User talk:Ruining

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Revision as of 01:10, 1 February 2006 by Serpico (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

You may find this to be interesting reading: -- Ruining

  • So, I'm guessing he was pushing human-centric stuff over on that page too? Fluffing the text to inaccurately imply one side was more successful/powerless than it really was? Hmmm. I'd say that the wiki misses nothing, but somehow I no longer believe that. The logged versions of the Mall Tour page aren't as they were when I reverted-to-zmo earlier, and yet someone changed the group info box on the right from "Mall Tour '06" to "United Circus Freaks"... Hmmmmm... - Serpico 01:10, 1 Feb 2006 (GMT)

Ruining, your actions have called for an Arbitration between you and other aggrieved parties. It would be appreciated if you could visit your case Humorous_Suggestions & Suggestions/8th-Dec-2005, and participate in the process, so a mutually agreeable solution can be reached. -- Odd Starter talk | Mod 03:12, 14 Dec 2005 (GMT)

First I'd like to extend a cold dead hand of friendship from Zombie Inc We are intrigued by your training methods and impressed by the power of your clan. However it is our belief that all effort not directed agaist Caiger Mall is effort wasted, These humans laugh in the face of our superiority and dare feel safe in our city. Plaese join us and our most powerfull allies in riding malton of this menace, before the spirt of this rebellion reaches your own territory. --bbrraaiinnss NOV 30

If you have constructive ideas as to fixing zombies post them, otherwise sit down. This wiki is ineffectual enough without people posting their complaints on the front page. I especially like all your petty ramblings about the democratic process when you enlisted your group to try and stuff the ballet box to save your suggestion. --Zaruthustra 01:56, 9 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Oh noes! Cause I just didn't post a three page skill revamp to zombies, and I certainly don't play one. I get head shot like everybody else. Zombies aren't overpowered. For god sake we can't be killed. I get headshot every day just like you. The thing is I actually try to do something about it instead of sitting on the front page filling up space with ironic drivel. I don't really have any interest in discussing this. Just keep your complaints in discussion and off the front page. --Zaruthustra 03:15, 9 Dec 2005 (GMT)

PS: "When your ignorant, ill-conceived, idiotic, idiosyncratic ideologies settle down" Careful with those big words, you might hurt yourself.

"Indeed, it is a testament to ALIENwolve's exceptional abilities that he was able to promote up to the lower rank of Second Lieutenant." Funny story, actually... --ALIENwolve 03:23, 9 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Ok, all my better judgement tells me this is a waste of time but you've kind of piqued my interest. For my zombie I think you're giving him a little too much credit. I would have to have been very dedicated to the harmans indeed to grind 14 levels with no skill except bodybuilding. He just revived to grab body building and a flak jacket before returning to get brainrot. I don't think theres anything really to discuss on the third point either, as much fun as nitpicking the grammar of others is. But how do you say zombies are underpowered? Boring as hell for sure but not gimped. Headshot is a minor deterent at best, barricades are no match for the horde, and claws have some of the highest average damage in the game. --Zaruthustra 03:35, 9 Dec 2005 (GMT)

Perhaps you don't understand why I don't like your suggestion, so allow me to elaborate on the problem with "protest votes." If your protest vote manages to go through the voting process successfully, it fully legitimizes using the Suggestions page simply to air grievances without promoting effective solutions. Sure, you may think your "Not Have Zombies" suggestion is a good way to make it known that you don't like what is going on with the zombie class - but if it gets through, it means the next day's suggestions could have "Not Have Survivors" in it. Or "Not Have YuriRuler," or "Not Have Ankle Grab," or "Not Have Pubs." And everyone may think that they're making a perfectly cogent point with their protest suggestion, but in the end all it leads to is a cluttered and mostly-devoid-of-use Suggestions page. If we allow people to specifically make suggestions that are bloody obviously NOT going to be included in the game, simply to air grievances, we might as well not even have a Suggestions page at all. Because its original purpose - providing useful ideas to Kevan - will have been buried under all the people with a grudge and no regard for the constructive point of the page. And that's just a waste altogether. --Drakkenmaw 21:25, 12 Dec 2005 (GMT)

He does not get that it's meant for productive suggestions. Everyone voted Keep because they thought it was funny. Guess what? Everyone thinks it's FUNNY... FUNNY goes to Humorous. Even if it went to Peer Reviewed it wouldn't be implemented. So maybe instead of thinking about a 12-year-old think about not posting an idea you'd get while high. --ALIENwolve 21:37, 12 Dec 2005 (GMT)
Personal tools