View source for UDWiki talk:Administration/Re-Evaluations

== Administration/Re-Evaluations ==
I did just have one in [[UDWiki:Administration/Promotions/Nubis_(2)|February.]] I feel the need to point that out.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 18:14, 20 August 2009 (BST)
:Sorry. Again, it was late at night and going through the user logs over and over again is difficult stuff. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 00:32, 23 August 2009 (BST)
:And you could have just changed it yourself, you know. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 00:54, 23 August 2009 (BST)

== Archiving REv's ==

i'd like to suggest that when we archive a sysop re-evaluation, that we place it under [[UDWiki:Administration/Re-Evaluations/YYYY/MM/Username]] <small>(where YYYY is the year using four digits, and MM the month's number using two digits, with a leading zero when needed)</small> This way it becomes easier to identify when the re-evaluation took place without having to open the page. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 20:46, 22 August 2009 (BST)
:I'm curious how you managed to fuck up the time line on my re-eval. You even put in the date of the last one but then couldn't do the math to realize it wasn't 8 months? I'm not DUE until October. --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 22:49, 22 August 2009 (BST)
::I only fixed when you were last promoted. When you are due to be re-evaluated again was not of my concern, specially when you are not due to be re-evaluated in said date, not untill all the others on due are to be re-evaluated. --[[User:Hagnat|People's Commissar Hagnat]] <sup>[[User_talk:Hagnat|[talk]]] [[wcdz|[wcdz]]]</sup> 23:43, 22 August 2009 (BST)

== Contribs template ==
Do we already have a contributions link template or something that we can add to a persons evalutation, kinda like what we do on Vandal pages? that way it would be easier to check someone contributions to see how active they are..--{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 17:56, 25 August 2009 (BST)

I've been putting ([[Example Page|Talk]] | [[Example Page|Contribs]]) into A/PM bids lately, I could do the same here? --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 23:20, 31 August 2009 (BST)

==Daranz?==
Shouldn't Daranz have gone up for Re-evaluation first since it's been about 4 years since he was promoted? =/ -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 22:41, 27 August 2009 (BST)
:Yes, technically he should actually have been up before me.--{{User:The General/sig}} 23:00, 27 August 2009 (BST)
::"Technically"? -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 23:04, 27 August 2009 (BST)
:::As in "Per the policy, he should be up first but DDR made a mistake and I didn't see any point in kicking up a fuss about it".--{{User:The General/sig}} 23:07, 27 August 2009 (BST)
::::Alright, I thought by technically there was a reason he was missed out. DDR got most of the promotion times wrong as well. =p I think he started at the top and worked down as opposed to the other way round. -- {{User:Krazy_Monkey/sig}} 23:09, 27 August 2009 (BST)
:::::lol. rest assured you'll all get your turn ;) --{{User:J3D/ciggy}} 05:21, 29 August 2009 (BST)
:::::I ctrl+f'd it all, and in between temporary demotions, evaluations, Grim's demotions and Kevan's subsequent repromotions, things got messy. It was very late too and it had been 24 hours since the policy had passed and no one had done anything about it so I worked to do it even though I was pretty drowsy. I accept that I failed pretty hard though, so sorry to everyone, particularly General. --{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sigcode|BlueViolet}}-- 09:42, 29 August 2009 (BST)
::::::Quick question.  What's up with Boxy's evaluation date?  It's before his promotion date.  --{{User:Dark Blue Helmet/Sig}} 20:46, 3 September 2009 (BST)