User talk:Cyberbob240/Archive2

Main | Talk | Sandpit | Signature | Archive | Talk Archive | Classification List | Arbitration | DEM Roster User talk:Cyberbob/Archive2 Archive Page This page is an archive page of User Talk:Cyberbob240. Please do not add comments to it. This is where my old discussions on my talk page come to die peacefully. No edits on this page other than by me will be tolerated. NOTE: This page will be updated monthly. Editing the Wiki July 2006 User Page You may wish to fiddle with the numbers for padding, and margin a bit. It's hard to tell exactly what effect there will be, a margin-left: .5em and padding: 0.1em would seem a safe bet to me. Sorry I can't get it any better than that. –Xoid S•T•FU! 10:34, 1 July 2006 (BST) Nah, that's fine. Thanks. Cyberbob  Talk  11:04, 1 July 2006 (BST) Speedy Deletions Hi. I have a question about the Speedy Deletion Requests. I have seen a number of pages put into the request list, but can't find the reason for their presence. Where can I find these? User:Rayvern Do you mean the reason for their presence on the Speedy Deletion queue, or their actual presence on the wiki? Cyberbob  Talk  10:07, 6 July 2006 (BST) Their presence on the Speedy Deletion queue.(Their actual existence seems pretty unharmful, not sure why they are being deleted) User:Rayvern 10:08, 6 July 2006 (BST) There is a list of Speedy Deletion Criteria at the top of the page. The pages fall under Criterion 1: "The page contains no more than a line or two of content that cannot clearly be expanded, or consists of random or incoherent content." Have a look at some other location pages, and you'll see what I mean. The style of content on those pages isn't in keeping with the way it should be done. Cyberbob  Talk  10:14, 6 July 2006 (BST) Aaah....now it all makes sense *8-). Sorry...had a bit of an page-interpretational problem - brain wasn't working right this early (it's before 4pm). I'll have a chat to the guy involved and get him to expand on the pages. Any chance I can get him a couple of days reprieve to update the pages properly? (if he doesn't I'll expand them to Stubs level at least). User:Rayvern 10:34, 6 July 2006 (BST) That's perfectly OK. As to the reprieve... OK. I'll give you until Monday. How's that sound? Cyberbob  Talk  10:32, 6 July 2006 (BST) Fine by me. Anything left as current should then be removed - can you warn me about any new stuff we put in that doesn't match the requirement? Many thanks for this. User:Rayvern 10:41, 6 July 2006 (BST) Will do. You're welcome. Cyberbob  Talk  10:38, 6 July 2006 (BST) On an aside note....feel free to remove this section if you feel it is cluttering up your page. I have all the information I need, and don't see an archival requirement for this. Up to you though. User:Rayvern 10:46, 6 July 2006 (BST) Location Rewriting Hi again. Just thought I'd let you know that I've made the first building page upgrade - Wadham Square Police Department. Can you let me know if it doesn't pass muster? User:Rayvern 11:48, 6 July 2006 (BST) Much better. That's great. Cyberbob  Talk  11:46, 6 July 2006 (BST) Vandal ban Hey, I just noticed that you never put the impersonation vandal ban for Bobhammero into Vandal Data. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 17:56, 7 July 2006 (BST) Didn't I? Silly me. I'll fix that up. Thanks for reminding me. Cyberbob  Talk  17:59, 7 July 2006 (BST) Template FTW Check it out: {{GoodOldDays}}. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 00:27, 9 July 2006 (BST) Hahahaha! That's awesome! Cyberbob  Talk  00:37, 9 July 2006 (BST) Thanks. :D I've been feeling nostalgic lately, what with Xoid seeming to have gone more or less inactive, Amazing been banned, the RRF leadership stepping down, increasing amounts of inter-moderator fighting, and all that. Feel free to add any "old-timey" images to the list if you want. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 00:46, 9 July 2006 (BST) Actually, on that note, you haven't seen Xoid lately, have you? –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 05:03, 9 July 2006 (BST) Nope. Cyberbob  Talk  14:35, 9 July 2006 (BST) Gold Blade Why, Cyberbob, why does he have to keep hurting the wiki? I mean, we were all newbies at one point, but this guy is fucking unreal. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 03:10, 10 July 2006 (BST) I find myself asking the same question daily, Bob. I have a theory that Mattiator has somehow managed to clone himself. That's the only rational explanation I can come up with for this sea of retardedness. Cyberbob  Talk  03:13, 10 July 2006 (BST) Perhaps Mattiator has cloned himself... or perhaps scientists have found a way to breed pure retardation, and it's just learned how to use the Internet! Oh God, no. Either way, I find myself growing more and more ornery about it by the day. I might have to leave Project Welcome soon. :P –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 03:16, 10 July 2006 (BST) Hm. I need to check whether I'm still a member or not. I think I may have left abot a month ago, after the pressure of being nice to The Fifth Horseman nearly gave me an anuerysmJK. Cyberbob  Talk  03:20, 10 July 2006 (BST) OK. I wasn't a member. But there are some...amusing members of W!. Mattiator, for one. Some random called ZedKilla. A few others. Cyberbob  Talk  03:22, 10 July 2006 (BST) Actually, I've already decided that I'm leaving it tomorrow, or at least removing it from my sig. Assuming that Kevan/Vista are on time. So probably next month or so. ;) –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 03:46, 10 July 2006 (BST) Proof that Our Time Is Here {{SecretShadowGroup}} –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 07:26, 10 July 2006 (BST) Image deletions So, I know that I'm supposed to be able to delete images that are unused and more than a month old. Any special procedure, or just go ahead and delete 'em? –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 09:22, 11 July 2006 (BST) Um...I don't think so. Make sure to make a comment in the reasoning behind the deletions, though. Congrats on the promotion, by the way! I can't think of anyone else more deserving of it. Cyberbob  Talk  09:36, 11 July 2006 (BST) Thank you. I really appreciate hearing that, especially since I've been a bit... edgy on here lately (I'm taking a nice break from the Suggestions page). –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 09:38, 11 July 2006 (BST) Good idea. I must say, Matthew Fahrenheit's giving the the shits a little... see his comment below. Cyberbob  Talk  09:42, 11 July 2006 (BST) Yeah, he does seem to be extremely eager to manage that page. Honestly, I'm glad. I needed someone to take over that job for me. It gets really tiresome after a while trying to keep the page under control. Feels like wrestling a bear or something (I imagine). Fifteen shitty suggestions, then suddenly a vandalism (or is it a newbie mistake? no time to guess, 'cause you've gotta try to fix all the damage while you're running into edit conflicts). Just way too stressful. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 09:46, 11 July 2006 (BST) I know. That's why I steer clear of modship duties on it, and leave most of it to Jedaz :-P Cyberbob  Talk  09:49, 11 July 2006 (BST) Yeah, he does a great job, and never seems to start yelling at stupid newbies. Bloody amazing if you ask me. :P –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 09:55, 11 July 2006 (BST) Definitely. Cyberbob  Talk  09:58, 11 July 2006 (BST) You know you wanna Brainstorm FTW. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 09:39, 18 July 2006 (BST) If you'd like to know why... See here. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 19:26, 27 July 2006 (BST) Pretending to be a Mod When have I ever done that? --Paradox244 16:45, 29 July 2006 (BST) I meant that if it were up to me he would be banned already. I didn't mean that I have the capability to do so. I'll try to be more clear in the future. --Paradox244 17:06, 29 July 2006 (BST) Thanks. Cyberbob  Talk  17:07, 29 July 2006 (BST) Thank you for bringing the matter to my attention. --Paradox244 21:07, 29 July 2006 (BST) A better way to strike Just letting you know that I've created a new template, {{Strike}}, that should allow us to strike comments and other things in a superior way to how we normally strike things. Once the wiki is updated and we can use templates inside of other templates, this will be even handier (e.g., we can use it on the suggestions page). Here's an example of it in action: while right now we strike things, it's even better to strike them in style. