Difference between revisions of "User talk:Vapor"

From The Urban Dead Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
(revert)
(revert)
Line 86: Line 86:
 
:::::::::With my IQ is nothing wrong, DDR, it's 130. Of course I know it's bad faith. It's fun to lawyer though, and what's even more fun is the fact that you can't prove that ''I knew'' the image was on Harrison's page. It's defenitely a loop in the rules. Stuff was worth all the lulz though. I won't do it again. ;) {{User:Generaloberst/s}} 8:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 
:::::::::With my IQ is nothing wrong, DDR, it's 130. Of course I know it's bad faith. It's fun to lawyer though, and what's even more fun is the fact that you can't prove that ''I knew'' the image was on Harrison's page. It's defenitely a loop in the rules. Stuff was worth all the lulz though. I won't do it again. ;) {{User:Generaloberst/s}} 8:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 
::::::::::It's official, you really are retarded. Thanks for the confirmation {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 10:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 
::::::::::It's official, you really are retarded. Thanks for the confirmation {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig}} 10:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
 +
:::::::::::It's nice to see how you always come up with 'conclusions' while you never actually elaborate and then claim to be 'right'. And no, accusations and swearing doesn't help to prove your point DDR. I admit that I knew the image was on the page. I admit that it was bad faith. Though who says that it's impossible that I didn't just coincidentally picked a name of a picture that was already on the wiki, didn't read the warnings that said it was on his page and uploaded it? Not reading warnings happen all the time, even terms of use are often not read. People simply see the upload or agree button and click. Furthermore, creating images on this wiki that already existed happens all the time, so why can't it be coincidence in this case? Ok, it isn't the most standard name, but in court, 99% proof is not proof. At the moment 99% proof ''is'' considered proof, then you get stuff like innocent death sentences, innocent life enprisonment, etc. How does it feel hearing that from a '''nazi'''? And then now ''you'' can explain me why in DDR-land people get sentenced for misreading a page and coincidentally picking a name that already existed. This is clearly a loop. Though, given the strong feasibility of vandalism, I would probably have given a soft warning for this myself, I wouldn't have given a 'full' warning because in Generaloberst-land 99% proof isn't proof. The only proof you have is my confession that I knew an image with that name was on the page and read the warnings. Or have you asked Kevan for the logs to see if I checked the source of his page, and then the source of the header? Here you got a nice, clearly elaborated statement. Have a nice day, dumbass. {{User:Generaloberst/s}} 11:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:41, 14 December 2011

  • Talk archive here.
  • Talk Archive #2 here.

Boobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gif Boobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gifBoobs.sh.siggie.gif

you might go blind-- bitch 17:34 16 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall cherish them always. These boobies will never be archived. ~Vsig.png 20:06, 17 March 2011

look >--    : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 12:47, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Disclaimer

This user does not give a fuck
Fucknotgiven.gif

Da Rules

Add new topics wherever you damn well please or if you're lazy click here. That is unless you are Sexualharrison, in which case, click here

how long...

am i banned for? sorry if i'm breaking a rule for logging in but i just saw the message on my talk page. and sorry for asking on your page but wasn't sure if you'd see my response on my talk page. and if i create a new account, can i "transfer" or copy/paste all of my pages to new pages? or can i continue editing pages under Son of Sin userspace logged in under my new account? i'm totally lost. do i have to create new signatures as well? sheesh...i'd rather be banned for awhile than start over with a new account. Son of Sin 19:48, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Candy

That better be a Rare Candy you're feeding the Mudkip, mate. :P --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 05:57, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Considering you're only the second person I've given candy to in-game and the first was a random player I didn't know, yeah I'd say it was rare. May it bring you luck in your Red endeavors. Don't forget to pass it along. Don't eat it, it'll rot or (more likely) break your teeth. Oh wait, do mudkips have teeth? ~Vsig.png 06:19, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
What? It's a rare candy, but not a Rare Candy? Guess it won't increase my level by one. D: --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 06:24, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, but whatever you're referencing it's completely lost on me. I am and old(ish) man, I'm afraid. Enjoy the candy anyhow. ~Vsig.png 06:31, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Sigh...Too old for Pokemon references, I guess. :( --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 06:35, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Aye, that I am. My oldest daughter probably would have caught it. I'm afraid Peekachoos and Mudkips are about where my pokemon knowledge ends. Even then its sparse. ~Vsig.png 06:41, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

?

Im more than happy to end my manhuntingness, if you still need to balance the teams. --Like Moss and The Dude..... 19:25, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

I'd hate to see more drop simply to rebalace things. Let's see how Sailor Moon responds. If we can't get another on Red, I'll step in and join to try to rebalance or if you'd rather switch over instead of dropping altogether that might be better. ~Vsig.png 19:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Birthday coming up = messy weekends, its more of a time available thing. Oh and I hate yon. --Like Moss and The Dude..... 19:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
You too, huh? Mine is on the 10th. Its up to you, man. I'd prefer to see you stay on but if you'll be inactive its understandable. Let me know. ~Vsig.png 20:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Ahoy!

