User talk:Boxy

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Revision as of 03:07, 29 September 2012 by Karek (talk | contribs) (→‎Karek A/RE)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Main

TalkLocationsSuggestSignatureTemplates
NavigationPlaypen POV SugImage Archive

Stop hand.png Please read first!
Don't worry about keeping to the relevant sections, just add new subjects at the top, I'll move 'em around when I get to it.

New Stuff

August 2012

Karek A/RE

Discuss?--I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 18:40, 26 September 2012 (BST)

DISCUSS??--I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 18:59, 28 September 2012 (BST)
Yeah...I don't envy you guys right now. :-/ Aichon 19:49, 28 September 2012 (BST)
Surely thats normal. Also, Im nixing slr bid as he fails loads of criteria and stuff.--I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 20:35, 28 September 2012 (BST)
Anyway, I'll give box until the first, or make a random decision on my own. --I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 20:46, 28 September 2012 (BST)
It's funny cause normally I don't look at the bid page for a week and it goes pretty well. I respond to DDR this time and meh. Either way I'm not put out whatever the decision is and I'm pretty aware of the whys. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 04:07, 29 September 2012 (BST)

To paraphrase

To save time, in the upcoming Aichon promotion thing, I have no problem with his promotion. --RossWHO????ness 11:42, 22 August 2012 (BST)

Yes, agreed -- boxy 13:48, 23 August 2012 (BST)

Talking of which, there's a re-evaluation due in 6 hours. --I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 10:42, 1 September 2012 (BST)

June 2012

This

User:Boxy/Sandbox Broken Redirects! --Rosslessness 20:10, 22 June 2012 (BST)

... the fuck was I even doing there? lol. Cleared out -- boxy 09:44, 24 June 2012 (BST)

Fun

yer no fun!--User:Sexualharrison16:30, 14 June 2012

You should totally take me to arbies Tongue :P -- boxy 22:31, 14 June 2012 (BST)
if only i had the time.--User:Sexualharrison23:45, 14 June 2012

May 2012

Promotions

Just letting you know Karloth Vois's promotion bid has passed the two week discussion period and is due for bureaucrat review. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 12:03, 22 May 2012 (BST)

Um...Just so you know, Rev, as per policy, new opinions can continue to be added to the bid until the 'crats announce their decision. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 13:23, 22 May 2012 (BST)
NO. REALLY? ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 14:04, 22 May 2012 (BST)
Theoreticallly, a bid can go on for an infinite amount of tine. Theoretically. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 14:52, 22 May 2012 (BST)
like my counting thread over on the NMC?--User:Sexualharrison15:34, 22 May 2012
Yeah even before that addition to the guidelines i remember one of Wan Yao's bid going for a month at least :/ DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 15:59, 22 May 2012 (BST)
Was that the one where he didn't officially accept for nearly 2 weeks, and the bids went from the time they were accepted (and had the required number of vouches)? -- boxy 06:53, 25 May 2012 (BST)

So, vois, my answer is "facial hair", and to pre empt future discussions, shortround shrugs sure. --Rosslessness 17:15, 22 May 2012 (BST)

Shorty should do alright -- boxy 06:53, 25 May 2012 (BST)

Axe

Obvious re evaluation is obvious. --Rosslessness 18:31, 9 May 2012 (BST)

Indeed -- boxy 09:02, 10 May 2012 (BST)

Much Love

<3 --Shortround }.{ My Contributions 13:41, 7 May 2012 (BST)

Agreed. Your sheer awesomeness is unparalleled. -- †  talk ? f.u. 14:00, 7 May 2012 (BST)

April 2012

You're awesome

git orf mai lawn!

