Talk:GKer: Difference between revisions
From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is it okay to destroy a genny so you can put up another one, especially if it's one hit away from becoming "broken beyond repair", and if you're fully encumbered? | Is it okay to destroy a genny so you can put up another one, especially if it's one hit away from becoming "broken beyond repair", and if you're fully encumbered? | ||
[[User:VFD642|VFD642]] 21:50, 5 July 2007 (BST) | [[User:VFD642|VFD642]] 21:50, 5 July 2007 (BST) | ||
:I'd like to add that with the advent of the halved hit-rate in [[Dark]] Buildings, GKing in Darks is a smart survival choice. This makes the issue of GKing a little less clear-cut. IMO, as long as the dark is EHB and the cades are clear, GKing is the way to go. GKing in a TRP, or a non-Dark, is another thing, entirely (outright griefing). --[[User:