Talk:Malton Skinz: Difference between revisions
(New page: ==Formatting of Recruitment Advertisement== Hey, I was looking through the Recruitment page, and I noticed that the Table of Contents for the page seemed to be a little off. I did some...) |
|||
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Formatting of Recruitment Advertisement== | ==Formatting of Recruitment Advertisement== | ||
Hey, I was looking through the [[Recruitment]] page, and I noticed that the Table of Contents for the page seemed to be a little off. I did some poking around, and I noticed that [[Malton Skinz/recruit|your group's advertisement]] seems to be the cause of the problem. Specifically, if you check the [[Recruitment#Format_for_Advert_Content|formatting rules]] for the page, you'll notice that it says you shouldn't use any subheadings in your advertisements. Unfortunately, your advertisement uses two level-two (i.e. the "<nowiki>==</nowiki>") subheadings, which seems to be responsible for those problems I mentioned in the table of contents. I'm certainly not in any position to require that you change it, but I'm sure that the other people reading that page will appreciate having a table of contents that accurately reflects the contents of the page. If you need any help replacing them with alternative formatting that looks essentially the same but doesn't disrupt the page, let me know and I'll be happy to help. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | Hey, I was looking through the [[Recruitment]] page, and I noticed that the Table of Contents for the page seemed to be a little off. I did some poking around, and I noticed that [[Malton Skinz/recruit|your group's advertisement]] seems to be the cause of the problem. Specifically, if you check the [[Recruitment#Format_for_Advert_Content|formatting rules]] for the page, you'll notice that it says you shouldn't use any subheadings in your advertisements. Unfortunately, your advertisement uses two level-two (i.e. the "<nowiki>==</nowiki>") subheadings, which seems to be responsible for those problems I mentioned in the table of contents. I'm certainly not in any position to require that you change it, but I'm sure that the other people reading that page will appreciate having a table of contents that accurately reflects the contents of the page. If you need any help replacing them with alternative formatting that looks essentially the same but doesn't disrupt the page, let me know and I'll be happy to help. (cross-posted on [[User talk:PunXnSkinz]]) {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{RecruitWarning|using subheadings}} | |||
It's just been commented out for now, so simply remove the HTML comments to add it back in once you fix it. Otherwise, the maintainers of the list will remove it entirely in two weeks, I believe. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 17:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
== GSGM 2010 == | |||
{{Group Inactive?}}Just our yearly group census to see who is still active. If you are, reply below. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 06:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
:If you are still active, just add yourself back to whichever suburb(s) you are still active in. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 07:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Is your Radio frequency still in use? == | |||
{{User:DanceDanceRevolution/sandpit/9/radioactive}} | |||
I'm sorry if this is an inconvenience or it seems relatively stupid when put into context of your group, but it is our interest to treat all groups on the same level when doing these purges. A reply within 2 weeks will be greatly appreciated. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 12:31, 25 August 2010 (BST) | |||
:No response has been made in 2 weeks, and as such, your group will be removed from the list. If you come back at a later date and would like to reserve this frequency again, just place it back onto the available frequency of your choice. Thank you. -- {{User:DanceDanceRevolution/l}} 13:33, 8 September 2010 (BST) | |||
==GSGM 2011== | |||
{{Inactivelist}} | |||
<small>'''Please list suburbs you're actually active in.'''<br>This is a generic message and not directed at any particular group.</small> --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 13:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
:No reply within 14 days. --{{User:Spiderzed/Sandbox/Sig}} 16:27, 7 February 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:27, 7 February 2011
Formatting of Recruitment Advertisement
Hey, I was looking through the Recruitment page, and I noticed that the Table of Contents for the page seemed to be a little off. I did some poking around, and I noticed that your group's advertisement seems to be the cause of the problem. Specifically, if you check the formatting rules for the page, you'll notice that it says you shouldn't use any subheadings in your advertisements. Unfortunately, your advertisement uses two level-two (i.e. the "==") subheadings, which seems to be responsible for those problems I mentioned in the table of contents. I'm certainly not in any position to require that you change it, but I'm sure that the other people reading that page will appreciate having a table of contents that accurately reflects the contents of the page. If you need any help replacing them with alternative formatting that looks essentially the same but doesn't disrupt the page, let me know and I'll be happy to help. (cross-posted on User talk:PunXnSkinz) —Aichon— 22:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Recruitment | |
Your ad has been removed from the Recruitment page because of rules violation, specifically using subheadings. There is a guide here. Please re-add it if you are still active and recruiting. |
It's just been commented out for now, so simply remove the HTML comments to add it back in once you fix it. Otherwise, the maintainers of the list will remove it entirely in two weeks, I believe. —Aichon— 17:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
GSGM 2010
Just our yearly group census to see who is still active. If you are, reply below. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 06:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- If you are still active, just add yourself back to whichever suburb(s) you are still active in. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 07:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Is your Radio frequency still in use?
2010 Group Radio Activity Query | |
In order to maintain the wiki as an up to date source of information groups are occasionally removed from the Radio pages when they are no longer active.
Is this group still actively using the frequency specified on the Radio page as theirs? If so simply confirm here by writing something below. If not, it's frequency will be removed from Radio pages in 14 days. |
I'm sorry if this is an inconvenience or it seems relatively stupid when put into context of your group, but it is our interest to treat all groups on the same level when doing these purges. A reply within 2 weeks will be greatly appreciated. -- LEMON #1 12:31, 25 August 2010 (BST)
- No response has been made in 2 weeks, and as such, your group will be removed from the list. If you come back at a later date and would like to reserve this frequency again, just place it back onto the available frequency of your choice. Thank you. -- LEMON #1 13:33, 8 September 2010 (BST)
GSGM 2011
Please list suburbs you're actually active in.
This is a generic message and not directed at any particular group. -- Spiderzed▋ 13:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)