User talk:The man

READ THIS BEFORE POSTING

If you wanna post something on my page, please do it from the BOTTOM, thank you The man 18:33, 9 September 2007 (BST)

BMC

Glad to see someone still looking after that page and keeping an eye on the groups activity. Thanks.

PS: added a header for the post below mine, wasn't sure what to do so just added it to conform to your page rules. - User:Whitehouse 12:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

?

In response to your question in my own talk, I'd like to say, yeah, I was in DNA, surprised they/I was remembered. I'll keep your advice in mind. User:Steven Faer

Please stop..

..editing the BMC page. It's considered poor form to edit a statement made by someone other than oneself. You'll also note that I explained that members with a negative impact outweighing their positive contributions would not be mentioned. Also, I am the police is still with us (got his internet connection back). If you want something changed, you are free to ask for it on the talk page. I know you're trying to be helpful, but it would honestly be better if you left the page alone, the only changes I am looking for these days is keeping the list of past members up to date, and leaving a statement when we finally leave this game. - User:Whitehouse 00:17, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

By the way, thought you should know that we continued the tradition you started and had a Christmas party in the Beable Arms this year too. It was on a smaller scale, but fun all the same.

PS: Happy Christmas.

User:Whitehouse 17:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

A/D

Hey, just so you know some pages you have been involved with are up for deletion.--xoxo 04:38, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey, whitey

Why you go insulting my beliefs on the Servants of Allah page? I don't need this racist shit on the UdWiki, I encounter it regularly enough in everyday life. Keep to yourself, or you will feel Allah, trust me.--CyberRead240 03:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Roywood

Hi - since you seem to be showing interest in our area and seem to have more exsperience than me - would you like to help fix the Roywood wiki page a bit and reply to the discussion in the Roywood discusion page - I feel (even if it is short lived) that this needs to be done. Many thanks in advance. --Feon Kensai 19:06, 8 October 2008 (BST)

Forget it - there have been realworld issues that prevent me from doing anythings - sorry for waisting your time --Feon Kensai 16:01, 9 October 2008 (BST)

RE: Historical status much?

The BMC is only 2 numbers away from being technically dead. When the time comes, if I nominate the group for historical status its going to be rejected simply because its me. So, yeah, I was wondering if you could do it when the time comes? The man 14:56, 28 September 2008 (BST)

Let the BMC decide when they are dead. As for historical status, chances are low. Although we have been here since sometime in late 2005 not that many people have noticed us. The FU and our allies are the only people who really know us. - User:Whitehouse 14:57, 28 September 2008 (BST)

we were well known in the old days so the earlier the group is nominated, the higher the chance is of getting historical status. People are slowly forgetting this group exists. The man 23:46, 30 September 2008 (BST)

Be that as it may, we can not nominate a group till it well and truly is dead. - User:Whitehouse 23:56, 30 September 2008 (BST)

No, we can't. A group is dead when either it is completely gone, or when it declares itself dead. There is nothing we can do about that. Anyhow, about Dulston, no idea what happened. I had an alt in that area, and the place suddenly began falling. The North was lost and it began to creep south. Not sure who is behind it. Could just be ferals that became too much for the DA. - User:Whitehouse 12:59, 1 October 2008 (BST)

RE: Well?

What did the council say about the history page? The man 10:30, 10 September 2008 (BST)

You wont believe this, but they actually haven't given me an answer. The people who responded were the non council admins, and they were divided, saying either toss it or edit it. I've repeated my request for an answer. - User:Whitehouse 14:05, 10 September 2008 (BST)

Right, I am to rewrite and such. I'll run rewrites by both you and the council for approval. - User:Whitehouse 15:49, 12 September 2008 (BST)

Eastonwood

Please don't revert the danger level back to Ghost Town... FTR I read your history AFTER I changed it to V/D... But I agree with CannibalX... The news report was incomplete. And unconvincing. And POV: I fixed it. Please contact me on beerhah.com (Wan Yao) or Barhah (Bobby_Bubonic), I want to talk about this further in private, thanks. --WanYao 21:24, 14 May 2008 (BST)

Ad

Here, instructions for adding it to the recruitment page are there as well. Also, read the recruitment page guidelines although I'm sure you know how to do it, things might have changed since I gave up that job. But as far as I know Iscariot is doing an excellent job of keeping the page tidy and up to date. - W 11:23, 13 May 2008 (BST)

