UDWiki talk:Open Discussion/DangerMap Version 4: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Goals) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Anything we would add as goals? ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>15:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)</sub> | Anything we would add as goals? ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>15:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)</sub> | ||
:Needs to be somewhat clean looking. Like the map is now. Maybe a max of two additional icons in the map square. For example [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Talk:Suburb#Suggesting_change_in_danger_level the map at that bottom end of this header] with all it's links has too much stuff on it. {{User:Mazu/sig}} 15:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | :Needs to be somewhat clean looking. Like the map is now. Maybe a max of two additional icons in the map square. For example [http://wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Talk:Suburb#Suggesting_change_in_danger_level the map at that bottom end of this header] with all it's links has too much stuff on it. {{User:Mazu/sig}} 15:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Agreed. I think we could get by without any icons if we use <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki>. Just include the images on the template proper with a link to the template on the included version. One link and no images for the purpose of the map should be fine. ~[[Image:Vsig.png|link=User:Vapor]] <sub>16:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)</sub> | |||
==Relevant Discussion== | ==Relevant Discussion== | ||
Revision as of 16:25, 12 December 2011
Discuss the proposed changes to the DangerMap system here.
Goals
Currently I've set the goals at:
- Make Danger Reports more relevant to the game's decreased playerbase.
- Make danger levels more NPOV.
- Build on existing system. Don't reinvent the wheel.
Anything we would add as goals? ~
15:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Needs to be somewhat clean looking. Like the map is now. Maybe a max of two additional icons in the map square. For example the map at that bottom end of this header with all it's links has too much stuff on it. 15:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed. I think we could get by without any icons if we use <noinclude>. Just include the images on the template proper with a link to the template on the included version. One link and no images for the purpose of the map should be fine. ~ 16:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed. I think we could get by without any icons if we use <noinclude>. Just include the images on the template proper with a link to the template on the included version. One link and no images for the purpose of the map should be fine. ~
Relevant Discussion
Any topics of discussion that I've missed? ~ 15:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Ideas
Any that should be eliminated/merged from the list of ideas? Any to add? ~ 15:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
General Discussion
Go ahead and place new discussion under this header. ~ 15:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Just throwing this out there to make note of it. If we do happen to update our map with icons on it we should look at possibly upping the size of the map some for more space and to look less cluttered. I'm playing with stuff in my sandbox. 16:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