For all you do to make this wiki a success, I salute you. Keep doing what you do because you rock at it. --TheBardofOld 01:00, 15 April 2012 (BST)

I'm far to lazy and inactive to be described as awesome (any more Tongue :P}. Just a grumpy old man, sitting on his porch, with his shotgun, occasionally shouting, "git orf mai lawn!" -- boxy 01:10, 15 April 2012 (BST)
But, if you're who you claim to be, then you must be Clint Eastwood and for that, you're awesome. Seriously, you are. Never doubt. --TheBardofOld 01:12, 15 April 2012 (BST)
Not Clint, maybe a co-star though Tongue :P -- boxy 03:24, 15 April 2012 (BST)
Awwww XD --TheBardofOld 03:28, 15 April 2012 (BST)

Mis

I assume it's a no? --Rosslessness 09:30, 8 April 2012 (BST)

? --Rosslessness 08:58, 10 April 2012 (BST)
Hurry the fuck up. You are already 5 days late on demoting both Mis and Vapor, closing the VB case, and banning several spambots. Generaloberst 20:14, 10 April 2012 (BST)
You know what? Gimme another eight months of unused power just to piss this guy off. Nothing to be done! 23:44, 10 April 2012 (BST)
I agree with man, hell, the shitbrain almost makes me want to come back for the sole reason of driving him off the wiki. Not because it's right, but because I could. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 00:08, 11 April 2012 (BST)
Do you honestly mean that? I mean, you're one of the few sysops that I saw as not very biased. If you really ment that then I'm quite shocked. Generaloberst 01:22, 11 April 2012 (BST)
Vouch. ~Vsig.png 00:20, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Vouchx2--User:Sexualharrison00:59, 11 April 2012
Oh! Me too! Vouch, Vouch, Vouch, Vouch. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 01:18, 11 April 2012 (BST)
Yes. Vouch. -- Cheese 13:31, 11 April 2012 (BST)

Box, I'll set a weeks deadline on this, or otherwise make my own decision. Grazi. --Rosslessness 12:54, 11 April 2012 (BST)

Does that mean you will demote him tomorrow (when he's a week late), or in a week? Generaloberst 13:13, 11 April 2012 (BST)
Shakes head. --Rosslessness 13:26, 11 April 2012 (BST)

Sorry about that. Yeah, sure, demote him... or keep him, just to piss off the nazi. Either way is good Tongue :P -- boxy 10:01, 12 April 2012 (BST)

LMFAO, and you still claim to be unbiased?? Generaloberst 12:00, 12 April 2012 (BST)
Did I make that claim? I've always maintained a healthy bias against people who just come here to be arseclowns, trolls or vandals -- boxy 12:52, 12 April 2012 (BST)

