User talk:Cyberbob240/Classifications

Main | Talk | Sandpit | Signature | Archive | Talk Archive | Classification List | Arbitration | DEM Roster User talk:Cyberbob/Classifications Suggestions Any suggestions for the list go here. My Suggestion Though I'm still not happy with Net rat, this is something else; He's been here a while now, and with that recent "Conn Butt Cover" move of him, I simply , though sincerely, demand that Giles Sednik get's a place on teh list. Now I will leave it up to you and other to determine what he is as flamewarrior. I honestly wouldn't know myself, that, and I'm lazy.--Thadeous Oakley 21:00, 26 August 2009 (BST) I disagree with your choice.--xoxo 04:36, 27 August 2009 (BST) Ah i was tricked by my new sig into thinking ross said that, what with the numerous blue tones and all..--xoxo 05:13, 27 August 2009 (BST) a bloo bloo bloo. a bloo bloo bloo bloo bloo. Cyberbob  Talk  06:07, 27 August 2009 (BST) I enjoy that no matter how much you act like you think urbandictionary is lame, many words you use can only be found there. For this one i'm thinking definition 3b, 6 or (less likely) 7. --xoxo 06:50, 27 August 2009 (BST) I'm not following you Jed, forgive my stupidity *ah hum*...--Thadeous Oakley 13:20, 27 August 2009 (BST) I've looked at Urban Dictionary like twice in my whole life. Neither of those times involved looking up "a bloo bloo bloo" (I got it from Achewood, if you must know). Cyberbob  Talk  13:22, 27 August 2009 (BST) I'm not saying you get your words from there, more that in order to attempt to understand you, there is often no other easily searchable reference site available.--xoxo 03:10, 28 August 2009 (BST) k Cyberbob  Talk  03:37, 28 August 2009 (BST) Hurm. I was hoping to land somewhere around lamer or nitpick or tireless rebutter. But you gave me the lonely guy title? I'm butt hurt about this and you can bet I'll even the score. >:-( --GANG Giles Sednik CAPD 07:38, 28 August 2009 (BST) Comments Any commentary on the list goes here. Nice. Whoever wrote this is surprisingly perceptive. I always like it when people can be nicely categorised. Some of your choices were a bit hit and miss but some were spot on :P I know none of them are gonna be perfect, but i have ever used the "no sense of humour" argument? --xoxo 12:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC) Many of the entries are padding. I try and include every active user of significance rather than only picking the ones with the best matches. --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 12:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC) I think i win as having the most different classes. 4 by my count.--xoxo 17:47, 29 June 2009 (BST) What do you mean? Most number of changes that I've made to someone's entry or are you assigning yourself matches? --Cyberbob 17:49, 29 June 2009 (BST) Most changes you've made. xoxo 17:50, 29 June 2009 (BST) F^32 You give the guy up there the evil clown class and I get the yuk yuk. You'll pay.--Thari TжFedCom is BFI! 12:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC) Yeah i was wondering why you got that. Then again you've been AWOL from the wiki for more or less the last year. Only time will tell if we feel the way about each other that bob feels about us....--xoxo 12:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC) I thought about Evil Clown... but a bunch of people already had it and I like to keep things as varied as I can. --HAHAHA DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS 12:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC) Aww I'm not on here. :'( -- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 00:51, 5 January 2009 (UTC) I am happy to have been promoted from Sycophant to J3D's place as Artful Dodger. I cannot await to rally the past sycophants to glory against the evil sysop team. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:21, 5 June 2009 (BST) And curley. Actually he might have been a me-too, you were all me-too's then you changed to sycophant when i got promoted.--xoxo 07:57, 6 June 2009 (BST) I don't get an allowance :( and i have a relatively minute music collection. I like the bit about vague existential arguments though. --xoxo 07:57, 6 June 2009 (BST) I couldn't really find a decent one for you. Acne p much got chosen because it's at the top of the list. --Cyberbob 07:59, 6 June 2009 (BST) Yeha it was easy to find. --xoxo 08:02, 6 June 2009 (BST) Yeah, I agree that acne isn't really you but it's hard to categorise you since you gave up that prominence... I have to say it, you do remind me of Strumpet.. hehe. I know you never would have wanted suggestions Bob, but I would like to pitch Filibuster or even Toxic Granny for SirArgo... And The Swarm reminded me alot of the Developing Suggestions crew (particularly the consistent antics of Zombie Lord on there). And does anyone sort of think Grim might =Godzilla? I know Zombie Lord isn't a prominent contributer yet, but I would consider him a Howler. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 12:26, 7 June 2009 (BST) Filibuster would be perfect for SirArgo. As for Grim, I hesitate to give him one of those Big Important Site-Changing classifications simply because I don't think he deserves it. His meltdown was killed off by Kevan after about 5 minutes, and before that I would have said he was more of a Filibuster/Ferrous Cranous hybrid than something like a Big Dog. Based on my IRC conversations with him I'm going to give him Lonely Guy. --Cyberbob 12:41, 7 June 2009 (BST) As far as Developing Suggestions and Zombie Lord go I will have to take a closer look at them. --Cyberbob 12:42, 7 June 2009 (BST) Yeah, Lonely Guy is a good one. I can see that, remembering my IRC convos with him too. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 13:04, 7 June 2009 (BST) Net Rat I'm too old. --Thadeous Oakley 22:16, 24 June 2009 (BST) No you're not. --Cyberbob 22:25, 24 June 2009 (BST) Kay.--Thadeous Oakley 23:02, 24 June 2009 (BST) Bout time And here i was thinking you were still bitter at my promotion thus outlasting my bitterness by almost 2 months! --xoxo 04:34, 27 August 2009 (BST) I am so not artful dodger anymore. Woo. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 04:39, 27 August 2009 (BST) Oh yeah you were included in that edit. Way to make everything about you, ego. --xoxo 05:09, 27 August 2009 (BST) I thought you were referring to all the changes in the edits anyway, YOUR the ego *artful dodging* --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 05:37, 27 August 2009 (BST) SHUTUP ALLCAPS (and what's the one for people that can't tell your from you're??) --xoxo 05:40, 27 August 2009 (BST) I can think of the one for people that call the people that can't tell your from you're out. Cyberbob  Talk  16:09, 27 August 2009 (BST) Awww I feel left out --DOWN WITH THE 'CRATS!!! | Join Nod!!! 08:53, 27 August 2009 (BST) You're barely a user at all, lest one that deserves recognition for having a discernible personality about you. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 16:05, 27 August 2009 (BST) Unlike curley, that guy's the heart and soul of this godforsaken dump. --xoxo 03:16, 28 August 2009 (BST) You must have meant the Natalie Cole album, right? "High as a mountain and deep as a river"... --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 04:14, 28 August 2009 (BST) Ummm, no. The 1917 film starring Theda Bara.--xoxo 06:49, 28 August 2009 (BST) But the lyrics "High as a mountain and deep as a river" reminded me of curley so much... --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 07:20, 28 August 2009 (BST) Flagbox For You Ran across this while fixing up the flagboxes, it seemed most apt. Pigeon-holer Cyberbob enjoys placing users into narrow categories. --  RoosterDragon  16:37, 29 August 2009 (BST) Lol! I'm not too sure that it's entirely accurate though - I'm only fully satisfied with a few of the entries. If I "could" (self-imposed restriction) I'd be giving most people two or three categories each. Cyberbob  Talk  00:14, 30 August 2009 (BST) Hmm. Why not? You could have a secondary classification for people or something. Oh Oh Oh have a comments section where users can complain about them. Mwah hah hah. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 00:19, 30 August 2009 (BST) Well, before I had the restriction things were getting a little ridiculous - almost everyone had at least two or three which is really kind of lazy on my part. Cyberbob  Talk  00:23, 30 August 2009 (BST) Fair enough. I never saw it in that state. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 01:10, 30 August 2009 (BST) Update Ever going to get one?-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 12:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC) If I can be bothered. Dunno when that'll be - maybe the weekend. Cyberbob  Talk  12:35, 6 January 2010 (UTC) k-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 14:20, 6 January 2010 (UTC) I want something else. pretty please ^^ --Thadeous Oakley 14:26, 6 January 2010 (UTC) Dawwwwwwww, I'm such a cute wittle kitteh.-- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 13:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Ahh well, I guess that was expected. --Thadeous Oakley 13:43, 11 January 2010 (UTC) I tried to come up with something else for you but that whole feud thing the two Umbrellas have going on just screams Net Rat on both sides. Cyberbob  Talk  20:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC) That was what, late 08 and early 09? Poor excuse D: Besides, that past affair screams duelists more then anything else. --Thadeous Oakley 21:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC) I'm slow okay. I'll probably give you Duelists next time I get around to updating it. Cyberbob  Talk  21:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Eagle scout? I dun geddit. :( 20:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC) idk I just give it to people who don't get into much drama usually Cyberbob  Talk  20:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Nevermind, I just realised there was a site you linked to explaining it. Makes more sense now. 20:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Ha! Very apt with me. Nicely done, Cyberbob.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 20:53, 11 January 2010 (UTC) Ha, I thought of you and then I thought of that business with Iscariot and just went Yes. Cyberbob  Talk  20:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC) I just now became aware of this page and was surprised (and somewhat honored, I guess) to see that I was on it at all, given how infrequently you and I bump into each other. Lurker, eh? Well, could've been worse. I suppose the one time I stepped into any drama recently was with ZL around New Year's, and that's about the only time you would've ever seen me in drama, so Lurker seems perfectly reasonable, coming from you. Though I would definitely disagree with the idea of not involving myself in normal discourse. Granted, I've been slow in becoming a regular at the admin pages (I'm still not a regular there), but I've been active in most of the other places around the wiki for a few months now, and you'll be seeing more of me around the admin pages as time goes on, I'm sure. I wanted to get a feel for the place before wading in deeper, and I feel more comfortable around those parts of the wiki at this point. Personally, Philosopher struck a chord with me when it mentioned "ponderous and lengthy cogitations". As SA can attest, I'm not exactly great at keeping things brief. Even so, I'm not convinced it's a perfect fit for me, since I wouldn't say I have the breadth of knowledge it describes (does that make me a Profundus Maximus?). That said, I do like to think I'm slow to anger and considerate of others' opinions, and I definitely don't see a point in scheming or complicating things when directly approaching someone is the easiest way to deal with it. Anyway, cool page. I'm glad I saw a link to it and will definitely be checking in on it whenever it gets updated. —Aichon— 05:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC) I'm pretty lazy (I don't bother doing any research) and I couldn't remember seeing you around all that often off the top of my head - at least not enough to comfortably give you much else. Next time things'll probably be different. Cyberbob  Talk  06:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC) I made the list BITCHES! --Haliman - Talk 05:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC) I think you were on it before, I just took you off for some reason Cyberbob  Talk  06:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC) Congratulations. *cough ego cough* --         06:55, 13 January 2010 (UTC) I don't know if I would celebrate about being called a "Net Rat" --    Timmah!     Talk   06:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC) Awesome I even get one without a request. Am I just that awesome?-- Adward  19:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC) Guess so :D --Thadeous Oakley 20:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC) What's the point? What's the point of the classifications, and how did I get on your list? Is it a good or bad thing that I'm there?? -Poodle of DoomM! T 03:19, 27 February 2010 (UTC) The point is "for fun", you're on my list because you edit a lot and popped into my mind as a person worth having on the list, and it's neither a good thing nor a bad thing that you're on it. Cyberbob  Talk  03:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC) Why newbie then? I guess that's what I'm ultimatly getting at... Especially if I "edit a lot..." -Poodle of DoomM! T 04:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC) There's no real rhyme or reason to my selections... I just sort of look down the list and choose one on the spot for each person. I do update it from time to time if I think I made the wrong choice for someone. Cyberbob  Talk  04:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC) Update fool. I demand entertainment. In the short to medium term. --Rosslessness 21:16, 27 June 2012 (BST) ditto--User:Sexualharrison22:45, 27 June 2012 I suggest Ross makes his own version of this list as he retires from being a 'crat, as celebration for his time as one. —Aichon— 23:03, 5 November 2012 (UTC) YES please A ZOMBIE ANT 04:01, 6 November 2012 (UTC) yeah ok let me just go through a year and a half of wiki history and find all the new kids on the block and figure out who they all are and where they fit in and also how the old faces might have changed from a year and a half ago. Cyberbob  Talk  13:17, 19 June 2013 (BST)