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 21:01, 29 July 2006 (BST) August 2006 Because different people are different {{JustSayNo}} (see my user page) –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 23:33, 2 August 2006 (BST) HA! That's awesome! Cyberbob  Talk  09:09, 3 August 2006 (BST) Just thought you might want to know I thought that you might want to know that the archive and moderation services templates run into your side bar (I'm using Fire fox at 1024x768, but it looks fine in IE). I thought I might mention it in case you want to try and do something about it. - Jedaz 08:06, 15 August 2006 (BST) I'd say it's to do with your resolution - I don't know why IE has no problems with it, though. Cyberbob  Talk  08:41, 15 August 2006 (BST) Jedaz, could you send me a pair of screenshots, along with version information for Firefox and IE? Since I helped Cyberbob with fixing that part of his page up, I'm most intruiged with this particular discrepancy. –Xoid S•T•FU! 10:03, 15 August 2006 (BST) There you go, I've sent a screen shot of the page and the version details. Hope that helps. - Jedaz 10:17, 15 August 2006 (BST) IE as well please. I've got a sneaky suspicion that this is a case where Microsoft's failure to follow web standards actually results in something that looks better. Heh, that'd be the day. –Xoid S•T•FU! 10:24, 15 August 2006 (BST) There you go, sorry it took so long, I was a bit pre-occupied with a few things. - Jedaz 11:28, 15 August 2006 (BST) My suspicion was right. This is due to IE 6 not supporting the float rule under CSS. –Xoid S•T•FU! 11:30, 15 August 2006 (BST) Fuckin Templates on the Suggestion Page Am I off base, or am I right in thinking that the suggestion page is no place for those godawful "Suggestion has been removed" templates? It looks makes the page look like shit. --Mookiemookie 19:49, 17 August 2006 (BST) Agreed. I hate those too.. --Niilomaan GRR! 20:00, 17 August 2006 (BST) Ew. I just saw them for the first time. Do you know who made it? Cyberbob  Talk  07:19, 18 August 2006 (BST) Gold Blade. I thought it was funny. Once or twice. –Xoid S•T•FU! 08:33, 18 August 2006 (BST) Gold Blade, eh? I should've known that retard was behind this. (Can you go on MSN, Xoid?) Cyberbob  Talk  08:43, 18 August 2006 (BST) Vandalism revert test Thank you for "vandalising" the test page :D Anyway, you might be interested in the results: Moves are a bitch to revert (if you didn't know that already). Rollback won't work, since it doesn't considered moves, but individual pages (ie, it tries to rollback the redirect page, but since the mover is the only one whose edit is there it won't do anything). Only thing I managed to rollback was your actual edits (both of them), but the page remained at the moved location. And the page move revert only reverts the latest move. We seriously need some heavier weapons to revert this type of things. --Brizth M T 13:17, 18 August 2006 (BST) You're welcome. Maybe mention it to Kevan on his talk page? Cyberbob  Talk  13:24, 18 August 2006 (BST) My Awesome Idea Hi, can you please check out my idea.[1] It would be quite cool and nice if this was made.--Canuhearmenow 20:51, 22 August 2006 (BST) Your report of my "spam"... Yeah, all those people were on a list. I was going to invite you, but there's a message for it on our board. Just thought I'd clarify that. --A1C JerryASS•PK•ASA•T 10:23, 29 August 2006 (BST) OK. You're kind of lucky you didn't continue; 13 or more, and you would've definitely recieved a warning. That should probably be codified, really. Cyberbob  Talk  10:27, 29 August 2006 (BST) Codified? What do you mean? --A1C JerryASS•PK•ASA•T 10:37, 29 August 2006 (BST) Made official, instead of left up to chance. –Xoid S•T•FU! 10:41, 29 August 2006 (BST) As in a recruitng ad? --A1C JerryASS•PK•ASA•T 10:43, 29 August 2006 (BST) That wasn't what I meant by official, I meant making the 13 posts an official rule of thumb. Anyway: what you're supposed to do is use the recruitment page for recruitment. Not go around placing messages everywhere. –Xoid S•T•FU! 10:59, 29 August 2006 (BST) Why? 11:47, August 30, 2006 Xoid (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Risk (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (3 page) 17:52, August 31, 2006 Cyberbob240 (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Risk (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (Sockpuppet of a vandal) Sorta redundant, wasn't it? –Xoid S•T•FU! 09:19, 31 August 2006 (BST) Oh. Didn't notice that. :-P Cyberbob  Talk  09:32, 31 August 2006 (BST) September 2006 Special:Random Could you please link your signature to your user page, not to Special:Random ? While nubis do the same, he signs the same name as his user name. You sign as a bothan spy and your user name is cyberbob240, so it isnt that easy for someone who doesnt know you well to reach your user page. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 19:40, 9 September 2006 (BST) Awww.... OK. Cyberbob  Talk  03:39, 10 September 2006 (BST) From Rzar Rzar here, you told me on CDF boards to post for a complete fix and timestamp with all the fixins (Recruitment Fix also). So here I am, feel free to delete later.--Amc 19:43, 20 September 2006 (BST) Fixed the comment--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 19:43, 20 September 2006 (BST) Question Rather then clogging up Misconduct I was wondering if you could point me to where Gold Blade admitted to this 'vandalism'? I don't see in in the vandalism case so obviously I'm missing something. - Jedaz - 21:02/19/04/2024 10:50, 25 September 2006 (BST) It's here. I honestly don't think it was vandalism, but precedent (others getting warned/banned for calling Jjames Scinfaxi) forces my hand. Cyberbob  Talk  10:52, 25 September 2006 (BST) Who else got warned for that? I seriously must have missed it. There were a number of cases that Hagnat conveniently skipped over. Anyway if you noticed, Gold Blade doesn't actualy say that he called Jjames Scinfaxi, just that he used the two names at one stage. Well I can understand if you don't want to go against precedent, but do you really think it's fair for someone to be banned for a week just for that? Also if you are taking that stance I would like to point out that there are still a number of cases which need to be ruled upon. Well thats all I'm going to bother you about this topic any more. I'll leave it in your hands. - Jedaz - 21:02/19/04/2024 11:02, 25 September 2006 (BST) I'm agreeing with you, but I do think the line needs to be drawn somewhere. Sure, it isn't really vandalism, but it sure as hell isn't good faith. Cyberbob  Talk  11:09, 25 September 2006 (BST) October 2006 IP blocking Please, don't use range blocks when blocking proxies. For regular proxies it is of no use since in most cases they have one, static IP, and you potentially block legitimate users. For example, when you blocked those four /16 ranges, you blocked 262144 (or 4*2^16) IPs. --Brizth M T 09:55, 1 October 2006 (BST) November 2006 That Image Please define "explicid". It didn't seem THAT bad to me. -Lud Lum, 15th November 2006. You know what I mean. Keep the wiki clean, please. Cyberbob  Talk  22:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC) The Preview Button Um... what do you mean "the preview button is your friend"... did I do something wrong? If so, where? Thanks for your time. --Leutinuet Benjamin 02:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC) I noticed you made a bunch of edits to that one guy's talk page. It's not that big of a deal - just that the server has to store each and every edit made to a page. It eases some of that load if you use the preview button. Cyberbob  Talk  08:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC) This Edit Thanks for the warning, but dumb question: Should I have just removed the entire thing and redone it in my own words? The entry seemed valid, just messy and becoming a bit off topic, and I'm not sure if there IS a policy on sigs on timestamps on Suburb pages...whats the best way to deal with that in a NPOV area? --MorthBabid 19:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC) December 2006 Non-author comment struck Funny how when I'm the author of a suggestion and i'm trying to make an Re to an ignorant SAPM vote that you step in and remove it. You'll find I have undone your striking, as I was trying to fix the formatting. Please, if you're going to do things like that, at least make sure that YOU haven't also made a mistake --Panserbjørn 15:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC) Har. I don't see any SAPM votes on that suggestion, so you're obviously mistaken. Cyberbob  Talk  15:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC) OK, so I made a typo, three points to you. I had signed my comment, but I had also broken the formatting - which I was attempting to fix. --Panserbjørn 15:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC) First time's the charm, bucko. Cyberbob  Talk  15:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC) CGR I almost did that, but then I thought, isn't that policy still in voting? The current actual M/G still has the old rules. I didn't realize he was an alt.