets squished if I use the bigger scale. On the downside, it takes a moment to realize why the data jumps a bit. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- I quite like having the three different scales, but agree that the key should be at the top of each third. I also think a little wider would be good (1/3 of the page width?), since the text to the right would only occupy maybe 1/2-2/3 of the total page, assuming strategic linebreaks. Otherwise, love this layout! Bob Moncrief EBD•W! 16:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
|Here is some gold, in a basket.|
--hagnat 16:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
It’s looking great mate. Well done.09:19, 18 June 2020 (UTC)