UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Reevaluation for Bureaucrats: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Misanthropy (talk | contribs) (→For) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --<small>Oh, and vote on [[UDWiki:Projects/Very_Funny...or_Not|Project Funny]], by the way.</small> --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST) | #Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --<small>Oh, and vote on [[UDWiki:Projects/Very_Funny...or_Not|Project Funny]], by the way.</small> --'''<span style="font-family:monospace; background-color:#222222">[[User:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime"> Spiderzed</span>]][[User talk:Spiderzed|<span style="color:Lime">█ </span>]]</span>''' 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST) | ||
#Makes sense. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST) | #Makes sense. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST) | ||
#For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST) | |||
===Against=== | ===Against=== | ||
#incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will ''replace'' the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST) | #incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will ''replace'' the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sig4}} 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST) |
Revision as of 18:28, 13 May 2011
This line of A/BP will be changed to reflect the 8 months cycle.
said: |
If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 12 months, then an election is called after that period. |
New Text would be
said: |
If, for any reason, an individual Bureaucrat position hasn't faced an election after 8 months, then an election is called after that period. |
Voting Section
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop. |
The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
For
- Author Vote - This just makes sense. --Karekmaps 2.0?! 15:30, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Down with the cats! Srsly, it would just get rid of a needless complication in the current system. --Oh, and vote on Project Funny, by the way. -- Spiderzed█ 15:39, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- Makes sense. -- Cheese 15:49, 13 May 2011 (BST)
- For. I also find DDR's point moot, as the current system supersedes A/RE anyway, why would an amended length not do the same? 19:28, 13 May 2011 (BST)
Against
- incomplete. if said crat has not faced an election in 8 months they will find themselves up for evaluation as per A/RE policy. it should specify that an election will replace the A/RE evaluation, rather accompany it. -- ϑanceϑanceℜevolution 17:52, 13 May 2011 (BST)