User talk:MoonShine

:-(

This is me right now :-( --mo ヽ(´ー｀)ﾉ ^{MCM MOB DB} 13:04, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Izza me like this again :-( --mo ヽ(´ー｀)ﾉ ^{MCM MOB DB} 15:02, 9 August 2009 (BST)

I hate you freckington!

Yus I do! --mo ヽ(´ー｀)ﾉ ^{MCM MOB DB} 01:17, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

<3

YOU NEED MOAR CRAP ON YOUR TALK PAGE! --Amber Waves of Pain 14:30, 8 May 2009 (BST)

Warning

Please do not post humorous suggestions on this wiki. Continuing this behaviour may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. -- Linkthewindow  Talk  05:27, 1 July 2009 (BST)

Also, here's your paddle reference. Linkthewindow  Talk  05:27, 1 July 2009 (BST)

<3 --MoonShine 05:28, 1 July 2009 (BST)

	Humorous Suggestion!
	You'd better believe that's a paddlin'!

-- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 10:47 1 July 2009 (BST)

Your signature?

Did you want it with the text box around it? If not, just get rid of the space before the start of the codes. --Rahrah^{Come join the #party!}16:22, 16 July 2009 (BST)

i actually wanted the space between the -- and the &heart; and was testing it and it should work even with the textbox on the sig page -- ♥ Moonie ^{BI | RRF | LCGHC | MOB} 16:25, 16 July 2009 (BST)

Sock Puppets, Misguidance, Stickassedness.

Oi! since you don't unnnerstan' what a fock'n sock puppet is, (Speshly since that user page links to this fock'n user page.) oy's got a lickle fock'n pitcha for ya:

[Image:drib.jpg]

Fock'n sweet work on talking to a bloke before reporting it to a fock'n wiki tho. Oy's well impressed wiv 'ow you didn't take a fock'n bitch route and go cryin' to alla da big bosses, but decoided to talk it out loike a gent.

Fock, oy's got that bit wrong, now donnoy? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jason 'Fock'n' Stafam (talk • contribs) 10:37, 5 August 2009.

english please, i have no idea what you are talking about ♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 02:28, 5 August 2009 (BST)

Also i removed your obnoxious picture because it's fucking annoying ♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 02:37, 5 August 2009 (BST)

From one BI member to another allow me to translate "Oi, since you don't understand what a fucking sock puppet is, (specially since that user page links to this fucking user page.) I've got a little fucking picture for you: (image) Fucking sweet work on talking to a bloke before reporting it to a fucking wiki though. I was well impressed with how you didn't take a fucking bitch route and go crying to all of the big bosses, but decided to talk it out like a gent." I'll be here all week for translator services :D -- 

•   Timmah!  

•   Talk  

03:12, 5 August 2009 (BST)

Of all the roleplayers on this wiki, I find Statham the most annoying and impossible to understand. --ϑϑℜ 03:15, 5 August 2009 (BST)

I'm sure Jason will be along to thank you for the compliment. --Roorgh 08:57, 5 August 2009 (BST)

Oi fock'n thanks DDR fo' 'dat mother fockin' comment, oy'l be there to towlk' gibberish too ya' in the future oy! --ϑϑℜ 13:33, 5 August 2009 (BST)

Interesting i wonder if he realises that he didn't put the redirect in till after i posted that and I was the one who told link to mention redirects to him? LRN2HISTORY jason.
Also i do believe i did ask you to stop on IRC "loike a gent" months prior to posting that and you agreed but persisted with the harassment nonetheless. ♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 04:22, 5 August 2009 (BST)

As far as the sock puppet claim goes, if you had approached Jason before making the claim you would have found out straight away that he lost the ability to access the account, and if you were to inspect the contributions of the two I would wager you won't find overlapping edits. In return I have a question for you; did you attempt to iron out the problems with Jason before resorting to a vandalism report, as the guidelines state? --Roorgh 08:57, 5 August 2009 (BST)

Suggest (and that guideline is primarily in place for page vandalism there is no good faith whatsoever in any form of harassment) and please read what you're replying to next time. You have my humblest apologies for using the word "sockpuppet" happy? (if you look i didn't bring the VB for sock puppetry but rather harassment sock puppet was just used for lack of a better word on my part). Do you have any reason for bringing this up now a month after it happened aside from trying to start shit? ♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 13:11, 5 August 2009 (BST)

Couple of points: 1. (And this is my issue with you in the first place) Because nobody even bothered to mention it to me, and it's only just been brought to my attention. Sorry for not being telepathic and automatically knowing someone was telling teacher on me. That's my fault and I'll try harder. 2. I don't know who you think you've spoken to on irc, but I don't recall ever talking to you about eyebrows, puppets or anything else in fact. Could you tell me where you think this occured, or show me a log of what we discussed? 3. Check the edits from this user and Jason Stafam. You won't find an overlap. You'll actually find a couple of days gap where I was reluctant to create a new account because I wanted to find the password to the old one. This is also another fault of mine, I'm sorry that I wasn't aware of a conversation you had about me with Link where you told him to talk to me about redirects. I guess I should have been present there, but my telepathy failed again and now I sure do look silly! So to summarise: I'm bringing this up now because you snook around in the dark trying to get me in trouble, you didn't do the decent thing and ask me, and you used coincidence and circumstantial evidence to try and condemn me. That fock'n clear enough for you :) --Jason 'Fock'n' Stafam 13:58, 5 August 2009 (BST)

