User talk:Hashk: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
Hello, I'm firite of the 92nd Response Unit, and i was not very happy about your comment on the littlehales building page that we were zergers. We are a group of classmates of 14 people who come together during our breaks and after to maintain the kirby complex, as we know it. | Hello, I'm firite of the 92nd Response Unit, and i was not very happy about your comment on the littlehales building page that we were zergers. We are a group of classmates of 14 people who come together during our breaks and after to maintain the kirby complex, as we know it. | ||
You may think we zerge, but i assure you, we play by game rules. We find it ridiculous that you accuse us as a zerging person, just because you cannot bring the place down. You may think we are zerging, but we either communicate via msn as a group char to dispatch orders or by using the school computer lab when we meet up. We are named 92nd Response Unit because our high school class is 092S, and it was done to reflect that. Awaiting your reply. --{{User:Firite}} 15:53, 16 July 2009 (GMT+8) | You may think we zerge, but i assure you, we play by game rules. We find it ridiculous that you accuse us as a zerging person, just because you cannot bring the place down. You may think we are zerging, but we either communicate via msn as a group char to dispatch orders or by using the school computer lab when we meet up. We are named 92nd Response Unit because our high school class is 092S, and it was done to reflect that. | ||
Oh, and i'm making hoodies for all my mates in the 92nd RU. need me to mail you one? | |||
Awaiting your reply. --{{User:Firite}} 15:53, 16 July 2009 (GMT+8) | |||
Revision as of 08:15, 16 July 2009
Hello, thanks for dropping by. Leave a comment while you're here, will you? Click on the + symbol above to add a new topic, or add your comment at the end of an ongoing topic. I will reply in this same page unless you tell me otherwise.
See the Archive for old chatter.
Manhunt
Yep, July 1st. DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION (TALK | CONTRIBS) 02:36, 19 June 2009 (BST)
Malton Manhunt/image ark
For all your manhunt image storing needs. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 12:10, 11 July 2009 (BST)
As requested
Autograph | |
Best WishesDermot |
Starts really slowly, but really good after the Flintstones joke. --RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 16:18, 13 July 2009 (BST)
Tribalwars.com
Just another game I play! Hope you will too. Fun Fun Fun! - Dr Red Shadows
Ad
I'm lazy.
|
--RosslessnessWant a Location Image? 19:44, 15 July 2009 (BST)
lol - Dr Red Shadows
Zerging?
Hello, I'm firite of the 92nd Response Unit, and i was not very happy about your comment on the littlehales building page that we were zergers. We are a group of classmates of 14 people who come together during our breaks and after to maintain the kirby complex, as we know it. You may think we zerge, but i assure you, we play by game rules. We find it ridiculous that you accuse us as a zerging person, just because you cannot bring the place down. You may think we are zerging, but we either communicate via msn as a group char to dispatch orders or by using the school computer lab when we meet up. We are named 92nd Response Unit because our high school class is 092S, and it was done to reflect that.
Oh, and i'm making hoodies for all my mates in the 92nd RU. need me to mail you one? Awaiting your reply. --User:Firite 15:53, 16 July 2009 (GMT+8)
Hi, Establish here.
To add on to what Firite mentioned, I wish to have you know that zombie zergs were found in the area too [Check UD id=1572030 and id=1572033, for instance. Both were found in Randallbank]. What makes me infuriated is the fact that you so easily proclaim all our efforts as that of a "harman zerger", making our victory (if you could call it that - I would!) in the disputed area seem illegitimate. In addition, that comment was completely unsupported by any evidence whatsoever.
Quoted from you (Hashk), from the Littlehales Building News section: "Being held barricaded and powered by a harman zerger who poses as a group, the "92nd Response Unit." Probably safe for survivors, although not very classy."
Now, let's discuss this statement. You readily state that the barricading and powering was done by the 92nd Response Unit (which I will mention as 92RU from here on). How could you have gotten this knowledge without a survivor inside the building?
1. You had a friend inside the building as a survivor. 2. You had an alt inside the building. 3. You assumed.
Option 1 proves that the coordination we have achieved thus far is not impossible, especially since we have the advantage of being able to meet in real life on a very regular basis. Giving you the benefit of doubt (as you should have, too) I'll reject Option 2. My guess is that Option 3 is the most probable scenario, which disappoints me.
The 92RU did not power a single building in the area, reason being that we felt it would attract more zombies. In fact, we had to destroy some existing generators in non-TRPs to achieve this! As for the "barricading" section, it's pretty obvious that we barricaded the area quite alot - it's the first step to keeping an area safe, no? However, stating that the barricading was done by ONLY the 92RU is essentially discrediting the other survivors in the area of their hard work! It's almost a certainty that other survivors barricaded too, and given the number of survivors in the area, probably much more than the 92RU could have did by itself.
Lastly, I honestly doubt your "harman zerger" would put all his characters in the same group. It probably defeats his purpose.
If you so wish, you could meet up in-game with the whole of the 92RU and we can have a chat. And by the way, we've just got our first member who's not from our class - one "Stuart Delay". We can send the email he sent to our inbox to you, if you're interested.
We don't mind losing a battle in-game. It's happened more than once already, and I'd say we're kind of used to it! But what we can't accept is people mindlessly spewing accusations of us cheating. This is especially so for accusations without any evidence whatsoever.
Hence, I humbly ask that you retract your derogatory statement. Thank you very much for your kind attention.
--Establish 09:09, 16 July 2009 (BST)
EDIT: There may be some matters, or points of view, that I have failed to see or account for. If that is the case, please bring it up! Constructive criticism is always welcome. Thanks, --Establish 09:13, 16 July 2009 (BST)