--'STER-Talk-ModP! 01:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Criticism July 2006 August 2006 Coalition for Fair Tactics The CDF is currently against it, partly due to the fact that it condemns the DEM's UDTool. please remove your name from the signees --DJSMITH CDF 17:20, 4 August 2006 (BST) It doesn't condemn the use of UDTool. What are you on about? –Xoid S•T•FU! 17:47, 4 August 2006 (BST) Er, DJ, I'm not on the list as part of the CDF. I'm on as a player of UD. I'm not representative of the CDF in any way. Xoid, I believe he is referring to DEMON. Cyberbob  Talk  01:04, 5 August 2006 (BST) The Plague The rules of The Plague forbid joining organized sieges. I request that you either drop The Plague tags from here on the Wiki(yes I noticed you are not wearing them ingame) or stop following the Big Bash. Tordeck 21:56, 4 August 2006 (BST) Big Bash is organized? Dude we say hit this suburb and people do that. We're about as organized Cat Herders. Sonny Corleone WTF RRF ASS 21:57, 4 August 2006 (BST) Your more orgainzed then The Plague allow. Tordeck 05:13, 5 August 2006 (BST) Didn't you hear, Valafar? I'm not with the Big Bash anymore. apocalypsenow is making his way back to Plague territory. Cyberbob  Talk  01:14, 5 August 2006 (BST) Last I knew you had stopped for the Giddings Siege and continued on with them when they left. Tordeck 05:13, 5 August 2006 (BST) Well, now you do know. Cyberbob  Talk  08:57, 5 August 2006 (BST) Matthew Fahrenheit Cyberbob, the point that I wanted to make in the Deletion's page is that I don't want to vote "delete" because though that template looks hideous, it's totally optative for authors to use it and it could still be improved. Maybe we don't like the current state, but personally I don't like a lot of stuff and that only is no reason for putting them up on Deletions. When Xoid made his commentary, I think I clearly stated that he confused a general statement with a particular one. For your knowledge I mentioned the Tourette's Syndrome because I learnt in my childhood that people with that syndrom had involuntary swearing as a tic, but now that I read Wikipedia's article I see that that's just one of the many forms of this particular disorder, that involves 15% of the people with Tourette's Syndrome and it's called Coprolalia). Finally, I don't know how much do you like or hate me: I laughed at my description based on "Flame Warriors" altough I think it miss my personality (and age) by a mile. I don't like to swear or degrade the other party when engaged on a discussion, so I don't like when you do that, and probably there's plenty that you don't like of me (i.e. my arrogant talk) but don't you think it won't hurt us if we try to keep criticism on civil levels as much as we can? I hope you agree and don't just seek a meaningless "victory" on the Internet. --Matthew Fahrenheit YRC | T | W! 06:27, 19 August 2006 (BST) Stop clogging up this page with your inane bullshit? I don't really think that you need to be quite so angry, Cyberbob. I see this community rushing to anger with little to no provocation, and casual antagonism just adds to this culture of rancor. I'm not asking for everyone to trade Hello Kitty stickers or anything, but it does seem counterproductive when a mod tells someone to "Shut Up". My understanding is that users can post opinions and questions in the M/VB forum. If there is a rule or a policy that I am violating, then please link to it and I'll comply. But in any case I'd like to sincerely ask that you temper your vitriol. This was not written to sound smarmy or condecending or sarcastic. Thank you. --Kiki Lottaboobs 05:35, 20 August 2006 (BST) I've been controlling my temper for longer than you might think. You were clogging up a public page with bullshit. Bullshit is reserved for private pages, like group or user talk pages. Cyberbob  Talk  05:44, 20 August 2006 (BST) Could you please post an example of something I said in that discussion that was not pertinant to the specific case? --Kiki Lottaboobs 12:41, 20 August 2006 (BST) No, it was all very pertinent. But the moderator had already ruled it not vandalism, so any further discussion should be held on someone's talk page. Cyberbob  Talk  22:20, 20 August 2006 (BST) That's what happened. Moderation was made at 23:06, August 19. My last comment in that "thread" was made 32 hours prior to the ruling. I commented twice, and then 32+ hours later a ruling was made. I added no further discussion in that case after the ruling. My activity was neither clogging, nor was it bullshit nor was anything I said posted after the ruling. --Kiki Lottaboobs 18:03, 21 August 2006 (BST) OK, I apologise. Not for the comment on M/VB, but for blaming you for it here. Boxy and Saromu were the ones spamming, not you. I do have one question, though; why comment here if you weren't the one spamming? Hm? Cyberbob  Talk  21:41, 21 August 2006 (BST) September 2006 Wtf? Whats your problem? --Gold Blade Hunt! 17:27, 2 September 2006 (BST) What's yours? Cyberbob  Talk  17:38, 2 September 2006 (BST) My problem with MrA? My problem is that I and many others have given him good advice, and he ignores it. We tell him why the idea is bad, and he says we vote because we don't like him. He won't put anything up on the suggestions discussion because he says he gets flamed. Well, I have never seen one. He tried to make a policy designed to help just him. In short: he is purposefully trying to make us angry. I am getting really fed up with him. --Gold Blade Hunt! 17:44, 2 September 2006 (BST) Keep it under check. Or I'll do it for you. I know! How about, you don't look at his suggestions? Find something else to occupy your time. Cyberbob  Talk  18:11, 2 September 2006 (BST) Just so you know, I was about to apologize to him when you and Xoid came and made me remember exactly why i did that. Then I decided that he didn't really deserve it. I might think about it again later. --Gold Blade Hunt! 18:59, 2 September 2006 (BST) Pfft. Sure you were. You really expect me to believe that? You're a bigger idiot than I thought you were. And that's saying something. Cyberbob  Talk  19:00, 2 September 2006 (BST) Sad. --Gold Blade Hunt! 19:01, 2 September 2006 (BST) Your Message Now bob, why would you leave me a meesage like that? --Robert Charland 6:40, 03 September 2006 (BST) Because the preview button is there for a reason; to prevent edits from clogging up the server. Cyberbob  Talk  06:45, 3 September 2006 (BST) Digeridoo! Dost thou know how to play one? I hath purchased on in Australia and am not that good. Lol aussie stereotypes--Admiral Ackbar U! WTF 22:10, 5 September 2006 (BST) Er...no. Cyberbob  Talk  02:21, 6 September 2006 (BST) You should. Otherwise I'll eat a ham sandwich. --ĢΘζđ ЫǺđє 16:39, 16 September 2006 (BST) Are you allergic to ham? Cyberbob  Talk  16:37, 16 September 2006 (BST) Possibly. BLEAGH! --ĢΘζđ ЫǺđє 16:39, 16 September 2006 (BST) October 2006 Where is the love? I love you, why don't you love me? ♥♥♥♥UpsettingNot a Moderator 00:14, 6 October 2006 (BST) WTF? Why the hell did you wanker my user page? --SporeSore 16:08, 8 October 2006 (BST) Hm... I just don't know. It might have had something to do with reverting a proxy user's vandalism... but I'm just not sure. Cyberbob  Talk  16:18, 8 October 2006 (BST) It wasn't you Cyberbob, it was the edit you reverted. --Brizth M T 16:26, 8 October 2006 (BST) I know. I was being sarcastic. *sighs* Cyberbob  Talk  16:28, 8 October 2006 (BST) Sarcasm, what's that? :D --Brizth M T 17:11, 8 October 2006 (BST) D: Cyberbob  Talk  17:33, 8 October 2006 (BST) Our Suggestions Page Edit War Cyberbob, I spend quite a lot of time editing the suggestions pages. In doing so, I follow the rules of the page. I move spammed suggestions. I remove Duped suggestions. I sort suggestions into Previous Days, Peer Reviewed and so on. Within the rules provided on the page, I strike invalid votes if they have no signatures, or if they provide no reasoning for their vote. I also strike non-author Re comments and also multiple Re replies. I apply the same logic in all cases - that of the rules provided on