UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Archive/2010 07

This is the archive page for UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions.

Shortcut:
A/SD

Speedy Deletion Queue

There are currently no pages in the queue.

Served Speedy Deletions

Redirects

The pages found here are all unused redirects. They can be deleted... just the redirect pages that are subpages of the EVIL prefix,... not the pages they redirect to.... -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 06:23, 26 July 2010 (BST)

06:32, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Hey, it's been brought up before, and they were never deleted for whatever reason.... I just figured it was time for an author request... if you really don't want to do it though.... -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 06:36, 26 July 2010 (BST)

And with 62-38 pages deleted, Aichon reigns supreme over Misanthropy as faster deleter in the West. —Aichon— 06:48, 26 July 2010 (BST)

I wore out my fast-adminning hand in the Great Undeletion Drive back during whenever that happened. 06:50, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Pff, I smoked you on that one.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 11:45, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Oh cmon. He only deleted about 120 pages. I could have deleted three times that amount in a minute, don't you bastards complain. I'LL DO IT!!! --

 

 

 

 

11:57, 26 July 2010 (BST)

And I, you. You protected 33 pages in 11 minutes. I protected 77 in 16 minutes. I'd make some self-abasing joke about myself right now, but that's too cliché. Just know that, yes, I too find it pitiful that I just counted those. —Aichon— 12:17, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Yeah, but we're talking about the undeletion drive, which I'm pretty sure you missed most of. I was there when SA was actually deleting the pages. :P --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 13:32, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Well, if you'd like to stick to just undeletions on that day, Mis actually did more than you. By one. Plus, had the deletions been done right, I'd never have had to have come in and cleaned up after you guys later. :P —Aichon— 13:43, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Gah stop this mod e peen contest! We all know I'm the king! --

 

 

 

 

14:05, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Lern 2 count. I got 48, Mis got 46.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:48, 26 July 2010 (BST)

HA! I got you all beat.... I don't do anything! Except for conning all of you into doing all the work,... -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 16:44, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Yonn, you miscounted. Here's the deletion log for that day. Try counting again. You got 45. Logs don't lie. —Aichon— 00:24, 27 July 2010 (BST)

You recount, I got 48.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 00:30, 27 July 2010 (BST)

Proof. Notice the count up in the top right corner of my browser window. I did a search for your name with my browser and got 45 hits for that day in the deletion log. I'm not about to actually go and count them by hand. :P —Aichon— 00:37, 27 July 2010 (BST)

Misconduct? How the hell is that misconduct? -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 01:19, 27 July 2010 (BST)

What? SA is the one who got misconducted for it, for obvious reasons. 01:21, 27 July 2010 (BST)

Yeah,... but what SA did was clearly abuse of his sysop powers. I didn't catch anything right off hand that was wrong with what Yonnua did... -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 01:24, 27 July 2010 (BST)

Which is why Yon was never successfully taken to A/M for anything, ever. 01:26, 27 July 2010 (BST)

Wait... I misread... It was the word "miscounted",... I need to learn to slow down when I read.... -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 01:35, 27 July 2010 (BST)

Knights Templar/Recruitment

It is a duplicate of this ,... and the latter of the two is the one that's used. Knights Templar/Recruitment only linked to via their discussion page. -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 04:14, 26 July 2010 (BST)

1. Keep - Historically, they have used both, as is evident from the comment on the page where the link is used. Also, it's in their group's space and isn't a duplicate, so I see no reason for us to speedy delete it without their say-so. —Aichon— 04:24, 26 July 2010 (BST)

   Even though it could be considered a crit 10, and is partially falls under the category of crit 1? I mean no no offense when I say this, really, but the key word there would be "Historically". Not to mention, I've spoken to them, and brought up the usage of the poem on that page on the admin pages once prior, looking to have it removed from their front page as well. I'd prefer it to be removed here as well, but I guess I'll have to accept it where it is.... -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 04:40, 26 July 2010 (BST)

