Template talk:GroupCat: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==Link== Wouldn't it be better to use an external link with single brackets, rather than an internal link with double brackets? Else by using both categories and this template, we get the ...)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Link==
==Link==
Wouldn't it be better to use an external link with single brackets, rather than an internal link with double brackets? Else by using both categories and this template, we get the same problem as with the Orphan/Yorphan template - that there is an additional internal link, which keeps those pages from showing up on Special:Lonelypages should the original internal link be destroyed. (See [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Special:lonelypages|this policy discussion]], particularly the talk page.) --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 21:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be better to use an external link with single brackets, rather than an internal link with double brackets? Else by using both categories and this template, we get the same problem as with the Orphan/Yorphan template - that there is an additional internal link, which keeps those pages from showing up on Special:Lonelypages should the original internal link be destroyed. (See [[UDWiki:Administration/Policy_Discussion/Special:lonelypages|this policy discussion]], particularly the talk page.) --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 21:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
:Nevermind, I just checked closer and saw that you used stealthexternallink. (From my first look on Cat:ZALP it looked to me like an internal link, which immediately created a Yorphan dejavu.) Pretend that I never posted :p --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 21:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:29, 1 February 2011

Link

Wouldn't it be better to use an external link with single brackets, rather than an internal link with double brackets? Else by using both categories and this template, we get the same problem as with the Orphan/Yorphan template - that there is an additional internal link, which keeps those pages from showing up on Special:Lonelypages should the original internal link be destroyed. (See this policy discussion, particularly the talk page.) -- Spiderzed 21:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Nevermind, I just checked closer and saw that you used stealthexternallink. (From my first look on Cat:ZALP it looked to me like an internal link, which immediately created a Yorphan dejavu.) Pretend that I never posted :p -- Spiderzed 21:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)