View source for Suggestion:20090304 Additional Necronet Info

<noinclude>

{{Suggestion Navigation}}
{{TOCright}}
</noinclude>
===20090304 Additional Necronet Info===

[[User:A Big F'ing Dog|A Big F&#39;ing Dog]] 15:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

'''Suggestion type'''<br />
Improvement

'''Suggestion scope'''<br />
Necronet

'''Suggestion description'''<br />
I think Necronet should give us information about population trends, in addition to the map of scanned zombies. The three things I suggest adding are:

#The change in the overall number of scanned zombies in the map's area over the past 24 hours, and the current total of all zombies on the map. As zombies become unscanned as time passes, are revived, or leave the area this number would go down. 
#Number of scanned brain rotters currently in the map's area.
#Number of scientists that this data came from (not how many scientists are currently in the map area).

All of this information would logically be collected by Necrotech (otherwise why scan?), and it makes sense that scientists could access it. So below the map a scientist might see:

:<b>Over the last 24 hours:
:Population of scanned zombies increased by 15 to 129
:31 zombies with brainrot currently detected
:Data aggregated from 36 operatives
</b>

This information doesn't provide any direct military advantage (except maybe knowing when to flee), but it'd give a scientist a decent estimate as to a suburb's current condition, and whether the zombies are winning the battle for the area. It also satisfies scientific curiosity.


====Voting Section====
{{SugVoteBox}}


'''Keep Votes'''
#'''Keep''' I made some changes from the version in developing. Took out showing the number of revives because I couldn't think of a logical justification. I think these three pieces of data would be nice to know, and statistics have an appropriately sciency flavor to them.--[[User:A Big F'ing Dog|A Big F&#39;ing Dog]] 15:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' It's a useful idea, and adds more use to the necro net. --[[User:Happy doodle|Happy doodle]] 16:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' Looks good and i can't think of anything wrong with it/ --{{User:Michaleson/sig}} 20:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' Another triumph from [[Developing Suggestions]] --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 20:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' Sensible, justifiable and appropriate statistics. {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 20:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' The first seems pretty complex for the server to keep track of so I am unsure on that one but otherwise I like it. I would also like to see a stat telling me how many failed scans were performed, not sure how useful it would prove but it would be interesting... --[[User:Honestmistake|Honestmistake]] 21:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' Usefull, seems fair --[[User:Athur birling|Athur birling]] 22:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Like peanut butter and chicken in a sandwich, I like this. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 23:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Now if only we could force people to upload their scans... ;) {{User:Extropymine/sig}} 00:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

'''Kill Votes'''


'''Spam/Dupe Votes'''


<!-- Vote **ABOVE** THIS LINE -->
<br clear=both>
----
<noinclude>
{{SugVoteRules}}


[[Category:Current Suggestions]]

</noinclude>