   I'll grant that the pages serve similar purposes, but they were, at one time, being used concurrently yet for different purposes, so arguing that they're duplicates seems pointless to me, and it's certainly not a low content page. As for the template crit, maybe, but I'd really prefer to have their go ahead before deleting it since it's not in the Template namespace. If they give their say-so, I fully support speedy deleting it, otherwise it should really go to vote. —Aichon— 04:55, 26 July 2010 (BST)

   99 times in a 100, subpages are generally allowed to be borderline useless - I'm looking at you, Poodle. ¬_¬ 05:52, 26 July 2010 (BST)

   I can't for the life of me find the deletions page, or arbitration page where I specifically asked them not to use that poem,.... and were it was decided I had the right to take it down.... Regardless, I'm going to move this to the cycled section,... because, as I've said above,... the group already thinks I hate them, and pick on them.... -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 06:23, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Category:Historical Groups/FailedArchive

Crit 4. —Aichon— 05:48, 26 July 2010 (BST)

EATEN

Just a note, pages like this shouldn't be created. That isn't the talk page for a Category:Historical Groups/FailedArchive, it's the /FailedArchive subpage of Category talk:Historial Groups. It's a subpage of a category, used as a talk page. There aren't any actual pages that could go in a subcategory like this one (however I have considered draughting a policy that treats the archiving of historical bids in a manner similar to A/PM). 05:59, 26 July 2010 (BST)

How about a policy that forbids Poodle to submit anything for deletion (or create a page/category) without asking someone. Ffs. --

 

 

 

 

14:06, 26 July 2010 (BST)

Last of these for a while (hopefully)

User:Alexander_Dawkins/Shady
User:Alexander_Dawkins/Characters
User:Alexander_Dawkins/Talk2 Just the redirect, please :P --Dawkins ^{[T][P!][W!][♞]} is currently: having his arm torn off by a zombie. 21:58, 24 July 2010 (BST)

pow, pow, pow!--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 22:02, 24 July 2010 (BST)

User:Alexander_Dawkins/Name

Sorry, missed this one last time. --Dawkins ^{[T][P!][W!][♞]} is currently: having his arm torn off by a zombie. 21:36, 24 July 2010 (BST)

Deleted.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:41, 24 July 2010 (BST)

User:Alexander Dawkins/nav

Crit. 8, if you please. --Dawkins ^{[T][P!][W!][♞]} is currently: having his arm torn off by a zombie. 21:20, 24 July 2010 (BST)

Done.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:23, 24 July 2010 (BST)

User:Se-Looters and User talk:Se-Looters

Crit. 11. Appears to have been some some confusion. Although I've probably gotten this all wrong. Technical Pacifist 17:23, 24 July 2010 (BST)

User:Se-Looters is actually a user and they have the right to have anything on their page, namely a redirect to the proper group. It wasn't of their choice since it seemed to have been moved and the redirect kept but I think this is a good move. Yes, the user is existent despite no edits coming up, I suspect it was from the last history purge in 07, it's just my opinion but I think the redirect is probably best kept. --

 

 

 

 

18:19, 24 July 2010 (BST)

I knew I had done something wrong. Thought it was a non-existing user.. Dammit. Technical Pacifist 18:27, 24 July 2010 (BST)

No, that's fine, you just check by looking at the "toolbox" at the left of the userpage, if it has "user contributions" it means it's a user, I understand where you're coming from and it's an easy mistake to make, I just backtracked to understand the circumstances in which it became the mess that it is. --

 

 

 

 

14:11, 26 July 2010 (BST)

User:DangerReport/St Mark's Church (Chudleyton)

Dupe of: User:DangerReport/St. Mark's Church (Chudleyton) --Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 21:02, 23 July 2010 (BST)

Done. —Aichon— 23:35, 23 July 2010 (BST)

User talk:DanceDanceRevolution/wii

Crit 8. You can find your blood links elsewhere Axe. --

 

 

 

 

13:31, 23 July 2010 (BST)

...I was actually being serious about that comment too. >< --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 13:43, 23 July 2010 (BST)

