User:DangerReport/Kempsterbank: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rosslessness (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 1787088 by Special:Contributions/BigJD (User talk:BigJD) Tsk. SFHNAS would argue that there weren't mobs of ten in the suburb. Theres one in the vicinity of (57,72)) |
(The Knights Templar successfully retake all buildings.) Tag: Manual revert |
||
(99 intermediate revisions by 37 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!--Do not edit above this line!--> | <!--Do not edit above this line!--> | ||
|Danger= | |Danger=safe | ||
<!--Do not edit below this line!--> | <!--Do not edit below this line!--> | ||
}}</includeonly><noinclude>{{DangerMapInstructions}}</noinclude> | }}</includeonly><noinclude>{{DangerMapInstructions}}</noinclude> |
Latest revision as of 21:01, 3 September 2024
This suburb is currently safe.
What this suburb looks like (Please note that if you are updating the report, and are previewing the page, you might NOT see the new status. If so, you must save the page in order to see the changes.)
Kempsterbank |
Available 'Danger' statuses:
- safe - Structurally intact and inhabited by survivors, with numerous lit buildings, and few to no zombies.
- intact - Structurally intact with few zombies, but a very low survivor population and few to no lit buildings.
- moderately dangerous - Active zombies and break-ins, but no major hordes.
- dangerous - Zombies inside many resource buildings and/or significant hostile mobs.
- very dangerous - Most buildings wide open or zombie-infested and/or massive hostile zombie mobs.
- a ghost town - Mostly or entirely ruined, and devoid of significant survivor or zombie populations.
Change |Danger=status
and replace status
with the appropriate status from the list above.