User talk:Cman yall: Difference between revisions
Tefl0n B1lly (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:It was a deliberately non-NPOV response to clarify the stance of the Cult. If you think that such information is not helpful to people reading the news, then I think you're mistaken. --20:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC) | :It was a deliberately non-NPOV response to clarify the stance of the Cult. If you think that such information is not helpful to people reading the news, then I think you're mistaken. --20:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Radio Broacast == | |||
Was that broadcast genuine? Is Skarin under threat? Yours in Crociness --[[User:Tefl0n B1lly|Tefl0n B1lly]] 22:08, 2 April 2010 (BST) |
Revision as of 21:08, 2 April 2010
- No, we won't say a word. --DoohickeyBones 14:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Crocs / Gumms
I left a message on the cult's talk page, but I don't know if I'll get a fast response that way, so I'll talk to you, because you seem to be active, and a big guy among the cult.--Yonnua Koponen Talk ! Contribs 21:54, 16 October 2009 (BST)
- We don't really have leaders, but I do seem to be the most active lately.--Cman yall 05:37, 18 October 2009 (BST)
Adding news
Your entry on Dunningwood news section on November 13th was written in an extremely biased, non-news fashion (it was, in fact, a declaration from Cult of the Stuffed Crocodile.) Therefore, it was moved to the talk page and replaced with a rewritten entry. You are a veteran member. I hope I don't have to explain how to write a proper news for you, or what is and isn't NPOV. Thank you. -- Kittithaj 20:04, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- It was a deliberately non-NPOV response to clarify the stance of the Cult. If you think that such information is not helpful to people reading the news, then I think you're mistaken. --20:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Radio Broacast
Was that broadcast genuine? Is Skarin under threat? Yours in Crociness --Tefl0n B1lly 22:08, 2 April 2010 (BST)