I don't doubt you were. But IDC!! --

 

 

 

 

13:59, 23 July 2010 (BST)

Deleted.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:57, 23 July 2010 (BST)

Category:Administration

Poodle of Doom made the above category in feb, when there is already one here. Crit 1 and 4. --

 

 

 

 

12:49, 23 July 2010 (BST)

deleted.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:57, 23 July 2010 (BST)

How'd I manage to mess that one up? -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 22:38, 24 July 2010 (BST)

User talk:Adamwalsh and User talk:Waexu

We treat ad-bots as non-users and there's already a scheduled deletion for adbot userpages but rather than delete these on sight in the "spirit" of the rule (an action of which I was misconducted for many moons ago :() I'd just like to submit them here to get some clarification on whether they should go. They're funny, yes, but non-pages, pretty much. --

 

 

 

 

11:24, 23 July 2010 (BST)

No, my accidental plus one!!! >< --•▬ ▬••▬ • •••• •▬ ▬•▬• ▬•▬ ^{#nerftemplatedsigs} 12:55, 23 July 2010 (BST)

Deleted.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 14:57, 23 July 2010 (BST)

Image:Troopsofdoom.jpg

Crit 1.-- Adward  16:05, 21 July 2010 (BST)

Care to show where the duplicate is? I have no doubt in my mind that image is probably on the wiki 7 times over, but I'd just like to be sure. --

 

 

 

 

11:19, 23 July 2010 (BST)

Nevermind, made the effort of finding it myself, done. --

 

 

 

 

11:20, 23 July 2010 (BST)

Random Subpages

User:Alexander_Dawkins/inub
User:Alexander_Dawkins/culture
User:Alexander_Dawkins/Sandbox

All under criterion seven. Thanks --Dawkins ^[T][P!] 17:16, 21 July 2010 (BST)

Deleted. Also, you might want to change your sig link in preferences so it reads {{SUBST:Nosubst|:nameofyoursigpage}}. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 06:38, 22 July 2010 (BST)

Image:Ccribbon40_ironman.png

New version uploaded, this one no longer in use. --Hawke2019 07:18, 20 July 2010 (BST)

Done. And for future reference, unused images are automatically deleted anyway. Posting them here creates extra paperwork. —Aichon— 07:27, 20 July 2010 (BST)

crit 7 bonghit

User:Bonghit420/NEVCE #7 author request --Raddox MurTangle 22:09, 19 July 2010 (BST)

Done, --

 

 

 

 

02:17, 20 July 2010 (BST)

Image:JulietteReausfirstweddingring.jpg

He doesn't need me anymore. He replaced me with another image. --TheBardofAwesome 17:48, 19 July 2010 (BST)

Done. —Aichon— 18:37, 19 July 2010 (BST)

None

Crit 1? -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 21:44, 18 July 2010 (BST)

It's a reference to the default none field so it has some relevance, also it's linked to a lot of userpages because in character templates a lot of user seem to actually link the "none" to this page. I'm not saying it isn't eligible for SD but I'd prefer to see it go through deletions if no other sysop disagrees and deletes. --

 

 

 

 

01:28, 19 July 2010 (BST)

Kept - as with Journal:No Journal, it's a placeholder to avoid newbies creating red links. Although, they could be consolidated, so that No Journal (and any others about) either redirected to None or Example page (depending on context) -- boxy ^{talk • teh rulz} 02:53 19 July 2010 (BST)

Maybe you should start actually looking into and researching your SD requests from now on Poodle. --

 

 

 

 

12:19, 19 July 2010 (BST)

Quick question, if it has a "Group Page", why doesn't the group "None" show up on the stats pages? -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 16:17, 19 July 2010 (BST)

There needs to be a smilie to convey the way I pinch the bridge of my nose when I'm frustrated. The stats page tallies up the entries into the "Group" field on in-game profiles, displaying groups with 10 or more active members (I'm not 100% on how it works since I counted ten tagged RDDs the other day but it explicitly states ten or more). The page None is a dummy page for use with various templates on the wiki, and none of the wiki pages will affect any game pages (with the one sole exception being that the stats page will auto-link to the wiki pages of listed groups if there are pages for them). Two things that do not mix, basically. 16:38, 19 July 2010 (BST)