the page. It's not personal, I'm just following the example of, well, Gage - who used to do all of that stuff before he was made into a mod. Now, as you know, you and I have ventured into an edit tit-for-tat. I removed your vote because it had no reasoning. I don't see any reason why you should be immune from the rules everyone else has to abide by - the rules that are written clearly on the page and, presumably, were created and voted on as policy for that page by the community. You, on the other hand, are incorrectly striking my Notes as non-author replies - which they are not. They are notes. There is a clear difference between the two, and it is explained in the rules section of the suggestions page. I don't want some kind of mad edit war with you, or to enter into the drama of arbitration, but I don't understand why you're behaving as if the rules that apply to everyone else don't apply to you. Can you please respond? --Funt Solo 09:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Actually, the section of the rules you're quoting were inserted without discussion by Jedaz, back when he was still a mod, and when he was on his attention-starvation-get-back-at-the-wiki plan thing. Sorry. Cyberbob  Talk  09:34, 7 November 2006 (UTC) If that's the case, then why haven't they been deleted by a moderator? If the rules are not to be followed, then fine, but if that's the case, then they shouldn't apply to anyone, and they shouldn't be there. It's hardly fair for you to have a set of secret rules that you abide by, because of your knowledge of the history of the wiki, and for everyone else to think that the rules written down are actually valid. You can see why there's a problem? --Funt Solo 09:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC) They're in the process of being deleted... it's complicated. There have been other changes made to the same sections since then, many of them beneficial and sanctioned by others. Give us a little time, OK? We just found out about the fucking changes, so you can come right down off that high horse, mister. Cyberbob  Talk  09:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Look, I'm trying to meet you half way here, because I don't want a big disagreement. Please don't start verbally abusing me. I can swear just as much as anyone ("bugger, fuck, cunt" - see?) - and I'm not trying to take a superior position. Isn't it the case that the rules, as written, are followed on this wiki? That's what Xoid is always saying over in the policy section. My issue is that I'm following the rules as written, but you're not. The simplest solution would be for you to swallow your pride and provide a reason for your vote - even if it's just "as above". Then there wouldn't be any rule breach, or any disagreement. As to it being a complicated process - all you have to do is delete this line: "Votes that do not have reasoning behind them are invalid. You MUST justify your vote." It doesn't seem that complicated to me. Once that line's gone, I'm happy not to abide to the rule. --Funt Solo 09:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC) We've tried to step away from the rules naziing somewhat, Funt. Following them blindly became irritating; people were striking out "invalid" votes all the time, for even the most minor of reasons and it was beginning to piss people off. There's a reason why illegal Res are often outright ignored: rocking the boat simply because you can is dickish behaviour. If someone is going to post the same reasoning every time (e.g., "it sucks arse", "inane", etc.) then why necessitate that they write it? Pressuring Cyberbob into writing "SSS" over "No" isn't going to reduce the number of spam votes and all you're doing is pissing people off. This is why established voters tend to get overlooked for that rule. –Xoid M•T•FU! 10:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Okay, point taken, and thanks for explaining your position. I still think that rule should be removed, though. If it doesn't apply to one, it shouldn't apply to anyone - otherwise it's open to misinterpretation, confusion and bad feeling, as here. You see, from my POV, I thought I was doing the right thing by the contributers to that page - ensuring that they're provided with valid votes. I never set out to piss anyone off. Probably best if I take a back seat from the Suggestions page editing now, and let the moderators deal with it in their own way. Please make the rules clearer so that no future contributers fall into the trap I have. Regards. --Funt Solo 10:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC) The real problem is "explain your vote" is so vague it's not funny. As long as you have an explanation, no matter how inane, you manage to fulfill that requirement. So it tends to be ignored in practice. It's another area that needs reform. –Xoid M•T•FU! 03:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC) Funt? Do me a favor and don't compare yourself to me.--Gage 04:02, 8 November 2006 (UTC) Gage? The last thing someone needs when they've made a bit of a tit of themselves is for a troll to come along and rub their nose in it. I think it's clear from the above exchange, where I say "okay, point taken", that I agree with Xoid that my blind enactment of the rules, as written, was pretty stupid. Really, your input at this juncture isn't helpful, or welcome, and given your glowing diplomatic record of exchanges, I feel quite justified in saying this - just fuck right off. --Funt Solo 09:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC) November 2006 December 2006 Moved Please don't move my policy out of voting - it has been discussed for 24 hours in the Policy Discussion section of the Suggestions page, both this month and last (check the archives), including the core concept of the suggestion. I will willingly enter Arbitration if you disagree, but don't start another edit war, please. --Funt Solo 17:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC) No. No, no, no. You can wait your 24 hours, like everyone else. Cyberbob  Talk  17:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Arbitration it is, then. --Funt Solo 17:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Feud Still holding some kind of feud against me? I'll just sit here and watch how you mess up until you actually try to talk (or read, because while you mess up moving pages and berating me, other people more open to conversation solve the problem by talking, and thus you only have to read what they said). May this serve as a lesson that a careful decission may be better than a hasty one one certain situations. Read Gage's talk page, and try to understand that I don't have anything against particular persons (even you, no matter how much you piss me off), I just try to comprehend what are everyone's traits and capabilities. --Matthew Fahrenheit YRC☺T☺+1 07:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC) Feud? Har. You give yourself far too much credit. Also - what decision are you talking about? Cyberbob  Talk  08:58, 24 December 2006 (UTC) Already answered most of your drivel elsewhere, but there is some real gold here. Gage botched the page moves. You started the tension by coming off as one of the most pompous arseholes I know of, and since I'm including myself in that category that must've been pretty fucking bad. You pulled the lion's tail and one of the pride attacked you. Boo, fucking, hoo. –Xoid M•T•FU! 11:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC) This is such an {{ohsnap}} moment. --Gage 11:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC) Come here, kitty kitty kitty.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 11:20, 24 December 2006 (UTC) Praise July 2006 Fuck You That's all I'm saying. Sonny Corleone WTF RRF ASS CoL 19:52, 25 July 2006 (BST) (On a serious note, have I done anything that deserves an update on classifications?) Sonny Corleone WTF RRF ASS CoL 19:52, 25 July 2006 (BST) Probably. Take a look through it, you might find one or two that seem to fit you, then suggest them. If you get the cogs turning by giving him a kick-start, he should update it. –Xoid S•T•FU! 20:02, 25 July 2006 (BST) August 2006 The Basket Gold in the Basket Max Grivas sees the basket as half full not half empty. He wants to fix it. --Max Grivas JG,T,Max4Mod,F! 04:38, 31 August 2006 (BST) >_> This needs to stay between us, y'know? Real quiet like. <_< Cyberbob  Talk  08:39, 31 August 2006 (BST) September 2006 {{QuoteMulti}} and {{Quote}} Nice job on the templates, they should turn out to be quite useful. Keep up the good work. - Jedaz - 21:02/19/04/2024 15:24, 17 September 2006 (BST) Thanks. One thing about {{QuoteMulti}}: if you want italics with it, you're going to have to manually put them in, as template fields don't span multiple lines. Cyberbob  Talk  15:26, 17 September 2006 (BST) QuoteMulti got deleted as I made it completely redundant. Guess you might as well remove the links for it now. –Xoid S•T•FU! 16:14, 21 September 2006 (BST) Thanks You have proven your objectivity even when people you dislike are involved. Thank god one of the mods here finally got what was going on.