UDWiki:Administration/De-Escalations

Shortcut:
A/DE

Guidelines for De-Escalation Requests

All De-Escalation Requests must contain the following information in order to be considered:

• A link to the user in question. Preferably bolded for visibility.
• A criteria for de-escalation. This should be short and to the point, including relevant links A/VD and A/VB if available.
• A signed datestamp. This can be easily done by adding ~~~~ to the end of your request.

Any de-escalation request that does not contain these pieces of information will not be considered, and will be removed by a system operator.

De-Escalation Eligibility

To be eligible for a De-Escalation Request, the user must fall under one of the following criteria:

1. 1 Month and 250 Edits: At least 1 month has passed since the user's last vandalism infraction, and they have made 250 good-faith edits to the wiki since the last infraction/striking a user has received.
2. Invalid Vandalism Ruling: The vandalism data on the user's record is incorrect, because the specific vandalism ruling in question has been subsequently reversed.

Cycle of Warnings and Bans

The cycle of warnings and bans is laid out in these guidelines. De-Escalations will be administered starting with the 2nd warning, then working backwards through bans, and finally ending with the first warning, provided there are no acts of vandalism committed by the user in the interim period.

Permaban Appeals

Users who have been permabanned on UDWiki may have their bans appealed here on the De-Escalations page. To do this, a user must submit a case under the permabanned user's name, preferably with usage of the {{vndl}} template and an explanation regarding why the user should be unbanned. The case will also be noted on the main page via {{Wiki News}}.

Voting will commence for 2 weeks, and a majority of 2/3rds is needed. After the voting period is up, a sysop will review the vote and take appropriate action. If 2/3rds majority has been reached for rescinding the ban, the user will have their A/VD adjusted, and their permaban escalation will be struck, with an added link to the permaban vote. If the user was banned as per the "3 edit rule", they will have the permaban escalation struck but will be left with 2 warnings.

A permabanned user must be permabanned for at least 6 months before they can have the ban appealed. If an appeal does not fit this rule, it may be immediately cycled by a sysop without warning.

Appeals are considered a serious vote. Misuse of this privilege, eg. multiple submissions over a short time, may result in abusers being brought to vandal banning.

Pending De-Escalations

User:Cornholioo

Cornholioo (talk | contribs | logs | block | IP Check | vndl data | discuss)

Voting Rules

Votes must be numbered, signed, and timestamped. They can take one of two forms: # comments ~~~~ or # ~~~~ Votes that do not conform to the above will be struck by a sysop.

The only valid voting sections are For and Against. If you wish to abstain from voting, do not vote.

I'd like to be unbanned on the wiki so that I can join the Discord server again. I have no interest in being an active member of the wiki itself. There's nothing I've done on the Discord server which other people have not done, including 'holocaust denial'.

I appologize for making a new account to submit this appeal, Aichon mentioned on the 'Implementation of UDWiki Discord rules‎'-page that I should appeal the ban on the Discord server this way. I saw no other way to do so other than to make a new account.

It's several years since I've been a member of the UD community. I do hope all the animosity will be gone for good. Cornholiooo (talk) 20:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Against

1. You're literally a fucking Nazi. Fuck off, Nazi punk. If anyone seriously considers granting your appeal, they're fucking Nazis too. Fuck you, fuck your ideology, fuck anyone who has ever had your name leave their lips, a thousand curse on you and your entire shrivvelled, rotted, inbred, useless bloodline. I hope you are dying in the desert one day and encounter a Jewish traveller, who refuses you a drink from his canteen. You're goddamn lucky I don't have any actual shot calling power around here, but your very existence, the very fact you're allowed to breathe free air, is an affront to civilised society. Igotmadenoughtomakeanewaccount (talk) 21:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

If anyone seriously considers granting your appeal, they're fucking Nazis too. lmfao Cornholiooo (talk) 21:34, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

1. I've been on the Discord awhile now, and the only other Denier I saw was that 313 guy who attempted to quarter the victim count without a shred of proof. I wasn't around for the original ban, but I feel like it was a good shoot. Sniper4625 #4625 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ^TMG 21:25, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Hence, if you want to keep me banned for 'Holocaust denial' on the Discord-server, then consequentially you should ban Revenant/313 as well, as he did the same thing. Cornholiooo (talk) 21:36, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

I mean if Bob wants to ban for that, I'm sure not going to say no. Not the case under discussion though. He also didn't go on extended rants about how (Jews aren't white/the need for racial purity tests/half the Netherlands refusing to accept a non-white President/etc). Sniper4625 #4625 - |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ^TMG 21:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

There was a discussion about nazism for hours when I was offline, not even instigated by me. Why wouldn't I be allowed to contribute? And btw, I didn't see there was any need for 'racial purity tests', some guy on the server asked me at least 4 times "what is white", i answered. Cornholiooo (talk) 21:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

1. Nazi --Ocular 21:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

---

e De-Escalation Archive

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2018