User talk:DangerReport/Owsleybank: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Owsleybank trip report) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This suburb meets the criteria of a moderately safe area. "Active zombies and break-ins, but no 50+ hostile hordes" --[[User:Warm Puppy|Warm Puppy]] 22:51, 7 October 2008 (BST) | This suburb meets the criteria of a moderately safe area. "Active zombies and break-ins, but no 50+ hostile hordes" --[[User:Warm Puppy|Warm Puppy]] 22:51, 7 October 2008 (BST) | ||
Suburb counted 6+ zombies, and around half of the buildings ruined. -- [[User:Jack's Inflamed Sense Of Rejection|Jack's Inflamed Sense Of Rejection]] ([[User talk:Jack's Inflamed Sense Of Rejection|talk]]) 18:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:44, 7 June 2018
Visited Owsleybank today. There's a spirited attempt to reclaim some of the buildings, which are EHB, but most of them are still wide open and ruined, so this suburb still meets the criteria of a very dangerous area. Too dangerous for me to stick around and try to rebarricade it, even. --Ɛňvϊoцᵴ (talk) 20:58, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
This suburb meets the criteria of a moderately safe area. "Active zombies and break-ins, but no 50+ hostile hordes" --Warm Puppy 22:51, 7 October 2008 (BST)
Suburb counted 6+ zombies, and around half of the buildings ruined. -- Jack's Inflamed Sense Of Rejection (talk) 18:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
