UDWiki:Administration/Policy Discussion/Blinking Text Is Annoying: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→For) |
Haliman111 (talk | contribs) (→For) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
#'''Yarp''' -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 17:51, 14 June 2009 (BST) | #'''Yarp''' -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 17:51, 14 June 2009 (BST) | ||
#-- Blinking text is dreadful, and should only be used in applicable (and rare) cases. Knowing you idiots (only a few of you...), that will never happen, so I am fully for this. --{{User:The_shoemaker/Sig}} 18:07, 14 June 2009 (BST) | #-- Blinking text is dreadful, and should only be used in applicable (and rare) cases. Knowing you idiots (only a few of you...), that will never happen, so I am fully for this. --{{User:The_shoemaker/Sig}} 18:07, 14 June 2009 (BST) | ||
# - I debated making a blinking yes here, but thought I would [[A/VB|regret it]]. --{{User:Haliman111/sig}} 18:45, 14 June 2009 (BST) | |||
===Against=== | ===Against=== |
Revision as of 17:45, 14 June 2009
Ban blinking text. There is no need for it. I don't like it. Make it go away. From everything just sigs.
For bob:
The signature policy will be changed thusly:
What wouldn't be allowed
- Signatures which have images higher then 14 pixels high.
- Signatures which generally break the wiki in some way either through formatting or other means.
- Signatures which impersonate another user.
- Signatures which link to any of the following special pages: Special:Userlogout or Special:BlockIP.
- Signatures which link to external links that perform malicious actions (closing the browser for example).
- Signatures which contain images larger then 50kb.
- Signatures which contain blinking text or images that mimic blinking text.
Voting Section
Voting Rules |
Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms:
Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop. |
The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote. |
For
- Well thought out and coherent.--xoxo 10:05, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 10:06, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- I--Bonghit420 10:18, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- We needed this for a long time. Linkthewindow Talk 10:31, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- Indeed --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 10:34, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- Amen!--Dr Mycroft Chris 11:39, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- --Cyberbob 11:57, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- - User:Whitehouse 15:01, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 16:44, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- -- Jolly Good--C Whitty 16:51, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- Yarp -- Cheese 17:51, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- -- Blinking text is dreadful, and should only be used in applicable (and rare) cases. Knowing you idiots (only a few of you...), that will never happen, so I am fully for this. --The Shoemaker Talk Red Faction 18:07, 14 June 2009 (BST)
- - I debated making a blinking yes here, but thought I would regret it. --Haliman - Talk 18:45, 14 June 2009 (BST)