Well, best of luck with finding new members. But currently, seeing as the suburb just got steam rolled, that might be hard. - W 11:31, 13 May 2008 (BST)

Fuck off faggot

Get fucked and get off The Dead's page/nuts please. Also sign your A/VB snitching you pathetic cowardly piece of shit. --Riseabove 13:44, 18 April 2008 (BST)

Pics or it didn't happen

Just because you walked once through Eastonwood, this does not automatically make that suburb a ghost town. You need to realise this. You have continued to revert it from very dangerous to ghost town without reason. Either you give a reason as to why it’s a ghost town or give us some sort of proof or please refrain from editing the danger level. --CannibalX 19:46, 7 May 2008 (BST)

Chill

someone posted proof in the news thats its (as I said) very dangerous (May 6th), there's no need to fight me as I got the proof I asked for. --CannibalX 17:50, 21 May 2008 (BST)

In Response

Ahhh, Chris, I know you’re young. And there are things about you personally that I respect, including your RL background. But there is one thing you simply don’t understand - you need to grow up and learn to take responsibility for your actions. You like to play with fire and stir people up, but don’t want to pay the price? I’m sorry, but you can’t play the game that way. Misrepresenting yourself gets you into trouble, plain and simple. So does making hotheaded threats that past history shows you usually end up regretting later. You ask for a chance to change and then I see insulting posts like the one you just made on my talk page. Where’s the change? I really don’t care what you do in regard to making templates and the like. Be my guest. But do consider stopping the childish antics and hiding behind anonymous names to conceal your actions and change your behavior instead. You just might be a happier person in the end.--Priapus 18:31, 3 April 2008 (BST)

Hmmm, yes, anonymity was not the right word. You are correct there. I should have said hiding behind alts and alternate identities. For example, you represented yourself on ‘The Dead’s’ talk archive as a zombie player, conveniently leaving out the fact that you also play survivor and, in reality, likely have survivor interests most in mind. That is misrepresenting yourself. As far as the BMC goes, I never said you speak for them or lead them or represent them, I just said you are part of their group. Which you are. And it’s public knowledge, at least on the FU forum, who you are. Why try and hide it on the wiki unless you wish to misrepresent yourself? You have been posting stuff for awhile on The Dead's talk page, obviously annoying them. You say you don’t like to stir up problems, but you keep going back to them and riling them up. When I saw that people are confused enough to think you are actually Kevan, I felt it was time to set the record straight. Please explain to me why I should keep your identity a secret. And as far as your previous actions and those of folks like Killdare and Snuffleuff, I don’t think anyone has all the facts, including you, so I prefer not to comment. You might want to do the same.--Priapus 19:16, 3 April 2008 (BST)

Vandalism

Your edit on the page The_Dead/Original_Talk_Page (10:24, 29 March 2008 The man (Talk | contribs)) is technically considered vandalism since that page is a subpage of The Dead and you are not a member of this group. This means that you do not have editing rights for that page and any subsequent subpage. You have been reported here [1] --DCC 12:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

sigh re: that sarge

i think we're probably in accord on this, eh? ... i'm done with it ... and i posted to buddy's talk page ... but for fuck sake, sheeeeeesh ... i think you know what i mean, eh? sigh. well, whatever... wanna bet on whether same thing happens tonight? i hope not, but... --WanYao 17:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Mall Status Map

You know you can just look at page history to see who started the page, right? --~~~~ [talk] 22:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

yeah well...

that i wasn't sure about, i got fooled like many others by that screenshot they had. and besides, it was way the hell up in creedy, not my jurisdiction, i just like to try and keep the south civil. ^_^ --Bullgod 22:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

yeah, im just saying that the news isnt the place to go off on wild stories like that. altho Whittenside is usually agreeable to some flavor text. some other burbs get anal about it, they freak out if you talk in the first person on the news page, even if just stating facts. XD --Bullgod 02:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...

