UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2008/January: Difference between revisions
Cyberbob240 (talk | contribs) m (Protected "UDWiki:Administration/Protections/2008/January" [edit=sysop:move=sysop]) |
Krazy Monkey (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCright}} | |||
{{ProtectionsArchiveNavigation}} | {{ProtectionsArchiveNavigation}} | ||
===[[Suggestion:20080130 XP Level Up v.2]]=== | ===[[Suggestion:20080130 XP Level Up v.2]]=== |
Latest revision as of 13:14, 10 January 2011
Protections Archive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Suggestion:20080130 XP Level Up v.2
My suggestion, and I removed it for a revision. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm assuming you meant protect and not requested edits, because the suggestion was not protected. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 22:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Sysop Promotion Guidelines Overhaul
Reason: policy completed voting. --Funt Solo QT 14:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Criteria 7 Speedy Deletion Guidelines Change
Reason: policy completed voting. --Funt Solo QT 14:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
User Talk:Nalikill
Coming back a little bit early, to try to help with the Battle of Pitneybank page. Nalikill TALK E! W! M! USAI 00:10, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Suggestion:20080130 Allow survivors with construction to use pipes
Reason: The author removed the suggestion, and people are still editing it. --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs 21:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Truly Inactive Sysops
Reason: policy completed voting. --Funt Solo QT 11:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Arbitration Cases
- Cyberbob vs. Nalikill
- The Grimch vs. BP
- Jack's Cold Sweat Vs. TZH
- Jon Pyre vs Grim S
- Cyberbob vs Ashley Valentine
- Blood Panther vs Treviabot92
- Viva La Revolucion vs. Darkmagic
- Max Grivas and Grim s vs Akule
- Karek vs Sockem
- Karek vs Sockem
- Nalikill vs Saromu
- Stuarbman vs The General
- Cyberbob240 vs Matthewfahrenheit
- Nalikill vs Grim s
- Stuartbman vs Darkmagic
- Blood Panther vs Donathin
- Labine50 vs SooP
- Militant Order of Barhah vs Malton Mob
- SgtBop vs Evildemon989
- Axe27 vs Bagel7
- Mark D. Stroyer vs Gage
- Creedy Defence Force vs Angels of Mercy
- Xoid and Cyberbob240 vs Hagnat
- Matthewfarenheit vs Saromu
- Matthewfahrenheit vs Cyberbob240
- TheUncleBob vs Angels of Mercy
- Gage vs DarkStar2374383 (2)
- Gage vs DarkStar2374383
- Elias Taylor vs Crabappleslegalteam
- Hagnat vs The General
- The General vs Terminator 484
I guess these pages could be served as scheduled protections, as in admin archive. Anyway, these are old arby's that need protecting. Both front and talk page. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 21:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- Done - Vantar 21:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
More --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 22:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Labine50 vs LCpl Mendoza
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Banana Bear4 vs Legend X
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Matthewfarenheit vs Cyberbob240
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Jjames vs Karlsbad
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Banana Bear4 vs Legend X (2)
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Xoid vs Operation White Storm and Operation Black Storm
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Jjames vs Karlsbad (2)
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Bob Hammero vs God
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/MrAushvitz vs Gage
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Fuster vs Gage
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/The General vs The Apocalypse Horde
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Cyberbob240 vs Gold Blade
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/jjames vs Various
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Jjames vs 1 4 of CDF
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Jjames vs Zod Rhombus
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Scinfaxi vs jjames
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/The General vs Jjames
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/DHPD vs Maxwell Hammer
- UDWiki:Administration/Arbitration/Scinfaxi vs jjames (2)
Suggestion:20080127 Default Attacking Weapon
Put {{SugVoteBox}} back at the top of Voting Section so the page will be included in Category:Suggestion Pages. Also remove the category tag from the bottom as it makes the sorting on Category:Duped Suggestions go wrong (the dupe-template at the top already categorizes the page). --Midianian|T|T:S|C:RCS| 12:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
User Talk:Nalikill
I want it protected so that I don't have to worry about messages when I log back in, and I can pick up right where I left off, rather than dealing with a backlog. Nalikill TALK E! W! M! USAI 04:00, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not quite sure protecting talk pages is allowed, seeing as it makes it unable to contact you. -- AHLGTG THE END IS NIGH! 04:03, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- lolwut --Cyberbob DORIS CGR U! 04:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Nothing I've ever seen says we can't, he will still be contactable for any administrative functions. Done.--Karekmaps?! 04:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm uncomfortable with this precedent. Talk pages are there for people to contact him. Whether he replies or not is up to him, but he should still be contactable by anyone -- boxy talk • i 04:42 24 January 2008 (BST)
- He is contactable when it is important(warnings, etc), other than that they can always reply to a recent comment of his or on one of his various user subpages.--Karekmaps?! 04:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Users serving ban time have their talk pages protected (theoretically, cuz this is not always done), so people can't taunt or contact them while they are absent. If we do this for banned users, we should be able to do the same for regular users. And, ike said above, the administration still can contact them if needed. --People's Commissar Hagnat [cloned] [mod] 11:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm uncomfortable with this precedent. Talk pages are there for people to contact him. Whether he replies or not is up to him, but he should still be contactable by anyone -- boxy talk • i 04:42 24 January 2008 (BST)
- Nothing I've ever seen says we can't, he will still be contactable for any administrative functions. Done.--Karekmaps?! 04:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
If I see Nali back posting again this week, I'm unprotecting his talk page. It's ridiculous for him to be free to tell others off on their talk pages, but have his locked down because he's "away". Bah -- boxy talk • i 00:17 28 January 2008 (BST)
User:Nalikill/Cases
I want it protected to protect it from vandalism and for people to leave it the hell alone. Nalikill TALK E! W! M! USAI 22:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:ZombieSlay3rSig.png
It should probably be protected considering its existence on a large amount of pages. --Z. slay3r • Talk 18:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Big Request
This ones a nice big whammy for you guys, UDWiki:Administration/Vandal Data, as I'm sure most of you know the summary links don't work, what many of you probably don't know is why. It's the template {{usr}}, in summary headers templates and pipe links screw them up, I'm requesting they be changed to generic User:VndlsName style templates as those do not suffer from the same issue.--Karekmaps?! 11:33, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well, even your "generic" User:VndlsName style doesn't work all the time. A/VB edit summary links don't work for me, but they're usually in that format -- boxy talk • i 11:39 8 January 2008 (BST)
- Actually, that's what I meant by pipe links
[[User:Ioncannon11|Ioncannon11]]
That is actually called the "Pipe Trick" if you use that you break the link for Edit Summaries when it's a header, If use the stuff before the | the links should work fine.--Karekmaps?! 11:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, that's what I meant by pipe links
Done up to, and including M. That'll do me for now -- boxy talk • i 12:51 8 January 2008 (BST)
- Finished. Perhaps we should also change to that system on the vandal banning page as well, from now on -- boxy talk • i 03:05 9 January 2008 (BST)
UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Thekooks
the date needs to be changed. it's 2008 now.--'BPTmz 01:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Done - Vantar 01:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Thekooks
Needs to be protected in accordance with policy. Thankyou.--Thekooks 18:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Dux Ducis/sig
Because it is one of the most linked sigs, I don't want it used for any wrong reasons while I'm not around. Protection please. --Ducis DuxSlothTalk 05:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Nalikill/Archive
Please Unprotect I need to archive my massive talkpage. Nalikill TALK E! W! M! USAI 22:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)