User talk:Krazy Monkey: Difference between revisions
(→You) |
Dudemeister (talk | contribs) (→You) |
||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
[[User_talk:A_Helpful_Little_Gnome#Lolcats|Answer mah question]]!!! --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 22:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | [[User_talk:A_Helpful_Little_Gnome#Lolcats|Answer mah question]]!!! --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 22:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Oh, you crazy Scots and your weird words. :P --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 22:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | :Oh, you crazy Scots and your weird words. :P --{{User:Zombie slay3r/Signature}} 22:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
==How rude!== | |||
You took out your Cait is the best thing :P /me goes to cry moar {{User:Dudemeister/sig}} 19:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
=Do not put anything below this header= | =Do not put anything below this header= |
Revision as of 19:18, 22 January 2010
Do not put anything above this headerNEW STUFF RIGHT AT THE BOTTOM! August 09i hate you i hate you i hate youlol. Who was that one guy that got seriously fucking pissed off at people fiddling with their edit summaries on A/DM again? Was it Hagnat? Damn, that was hilarious. Cyberbob Talk 16:17, 27 August 2009 (BST)
LEGENDARY MEDICNow editing under User:Rogue Medic according to checkuser, might need to ask him instead, --DANCEDANCEREVOLUTION-- 12:34, 7 September 2009 (BST) September 09Protected ImagesDDR and I were discussing image linked signatures this morning and various thoughts have occurred to me in regards to the benefits and limitations of protected images. I understand you recently conduct some tests on protected images, can I get the results? -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 06:11, 15 September 2009 (BST)
While you're there, they need shifting out of the Moderation namespace and into the Administration one. -- . . <== DDR Approved Editor 15:15, 26 September 2009 (BST) October 09DEM DisambiguationThis is in response to your revert, with the explanation "Yes but people might still be looking for the group page." I'm not sure that's a reasonable argument- I think that the great majority of people who are searching for "DEM" will be thinking of the Department of Emergency Management. There are other shared acronyms, such as "RRF", which don't have disambiguation pages because the most relevant search item is clear (in the case of RRF, the Ridleyabnk Resistance Front- not the Ridleybank Reclamation Forces). Disambiguation is only necessary in cases of actual ambiguity. The other DEM doesn't even exist anymore- it's just a defunct group, with a defunct page, which nobody on the wiki seems to talk about except in the context of its shared acronym with one of the most readily recognized groups in the game (check here), the Department of Emergency Management (or "DEM", as virtually everyone who speaks about the group chooses to call it). Would it be possible to review the decision to maintain that disambiguation page?--FT MCI 02:09, 3 October 2009 (BST)
ScotishI speak it nowand your face looks like a lum.xoxo 09:39, 20 October 2009 (BST)
Just a quick thanks!Just to let you know I appreciate the work you folks do on the wiki and I really appreciate the helpful tone you all take when I occasionally screw something up. Sorry about that last one i do know better...must be overtired! Anyways, just wanted to say thanks---Belisarius17 20:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC) The Randoms/Close EncountersStill planning on using it? Linkthewindow Talk 06:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
woahYou just blammed A/A good, and I was about to settle. Should I not settle since it was vandalism and got removed or what? --Bob Boberton TF / DW 22:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC) A/AWhy did you move a case which was almost done choosing an arbitrator to the talk page? I can understand the others, but the Bob Boberton one practically has a ruling sorted. The second Zombie lord slaps on an acceptance, it'll be pushed through, and off the page.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 22:50, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Mudkip!Heh. Guess who's back? So what have I missed in my long absence? Care to fill me in, Cheese? --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ #nerftemplatedsigs (status:Mudkip!) 15:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC) LolcatWith every image you delete, a kitten dies somewhere ;'( --Thadeous Oakley 22:46, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
SitenoticeJust spotted your old old entry on Admin:Discussion about MediaWiki:Sitenotice. I really wanna get this working, what's the go? What repercussion does it have when mixed with CustomTitle template? -- 11:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
YouAnswer mah question!!! --ZsL 22:36, 17 January 2010 (UTC) How rude!You took out your Cait is the best thing :P /me goes to cry moar - Love from Swing XOXOXTalk 19:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC) Do not put anything below this headerNew posts go directly above this bit (unless you are SA) hi-- dǝǝɥs oʇ ɯɐds: sʎɐʍ1ɐ! 22:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Thats why I put it up. I'm a bit busy right now, so have at it.--Suicidal Angel, Help needed? 15:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Also, nice HQ. I didn't believe my eyes at first. And my first instinct was to call the horde. :D --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 21:16, 19 May 2009 (BST) Rollback or not, my war was just and valiant! Now if everyone would speak in easy to interpret sentences. Also, my spell check is stuck on Deutsch. I'm angry now. >:( --Mr. Angel, Help needed? 04:03, 23 May 2009 (BST) Rule on my A/VB case. I want it closed.--Mr. Angel, Help needed? 15:44, 31 May 2009 (BST) Actually, I'm pretty sure users have added comments in new bullets on bids before. I don't see a problem with it either.-- High Overlord and Lead Conspirator of the Administrative Rebellion. Want help? 08:05, 5 August 2009 (BST) Thank you herr cheezle.-- SA 22:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
been done before. :/ -- ¯\(°_o)/¯ 22:50, 12 January 2010 (UTC) |