Template talk:Antidualnature: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Misanthropy (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
((Moving Misantropy post to keep the same discussion in the same place.)) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::::Zombies play as zombies, survivors play as survivors? Yep, totally unusual. :/ {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 21:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | ::::Zombies play as zombies, survivors play as survivors? Yep, totally unusual. :/ {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 21:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::You are describing the normal way of playing. Dual Players don't do that. It is the whole point of this template. --{{User:Eagle of fire/signature}} 21:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | :::::You are describing the normal way of playing. Dual Players don't do that. It is the whole point of this template. --{{User:Eagle of fire/signature}} 21:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::::Just saying, it's in-genre and sensible - how many films feature a survivor dying and then continuing to actively help survivors? I can only really think of ''Day of the Dead'' (the original loosely, more strongly in the awful awful remake), whilst every other instance is more along the lines of "Oh hey Johnny's dead. Oh hey Johnny's now eating Jimmy." {{User:Misanthropy/Sig}} 21:57, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::::::I completely agree. However, this is not a Holywood movie but an internet browser game. There is not a lot of games, movies or about anything zombie in which you can come back from the death 378 times and still remains exactly the same either, isn't? Thus I simply can't adhere to the comparison. --{{User:Eagle of fire/signature}} 22:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
::::Zombies standing neatly queued in a cemetery and being careful not to rock the boat in the meantime is what is pretty silly. I goes against everything the zomie genre tries to achieve and how it has been running since 1968. Srsly, DN is for me the only way to play a harmanbargar without feeling utterly and ridiculously out of place. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 21:37, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | ::::Zombies standing neatly queued in a cemetery and being careful not to rock the boat in the meantime is what is pretty silly. I goes against everything the zomie genre tries to achieve and how it has been running since 1968. Srsly, DN is for me the only way to play a harmanbargar without feeling utterly and ridiculously out of place. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 21:37, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::I am not going to turn this talk page into a fan page discussion about people who like Dual Nature or not. The template should tell you pretty much what I think about DN and I don't feel the need to add to it. The [[Talk:Dual_Nature_Policy]] page is there for that. --{{User:Eagle of fire/signature}} 21:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | :::::I am not going to turn this talk page into a fan page discussion about people who like Dual Nature or not. The template should tell you pretty much what I think about DN and I don't feel the need to add to it. The [[Talk:Dual_Nature_Policy]] page is there for that. --{{User:Eagle of fire/signature}} 21:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:10, 18 November 2010
Well this is odd. 
20:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Care to be a little more specific? If you have suggestions for a better presentation then I am all ears. -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 21:25, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not the presentation, the stance. It's pretty silly. 21:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- The Dual Nature stance is what is pretty silly. I can't actually believe there is so much support for it. It goes against everything I been trying to achieve and how we been playing the game since 2005. O_o -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 21:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Zombies play as zombies, survivors play as survivors? Yep, totally unusual. :/ 21:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- You are describing the normal way of playing. Dual Players don't do that. It is the whole point of this template. -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 21:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Just saying, it's in-genre and sensible - how many films feature a survivor dying and then continuing to actively help survivors? I can only really think of Day of the Dead (the original loosely, more strongly in the awful awful remake), whilst every other instance is more along the lines of "Oh hey Johnny's dead. Oh hey Johnny's now eating Jimmy." 21:57, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- I completely agree. However, this is not a Holywood movie but an internet browser game. There is not a lot of games, movies or about anything zombie in which you can come back from the death 378 times and still remains exactly the same either, isn't? Thus I simply can't adhere to the comparison. -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 22:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Just saying, it's in-genre and sensible - how many films feature a survivor dying and then continuing to actively help survivors? I can only really think of Day of the Dead (the original loosely, more strongly in the awful awful remake), whilst every other instance is more along the lines of "Oh hey Johnny's dead. Oh hey Johnny's now eating Jimmy."
- You are describing the normal way of playing. Dual Players don't do that. It is the whole point of this template. -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 21:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Zombies standing neatly queued in a cemetery and being careful not to rock the boat in the meantime is what is pretty silly. I goes against everything the zomie genre tries to achieve and how it has been running since 1968. Srsly, DN is for me the only way to play a harmanbargar without feeling utterly and ridiculously out of place. -- Spiderzed▋ 21:37, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- I am not going to turn this talk page into a fan page discussion about people who like Dual Nature or not. The template should tell you pretty much what I think about DN and I don't feel the need to add to it. The Talk:Dual_Nature_Policy page is there for that. -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 21:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Zombies play as zombies, survivors play as survivors? Yep, totally unusual. :/
- The Dual Nature stance is what is pretty silly. I can't actually believe there is so much support for it. It goes against everything I been trying to achieve and how we been playing the game since 2005. O_o -- •Eagle of Fire• •[Talk]• 21:29, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not the presentation, the stance. It's pretty silly.
