User talk:Celmare
--
Thadeous Oakley 18:32, 13 August 2010 (BST)
Pathetic Bill
A little while ago you made several edits to Pathetic Bill. Do you have a reason for these? -- Cheese 15:57, 15 August 2010 (BST)
Yes, was following up info received in game that the group was gone, and shown screenshot that the players havent logged for awhile. Also part of their site is propoganda and not berifiable proof, so decided to edit it for accuracy (both on the group's status and on the veracity of their claims). There are only screenshots of a sparse amount of the people they claimed to kill, so the * needed to be added.
If people are going to read about this group, then they need to know what's proveable vs. what isn't in this case.
- Please avoid editing the names of said victims that were killed. By doing such actions it is considered vandalism and you can find yourself temporarily banned for editing the wiki. --
16:32, 15 August 2010 (BST)
Because Pathetic Bill is a group page, what is on the page is up to the members of that group and those outside it are not generally allowed to edit that page. It is considered vandalism on this wiki as a result. Just a head's up. -- Cheese 16:36, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- I know you're trying to be helpful, but don't edit the page again or you'll wind up on A/VB -- Cheese 16:42, 15 August 2010 (BST)
Please do not post false information
I noticed your edits to our page. I just verified in-game that neither of those buildings are EHB, nor were they non-ruined when I scouted them just a couple of hours ago and updated that page. While we do implicitly welcome scouting information from non-MOB members if they wish to provide it, we do require that it be accurate, and yours was not. Additionally, yours had some wiki-code errors that broke the page slightly.
Anyway, long story short, if you're interested in posting scouting info to our page, we generally won't turn it down, but if we find out that you're posting any more inaccurate information, we likely will be pursuing measures to protect our page from your edits. I don't mean to sound scary or intimidating, but it's my job to look after that page, and a lot of zombies depend on it for information, so keeping it accurate is important to me. —Aichon— 23:47, 15 August 2010 (BST)
- Additionally, please be careful about impersonating other users, as I believe you have inadvertently done twice today with the User:DangerReport/Dunstan General Hospital page (and which is why your edits were reverted). You need to switch out the name of the "user" variable when you're editing the page, not just the "comment" variable. Impersonation is considered vandalism on this wiki, but I've chosen not to pursue it as such, since it seems obvious to me that you didn't mean anything by it and were simply making a newbie mistake, which we all made when we first started here. Also, make sure you can back up any claims of zerging or "zed spies", otherwise such claims are better taken to group pages. —Aichon— 01:51, 16 August 2010 (BST)
While you're correct, I forgot to change the name. The characters linked as spies were present in previous posts. Thandar and Austing for two. Now since I didn;t keep the threds to their profiles any longer I won;t post that but you don;t have proof that the MOB took over the hosp either. In fact. I do have an exteded list of the zoms taken within the past month or so in Raines Hills and Chancelton. Most of the ones during the seing are not listed as MOB.
That being said, posting an unproveable (until a link is provided) comment such as you have will have to be amended as well. I can understand the desire to implement imaginative ideas (like destryoing a burgh), but to post in in general info needs visual proof. Propoganda is all well and good, but needs to be kept on your group page. Just the facts here. You can claim that the MOB took Dunstan, but you need to have a link. Otherwise it was just Zeds, and will keep being reverted back to a generic report.
- But if you prefer, since I'm a newbie here, though hardly so ingame, feel free to take it to the administrators for review of factual accuracy. While we're on the topic, if that's the necessary course of action then please also include all the places you've posted similiar MOB claims in Chancelwood, because (as it's already been explained to me by admins here) the general pages needs factual info, while the group pages are where proof is not needed. Thus claims can be stated on group pages, but not need verification.