I didn't expect you to be aware of my conversation with link. i have apologized for the sock puppet comment it was a side note the VB was brought for harassment. This happened a month ago if you look you'll see that the dribbling beavers is struck out on my main page i have other things i need to be spending my time on can you please give this a rest? i'm fock'n sorry okay ♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 14:26, 5 August 2009 (BST)

Also, it's interesting that you can edit my comments without permission, but as soon as we jokingly say we will, all the wiki goes up in arms. Isn't it? Miniedit™: Notice I brought this up with you, not vandal banning? This is how it works. --Jason 'Fock'n' Stafam 13:58, 5 August 2009 (BST)

I signed it and stopped the picture from embedding and notified you of what i did otherwise i didn't alter it in anyway ♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 14:26, 5 August 2009 (BST)

"You may not impersonate (including the act of modifying someone's comment) anywhere." - DDR

"No, you're not allowed to edit someone else's post on any page." - linkthewindow

"openly editing someone else's post is blatant impersonation." - linkthewindow

Well, now what? --M4rduK 14:11, 5 August 2009 (BST)

===[[User:MoonShine]]===

{{vndl|MoonShine}

♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 14:26, 5 August 2009 (BST)

Bit different here - Moonshine didn't remove what you where actually saying, merely removed an image call (and mentioned it further down the page.) If Moonshine replaced your post with "lol ur a fag!!!!" that would be different.

Adding an unsigned message isn't impersonation - it's useful and I do it all the time. Linkthewindow  Talk  14:31, 5 August 2009 (BST)

As link said, adding an unsigned template is fine and dandy, and modifying an image to display the coding instead of the picture is fine and dandy.-- High Overlord and Lead Conspirator of the Administrative Rebellion. Want help? 16:55, 5 August 2009 (BST)

Yep. No altering of meaning. And I'm pretty sure its their talk page (Moonnoise). Look its a sysop threesome of agreement. Just don't make eye contact.--Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 21:47, 5 August 2009 (BST)

Why won't you let dTangent be happy?

Your constant censorship of my courting of Calista is obviously an act of jealousy so I ask you to stand back and let lovers deal with lover matters. --DTangent 08:19, 6 September 2009 (BST)

No ♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 14:01, 6 September 2009 (BST)

I maed you a cookie!

That was a lie :3

	Let's do it! ♥
	This user is killing time like the little blue-bird who has never said a word in my dreams cause I've heard roosters do it when he opens the cage and he sets you free (with a doodle and COCK).

<_<

>_>

BYE!

- Love from Swing XOXOX^Talk 20:20, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

RE: Free Boobies

It's how I show affection! But mostly for funsies <_<. The boobies are a lie? ._. - Love from Swing XOXOX^Talk 00:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

:O

No that's okay, you can keep it - Love from Swing XOXOX^Talk 09:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Re:Ruling

The formatting bit is mostly there since I knew people would pay attention if I said it there, it's not meant to be a genuinely enforced ruling. As for the other thing, I've never liked elections without clear-cut rules, and confusing people as to whether they're voting for a party or a person is not really a good thing. No ruling has actually been finalised yet, though, but I'm not entirely keen on multiple-candidate parties. It's worth bringing it up on the election talk page, and on the talk page for the arbitration case, though. But my ruling won't affect the number of people per party, just the layout of the page. 00:21, 5 June 2010 (BST)

Re: Late breaking news!

Sorry, man, coulda sworn I left you yours before I had to head out. The intent was there, anyway. Plus I figured that you, as Kyle's campaign manager, should have right of reply to our latest argument. Ciao! <3 ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 14:10, 5 July 2010 (BST)

Read your campaign statement again. Closely. Now explore the logical ramifications. I'm sure you'll see it. ᚱᛁᚹᛖᚾᚨᚾᛏ 14:18, 5 July 2010 (BST)

multiple fallacies

Always funny. What did we get wrong? --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 10:20, 10 September 2010 (BST)

Just a couple of small wording choices like "the entire RRF" when the siege was already over before all the RRF teams had even arrived in the bonk and the extent of Gore Corps involvement. I mentioned this in #404 after it was over and was told it was insignificant which may be so but if it's going forward as a historical event accuracy shouldn't be forsaken :/ Aichon's revision (see event talk page) has improved wording ♥ Moonie ^{Talk | Testimonials} 10:29, 10 September 2010 (BST)

Cool. Thanks Moonie! --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 19:02, 10 September 2010 (BST)

gore corps page

i really don't see the need to completely write goolina out of the GC history. no matter how stupid she became in her actions. she is still a part of this teams history and her part should not be forgotten or swept under the rug.--User:Sexualharrison18:20, 13 June 2011 (bst)

I thought it was changed back after the compromise was reached on the forums, sorry. I removed the second link as two in a paragraph to the same page is kind of redundant. We're planning on completely redoing the page in the near future and I will probably just reduce it to a unlinked reference by name (like it used to be) if that's cool. ♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 04:03, 14 June 2011 (BST)

nope that's fine. i'm good with the last edit. just as long as history is not swept under the rug. like it or not she did start the group.--User:Sexualharrison04:17, 14 June 2011 (bst)

No worries. I don't intend to, I wasn't really in full agreement with removing her like that in the first place. ♥ Moonie ^{Talk Testimonials} 04:44, 14 June 2011 (BST)