March 2012

I feel for you

Listen, we gotta talk. You and I both know that I'm actually one of the finest warriors in Malton. Also, there are not many groups stronger than Nazi Zombies either. Perhaps only the RRF is stronger right now. During Operation Naaldloos we have defeated a group of about 250 survivors with less than 4 dozen of men. In the Blitz we're taking on 350 survivors with even less men, now that Fascist Italian has shown his true colors. I don't see how these things are "Nazi propaganda". I'm just stating fact. So leave my pages alone and do something useful. I'm taking warfare on Urban Dead to a whole new level. And that level is called Sitzkrieg. Just a small step for a man, but an enormous step, für das Vaterland. Generaloberst 16:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Lol. My army of level one members with no xp at all created one after another is the strongest group in Malton. --Rosslessness 17:22, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
There we go again "yes but you are just a zerger". You don't even know my ingame name. Perhaps I'm not even wearing the tag. I can be everyone in Malton. Generaloberst 18:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
I'm sorry General, I never claimed you were zerging. I was merely commenting on the make up of the group you associate with. I believe we're talking about Zombie Nazis? I feel I have a right to call several of their members level one players with little or no Xp, created one after another over the course of only a few minutes. In fact I have. Here are four examples. You're getting a little obsessed that everyone thinks you're a zerger. --Rosslessness 19:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Ok so someone has multiple accounts within Nazi Zombies. How is that a problem? It was funny how at the time Corn and "Zyckde" both had multiple accounts within their group. Corn was then constantly called "zerger" and "PK-er" (both ingame as on the wiki), though what Zyckde did was considered ok. That is what propaganda is. Generaloberst 10:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
if you're noting propagandas affectiveness on the weak then why are you so goddamn shit at it, you spout more of it than you do vowels DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Learn English and learn to read. Not propaganda from my side. Generaloberst 14:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
you spend more time having tantrums about jews than you spend time breathing. If you actually legitimately believe that you don't use any sort of progaganda and that if one thinks you do he needs to learn english then you are literally the most retarded person who's ever been on this wiki. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 23:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
bitch got owned? DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
When you create a number of pages like that, claiming to be glossary terms, but then proceed to fill the pages with group specific images and references to your own group and it's greatness, it becomes clear that they are nothing more than group propaganda/trolling. And they'll be moved -- boxy 21:48, 17 March 2012 (BST)
Yeah, and if other (non-Aryan) pages are made like Jihad tactics including fitting images then it's all ok suddenly. What you just said occurs on the wiki all the time. It really isn't anything specific for Nazi Zombies. Just stop being jealous that someone invented a tactic you wasn't able to come up with and go outside to find some friends. People wouldn't bully you all the time and you wouldnt be such a cunt. Generaloberst 10:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
if you legit think that jihad tactics is the same kettle of fish as the shitskrieg page where it matters then you are beyond help. i have no problem with either but just saying DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Lol. Why was corn called a zerger when he was zerging. That's an amazing question. --Rosslessness 12:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Corn wasn't zerging, corn had multiple accounts in the same group. Generaloberst 14:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Ah, I see how that could lead to us having differing opinions on this. Which alts are his? I could probably get some of them off the zerg list, if they aren't in the same burb. --Rosslessness 16:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Damn, I was looking for this quote for ages. Completely pointless now. --I'm not the Ross UDWiki needs, I'm the Ross it deserves. 20:41, 28 September 2012 (BST)
How does the page that you referenced deal with my criticism of your pages being little more than group propaganda? I see no group links at all on that page. Perhaps you were expecting me to have other objections, and just argued against that strawman? -- boxy 13:41, 18 March 2012 (BST)
even more so he is using a joke tactic as his example. pure genuis --User:Sexualharrison13:49, 18 March 2012
Jihad tactics shows images of Jihadists. The pinata page has links to Maltonian Inquisition or however you spell the name. What you call 'propaganda' (I call it fact, or in case of images decoration) is all over the wiki. Generaloberst 14:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Bureaucrat Elections

Hey, Boxy, I've started the Bureaucrat election for your seat. I hope you don't mind, but it was a day overdue, so I just did the leg work. Feel free to correct anything I've done wrong. :P --Shortround }.{ My Contributions 11:25, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

The system is designed so that anyone can start the process, so that's fine and dandy -- boxy 10:57, 16 March 2012 (BST)
Just so you know, Box-man, you can keep your seat. This is not some crazy plan to get into a close race with Boxy for the seat just to withdraw at the very last minute to ensure all my votes don't count, leaving absolutely no time for anyone who voted for me to change their vote, thus ensuring Boxy pretty much wins by default. Nope, definitely not some crazy plan like that. I'm just not that interested right now, but it is nice to see who is willing to trust me with such a role. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 11:10, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Remember me?

Because I remember you and will be very sad if you've forgotten me. --Mikalos209 02:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

yer sliping

(diff | hist) . . UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots‎; 03:54 . . (+93) . . Boxy (Talk | contribs) (→Slambuts: ) YOINK!--User:Sexualharrison12:08, 28 February 2012 (bst)

Just because I didn't change the edit summary, doesn't mean I didn't yoink it, but good, regardless Tongue :P. Getting bored yet, tilting at windmills? -- boxy 12:19, 28 February 2012 (BST) Like.png 156 people like this comment.
i've been playing this game for over 5 years. you tell me. also Don Quixote can kiss my arse!--User:Sexualharrison12:48, 28 February 2012 (bst)

Come.jpg -- boxy 19:35, 28 February 2012 (BST)

Nou.jpg--User:Sexualharrison19:45, 28 February 2012 (bst)
(diff | hist) . . UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots‎; 04:40 . . (+91) . . Boxy (Talk | contribs) (→Scamboxs: ) --User:Sexualharrison12:19, 29 February 2012 (bst)
Congrats, after 3 months of trying, you finally got one through! Time to stop, and be bask in the greatness of your glorious victory? Tongue :P -- boxy 00:30, 1 March 2012 (BST)
i will only accept unconditional surrender--User:Sexualharrison04:02, 1 March 2012 (bst)

and the torch is Passed--User:Sexualharrison13:02, 6 March 2012

Get shorty! Grr! Argh! *shaking fist* -- boxy 01:56, 7 March 2012 (BST)