None is the default tag for a character's group. When users come onto the wiki sometimes they specify this is their status in their affiliation with groups. All it takes is for one guy to see the link is red for them to make the page saying "group" or "this is my group for character 236" or something annoying like that. I'm going off track, the answer to your questions is, again, as simple as the method of finding out- simple deliberation: If None WAS on the stats page, it'd look pretty fucking stupid to see that of the actual groups, the top one was one that unintentionally had 7500+ members and didn't indicate any sort of organisation either. If this is another one of your attempts to try and demonstrate a point with smart-arse and pointless questions, the REAL answer lies somewhat in the one I gave- the page is there as a group because it's a placeholder for the term "none" which is a reference towards the default group affiliation which around 7500+ players of Urban Dead may one day be compelled to follow up if they find a link to it. It just so happens that it's written in good humour and half of that humour is the fact it's a short page about a "group" or at least "common affiliation" that has a short history and a short description. If you're wondering why it's classified as a group, it's mostly because that's literally the best thing we can liken it so, it could loosely be part of Glossary but the whole joke of the page is that it describes itself as a group so it'd be silly not to categorise it as such.

I'm really tired so I ramble, forgive me. Another point is that if you really are trying to make a point of it trying to be classified as a group even though it isn't one in the classical sense, well category:Groups isn't the official indicator for what groups exist/ed in game, it's just a list of groups on the wiki. In that category, there are several nonexistant groups, wiki-centric groups and humorous groups. This is one of those. --

 

 

 

 

17:21, 19 July 2010 (BST)

Various Crit 1's

• Banana Tactics
• Bravo company
• Journal:Dorsalus
• New Radio Free Malton
• Saviors
• Vegan Zombie Barricade Adjustment Squad

-- Linkthewindow  Talk  06:23, 18 July 2010 (BST)

On second thoughts, Bravo Company isn't really a crit 1. Might take it to deletions. Linkthewindow  Talk  06:26, 18 July 2010 (BST)

We had banana tactics listed recently, a majority of people wanted it kept. 13:54, 18 July 2010 (BST)

Alright. Consider it struck. Linkthewindow  Talk  14:06, 18 July 2010 (BST)

I did the others, seemingly useless and abandoned. would loved to have done gaynana tactics. --

 

 

 

 

01:33, 19 July 2010 (BST)

It was a tie last time, hardly a majority, Misanthorpy :P. Linkthewindow  Talk  12:36, 19 July 2010 (BST)

Well, technically not a majority at all. even less so considering Wan didn't specifically vote keep on it, Yon just assumed he did ;D --

 

 

 

 

13:19, 19 July 2010 (BST)

Fuck it. Linkthewindow  Talk  14:29, 19 July 2010 (BST)

More like fuck YEAH!! --

 

 

 

 

14:49, 19 July 2010 (BST)

Deletion

Delete me please. He doesn't need me anymore. He replaced me with another link. --TheBardofAwesome 03:40, 17 July 2010 (BST)

Deleted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Red Hawk One (talk • contribs) 06:48, 17 July 2010.

Various crit 3's

Various pages that are now unused redirects as a result of the reorganization of the guides name space:

• A Survivor's Guide (really a crit 1, as Red Hawk wiped it for some reason)
• Bounty Hunter's Guide
• Anti siege strategy and Guides:Anti siege strategy (there are a couple of talk page comments linking to the former - I'm not going to edit out those, and they are all pre-2007 anyway.)
• Claw for Grasp, Bite for Threes
• DamagePerAction and DPA have been unused for a while. Damage Per Action is likely a search term, and is probably worth keeping.
• Getting Started as a Feral Zombie

Linkthewindow  Talk  02:11, 16 July 2010 (BST)

1. I call on the sysop team to channel Trogdor and burninate all of the above! --Maverick ^{Talk - OBR 404} 10:21, 16 July 2010 (BST)