--Gage 15:11, 25 September 2006 (BST) No probs. Cyberbob  Talk  15:16, 25 September 2006 (BST) Haha, I put it at the top instead of the bottm because Xoid likes it better that way XD.--Gage 15:18, 25 September 2006 (BST) October 2006 Just because Feel the Love This user is a Mod, and is loved for their efforts towards fighting stupidity. Conndrakamod T CFT 14:31, 9 October 2006 (BST) Why thank you! Cyberbob  Talk  21:49, 9 October 2006 (BST) And Thank you for the Cookie sir... Conndrakamod T CFT 12:56, 10 October 2006 (BST) No probs. You're doing a fantastic job. I'd help out, but I'm off to bed... Cyberbob  Talk  13:00, 10 October 2006 (BST) All your wiki are belong to us Hysterical... keep coming back to re-read it when I need a laugh... well done! Barbecue Barbecue 22:42, 14 October 2006 (BST) Thanks! Cyberbob  Talk  01:11, 15 October 2006 (BST) November 2006 December 2006 Other July 2006 Apologies Recently I was experimenting with the suburb danger settings, since I'm new to this wiki. In order to practice I made three suburbs safe, planning to revert them back to dangerous. However, I forgot to copy the new code to make them dangerous again, and pressing CTRL-V just posted the safe code again. I apologize for this mistake, I did not intend to vandalize anything, this was a complete mistake, I am sorry if this caused any trouble. Also, I am glad there are people like you in the wiki who respond quickly to possible vandals. Thanks and great work! --Abslch 01:53, 10 July 2006 (BST) You're welcome...I guess. Cyberbob  Talk  02:22, 10 July 2006 (BST) MSN You there? –Xoid S•T•FU! 17:03, 4 July 2006 (BST) Deedra X Wouldn't it have been easier to transfer them to the CDF, than to start a new character? –Xoid S•T•FU! 14:41, 6 July 2006 (BST) Good point. I'll see if I can still log on to Deedra. Cyberbob  Talk  15:09, 6 July 2006 (BST) xoid and Anton Howard were inactive for almost 3 months and still exist, so you shouldn't have any problems there. Hope it works out. –Xoid S•T•FU! 15:44, 6 July 2006 (BST) "…an honourable meatshield in the fight…" Heh. –Xoid S•T•FU! 15:48, 6 July 2006 (BST) Yup, Deedra is back in action. Thanks for the tip! Cyberbob  Talk  16:10, 6 July 2006 (BST) No probs. Sorry about the lack of indentation. >_< –Xoid S•T•FU! 16:24, 6 July 2006 (BST) Misconduct case I found something interesting and I just wanted to share it to someone that holds (more or less) the same opinion than me: General reporting to his Commander in Chief. It's pretty funny and sad to see how everything goes in circles and even banned he has still that much influence here. --Matthew Fahrenheit Talk 06:40, 8 July 2006 (BST) Is Amazing Motorhed there? Cyberbob  Talk  06:42, 8 July 2006 (BST) Yah. --Matthew Fahrenheit Talk 06:43, 8 July 2006 (BST) That is truly sad. Yet, somehow not surprising. *shrugs* Thanks for that. You just made my day. Cyberbob  Talk  06:45, 8 July 2006 (BST) My response to your comment regarding this on my page: Not a problem. I was sick of it too, and went and hammered it shut as soon as i realised i could. --Grim s-Mod U! 23:01, 8 July 2006 (BST) Strange Is it just me, or is the wiki really quiet lately? I don't get it. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 09:35, 8 July 2006 (BST) Um...kind of. There is that Misconbitration case, and those Arbitration cases. But I know what you mean. I guess it's because the normal drama generators (Scinfaxi, Mpaturet etc.) just don't take an interest any more. Cyberbob  Talk  10:10, 8 July 2006 (BST) Maybe that's it. I dunno, it seems like within the past few days, very little has happened at all. I normally see you and Xoid doing stuff at least, but even you guys seem to have been fairly inactive, aside from some stuff over at M/M. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 10:52, 8 July 2006 (BST) Archive wouldn't normaly have bothered but as i started the thread i thought it reasonable to put in one last comment. would have done so before it was archived but haven't had time. won't do it again.--Honestmistake 18:14, 8 July 2006 (BST) Thanks. Cyberbob  Talk  22:50, 8 July 2006 (BST) Vote strikeout It was agreed by me and Grim that when a vote has no timestamp because the voter had mistakingly used 3 "~" instead of 4, the action we should take is to construct the timestamp ourselves and hint the voter with the proper way to sign. The only reason for striking out these kind of votes is to ease the work of the people that administer suggestion's after the voting's deadline, but when you add that comment on it, as Grim said, "(the comment's) timestamps have already anchored them on the realm of surety". Check the discussion in mine and Grim s's Talk page if you want. --Matthew Fahrenheit Talk 02:51, 10 July 2006 (BST) New Template i created a template to honor the occasion with Steel Hammer: I hope you like it (and can take a joke!) Wiki Gestapo This user is a member of the Wiki Gestapo. --talk 05:39, 10 July 2006 (BST) Awesome! I wasn't objecting to Gestapo as a Nazi thing; it was more the harshness that it implies. Cyberbob  Talk  05:43, 10 July 2006 (BST) Already a deletion case. From Saromu. Surprise, surprise. WTF is wrong with people nowdays? All this politically correct bullshit is really beginning to piss me off. It's a fucking joke, even he acknowledged that it was funny, so why the fucking fuss? –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:19, 10 July 2006 (BST) Arbitration Are you sure that Denzel Washington and Banana Bear 4 are one and the same? I'm still certain that that is a crock of shit. Check M/A for a list of people who have claimed to be Denzel Washington, and perhaps you'll understand why I'm skeptical of it. –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:19, 10 July 2006 (BST) I never said I was sure. I think I read somewhere a while ago that he was. I'm probably wrong but. Cyberbob  Talk  06:22, 10 July 2006 (BST) Wiki Gestapo Join my group! --talk 05:35, 11 July 2006 (BST) Hm...I'll think about it. Cyberbob  Talk  09:49, 11 July 2006 (BST) Give Him a Break We've all been in his position once. Cut him some slack. –Xoid S•T•FU! 16:20, 15 July 2006 (BST) Give who a break? Cyberbob  Talk  23:24, 15 July 2006 (BST) The General. –Xoid S•T•FU! 09:08, 18 July 2006 (BST) Arbitration case It wuold be rude of my part not to notify you: I started an Arbitration case about our little edit war. --Matthew Fahrenheit YRC | T | W! 01:33, 16 July 2006 (BST) I already replied. Cyberbob  Talk  01:34, 16 July 2006 (BST) Any particular reason you don't want me to arbitrate? --Darth Sensitive talk • W! 01:36, 16 July 2006 (BST) Yes. There is. Cyberbob  Talk  01:37, 16 July 2006 (BST) Are you willing to share? --Darth Sensitive talk • W! 01:40, 16 July 2006 (BST) Sure. Your opinion on the Spam vote issue makes you biased. Cyberbob  Talk  01:41, 16 July 2006 (BST) Good enough. I don't really agree with you on bias. I can see both sides - but my campaign is really against rudeness on the wiki in general. Thanks. --Darth Sensitive talk • W! 01:50, 16 July 2006 (BST) I have accepted your request to serve as arbitrator. Thank you for your trust in my neutrality and fairness. Please review M/A for instructions on what I request. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 03:22, 16 July 2006 (BST) My Suggestion Remove Things From Menus. –Xoid S•T•FU! 09:10, 18 July 2006 (BST) Ohh... heres mine as well, lol. But I seriously would like to see your constructive feedback on it. - Jedaz 09:16, 18 July 2006 (BST) Of course. Jedaz, I'm only mean to suggestors on the actual Suggestions page, when they've not bothered to go through Talk:Suggestions. Cyberbob  Talk  09:20, 18 July 2006 (BST) He he, yeah I noticed, and thanks for checking it out for me. - Jedaz 09:24, 18 July 2006 (BST) It's live, baby! –Xoid S•T•FU! 07:30, 20 July 2006 (BST) Labine50 Pwnage. All round. God I hope that pus-bucket goes and slits his wrists over this. That'd be so emo. –Xoid S•T•FU! 07:30, 20 July 2006 (BST) The sky's the limit when you're dreaming... Cyberbob  Talk  07:32, 20 July 2006 (BST) Remember kids, it's down the road, not across the street! --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 07:34, 20 July 2006 (BST) Knowing Labine, he'd fuck up and cut his finger trying to pick up the razor. Cyberbob  Talk  07:35, 20 July 2006 (BST) Hopefully he'll bleed to death in the process. –Xoid S•T•FU! 07:36, 20 July 2006 (BST) Nah...his veins are too clogged up with what his mummy refers to as "puppy fat". Cyberbob  Talk  07:38, 20 July 2006 (BST) Only in this case, it's actually derived from eating puppies. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 07:39, 20 July 2006 (BST) LMFAO. Cyberbob  Talk  07:40, 20 July 2006 (BST) Maybe it will be a rusty razor. Tetanus FTW! –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 07:41, 20 July 2006 (BST) Razor, nothin'. I'm rooting for a chainsaw. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 07:44, 20 July 2006 (BST) How is he going to use a chainsaw on himself? Remember, he has trouble controlling his left hand... Cyberbob  Talk  07:45, 20 July 2006 (BST) Right now, I'm envisioning something like the process whereby soldiers in ancient times would fall on their swords. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 07:47, 20 July 2006 (BST) Slitting your wrists with a chainsaw would be a little excessive, wouldn't it? I mean, it's obvious that the guy has to type by banging his arms against the keyboard and hoping something intelligible comes out. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 07:47, 20 July 2006 (BST) Or seppuku, where they disembowel themselves and have someone behind them to behead them. We could rock off for the privilege to be the second guy... Cyberbob  Talk  07:49, 20 July 2006 (BST) Too much is never enough, Bob. Besides, I've always pegged him as more of a face-typer myself. --Jimbo Bob ASS•U! 07:51, 20 July 2006 (BST) But he doesn't have a face. He has a head, and there's this... surface on it, with these sort of half-formed features... it's disgusting. Nothing there I would call a face. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 07:54, 20 July 2006 (BST) That's what happens when you type with your face. –Xoid S•T•FU! 08:03, 20 July 2006 (BST) Labine50 is a loser, amirite? Sonny Corleone WTF 02:33, 22 July 2006 (BST) Shit Groups Speedy Delete the guys template two minutes after he creates it? Evil. But really funny. Check this out to stop that from ever happening again. UDWiki:Moderation/Policy Discussion/Creating a Group Page Sonny Corleone WTF 02:33, 22 July 2006 (BST) Why do I feel misconbitration coming on? Two edits and perma ban. Exactly how long do you think it is going to take Zod to show up for this? –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:09, 22 July 2006 (BST) I don't particularly care. I'll win. Cyberbob  Talk  06:11, 22 July 2006 (BST) I dont see how. Regardless, I'm sure Amazing does this everytime one of us says something he doesn't like. To hell with the fact that I was being honest about the Crossman Defense Force's page looking dicky with that *Malton's Fighting Elite* up there. –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:13, 22 July 2006 (BST) Wait. You don't see how what? Cyberbob  Talk  06:15, 22 July 2006 (BST) Cause your in trouble now bob! That Zod sure is a bad bad man! He once killed a man just for opening a window! He traveled central America leaving a wake of blood and babies! The end is Nigh bob! A reckoning comes! a reckoning named.... ZOD RHOMBUS!-That's Why I did your Wife 06:18, 22 July 2006 (BST) I don't see how you'll win. You know that mods are powerless, right? Unless there is a parlimentary inquiry, we aren't allowed to use our powers for anything. –Xoid S•T•FU! 06:28, 22 July 2006 (BST) A vandalism case could be brought forwards against CyberBob. I know of something that would be counted as vandalism, but I'll wait for about 40 Minutes before I bring it forwards so that theres a chance to fix it up and all. - Jedaz 06:35, 22 July 2006 (BST) Huh? What are you on about? Cyberbob  Talk  06:42, 22 July 2006 (BST) Oh. Gotcha. You know, it would've been a whole lot easier just to actually, you know, tell me what it was? Saves me a whole lot of angst. Cyberbob  Talk  06:47, 22 July 2006 (BST) Yeah true, but I'm starting to get sick of seeing all of these suggestions being removed "Just because a mod can", three spam votes don't give that acurate representation from the community in my opinion. - Jedaz 06:51, 22 July 2006 (BST) I thought childishness might have come into the equation somewhere. Cyberbob  Talk  07:02, 22 July 2006 (BST) Well yeah, I am a bit annoyed that my suggestion was removed, but if you are going to follow the rules at least do it properly and not half way. Anyway I've put The General up for vandalism becuse he didn't follow the rules properly. The rule for removing suggestions is just as hidden as the one saying that mods can remove a suggestion with 3 Spam votes. So theres no real excuse to follow one and not the other. - Jedaz 07:08, 22 July 2006 (BST) HURRRRRRRRR!!!1one!!1 Jedaz should read the goddamn suggestions in question. –Xoid S•T•FU! 07:14, 22 July 2006 (BST) I have, now... - Jedaz 07:16, 22 July 2006 (BST) User_talk:Vista/archive#A_thing Well My main beef was that you were also ignore a few other judgements from other moderators while doing so, but anyway thats all in the past. for the rest of your comment, You're right. I'm simply not active enough anymore now to be so snarky to other people. It's not as much lazyness (as you seem to think) but more that I've not enough time to check the wiki on a meaningful basis. whatever the reason however and however crudely put, you had a point.--Vista 21:52, 27 July 2006 (BST) Thank you. Cyberbob  Talk  22:14, 27 July 2006 (BST) My votes Ok, i admit i was being a little bogus with my "invalid" votes. I will stop, but you do have to admit soem of them were funny, ok? (escpecially that forklift one i put in!! rofl!!) --Poopman9 15:26, 29 July 2006 (BST) Er. No they weren't. Cyberbob  Talk  15:31, 29 July 2006 (BST) The Bob Award Congratulations! Cyberbob's Bob Award For hilarious pwnage of idiots. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 10:16, 30 July 2006 (BST) Yay! What can I say? I accept! Cyberbob  Talk  10:17, 30 July 2006 (BST) My vote From my discussion page: "Not as good as those two others, but way better than most." Gee, thanks. Cyberbob  Talk  21:46, 31 July 2006 (BST) Hey! Least I'm not some damn ass kisser. And that WAS a compliment! (Might even still be.) --Niilomaan 21:53, 31 July 2006 (BST) "Not as good as those two others"? Yeah. Sure. Cyberbob  Talk  21:54, 31 July 2006 (BST) You would have been my third choice... *sniff* --Niilomaan 21:55, 31 July 2006 (BST) Sure, I can understand that, but you don't actually say that! How else can I feel, reading that? Cyberbob  Talk  21:57, 31 July 2006 (BST) "WOW! I must be the third best guy ever!" How's that? You are way too pessimistic.. --Niilomaan 21:58, 31 July 2006 (BST) Except that once you get past us three, the talent pool dries up pretty damn fast. I'm better than Jedaz? Thanks. I already knew that. Same goes for General. It's not that much of a victory to be labelled better than them. Cyberbob  Talk  22:01, 31 July 2006 (BST) You are also a bit better than Labine50... And yeah, you're pretty much right with this. Next time I'll just say "he not eat poo". --Niilomaan 22:06, 31 July 2006 (BST) Er...thanks, I think. Cyberbob  Talk  22:10, 31 July 2006 (BST) August 2006 My Warning? Hey, I recieved a PM type thing from you where you said "Please do not vandalise this wiki...". Now I will be the last person to claim to understand the detailed rules that govern this Wiki's behavior, but I would have perfered a little more info into what I specifically did wrong. Unless your timing as an amzing coincidance, I guess you are upset from my Edit of Saramu's (sp?) Big Bash related post at the Giddings page. Now, like I said, I'm not 100% on the wiki rules, but I don't think what I did was out-of-line. I edited the post made in order to make it conform to a more nuetral point of view. The original post was quite biased and critical of the mall (on the mall's own page no less) and accused the defenders of using Bots without any attempt at proof. I hardly see how keeping the bot reference but allowing for the possibility that the Big Bash was defeated legitimately can be considered vandalism. - —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sunrise089 (talk • contribs) . Er... check the Vandal Banning page. Cyberbob  Talk  09:09, 3 August 2006 (BST) I got a warning too. I checked the page and I got no description of my offense.