Spiderzed

Re-ev. Yes? --Rosslessness 09:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Sure, why not -- boxy 10:39, 26 February 2012 (BST)
Don't do it, Boxy. It's a conspiracy to replace you for Spiderzed in the next 'Crat elections. ;) --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 10:44, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Oh no the crats will end up doing stuff on time! ;) DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Im sure thad will find some way to complain. --Rosslessness 13:49, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
I'll misconduct you for not reflecting properly on Bad Attitude Kirsty's valid counter-points. All four of you. -- Spiderzed 21:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

January 2012

Deletions

So are you going to delete that stuff from Harrison's page? --Dhavid Grohl 03:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Dude, if Boxy hasn't deleted it by now, perhaps you need to look up the definition of "sarcasm". --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 03:15, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Yeah, cause you really needed to wait for him not to do it to realise it was sarcasm. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Grohl, I already said on the A/VB page. No one is going to do it, you might as well just do it yourself. Seriously. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 05:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
No. That was just my way of telling harrison to STFU. I'll change back anything that needs doing, if you can tell me which bits he messed with -- boxy 07:09, 22 February 2012 (BST) Dislike.png 1337 people dislike this comment.
didn't work--User:Sexualharrison18:38, 22 February 2012 (bst)

Rev

Re-ev thoughts? --Rosslessness 11:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

I could go either way. The long periods of inactivity are a worry. Perhaps he needs some wiki-drama to inspire some contributions? Tongue :P -- boxy 02:01, 24 January 2012 (BST)
Well I say yes, with a word of caution that he needs to be active occasionally. --Rosslessness 17:25, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Two weeks instead of one, because he showed up at the last minute? Or just plain incompetence on your parts? Christ, do tell me if I need to put up my policy for extending RE's again. -- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley Talk 23:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
If something as small as a week(or a few extra days even) has had an impact on the communities input simply because Revenant has shown intent to stay then they're probably right for waiting. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 19:45, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Forgive me for expressing a position and asking for confirmation from my fellow crat. I could just push them both through now as passed and maybe thad could come up with a policy about that instead. --Rosslessness 21:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Oh, and box, general appears to be a yes as well. Care to confirm? --Rosslessness 21:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
HEY HE GOT FRENZ TO COME AT THE LAST MINUTE HE MUST BE WORTH KEEPING DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 03:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I enjoyed the above comment. Although I'd of spelt it Minit. --Rosslessness 12:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Thats a week without objection, I'll go do it. --Rosslessness 17:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, Ross. Sorry about that -- boxy 11:10, 5 February 2012 (BST)
Some of us do have other concerns, you know. No need to get your panties in a bunch — although I'm always happy to help. Happy ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 12:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Karek

Obvious decision, is obvious. Unless you object for pointless reasons I'll cycle it in the morning as successful. --Rosslessness 18:53, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

He is obviously too much of a threat to our positions of supreme power. Demote him at will... with extreme prejudice! -- boxy 13:02, 18 January 2012 (BST)
What's this? I'M TELLING EVERYONE. --  AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 18:51, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Stuff I really should archive

December 2011

pinata

My changes on the Pinata are not self-promotion. They are fact, just like the Red Rum statistic is fact. If it is not true, that is one thing, find someone with more recorded and I'll agree with you. But if it is true, then you should leave it. --Krazyxman 01:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make a claim like that and have it stick, you'll need to provide evidence/proof to be displayed next to the claim. If you cannot provide such proof, it is highly unlikely it will remain on the page. Also, don't make the page Krazyxman, it will be deleted, all your info has to go on your user page. sorry. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
I have the proof already on my user page which I now linked to instead of the other link. I was unaware of that possibility but now it is fixed. --Krazyxman 02:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
It's not a very interesting fact, and not really noteworthy enough to be on the main page. One guy, who's created 14 pinatas? And it's not proof that you are the "pinata master", it's just evidence that you're the only one who's bothered to collect the screenshots. Red rum were the first group to do it in any coordinated manner, which makes much more of an impact than one guy, and his reviver -- boxy 05:48, 12 December 2011 (BST)
The fact that I have done over 50 is a noteworthy statistic, but I have only started keeping track of them recently as I have said many times before. I have no reason to lie, have been playing the game a while now and have many people, both survivor and zed alike who can testify to my presence and actions in the game. Also, I have no reviver, and while the original intent behind Los Diablos was to utilizing the Pinata as a team strategy, I do not have any active players with which to utilize this opportunity with, and have been operating solo for quite a long time now and I don't even play any alts. --KRaZyXmAn 17:49, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

November 2011

Really?

