View source for UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/Crit 12 Nukage

Nothing too drastic I think. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 21:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Won't this just make all reports before its removal for crit 13, and reports after for crit 12 (IE: missed sub pages) appear incorrect in the archive, thus requiring its own text to explain this change? At best, you could cut down the crit 12 text. EG: 12. '''Defunct group page''' - ''This is a old criterion for the removal of group pages, and may no longer be used as a valid speedy deletion reason.'' {{User:The_Rooster/Sig}} 21:44, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


There is a reason why policies are asked to remain a few days under discussion before going for vote. This policy, as its written, will prolly fail. Rooster's suggestion would be a good way to handle with the ''removal'' of crit 12, specially if a link to an article explaining crit 12 were created. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 13:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
:i asked for a page explaining Crit 12, and [[UDWiki:Administration/Speedy Deletions/Criterion 12|so i did]]. Now all it takes is a sysop removing the text from the A/SD guidelines, and leaving a link to this page. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 13:59, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Why is this under voting when the wiki news template says it's under discussion? -- {{User:Iscariot/Signature}} 13:53, 15 March 2009 (UTC)