User talk:Sexylegsread

All posts that were here, that now aren't here, can be found in the Archives. 2007 or 2008

New Posts/Rules

• New posts at the bottom of the page, use that little + button at the top of your screen.
• Always sign your posts.
• Remember that I enjoy wiki wars, so if you have a problem, please tell.
• Refer to me as "Sir" or I will delete your posts.

• kidding, btw.

hai

update your user page, and check this lol, a/vb archives are classic. Shame the histories don't work though. Also, are you at fingallol?--xoxo 00:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Ugh

Why does your signature hurt so much? Liberty 04:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

It also happens to break the signature policy. --Karek^maps?! 04:21, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Please explain how, and I will oblige. The sig doesn't break the page on this browser, if it does on yours, send me a screenie and we will sort it out.--CyberRead240 10:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

It should be obvious from his link, that he doesn't think it links to your user page... it does, it's just hidden by all the crap you've included, multiple times, to make it hard to find who's signature it is. It doesn't break the letter of the policy, but it does break the spirit pretty blatantly.
Thankfully you never say anything worth knowing who the author is -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:32 29 January 2009 (BST)

OH SNAP. Boxeh u r teh kulest--CyberRead240 10:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Signature Policy

The handle portion of your signature must link to your user page or one its subpages so that it is easy for readers to learn more about the person behind the signature.

It needs to be obvious who the author is. Hiding it among a gazillion other links doesn't do that. It needs to clearly link to your user page. Not doing that means it not only breaks the letter of the policy but the spirit as well. --Karek^maps?! 01:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

It isn't a gazillion it is 16. It is repeated 3 or 4 times. Policy isn't strict enough on sigs tbh.--CyberRead240 01:22, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Can you at least use more than the letter d?--Suicidal Angel - Help needed? 01:35, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Nah, I like d, its my letter.--CyberRead240 01:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Did you guys ever stop to think maybe instead of bitching and coming down like a hardass you could just ask if he would mind moving the user link to the first d and shaving off a few of the extra ds? You could at least try talking to him first. When you guys rewrite the sig policy be sure to include no blinking text and no spoilers. --– Nubis ^NWO 23:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

How is this any of those things? I came here to let him know that it was breaking the policy and was explaining how so that he could alter it and have the information for the future. Being a hardass would have been instantly reverting it and escalating him and then calling him an idiot for breaking my user page and making a sig full of ds, the point is I'd actually have to mind the sig and not the fact that it isn't clear who is signing(which was the only problem with it). --Karek^maps?! 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Didn't mean that at you, Karek. I was just annoyed with the whole way Hag treated the case. I was venting.--– Nubis ^NWO 02:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Administration

Your signature breaks the Signature Policy and was changed to make it easy for people a) to identify you as the author of your edits b) have an easily identifiable link to your user page. Further edits of this kind will be seen as vandalism, and dealt accordingly. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Hagnat (talk • contribs) at 12:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

what isn't easily identifiable as scrolling over the fucking D's until you find the link to the userpage? Wiki bullshit, you cant stand anyone that makes your policies look like shit. You're all fucking retarded no life mother fuckers who wont fuck anything with a definable hole until your own fucking carcass erodes into itself and you spasm in a fucking motion towards the corroded hole in the front of your graves you pathetic wastes of human space. Except Hagnat. I don't mind you sometimes.--CyberRead240 13:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

You swear like a 12 year old on Xbox Live, fyi. --Cyberbob 13:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

You would know. Yeah, I've seen your Xbox live profile online. I email searched it. "OMG I TOTALY HEDSHOT THAT GUY B4 I SHUD JOIN MLG YA TLTW?!"--CyberRead240 13:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

moar cyberstalking? you're a sad, sad child. also, that stuff is pretty obviously bullshit as a) I haven't played halo in months, b) even when I did play it was kind of meh anc c) funny third thing. --Cyberbob 14:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Lol. You should commend me, it was hard to find that halo profile through the abundance of fail that came up while searching for you. And unless someone shares your email, it can't be bullshit. Gtfo my talk page, it's a halofag fanboy free zone.--CyberRead240 14:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

You are creating needless drama over something that is bothering several users in this wiki... for teh lulz. You have been asked to change your sig by several users, and even after an unofficial warning was given you still went ahead and reverted your sig for what it looked like. You were given links to the signature policy, and even admits to be abusing it. You leave me no choice but to warn you for vandalism, thus banning you for a week. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Hagnat (talk • contribs) at 16:08, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Why don't you give him five more days the policy says he gets before an escalation? --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 16:12, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

You could also protect his signature page after reverting back to a more sensible version. Linkthewindow  Talk  16:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

I've never been so proud of you, hagnat. --Cyberbob 16:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Wow, I thought we got along rather well. :'( --Suicidal Angel - Help needed? 15:38, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

New Sig

If there is an issue, say so here before you go all wiki warrior on it.--CyberRead240 15:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Still annoying, but I find no problem with it.--Suicidal Angel - Help needed? 15:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

It's ~4k of html code every time that appears on a page. --Midianian^|T|DS|C:RCS| 16:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm tired, but if I'm not mistaken, for a wiki page, that's quite large isn't it? Could be a problem, huh?--Suicidal Angel - Help needed? 16:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

If your surfing the net with a Nintendo DS, on a net connection from a Vietnamese provider. Liberty 01:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)