Yeah, I don't think there are many people who've figured that out... BB=WY... It's kind of funny... And I think I enjoy playing the whole split personality thing... ;P --WanYao 13:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

PM me ... either on Brainstock or barhah.com, doesn't matter... we should talk... but privately. --WanYao 21:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Question

Ah well then sorry for the mistake.--Rico Montoya 22:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

All I would like to know is why you felt my saying Buckley fell on the 27th was false news when it did fall.--Rico Montoya 00:01, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Comeback

Thanks. And I'm glad to see you didn't have any hard feelings. I was just tired of seeing it everywhere.  Nalikill  ^{TALK  E!  W!  M!  USAI}  00:46, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Stop posting shit on A/VB

You are hereby soft warned for posting shit on A/VB. Please refrain from conributing directly on the page unless you are anm involved party. We have a talk page for people to chat on. --The Grimch ^{U! E! WAT!} 16:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

No news is... well... no news!

In regards to this edit and the previous day's entry... Saying "nothing has changed" every day or two is just spam. One should post news when there have been developments... That is why I am going to delete these two entries... --WanYao 14:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

funny, i had just come to the wiki now to change the news myself, turns out things have changed big time. The man 15:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

"juicybraindrinker"?

Quoted from the Fort Perryn page:

October 17th It has been discovered that the cause of the rapid fall of the fort was caused by a zerger named juicybraindrinker who used 40 alts (yes thats right, 40 alts for 1 person) to attack targets in whittenside and pennville simultaneously. the zerger upon being discovered, changed his group affiliation for his alts in an attempt to hide his crimes and is still zerging all across the south east. The man 20:00, 17 October 2007 (BST)

Searching the name juicybraindrinker brings up only the above and the person's inclusion on Feral Undead/Member List.

Where did you get this information? Zerging is a very serious accusation, especially if you try to say that a major zombie victory was only acheived thanks to cheaters.

--Jac Z 22:26, 17 October 2007 (BST)

it has been discussed on brainstock, the zerging did not cause the downfall of the fort...however it did cause the downfall of everyhtign else within the vicinity. juicybraindrinker is a former FU member that has gone rogue. I'd make a wiki page containing a copy paste of the evidence from the forum I heard about the zerging.....but I don't know how to make new wiki pages :P The man 22:32, 17 October 2007 (BST)

nevermind, I created one http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Juicybraindrinker The man 22:49, 17 October 2007 (BST)

Cause when I think real news and practical people that aren't paranoid I think Brainstock.--Karek^maps?! 23:31, 17 October 2007 (BST)

The Rottary Club

My point exactly my good sir! Thanks for the vote of confidence! Don't hesitate to put the Rottary template on your page! Cheers! --PROJECT K9 | _FU^{Talk | Rottary} 15:58, 11 October 2007 (BST)

Danger levels in the NW

eerm... danger levels really shouldn't be changed without scouting or at least some external military reports to back up the claims. you can't just assume something... you don't know, there could be lots of zombies in these burbs. there are people actively scouting the area, maybe it's best to await first-hand reports before making changes. and, you could be (justifiably) charged with vandalism for changing the danger reports without evidence... i won't do it, but you should be very careful, others will... --WanYao 16:58, 9 September 2007 (BST)

hmmm, ok I'll revert some of the stuff then. The man 16:59, 9 September 2007 (BST)

good call... i'm hoping to scout the area myself within a few days. it probably IS a ghost town, but you never know... it could have lots of zombies... it could all be 'caded up! you don't know... --WanYao 17:02, 9 September 2007 (BST)

yeah, i'm aware of that, thats why I didn't argue with you :P The man 17:04, 9 September 2007 (BST)

See, it wasn't a ghost town! I did a scout and found a lot more zombies there than in most of the other burbs in the area -- and a much bigger survivor presence, as well... That's why you don't jump da gun! ;) --WanYao 03:32, 10 September 2007 (BST)

lol! it was a similar story in darvall heights :P I got an old character to scout it out. The man 15:20, 10 September 2007 (BST)

Chris, I'm curious why you changed the danger level of Shearbank to green (safe) yesterday. If you are along on the FU Church Lurch, you will surely see that it is nowhere near that. There are tons of zombies in the area and frequent break-ins. I reverted it back to moderate.--Priapus 14:37, 21 September 2007 (BST)

Hey

Hey Chris. Nice to see you using my talk page too now. You might want to consider removing the welcomnewbie template if you have finished reading it. :P - Whitehouse 21:55, 11 July 2007 (BST)

hehe, nah, it contains useful info. I'll keep it for a while :P The man 11:42, 12 July 2007 (BST)

I finally removed it :P The man 20:33, 19 September 2007 (BST)

and now I regret it...