--Gold Blade 23:33, 3 August 2006 (BST) I can't help you then. Cyberbob  Talk  07:50, 4 August 2006 (BST) Preview Button yes, I have heard of it. and i'm sorry for not using it more. without sufficient sleep, i have been making mistakes when trying to fix things that were not quite right. i'll use the preview button more next time. Sorry again --Isaac James 10:38, 4 August 2006 (BST) :P It'll remain in the history.--Marmosetmarmolade 05:46, 13 August 2006 (BST) So? Cyberbob  Talk  05:47, 13 August 2006 (BST) Please, ban the fuck out of him. He is asking it.--Thari T/C/TJ! 05:48, 13 August 2006 (BST) IM Do you have AIM or MSN? I got to talk to you about something. Sonny Corleone WTF RRF ASS 03:25, 14 August 2006 (BST) I have both. Which would you prefer? Cyberbob  Talk  03:26, 14 August 2006 (BST) I'm on AIM right now so that would be best. My screen name is RRFSonny. Sonny Corleone WTF RRF ASS 03:27, 14 August 2006 (BST) Re: ing Although technically re abuse is replying to all the kill votes, i re:'d to the constructive kill votes with a thanks and what their exact idea was, and i in general re:d negatively to the ones that were not constructive. If i get rid of the positive ones, technically i wouldnt be eligible for abuse: almost half were constructive, so it wouldnt be most. Also, there is a difference between MrAuschwitz and I: Mr Aushwitz comes up with 2 suggestions a day and puts them right on the suggestions page, I take about 3 days to come up with a single idea, and before I put it on the talk:suggestions page first. Then I edit it, see how people like it, edit it again. He just slaps it on there. Accuse me of that again when you see him experimenting and testing his idea before he puts it on the Suggestion page. --Gold Blade 22:31, 16 August 2006 (BST) Hey - I didn't say I was going to report you now. Just that you should be very careful. Cyberbob  Talk  22:34, 16 August 2006 (BST) I miss you too Bob You remember the good ole days (like three months ago). We argued all the time. That was great. Now we don't even talk. Scinfaxi 09:33, 17 August 2006 (BST) Heh. We can talk if you'd like. I just got a bit tired of drama, is all. Cyberbob  Talk  09:35, 17 August 2006 (BST) Well, I guess my "bring back Amazing idea" won't be seen as constructive then. Anywho, my next project will hopefully not pull in the moderation staff so much. I promise to never do anything more about race. Now abortion? Hmmmm... Scinfaxi 09:40, 17 August 2006 (BST) You could try the Amazing thing if you want. You won't be hated as much for it as you would if you started up on abortion. Not by me, mind you. Someone who loves shows like Drawn Together would only be a hypocrite to condemn politically incorrect things :P Cyberbob  Talk  09:43, 17 August 2006 (BST) Reason? I saw BobHammero's page. I didn't like it.--Rogue 02:13, 20 August 2006 (BST) OK...I guess. It seems a little rabid for mine, but you're entitled to your opinion, just like everyone else. Cyberbob  Talk  02:15, 20 August 2006 (BST) What about my page? –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 22:26, 20 August 2006 (BST) Rogue doesn't think mods who leave UD to play NW or whatever should be able to be mods on the UD wiki. Cyberbob  Talk  22:28, 20 August 2006 (BST) Good thing Rogue is neither a moderator or a Bureaucrat, hmm? I've never even heard of him before, actually. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 22:40, 20 August 2006 (BST) I just don't get why someone would want to moderate a broken game that they claim they don't play.--Rogue 09:17, 23 August 2006 (BST) So? Judging by your behaviour, I bet there are plenty of things you don't get. Cyberbob  Talk  09:21, 23 August 2006 (BST) Why the fuck do you care? Fuck off. –Bob Hammero Mod•B'crat•T•A 09:55, 23 August 2006 (BST) Just trying to get clarification of something I'm really not trying to stir shit here and I have no personal stake in this. I don't know jake weber and I like Mia. I'm just trying to understand how things work on the vandal banning page. I think you ruled in the way you did based on your interpretation of the rules and have no problem with that. I just don't see how you can warn someone when a another mod already cleared someone. I haven't seen that happen before and I wanted clarification. Please do not take this as trolling, or at least pretend I'm being genuine for the sake of argument. Thanks for your attention to this matter.Jjames 22:29, 21 August 2006 (BST) If the rule I cited as the reason behind your warning was incorrect, you can be sure that the other mod (or anyone; Matthew Fahrenheit has a penchant for this) would have called me on it. They didn't, so... Cyberbob  Talk  07:14, 22 August 2006 (BST) I'm sorry but that still doesn't answer my question. Another mod disagreed with you Hagnat, and yet you still issued a warning. What's the harm in asking for another opinion so that further confusion doesn't come up later when a litigous person is warne under the same circumstances. Just my opinion.Jjames 23:00, 22 August 2006 (BST) My opinion was the second opinion. I was the second person. Cyberbob  Talk  08:19, 23 August 2006 (BST) You seem to have trouble understanding my point. A mod already ruled. You rule contrary to them. Yet only your opinion was implemented. What gives you more authority than hagnat? Shouldn't another opinion (this is where you seem to be confused) other than your own or hagnat's be heard? What precednt allows a moderator to warn someone after another one cleared them? Just curious.Jjames 21:58, 24 August 2006 (BST) Mine was taken over hagnat's purely because mine was actually based on a rule. I don't know where hagnat pulled his from. Mods can only override one another if they can provide a) an actual rule (and the first one hasn't) or b) they can come up with some pretty good reasoning behind their decision. Cyberbob  Talk  22:15, 24 August 2006 (BST) Bueracrat Bid You'll probably notice that I didn't "vouch" or "against" you on the Bueracrat page. Here's why: I don't think we should have to many Bueracrats, just like a forum shouldn't have to many admins. I walked into that page knowing I'd only vouch for one. I was instantly against Nubis, so that left it between you and Bob. Recent bits I've seen from both of you Bobs caused me to choose him over you. Since I think "Nuetral" and "Abstain" votes are silly, I didn't leave a comment on yours there. Better luck next time ^^ --(user)(talk) 20:09, 27 August 2006 (BST) Fine, Mia. I don't particularly care. Although, I'd like to know what's made you choose him over me... Cyberbob  Talk  02:55, 28 August 2006 (BST) Guess who's back sexy bitches? Who's this gold blade person and why the fuck do him and gage still think trolling auschvitz is cool?--Admiral Ackbar U! WTF 22:30, 31 August 2006 (BST) Hey hey hey! Cyberbob  Talk  07:18, 1 September 2006 (BST) September 2006 RE: Tunnels My complaint with how "The Underworld" would fit in the game is that it provides no reason for a survivor (or zombie for that matter) to go into a system of linear tunnels. My suggestion solves that complaint by providing the reason of faster travel time and being very specific on how it would be implemented into the game. --Jon Pyre 00:22, 7 September 2006 (BST) MSN? How does it feel for once, huh? Huh? HUH? Uh, yeah. –Xoid S•T•FU! 15:09, 9 September 2006 (BST) Ridiculousness I know you hate me, and I would like to end this. I don't recall ever insulting or degrading you, but if I did I will gladly apologize for it. I want this to be over; I will be civil to you as long as you return the favor.--∴Gage 08:43, 10 September 2006 (BST) It's not what you do, Gage. It's just... I don't know. I'll make a big effort, simply because I'd rather be friendly with someone than constantly arguing with them - whatever anyone else may think. Cyberbob  Talk  09:06, 10 September 2006 (BST) Sounds good to me.--∴Gage 22:14, 10 September 2006 (BST) Wait, I thought we were going to try to be civil to each other... what the hell is up with you bashing me on M/PM?--Gage 17:30, 15 September 2006 (BST) Who said anything about bashing? I was mostly agreeing with the part referring to Matthew. Sorry; I didn't make that clear. Cyberbob  Talk  17:31, 15 September 2006 (BST) Well, I thought you meant you agreed on both points. It's all good.