User talk:Nicks

Very nearly with the incipient infection. The only problem is you can't cite an article in the same round you're in unless someone's actually already written it, or at least made it a phantom in an earlier round--if you could we'd end with with more articles than people. But other than that it looks good. I like the actual writing, too. Nice job.--'STER-Talk-Mod 19:28, 3 May 2006 (BST)

On another note, you should probably cut down the number of total articles linked to in your articles. It will make it a bit easier for everyone to tie everything together. 2-3 phantoms per article should be best.

Thanks, Darth Sensitive 23:16, 3 May 2006 (BST)

Let me rephrase that. :) You should most likely cut down on the phantoms. Adding links to articles that already exist just increases the intrigue.

Darth Sensitive 23:48, 3 May 2006 (BST)

As a suggestion, you should remove either Abigail_Batey_(Lexicon) or Genomic_Resequencing_(Lexicon) from the Incipient_infection_(Lexicon) page. If you do that, the contradictions created by the triad of articles surrounding Genomic_Resequencing_(Lexicon) will be cleared up quite nicely. Thank you in advance for your consideration. -Wyn ^(talk!) 04:12, 4 May 2006 (BST)

Lexicon correction

I removed the Genomic Resequencing link in Incipient infection and it seems to "fix" the conflicts..Sorry folks! I linked to the GR page before it had been filled in. - Nicks 04:23, 4 May 2006 (BST)

• It's alright to link to phantom articles, it's just that the content of the phantom article as dictated by my article was contradictory to the content that your article required. If you had to have removed Dr. Batey, the Genomic Resequencing link could have stayed in. It was just an either-or thing. Darth Sensitive is removing Delta Alpha Omega from his article for the same reason. It's just the Dr. Batey/Delta Alpha Omega link to Genomic Sequencing that was incompatible. -Wyn ^(talk!) 04:41, 4 May 2006 (BST)

Um, while Quarantine Force (Lexicon) was quite good, it only has one citation to a future round...you'll need to add another...sorry.--'STER-Talk-Mod 00:21, 27 May 2006 (BST)

Families of Malton

As a member of the Outbreak Lexicon team I thought you might be interested in looking at and/or helping with the Families of Malton project. Conndraka^{mod T W!} 01:49, 30 May 2006 (BST)

Finishing the Lexicon?

We've had about a month of inactivity with the lexicon, and we're only missing 7 articles. You think you can handle writing one or two more then help with final cleanup? We really can do it! (Please RE on my talk page. --Darth Sensitive ^W! 00:42, 27 July 2006 (BST)

Go ahead and add your articles - we only have 3 more red ones. We want this thing finished! (And I'm not the one doing the wrap-up.) --Darth Sensitive ^W! 15:12, 31 July 2006 (BST)

New Lexicon

I know the old one never really got finished, but I'd still reall like to do another one. You wrote some of the best articles in Outbreak. Please discuss here.--'STER-Talk-Mod^P! 02:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Just a quick reminder; DEF articles are due this Friday.--'STER-Talk-Mod^P! 01:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Requesting Your Vote

Hi Nicks. I have a suggestion up for voting in previous days now, from Dec 31st, called Lower The AP Cost To Use Syringes On Murder Victims. It's designed to slightly discourage PKing by making survivor deaths from zombies a tiny bit more effective by lowering the cost to revive someone who was PK'd to 5AP from 10AP. It doesn't stop PKers from doing their thing but it should make victories as a zombie the more attractive option. The suggestion could sure your keep vote to pass. Thanks, I appreciate it! --Jon Pyre 08:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Lexicon?

Hello I'm just going around checking the Lexicons current status and am wondering if you are still interested in working on it. If you do not want to work on the Lexicon anymore could you please either move down to Alternates or dropped out players. - Vantar 20:44, 3 June 2007 (BST)

Lexicon Revival

Hey Im checking in to see if you would be interested in finally finishing the Lexicon. When I returned to UD after a long absence and I saw that the Lexicon was not done yet and I think we should try to finish it off and give it a fitting end.--Slowwber 19:11, 14 March 2008 (UTC)