Template talk:Bot: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
MisterGame (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
dropped the span that's just for looks and the unneeded variable call, wiki already fills that in with the pipe then nothing. Also includeonly wasn't really necessary.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 21:42, 13 April 2011 (BST) | dropped the span that's just for looks and the unneeded variable call, wiki already fills that in with the pipe then nothing. Also includeonly wasn't really necessary.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 21:42, 13 April 2011 (BST) | ||
:All I'm seeing now is a broken template. --[[Image:Cat Pic.png|14px]] [[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''Thadeous Oakley''']]</span> [[User_Talk:MisterGame|<span style= "color: black; background-color: white">'''''Talk''''']]</span> 21:43, 13 April 2011 (BST) | :All I'm seeing now is a broken template. --[[Image:Cat Pic.png|14px]] [[User:MisterGame|<span style= "color: maroon; background-color: white">'''Thadeous Oakley''']]</span> [[User_Talk:MisterGame|<span style= "color: black; background-color: white">'''''Talk''''']]</span> 21:43, 13 April 2011 (BST) | ||
::Yeah, strange, that should work like this [[Template:Bot|Bot]] --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 21:45, 13 April 2011 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 20:45, 13 April 2011
Usage
This template makes bot reporting easier. For example, if you wanted to report Example User, you could type {{bot|Example User}}.
It would produce:
Example User (contribs | logs | block | del userpage | IP Check)
Nice
I like.--
Thadeous Oakley Talk 17:39, 13 April 2011 (BST)
Changes
dropped the span that's just for looks and the unneeded variable call, wiki already fills that in with the pipe then nothing. Also includeonly wasn't really necessary.--Karekmaps?! 21:42, 13 April 2011 (BST)
- All I'm seeing now is a broken template. --
Thadeous Oakley Talk 21:43, 13 April 2011 (BST)
