User talk:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sandbox899

Really nice

Nice stuff!

Might I suggest two small things? I like the population scale being at the top so you don't have to scroll down to the bottom of a graph to see what the numbers are over time. And just personally for me, I think it would be cooler if the numbers were the same scale across all 3 graphs?

The graphs could probably afford to be 'wider' too.

Just three non-professional ideas on design from someone who's horrible at design. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 07:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Will do, thanks. I had picked the 3 different scales because it de-emphasizes the declining population (which people were not liking with the current SZI graph), while making it easier to see the data in the tail region. It gets squished if I use the bigger scale. On the downside, it takes a moment to realize why the data jumps a bit. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 16:27, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

I quite like having the three different scales, but agree that the key should be at the top of each third. I also think a little wider would be good (1/3 of the page width?), since the text to the right would only occupy maybe 1/2-2/3 of the total page, assuming strategic linebreaks. Otherwise, love this layout! Bob Moncrief ^EBD•W! 16:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

No mention of Borehamwood?--Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 20:41, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

It's there, end of '08. Open and close. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 13:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

	Good work!
	Here is some gold, in a basket.

--hagnat 16:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

It’s looking great mate. Well done. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION 09:19, 18 June 2020 (UTC)