View source for Suggestion:20071220 Hero

<noinclude>
{{Rejected}}
{{Suggestion Navigation}}
{{TOCright}}
</noinclude>
===20071220 Hero===

[[User:Heretic144|Heretic144]] 19:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

'''Suggestion type'''<br />
New Skill

'''Suggestion scope'''<br />
Survivors and Zombies

'''Suggestion description'''<br />
A new survivor skill called "Hero" would be created, with a prerequisite of being level ten, just like Headshot.

A Heroic survivor would have a button labelled "Heroics" available at all times.  Clicking it would cost 1 AP and 100XP and the next action the survivor takes (next action only) has the success rate doubled.  Yes, this means a maxed out shotgun blast has 100% accuracy.  If a survivor took an action that has no failure rate involved, like healing someone, then the Heroic bonus is lost, along with the XP spent to activate it.

Any action done while under the influence of Heroics doesn't grant XP at all.

Zombies would have a parallel skill that functions the same way, although I can't think of an appropriate name at this time. (suggestions welcome)

====Voting Section====
{{SugVoteBox}}


'''Keep Votes'''
#'''Author Keep''' --[[User:Heretic144|Heretic144]] 19:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Keep/Change''' Maybe instead of doubling the % just make it add a fixed number. Having a 100% shot at doing something is bad. Maybe +25%?- --[[User:Jon Pyre|Jon Pyre]] 20:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Keep''' - Cause I can --[[User:WOOT|/~WOOT~\]] 21:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)


'''Kill Votes'''
#'''Kill''' - I don't like spending XP on things. Also, I can't really think of many things that really need a double success rate. A shotgun blast, maybe, but that's about it --[[User:Druuuuu|Druuuuu]] <sup style="font-size:70%">[[User:Druuuuu/Ocular|Oc]][[User talk:Druuuuu|T]][[Red Rum|RR]]</sup> 20:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Kill''' - It is underpowered in it's current form. However, if you fixed it, it would be overpowered--{{User:Rictor_Stilwell/sig}} 21:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Kill''' - I have well over five-thousand experience by now. That equals using this more than fifty times. Which means that in one day, when fully stocked to the brim with shotguns (and a fireaxe), I can potentially destroy an entire horde. Which can only mean one thing... --[[User:Macampos|Private Mark]] 22:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Kill''' - How many times do I have to vote "kill" on XP sucking wastes of time again? --[[User:Ms.Panes|Ms.Panes]] 23:08, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Kill''' boost percentages by all means, but there must be some chance of faliure.--[[User:Rosslessness|Rosslessness]] 09:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Kill''' - Leave our XP alone. {{User:Ariedartin/Nickname}} 14:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Kill''' - I want a decent XP suggestion... But this ain't it. [[User:UCFSD|UCFSD]] 17:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Kill''' - Incomplete, you need to have all aspects of your suggestion down on paper, otherwise it is incomplete. --[[User:BoboKilledMe | BKM]] 00:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Kill''' - Sorry, I don't like XP spending, and 100% hit chance is most-assuredly bad. --{{User:TriPolar/sig}} 02:50, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


'''Spam/Dupe Votes'''
#'''Spam''' - [[Suggestions_Dos_and_Do_Nots#Balance|Costly Does Not Equal Balanced]] and [[Suggestions_Dos_and_Do_Nots#Implementation|Don't Create Multi-Step Skills]]. --{{User:Midianian/Sig}} 20:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - Take this to [[Talk:Suggestions]] and we might could redeem it. But as of now, no. Some people have over 10,000 XP stored. They would be able to use this constantly. {{User:Nalikill/Sig}} 20:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - This is irredeemably bad. Blatant trenchcoatery, breaks the dos and do nots, and is all round fucking stupid. Im also getting mighty tired of people saying they dont like major parts of a suggestion but voting keep anyway. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]] [[We are Trolls!|WAT!]]</sup> 21:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - See Grim above --[[User:Ryiis|Ryiis]] 21:51, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam-o-rific''' - Hero complexes suck. So does spiced ham. For clarity, as per Grimch --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 22:26, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spamorama''' - llama banana a man, a plan, canal panama.  Overpowered. --<span style="font-size:90%">[[User:Funt Solo|Funt Solo]]</span> <sup style="font-size:70%">[[Mod_Conspiracy|QT]]</sup> [[Image:Scotland flag.JPG|18px]] 22:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' "You know what the definition of a hero is? Someone who gets other people killed. You can look it up later" Sorry, couldn't resist. --{{User:Seventythree/Sig}} 01:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - Do you know how many people have thousands of extra AP? --{{User:Blobdude/Sig}} 01:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - Everything Grim said.--<small>[[User:Karek|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 01:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - Doesn't sound very heroic to me, sounds overpowered <small>-- [[User:Boxy|boxy]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|talk]] • [[UDWiki:Image Categorisation|i]]</sup> 01:48 21 December 2007 (BST)</small>
#'''SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM''' - This would be fun till griefers found it, and ate generators. and then people. Think of what [[User:Finis Valorum|Finis]] could do with this. :( --[[User:Officer 123satsitx|Officer 123satsitx]] 01:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - as Grim and Midianian --[[User:Duke Garland|<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>]] [[LCD|<nowiki>[</nowiki>]][[User talk:Duke Garland|talk]][[Signature Race|<nowiki>]</nowiki>]] 07:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''My grandma''' - makes delicious cookies --{{User:Wasted wallaby/sig}} 13:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - No hero classes. --{{User:A Helpful Little Gnome/Sig}} 04:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - A 100% shotgun blast? You've got to be kidding me. With the number of people with thousands of spare XP just lying around... NO THANKS! --[[User:Uncle Bill|Uncle Bill]] 06:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
#Spam Use the fucking TALK:SUGGESTION page before you post shit like this.--[[User:Thekooks|Thekooks]] 14:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' This could very well be the stupidest thing I've ever seen.--[[User:TravDeDo|Trav]] 22:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - Silly.--{{User:Suicidalangel/Sig}} 15:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
#100% for a shogun?  Just by using 1 skill and 2 APs?  You're kidding, right? --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 14:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Spam''' - As so many above me.  {{User:Acoustic_Pie/Sig}} 17:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
#'''Ham'''-Even worse than spam, ham WILL get bad in the fridge. I don't want a 100% sucess rate, it takes the fun out of things. And ditto from above. --[[User:31337roxxor|Shotstol]] 16:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
#:{{S|'''Spam''' - }}--{{User:Dux Ducis/sig}} 14:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Vote not justified. --[[User:Grim_s|The Grimch]] <sup>[[Project UnWelcome|U!]] [[Project Evil|E!]] [[We are Trolls!|WAT!]]</sup> 14:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)