--Gage 17:40, 15 September 2006 (BST) Kewl. Cyberbob  Talk  17:44, 15 September 2006 (BST) The List I appreciate that you added me. I agree that I do fit under Net Rat, because I REALLY need to get a life outside of the PC. However, I must ask that you change it from Rebel Without A Clue to Rebel Leader. You see, I don't really fit under the W/o a clue status: I have made valid arguments, and I have supported mod's desicions more often than not. Oh well. --ĢΘζđ ЫǺđє 15:55, 16 September 2006 (BST) HA! Sorry, GB, the classification stands. You butt in on almost every decision made, and pretty much always attack the mod making it - except for when it's obvious, even to you, that doing so would get you laughed off the wiki. I think you're misunderstanding the label Net Rat, however - it's used to designate a kid who wants to be one of the "big boys". If you didn't have a life, you'd be a Lonely Guy. Cyberbob  Talk  16:10, 16 September 2006 (BST) On second thought, I think you should also classify me as loopy, cause I have done some very strange things. Example: Keep - WTFCENTAURS --ĢΘζđ ЫǺđє 16:31, 16 September 2006 (BST) No, that's just fucking with an awesome joke made by people more awesome than you by several orders of magnitude. Now you're just rubbing in your Net Rattiness. Cyberbob  Talk  16:38, 16 September 2006 (BST) Oh well, I guess Ill never convince you, Ferrous Cranus. --ĢΘζđ ЫǺđє 17:35, 16 September 2006 (BST) Holding to one's views doesn't automatically qualify one for a Ferrous Cranous, Lamer. Cyberbob  Talk  17:54, 16 September 2006 (BST) This is pathetic, on both sides. I mean, look at us! We both look like infants. --ĢΘζđ ЫǺđє 17:57, 16 September 2006 (BST) Speak for yourself. While you're at it, the exit's third door on your right. Cyberbob  Talk  17:59, 16 September 2006 (BST) October 2006 Your impersonator Caught us all. Funny, isn't it?--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 06:16, 1 October 2006 (BST) I don't think so. You guys were extremely willing to accept such erratic behaviour as mine. Cyberbob  Talk  06:17, 1 October 2006 (BST) Sorry, but it looked like you. I bet that if something similar just happens to xoid, you would fall for it as we did.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 06:30, 1 October 2006 (BST) Maybe. Cyberbob  Talk  06:33, 1 October 2006 (BST) I doubt it if it happened right NOW, but I would. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 06:34, 1 October 2006 (BST) You are quite good trolling. You have restored my faith in humanity.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 06:49, 1 October 2006 (BST) Test My test is over. I have nothing more to say to you ever. Good day to you. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 07:05, 1 October 2006 (BST) Oh my gawd, Mr. "Covered in a Veil of Darkness" Gold Blade will leave the wiki? AGAIN?--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 07:07, 1 October 2006 (BST) I'd even go so far as to say he was behind the impersonator. *goes to M/VB* Cyberbob  Talk  07:09, 1 October 2006 (BST) Nope. I meant that I have concluded from my tests, that I can stir things up as much as I want, and burst blood vessels. I never knew I could do that. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 07:11, 1 October 2006 (BST) Sure. It wouldn't have happened if the impersonator hadn't come along. Cyberbob  Talk  07:11, 1 October 2006 (BST) I actually like you, cyberbob. However, I have to make the pretense end sometime, aand seeing as I have finally reaches you smashing your head against the keyboard, I decided it's over. --Gold BladeVote Abstain! 07:13, 1 October 2006 (BST) Just fuck off, Gold Blade. Cyberbob  Talk  07:14, 1 October 2006 (BST) Posting I'm not sure what you're talking about. My last suggestion was "Ransack Improvement" timestamped the 20th, and the one before that was "Fascinated Lurch" from the 19th. --Jon Pyre 10:20, 20 October 2006 (BST) It's actually a 24-hour gap, not just in the same "day". Sorry. MrA was caught by the same trap. I'd reread the rule again, if I were you. Just in case you might've missed anything else - I don't want to see you banned. Cyberbob  Talk  10:33, 20 October 2006 (BST) 'elp Please see teh bottom of Gages Talk page where I have asked for his assistance as well. Conndrakamod T CFT 08:51, 26 October 2006 (BST) Yeah, I saw. I'll think on it a while. Cyberbob  Talk  08:54, 26 October 2006 (BST) Thanks Conndrakamod T CFT 08:57, 26 October 2006 (BST) November 2006 HAHA! Your main page is messed up. Serves you right for deleting my template from the DORIS talk page.--Blue Command Vic DvB 17:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC) I Think somebody is suffering from small monitor syndrome... Mmmmmmm... I loves me a widescreen.--THE Godfather of Яesensitized, Anime Sucks Yalk | W! U! WMM| CC CPFOAS LOE ZHU | Яezzens 17:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC) Your mother loves em wide, too. Blue Command Vic DvB 19:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC) Yours can't have them wide anymore.... not after that incident with the pool cue. Cyberbob  Talk  23:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC) MODERATOR DEMOTIONS Hey, They don't go on that page they go on this one: [here] - 343 U! 01:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Why, so it does. Thank you. Cyberbob  Talk  01:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC) December 2006 QUOTES Are you kidding? I'd be honored if anyone quoted me.--J Muller 04:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC) By "quotable", I meant "so stupid that they could easily fit into people's lists of funny shit". I was being derogatory. Cyberbob  Talk  04:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC) I know. I wouldn't exactly be "honored", though I would feel vaguely accomplished. Being considered stupid by people I would quote based on the same criteria (Not the quote in question, though. That was genuinely funny) doesn't really seem all that bad to me. By all means, quote away.--J Muller 05:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Thanks Hi, man. Thanks for the advise. I didn't know about that rule about vandalism. Are you part of that PKer group? --Eek x 16:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC) You're welcome. No, I'm not in Black Mesa. Cyberbob  Talk  16:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC) Question I have a query to do with some code - is there a way to change the color of all of my links on my user page? Say I want to change them all to maroon, how would I achieve this? I see that you seem to have a good grip of CSS... or am i mistaken? --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 08:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Hm. I don't think you can change the external links, but changing the internal ones is fairly simple - if a little clunky. You need to use this template for each of the links, I believe - there are other ways to do it, but that's the simplest. If you're after the actual hexadecimal codes, here's a good site I use frequently to look them up. Cyberbob  Talk  09:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Thanks!--Ducis DuxSlothTalk 12:51, 8 December 2006 (UTC) EDIT- Doesn't seem to be working. The link that is... That template is for colorizing stuff, it screws with links... Is there a universal code that will change them all?--Ducis DuxSlothTalk 12:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC) It works for me. See? Cyberbob  Talk  13:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC) Ah, k Thanks. I did it wrong before...--Ducis DuxSlothTalk 01:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Cool. Is everything cleared up, then? Cyberbob  Talk  01:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Pretty much I think... thanks for the help!--Ducis DuxSlothTalk 02:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC) No probs. Cyberbob  Talk  02:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Help Help Xoid and I out here--Gage 09:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC) I just did. ^_^ Cyberbob  Talk  10:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC) I posted this just before you did :P--Gage 10:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC) I noticed. Heh. Cyberbob  Talk  10:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Xolah's User Page Not a problem, I'll edit my page in a bit but I would like to keep my Sw link intact as I do play both games, I'm just not a major fan of wiki's in general but I want a user page and here seems like the place. Do you know of a UD banner template in the sw wiki that I could add there? ~X. There isn't one.--Gage 08:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Would you mind if I made one? ~X. You won't receive any benefit from Kevan for putting it on your userpage.--Gage 09:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC) You can make one if you wish... Cyberbob  Talk  10:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)