Ye be rollin with the FoD now, I'll be happy to see the impression ye leave on the flotsam in this city! --RaddoX 08:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Indeed, I will leave my impression all over this city. The spoiled and overindulgent masses of Malton surely won't soon forget me when I leave my mark. They shall cower in the dark, palms sweating as they grip their pistols, perhaps more prepared for what lurks outside. ~Vsig.png 14:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Text Rape Nonsense

Hi Vapor, I saw your responses on the misconduct case regarding this issue. Any chance you would care to chime in here? http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/UDWiki_talk:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Text_Rape

Cheers, Gordon 22:33, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned Images

File:PMHunt Header.png which you uploaded is currently unused and is subject to deletion if it is older than two weeks. If you wish to ensure that it remains on this wiki then you will need to ensure that it is included in at least one page on this wiki..--A Helpful Little Bot 11:53, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Axe Hack's Manhunt 5

5 days. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 05:04, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Ms. Pacman

read my disclaimer: if you see my characters in-game, do not lecture me about my wiki opinions ...i am 100% in-character in Malton ...my characters are not text-rapists. Son of Sin 23:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

in-character: i am harmless, why did you shoot me? TheSonOfSin 23:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Yes. I see. Well, that does place us in an unenviable situation, now doesn't it. You see, we feel some things are best solved through violence. In a completely role-playing sense of course. Hmmm...well now. I guess we'll be seeing you around, Mr. Sin. ~Vsig.png 03:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Cobra forums

No idea what it is you want from us, but I have activated your account. -- Spiderzed 19:56, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I needed a way to get a hold of one of your members. Sorry, I'll duck my head in to just say hi. Nothing special. ~Vsig.png 20:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

deleted page

The reason I add that information is so people can see it immediately without going to my profile --Krazyxman 01:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

It is against the rules unfortunately DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 01:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
ok, i fix it to use user page, sorry for mistake --Krazyxman 01:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Heyo

Still waiting for a reply in the nazi's second vandal case. -- Cat Pic.png Thadeous Oakley Talk 21:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

In hindsight, it probably wasn't my best choice of words. Yeah the guy took it out of context but I probably did as well. Perhaps it was your delivery or perhaps I was just caught up. I see now the point you were making but at the time it made it sound like it was always acceptable practice to resize images whenever anyone damn well pleased. Sorry man. It wasn't shitty advice just a shitty situation. ~Vsig.png 21:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

revert

Why did you delete that picture I uploaded? Continuing this behaviour might lead to a warning for Vandalism. Jew. User:Generaloberst/s 7:57, 13 December 2011

what in god's fucking name are you talking about DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 11:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
None of your business. User:Generaloberst/s 13:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
mr craven nazi wannabe is talking about the swastika or other bullshit he added to my header template. subtlety has never been very useful to the nazi's and don't forget we jews invented sarcasm. enjoy your rope. -- HEY! HANDS OFF MAH BOOBS!   bitch   COBRA!   אמת 13:55, 13 December 2011 (bst)
I didn't even edit your page retard. Can you see any edits there? User:Generaloberst/s 14:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
What you did was modify an image uploaded by harrison and used only on his pages. But I'm sure it was a good faith edit. Knock it off. --Like Moss and The Dude..... 18:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Is it bad faith to upload a picture of swastika? Is it bad faith to upload a picture with that name? Did I edit his page? User:Generaloberst/s 21:13, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Replace dear fellow, replace an image. Specifically when there's a reminder asking you if you wish to replace the existing image. Specifically one so obviously named. I think we both know you're too clever to fall back on the ignorance excuse. --Like Moss and The Dude..... 21:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
I saw what happened but the thing is, I hope to fucking god you are trolling. Do you actually literally think what you did is some sort of clever loophole? We pulled shit like this literally 4 years ago with finis. The thing is, what you did is vandalism, not spiderzed, surprise surprise. Must you really fucking fail at everything DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 23:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
PS It's in the upload log, dipshit. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 23:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
With my IQ is nothing wrong, DDR, it's 130. Of course I know it's bad faith. It's fun to lawyer though, and what's even more fun is the fact that you can't prove that I knew the image was on Harrison's page. It's defenitely a loop in the rules. Stuff was worth all the lulz though. I won't do it again. ;) User:Generaloberst/s 8:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
It's official, you really are retarded. Thanks for the confirmation DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
It's nice to see how you always come up with 'conclusions' while you never actually elaborate and then claim to be 'right'. And no, accusations and swearing doesn't help to prove your point DDR. I admit that I knew the image was on the page. I admit that it was bad faith. Though who says that it's impossible that I didn't just coincidentally picked a name of a picture that was already on the wiki, didn't read the warnings that said it was on his page and uploaded it? Not reading warnings happen all the time, even terms of use are often not read. People simply see the upload or agree button and click. Furthermore, creating images on this wiki that already existed happens all the time, so why can't it be coincidence in this case? Ok, it isn't the most standard name, but in court, 99% proof is not proof. At the moment 99% proof is considered proof, then you get stuff like innocent death sentences, innocent life enprisonment, etc. How does it feel hearing that from a nazi? And then now you can explain me why in DDR-land people get sentenced for misreading a page and coincidentally picking a name that already existed. This is clearly a loop. Though, given the strong feasibility of vandalism, I would probably have given a soft warning for this myself, I wouldn't have given a 'full' warning because in Generaloberst-land 99% proof isn't proof. The only proof you have is my confession that I knew an image with that name was on the page and read the warnings. Or have you asked Kevan for the logs to see if I checked the source of his page, and then the source of the header? Here you got a nice, clearly elaborated statement. Have a nice day, dumbass. User:Generaloberst/s 11:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Personal tools
project wonderful
column-okay