Destroyed the unlinked obvious one. Will look through what links here for the others first. --Rosslessness^{Want a Location Image?} 11:07, 16 July 2010 (BST)

Keep on DPA, a likely search term, for example if referenced in game etc. --

 

 

 

 

11:28, 16 July 2010 (BST)

In fact, I don't even know why DPA was moved to guides to begin with, I think it is better as a glossary item. Either way, I've done all of them sept DPA so far. --

 

 

 

 

11:35, 16 July 2010 (BST)

Fair enough. Linkthewindow  Talk  11:36, 16 July 2010 (BST)

Crit 2(Possibly 1?)

like 15 views What is this useful for?-- Jerrel tlk _{(82nd!) (Project Unwelcome!)}. 03:54, 14 July 2010 (BST)

The page is currently 50 minutes old and created by a new member. Its use appears to be as a guide for new zombie players, and as such, should be allowed a bit more time than less-than-an-hour to make it. Also it's not even remotely a crit two, and if you're wanting to apply crit one to it then perhaps A/SD is a crit one of A/D. I'm voting keep on this bad boy. 04:01, 14 July 2010 (BST)

Shouldn't be a need, it isn't crit 1 and it definitely isn't crit 2. I would suggest moving it to the guides namespace though. --

 

 

 

 

10:21, 14 July 2010 (BST)

To A/MR! Linkthewindow  Talk  15:46, 15 July 2010 (BST)

Crit 2

True, but irrelevant.--Yonnua Koponen ^{Talk ! Contribs} 00:38, 12 July 2010 (BST)

It's now a group page. 00:45, 12 July 2010 (BST)

One character doesn't make a group. And unless our "Holland Vs Spain" groupie makes it proper group page, this is looking like a pretty clear c.2. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 03:08, 12 July 2010 (BST)

:( 03:13, 12 July 2010 (BST)

So, ummm... Are you voting keep, or can we go ahead and delete this? ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 04:08, 12 July 2010 (BST)

I took care of this, amnesia is a good precedent as is this, making one-man groups to allow vulgar wiki pages has even been vandalism in the past. I wouldn't go this far this time but ya, definitely deletable. --

 

 

 

 

08:11, 12 July 2010 (BST)

I didn't even get to read any comments. Oh come on, you could at least waited for me! --Thadeous Oakley 10:58, 12 July 2010 (BST)

Suggestion:20081007 Suggestion Dupe change

Same as below. --

 

 

 

 

11:10, 10 July 2010 (BST)

EATEN

19:21, 10 July 2010 (BST)

Suggestion:20080804 Trenchcoat Solution

An oldie, but still a non-page. Crit 1 of the actual template. --

 

 

 

 

11:09, 10 July 2010 (BST)

EATEN

19:21, 10 July 2010 (BST)

Special:Unusedimages

Numbers 1-15. All unused. All older than a week. -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 20:01, 5 July 2010 (BST)

The guidelines call for two weeks. Regardless, the ones that fit are deleted. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 20:03, 5 July 2010 (BST)

Learned something new... thanks. -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 20:35, 5 July 2010 (BST)

Personally I'd ask that you stop bugging us with this. We do get around to them eventually. --

 

 

 

 

01:07, 6 July 2010 (BST)

Good Article Nominees

Crit 4,... will this be uses at all? -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 04:50, 2 July 2010 (BST)

1. Keep. Yes, yes it will. --
    
    
    
    
   05:30, 2 July 2010 (BST)

   This category, like Category:Recently Closed Suggestions, is a utility category that is automatically applied to any pages up for GA nomination. It won't be used often, but it is used. ~ Red Hawk One ^{Talk | space for lease} 06:19, 2 July 2010 (BST)

   Now I know... -_∞ Poodle of Doom _∞ 23:40, 2 July 2010 (BST)

   Hang on, I'm gonna go add something to it as a placeholder so no one makes this mistake again. 23:44, 2 July 2010 (BST)