	AHHH!
	This user is frustrated because he cannot figure out how to find Matthew Fahrenheit's user page.

The man 21:08, 28 September 2007 (BST)

Try Matthew Fahrenheit. --Dylan Mak Tyme 19:05, 6 October 2007 (BST)

thanks, but isn't there something I can type in the search bar that will allow me to find usernames? or must I go searching for pages with their signature on it? The man 21:37, 6 October 2007 (BST)

Noob mistake on Danger Report

Yeah, did you take a screen of that screwup, or is it in the history of the wiki? I should have checked after making my contribution :X (I'll definitely do that from now on :D) --Socco 23:12, 3 October 2007 (BST)

man, I wish I did....alas I have no screenie, needless to say it was hilarious XD the whole map was like distored and stuff...oh man you shoulkd have seen it The man 12:46, 4 October 2007 (BST)

RE: River Kevan

Fictional. - Whitehouse 13:59, 4 October 2007 (BST)

ah, thanks The man 14:13, 4 October 2007 (BST)

cookie template

to be used when I need to

	A FREE COOKIE
	user1 has given user2 a cookie for insert reason here

B.E.S.T. Help Request

The survivors are retaking the Fort Perryn, but we need help, I've retaken the gatehouse and require assistance, please help us retake Fort Perryn Agent Fenix 02:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Pac Man Vote

You voted twice, since it they have the same time-stamp I struck them, feel free to unstrike the one you actually wanted to cast or some such. But, you're kinda only allowed 1 vote.--Karek^maps?! 21:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

must have been an accident, sorry. The man 10:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL

Sigh, there are zombies in most resource buildings. You do know zombies count right?...I'm tempted to go ahead and change it again just so I can laugh at you on the vandal banning page, but I wont, instead i'm going to take some Iwitness records, show why it should be counted as dangerous and then change it. PS: I am open minded, if my Iwitness records show it should be a ghost town I'll leave it alone.--Thekooks 23:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't you look like a moron now :D Are you even in Dunnel Hills? Check Dunnel Hills Update talk page.--Thekooks 23:22, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Right

I think it is great that you are spending an effort on the suburb map, however you clearly don't understand the reasonably simple suburb map danger system, thats ok, lots of people get confused by it at first. So I thought I would help.

Here is the System: http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Template:MapColors

As you can see everything is fairly straight forward, you recently changed the danger level of Fryernbank saying that there were over 70 zombies, you changed it to Moderate when the System says:

"Moderate Active zombies and break-ins, but no 50+ hostile hordes"

so clearly it should have been Very Dangerous instead, which is for over 50+ hordes.

If you need any help or anything explained further feel free to ask.--Thekooks 19:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

there is not a 50+ horde in DH at this time. It is a ghost town. There are zeds there that only unidle when the DHPD comes back to its suburb, which we have stayed out of, hence, there is no one there. -- Cisisero 05:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Also for further clarification, a horde is a group of zombies. Not a bunch of stragglers, which is what all of the zombies that reside in DH are. -- Cisisero 05:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I don't know anything about what's going on there but just and fyi no zombie mobs of over 10 and no total zombies over 60 If there's a mob of 10 it doesn't meet the requirements, any 10 zombies on one block(or say 8-9 with 1-2 bodies or zombies nearby) shouldn't be gray. It's not just less than 60 zombies in the suburb.--Karek^maps?! 06:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I think the largest horde in the area is 7 or 8, that is in the one NT in the suburb. I dunno either way I could care less if the color is white or red :P --Cisisero 18:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

what the hell? The man 18:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Left 4 Dead

Would you kindly explain what's wrong with it?Or are you one of those Source mod freaks?--Gamestriker4 20:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned Images

File:Output.gif which you uploaded is currently unused and is subject to deletion if it is older than two weeks. If you wish to ensure that it remains on this wiki then you will need to ensure that it is included in at least one page on this wiki..--A Helpful Little Bot 21:23, 18 September 2011 (BST)

Yeah, delete that shit.... ZS is such a bad game now. The man 18:57, 7 October 2011 (BST)