I leave this place for what feels like eons and you're STILL HERE. I am beginning to think that you are in fact, sir, a robot pretending to be a person/zombie/wiki admin. --Maverick Talk - OBR Praise Knowledge! 404 08:58, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Banbot Wink -- boxy 05:10, 1 December 2011 (BST)

Splambits

NEVER!--User:Sexualharrison15:17, 8 November 2011 (bst) Like.png 50,206 people like this comment.

It's only funny when you can sneak it in without anyone noticing Grr! Argh! *shaking fist* -- boxy 06:10, 10 November 2011 (BST)
I am soooo thumbs-upping Harrison's comment. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 06:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Happy--User:Sexualharrison02:03, 1 December 2011 (bst)
Dislike.png 1337 people dislike this comment.
-- boxy 05:10, 1 December 2011 (BST)
dunna care boychick --User:Sexualharrison05:16, 1 December 2011 (bst)
Come back when you manage to slip one by me Tongue :P -- boxy 09:52, 1 December 2011 (BST)
i did, and past the general. suck it!--User:Sexualharrison06:17, 9 December 2011 (bst)
Oooooh outdoing the general that's tough to do! DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 08:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
ZOWNK! (diff | hist) . . UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots‎; 13:57 . . (+1,382) . . The General (Talk | contribs) (→Spamcox: ) --User:Sexualharrison18:15, 14 December 2011 (bst)
TO THE DEATH! (diff | hist) . . UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Banning/Bots‎; 13:20 . . (+457) . . The General (Talk | contribs) (→Spambµtz: ) --User:Sexualharrison18:19, 15 December 2011 (bst)
Don't make me come over there -- boxy 00:02, 16 December 2011 (BST)
at least i'm consistent--User:Sexualharrison03:20, 24 December 2011 (bst)
I think predictable is the word you're looking for Tongue :P -- boxy 13:50, 24 December 2011 (BST)
no if everyone just put "spambots" in the summary you wouldn't notice it right away. fooking cunt!--User:Sexualharrison15:29, 24 December 2011 (bst)
Are you kidding? I only have to see your name in the edit history, and I know it'll have been changed. Why, why do you do it, Mr Anderson? -- boxy 11:51, 25 December 2011 (BST)
caz i haz 2.--User:Sexualharrison13:42, 25 December 2011 (bst)

September 2011

Arbies

The time has come for you to answer questions. Please proceed to arbitration and answer the questions under your header. Your silence may be rewarded with sweet and bitter cakes. Proceed now before the inquisition.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 12:51, 4 October 2011 (BST)

RHO

Just a heads-up that from Saturday on, he is due for an activity warning by a crat. -- Spiderzed 21:44, 22 September 2011 (BST)

A/RE

Vapor looks like a Keep. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 21:30, 7 September 2011 (BST)

We'll take a chance, eh Wink -- boxy 21:47, 8 September 2011 (BST)

Demotion

Whenever you can please. :) --Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:46, 1 September 2011 (BST)

FFS Revenant hasn't edited in over a week, just do it already.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 10:49, 2 September 2011 (BST)
Oh, we're in a hurry now, are we, after a two weeks lead up? A day or two shouldn't matter after all that -- boxy 11:19, 2 September 2011 (BST)
I was totally going to snipe this but RL has been crazy. At least I got to do Thad! Wink ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾ 01:33, 5 September 2011 (BST)

Archives

Location Editing

Locations talk archive:


Suggestions

Suggestion talk archive:


Moderation

Moderation talk archive


Editing teh Wiki

Editing talk archive:


General Talk

General talk archive: