|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/talkn}}
| |
|
| |
|
| == Those images ==
| |
|
| |
| [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Image:Zombies.jpg&curid=124879&diff=1536118&oldid=1535437 Bwah]. We need a "popular images" category, and send people there before they upload an image... problem is, it'll probably be full of [[:Category:Ribbons|these bloody things]] ;) <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:51 8 August 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| :Yeah, and as is the norm, no one will bother checking before they upload what is probably 50th image of Biohazard's Umbrella logo that is on the wiki. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 13:24, 8 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Unlike read==
| |
| i do see minor edits in rc.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:09, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :...And? --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 07:23, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::Ah gonna play the ol' i don't understand you card, uninteresting choice. P.S can you strike me? I've earned myself annudda one. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 10:43, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::If you are talking about my edits being minor recently, [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=250&offset=20090808074708&target=DanceDanceRevolution]. Hagnat complained that it would fill up recent changes so I made all edits minor while I was fixing Conndraka's fuck up. As for a strike, you don't actually have any warnings to strike at the moment. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 10:54, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::It turns out you actually do. Sorry, long day. However, I struck you on the 14th ([http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=UDWiki:Administration/Vandal_Data&diff=1507888&oldid=1506007]). Sorry, you'll have to wait a few days before I can strike you again. --[[User:DanceDanceRevolution|<big><u><span style="color:DarkSlateGray">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkBlue ">ϑ</span><span style="color:DarkSlateBlue">ℜ</span></u></big>]] 11:56, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::I get a striking a month. So 2 strikes after 2 months. It's been 2 months. I shouldn't be punished because i have to request a striking and wait for someone else to do it.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:53, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::You get a striking one month after your last strike. You were struck on the 14th. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 13:54, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::::DDR speaks the truth {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 13:55, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::::So if all ops refuse to strike me thats cool? The case has always been it didn't matter if the physical strike wasn't there provided the grounds for having a strike had been met. I earned a strike on the 9th, so i'll earn another one on the 9th (assuming edits are met)--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 13:58, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::Yeah it is cool, provided your aren't legible to be struck as per the guidelines, which you aren't. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:01, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::Keep on following the exact letter of the guidelines rather than bothering with what it actually meant. --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:04, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::Keep out of trouble for 5 days and it will have made no difference. Think you can manage it? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:07, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::::Fuck no. And you well know it's the principle of the matter. If it was your vandalism you could strike it on the day, i have to wait for someone to bother to strike it. And they can just refuse if they like. Which is fucked. The next person to try that one i do plan on A/Ming :P --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:17, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::::Fine by me, I agree that valid strikes shouldn't be refused. But for now, wait 5 days or go to someone else and see if ''they'' want to ghost the guidelines for you, because I'll tell you something right now. I have no intention of sidestepping the guidelines for anyone, lest my supposed ex-clique-buttbuddy-partner-in-crime, sorry. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:30, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::::Since when has any sysop outright refused to strike an escalation when the requirements have been met? Also can I just say how faggoty that passive-aggressive ":P" smiley is? {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:21, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::::::I grant you my permission to say how faggoty it is. Also i forget who it was. I think SA, i asked on his talk and he said "Oh i don't go on that page" or something. Might have been karek actually. I didn't complain coz by the time i'd logged on someone else has already got it, perhaps boxy.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:24, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::::::It was Nubis. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 14:30, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::::::::::::Ergh, should have known...--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 14:36, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::::::::Well if it happens again - ''and assuming that the requirements have actually been met'' - I would say it's definitely worth at least a mention on the A/VB talk page. It's not something that I can see being worthy of an A/M case 90% of the time but it shouldn't happen. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:34, 9 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Categorizing. ==
| |
|
| |
| Hey, thanks for all the categorizing you have done for my images, I forget so easily. <span style="color: #4ABF0E"><sub>p</sub><sup>y</sup></span>[[User:Pyxzer|<span style="color:#4ABF0E">x]]<span style="color: #4ABF0E"><sup>z</sup></span><sub>[[User_talk:Pyxzer|<span style="color:#FF2811">e]]</span></sub><sup>[[User:Pyxzer/Alexander_Stoy|<span style="color:#EEF94A">r</span>]]</sup></span> 12:01, 10 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == WikiFauna ==
| |
|
| |
| Here you go: <nowiki>{{WikiKnight}}</nowiki>
| |
|
| |
| Thanks.
| |
|
| |
| {{WikiKnight|DDR}}
| |
|
| |
| Ho ho ho. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 16:20, 11 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Re: [[User:Super_Nweb|SuperNewb]] ==
| |
|
| |
| It was vandalism strike one, I'll talk to them if they can be bothered coming back for more ... or you can chase them down as you see fit.
| |
|
| |
| Cheers --[[User:Zeug|Zeug]] 03:44, 12 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == This needs to be addressed... ==
| |
|
| |
| I really need something addressed. I'm tired of the way people are treating each other, constantly belittling each other here. It has got to stop. Frankly, I'd assume that the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_pillars_of_Wikipedia Five Pillars of Wikipedia] would apply here. If not, something needs to be implemented similar to that.
| |
|
| |
| I don't much appreciate being talked to like I was by [[User:Sexylegsread|I'm a motherfuckin' lyrical wordsmith motherfuckin' genius!]] [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Administration/Deletions#Image:Krotch.jpg here],... Or general subject matter contained [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki:Open_Discussion/Wiki_Status#Wan_suck_MY_dick here]. I can deal with minor cursing, and being put down to an extent.... but seriously, I've had enough of the abuse. I'd appreciate someone putting some sort of limitation on how far it can go. -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 01:51, 13 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :Fuck off! Stop running around to sysops pages trying to get them to do something and make a fucking [[A/PD|policy]]!!! --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 02:06, 13 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| That could be addressed too.... -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 02:18, 13 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :Stop running around and crying to mummy and daddy sysops about being picked on and fucking do something about it yourself, maybe you will get some respect by having a well thought out policy or a nice slick argument back at one of us, rather than crying to the nearest (see:all) sysop whenever someone says a naughty word. Faggot.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 03:27, 13 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| Look at the big words fly!! And then pick on someone cause they can't spell! Thanks to all your intellegent ramblings, the world is a whole lot gooder now!! -[[User:Poodle of doom|Poodle of doom]] 03:52, 13 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :Grow a thicker skin and/or ignore them. This isn't a second-grade playground where everyone has to be nice to each other. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 03:56, 13 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::"Thanks to all your intellegent ramblings, the world is a whole lot gooder now!!".....I rest my case.....what do you expect mate, if you are an idiot you will be treated like one. Also, learn to fucking indent, ton continue a conversation, you indent, when you edit, look at what the other posters have done to reply to you. You stupidity is boundless.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 04:44, 13 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| There is no civility policy on this wiki, they have every right to say what they are saying. The thing is, 90% of the abusing comments on the deletions votes were not personal attacks but only in response to the tameness of the deletions case. As for Read and co, they are shitstirrers and are looking for a reaction from their behaviour, your responsibility is to stop giving it to them.
| |
|
| |
| As for DCC's comment on the open discussion, DCC notoriously swears a lot and it is 100% within his right.
| |
|
| |
| Basically, as per Jed and Read, there's nothing the admin can do to help you or enforce your wishes. It isn't because we are bad sysops, or we like to see this happen, but because the structure of the wiki prevents us from having any authority in stopping user X saying user Y is gay. As for [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Five pillars|the 5 pillars]], a majority of them don't apply to UDWiki at all, namely in this case the fact we don't have a Code of Conduct. The best you can do is to go to [[A/A|arbitration]] and request something that necessitates your wishes. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 05:43, 13 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == [[UDWiki:News]] ==
| |
|
| |
| Its a little home for stuff you remove from News. :) --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 17:59, 13 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :How embarassing. After [[Project CP|PCP]], I should know better. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 01:05, 14 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ==[[Things to do on the Wiki when you're dead]]==
| |
| Ta. Da. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 21:56, 14 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :Brilliant. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 01:00, 15 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Urban dead has become boring now==
| |
|
| |
| I think it is due to the sameness that occurs over time. Nothing ever changes, it's just more of the same. Kill zombies, get killed by pkers, kill humans. It never changes. Do you agree is my question. [[User:Aka Paradox|Aka Paradox]] 01:55, 15 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :I've been playing for just over 2 years and at one point, yes, I thought the game had become boring. I think the game can only become boring if you expect too much from it. I won't go through a history lesson, but when I got bored with the game, I just tried new things. Being a brain rotted human, leading groups, [[ATO|travelling]] and organising games like [[Manhunt|manhunts]]. At the moment I'm with a couple of groups who co-ordinate over IRC and hence it has a fun, welcome, social point to it. When I found UD got boring I just played it more casually, and it worked that way. To play UD you have to be prepared to ''fight'' for something, and when a suburb is green and it's surrounding suburbs are as such, there isn't much to ''fight'' for, only to ''stay'' for. They aren't the same thing.
| |
| :As for the balance of the game and its structure, I do think that something's wrong. A battle hasn't happened since Kevan introduced cade-blocking and de-centralised malls with the FAKs, which I don't like because I enjoyed being with a massive brethren fighting against the biggest horde there was to offer. Kevan's changed the game over time so it can serve more as a ''zombie apocalypse'', which is great, except for the "apocalypse" part, which Malton is currently ''not''. Survivors outnumber Zombies far too greatly and that's likely to never change in UD's current state.
| |
| :Long story short: UD gets boring when survivors dominate 70% of the game over zombies. The game isn't boring when someone like [[The Dead]] trounce the place and make every single suburb a death zone, because then you have someone to truly fight against and a true goal to achieve. At the moment, it's a bit of a wank for survivors and it's been like it for a while. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 02:16, 15 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::I guess that means I do agree to some extent, but personally I don't find UD boring because I've gone to certain lengths to keep doing what makes me enjoy UD: fight back for suburbs with survivor groups in ravaged towns, and participate in [[Manhunt|manhunts]] with friends and other wiki users. You just have to find something Malton that keeps you coming back. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|LightSkyBlue}}-- 02:16, 15 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :Thank you for that very honest answer. I honestly think though that it's the "standstill"ness of the game that makes it so different from what I imagined a MMORPG. If it helps you to understand what I mean try to imagine the movie Dawn of the Dead but with you being able to play in the entire city and there's *animation*. I don't want to click on a button and affect essentially nothing cause on a small scale like urban dead it feels like you are only playing with yourself and time is standing still. (no joke intended). I want to like see actual weapons and you aiming at the zombies who number in the hundred thousands as I helplessly try to barricade a mall or something. Can you feel that adrenaline from something so innovative? [[User:Aka Paradox|Aka Paradox]] 19:08, 15 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::Go get dead rising (i think thats its name) or some other zombie xbox game. This is a text based game, it doesn't try to be anything else. Look up text based MMORPG and you'll see theres heaps of them, they aren't everyones cup of tea so you can always play WoW if thats more up your alley.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 23:59, 15 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == I needs a template!!!!! ==
| |
|
| |
| I need some kinda template that says I'm friggin anoying and probably have the most templates in 1 userpage in this whole wiki please :P --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Crazy Hobo Man]] 13:05, 16 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| {{codeinline|<nowiki>{{Hyperannoying}}</nowiki>}}
| |
|
| |
| :All in the name of fun, of course. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|OrangeRed}}-- 13:29, 16 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| LMAO!!! that is epicsauce XD --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Crazy Hobo Man]] 13:34, 16 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :Ty, have fun. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|OrangeRed}}-- 13:34, 16 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Re-evaluation ==
| |
|
| |
| Hey, I've just had a thought: shouldn't Daranz be the first sysop up for re-evauation as he was, technically, the first to be promoted (despite his inactivity). I don't mind going first, it gets it out of the way early but I was just wondering what you thought about it?--{{User:The General/sig}} 16:17, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :If he was the first one to be promoted then you are absolutely right and I apoligize, I set up the A/RE page late at night and was fearful I would get some of the user rights logs a little wrong. It is within your policy to have Daranz go before you, so it's up to what you'd prefer. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 00:27, 21 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == [[Suggestion:20090820 Zombie hunter Skill]] ==
| |
|
| |
| possible meat/socking on keep votes? All very little conrtibs, some with similar sig set ups? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:28, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :Wow, that was weird...--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:29, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::And here I thought I was the only one. I was looking around to see if there was something against this, but couldn't find anything yet. --{{User:Dark Blue Helmet/Sig}} 20:31, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::I posted earlier on Cyberbob, because he's always good for an IP check, but he hasn't been online. Ironically, just before I managed to post here, Ross beat me to it. <_< --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:32, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == [[Suggestion:20090820_Zombie_hunter_Skill| Suggestion]] ==
| |
|
| |
| What do you think about the users voting keep on this? I tried asking Cyberbob, but there was no response. There are easily six of them now, and all of them are new users, most of whom have only voted on that suggestion. Do you think that they're sockpuppets, or do you think that they're just a load of newbs? --{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 20:29, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :I've run the ips. A couple of them appear to be from the same area, possibly even the same person using a variable ip, but the addresses are different enough that we can't get them for sockpuppetry. Considering the similarities in the quality of their spelling and grammar, and the fact that they're all voting on the same awful suggestion, I would hazard a guess that some of them might be meatpuppets (i.e. the author asked his friends to come along and vote) but there's really nothing we can do about it.{{User:The General/sig}} 20:56, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::Damn, I just wrote up the Vandal Banning entry too. --{{User:Blake Firedancer/sig}} 20:57, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::Looks like [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Suggestion:20090820_Zombie_hunter_Skill&diff=prev&oldid=1544572 he is not going to stop]--{{User:OrangeGaf/Sig}} 21:11, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::Well, he lost, because the suggestion was spammed. But that doesn't stop him trying again with an even zanier suggestion. How about we create a policy of haviong to have 5+ edits in the past month to vote on a suggestion? I'd happily make a policy discussion for it, but I don't know how.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 21:40, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::If he tries again then I have no doubts whatsoever that it will be spamminated as well. While I do agree that some sort of policy limiting meatpuppetry would be a good idea, but I'm not sure it would be passed as because people wouldn't like the fact that it could restrict new users from voting. The suggestions system has it's own system for suggesting rules changes, etc. which is done through [[Category_talk:Suggestions#Suggestion_Discussion]]. Anyway, it appears boxy is more observant than I am and noticed further similarities in the typing patterns and on those grounds I've ruled vandalism.--{{User:The General/sig}} 22:43, 20 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == The Safe Sleeping Policy ==
| |
|
| |
| Surely you didn't think I was being serious? --[[User:Shank Case|Shank Case]] 05:42, 23 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :There are a lot of morons around here, I wouldn't put it past someone, particularly if they are a stranger. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 09:47, 23 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::So you went off on the Bunnies' talk page against me instead of first trying to ascertain if I was being serious or not? --[[User:Shank Case|Shank Case]] 17:28, 23 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::Why should I bother? The entire topic was on the bunnies talk page, it's just customary on this wiki to continue the conversation there. Personally, I couldn't give two shits whether you were serious or not, the very fact you made the statement at all is ludicrous, even as a joke. Anyone with a shred of common sense would have criticised DTangent ''when'' he announced the policy, not just sit back and then cry when he 'breaks' it. If you are so touchy about me taking this up with you on your talk page, there's a lesson to be learned in this and it is you should have taken up your frivolous matter on DTangent's talk page, not the Bunnies. Now you've screwed up and anything goes, so deal with it.
| |
| :::And if you want to continue this on a talk page, then so be it, make it personal, I had trifles with the policy more than you, but whatever. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 00:00, 24 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::I was doing something that I like to call "joking". I don't like getting angry or going into SERIOUS BUSINESS, and prefer to use jokes to get points across. Jokes that are apparently misunderstood at times =] --[[User:Shank Case|Shank Case]] 05:07, 24 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::LOL damage control. Nice attempted recovery with the "Oh I was joking bit". --[[User:DTangent|DTangent]] 19:02, 24 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| Well, it's no surprise that my presence in UD is so grandeur that my spoken word is enacted into policies. --[[User:DTangent|DTangent]] 19:06, 24 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == WAIT DDR! ==
| |
| WE CAN'T STOP HERE!...
| |
|
| |
| THIS IS BAT COUNTRY!--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 09:52, 23 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :don't worry, he'll see them soon enough! --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 10:06, 23 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::JESUS CHRIST LOOK! THERE'S TWO WOMEN FUCKING A POLAR BEAR! --{{User:WOOT/sig}} 10:11, 23 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Talk page==
| |
| [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Boxy&curid=17417&diff=1546144&oldid=1546142 WTF?] <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 10:07 23 August 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| :Hmm, sorry, I originally tried to fix WOOT's header formatting, and my net got sloppy... Beyond that, I don't know what happened. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 10:12, 23 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Contribs stats==
| |
| The point is.......?--{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 15:21, 24 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :It was originally made so I could have a friendly competition with Link over IRC, but while it was being done, I figured it would be more fun to just add some users. Link and I are both into graphs, etc. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 15:23, 24 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::And the joke about adding Rooster to is was that I always claimed that the reason he didn't like it was cause we never put him on, to which he promptly replied "I could just use my bots to mass up thousands of edits and screw your little graph over". I think there was a pompous laugh somewhere in the quote aswell. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 15:28, 24 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::Said laugh would also be evil, maniac and condescending, just for the record. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 16:03, 24 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::Its how I pictured it. --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 10:31, 25 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| ==[[ALiM]]==
| |
|
| |
| hey next time you want to vandalise alim with your [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php?title=Amusing_Locations_in_Malton&diff=1544031&oldid=1529830 inane bullshit] can you at least post on the talk first so people have an idea what the fuck you're doing. thanks.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 00:54, 25 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :It's called fixing newly broken links caused by unmerging location pages. --'''[[User:BobBoberton|<span style="color: #FF4500">Bob Boberton</span>]] <sup>[[The_Fortress|<span style="color: #6B8E23">TF</span>]] / [[The_Fortress/Dark_Watch|<span style="color: #778899 ">DW</span>]]</sup>''' [[Image:Littlemudkipsig.gif]] 03:53, 25 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::I've been unmerging location pages since before you were born pal.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 01:14, 26 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :Hilarious. Keep up the jackass persona and revert it then, saint. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 05:08, 26 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == ... ==
| |
|
| |
| I'm not even sure if this is worth saying but I spent around three hours creating this and was tired last night and figured I would fix the link this afternoon when I got home from school but found the page had been deleted, I then looked in recent changes under deletions and found this:
| |
|
| |
| 17:20, 26 August 2009 Nubis (Talk | contribs) deleted "Kakashi on crack/toilet tactics" (unused redirect)
| |
|
| |
| I luckily saved a copy and will be fixing it but I thought I would say this anyways because I thought it fell under deletion of other users work or whatever... --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 01:54, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :You're really really really dumb. Nubis deleted that page because he'd already moved it into your [[User:Kakashi_on_crack/toilet_tactics|userspace]]. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 01:56, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::well sorry XD I was looking for it for about ten minutes and tried everything under the sun :P anyways I ended up aparently deleting the save file somehow... --[[User:Kakashi on crack|Gat]] 02:00, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::It's sysop courtesy to inform the users that their pages have been moved, it makes it easier for the user, but sometimes we forget, sorry. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 02:59, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::Or sometimes we're nubis.--{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 04:04, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::"We're" {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 06:10, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Header Images ==
| |
|
| |
| In some of the [[Dulston| North-Eastern]] [[Pescodside|suburbs]], I've seen some images, used alogn with the headers, such as [[Image:AquaMonument.jpg|22px]], [[Image:AquaInfo.jpg|22px]] and [[Image:AquaReviv.jpg|22px]]. I think they give a nicer aesthetic feel to the page. I'd be willing to add them to the other suburbs, but ideally, I'd like to ask a sysops permission first, as it's a change to the overall format of the page. (Well, just adding an image, but still). What do you think?--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 14:39, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :Sysops don't have any more say over the aesthetics or content (except NPOV) of pages than anyone else. The only reason you should feel the need to ask a sysop before doing something is if you think it might be taken as being vandalism, and the sort of thing you're looking to do is anything but. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 14:59, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::Thanks, well I'll get right to work on that then. I just didn't want an a/vb case or anything.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 15:01, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::There's seriously honestly truly no need to be wary of being accused of vandalism, much less being "convicted" of it, when you're doing something so obviously in good faith. You do get the odd stupid case from numbskulls who don't bother to ask the person they're accusing about their actions beforehand, but those are a rarity.<br />BTW: Making A/VB cases doesn't have anything to do with being a sysop in any way shape or form. We do make the majority of them but that's because we - for the most part - tend to either be more active than most people or are simply a bit more alert. It doesn't bear any relation to our position at all. {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 15:09, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::(sorry if I'm harping on a bit here but I really don't like that particular misconception - nothing against you or anything) {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 15:10, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::No, I moreso asked a sysop because they have the power to vote, and being a sysop means that you're meant to ahve a better understanding of policy. I was wondering if it breached a policy I was unaware of. I've done the first 10 or so, and I'll continue with the rest another time. I should have finished it within the week. Then I'll start work on trying to get all suburb pages ordered in the same way.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 15:24, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::Ah, I misunderstood slightly. Sorry! {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 15:26, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::Nah, don't worry, it was a misleading statement.--{{User:Yonnua Koponen/signature}} 15:27, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :::::::I should probably start calling this Cyberbob's talk page soon, he always seems to get on when I'm not around. Good luck, Yonnua. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 16:02, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| ::::::::[[User_talk:Cyberbob240/Archive7#ghosts|OBJECTION]] {{User:Cyberbob240/Sig}} 16:07, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| == Excuse me? ==
| |
|
| |
| "Please do not modify suggestion timestamps to deceive users and to "legally" submit two suggestions in the one day. Similarly, do not post humorous/attack suggestions. Further vandalism may end up in your editing privileges being revoked. --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 03:19, 27 August 2009 (BST) "
| |
|
| |
| I didn't change the timestamp to "legally" submit two suggestions in one day. And why can't I post humorous suggestions? Climaxville isn't an attack at anyone... {{unsigned|BlueSpurt|}}
| |
| :Humourous suggestions are seen as vandalism if posted in the main suggestion system. There is a [[Humorous Suggestions|separate place]] to put them. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 16:29, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
|
| |
| A) There is no feasible reason why you should have changed the timestamp on your suggestion and the fact that it was superseded by a multi suggestion made it look bad. B) You can't post humourous suggestions because putting them in the main suggestions system is vandalism. C) Regardless of whether it is/isn't an attack at all, (B) still applies in the justification of your warning. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 16:31, 27 August 2009 (BST)
| |
| :'''RE:''' Okay, fair enough, but I did take it out of the main suggestions system after like 5 minutes. I do have a question though, maybe I'm an idiot and oblivious to the obvious, but why is everyone so worked up about it in the developing suggestions syste? {{unsigned|BlueSpurt|}}
| |
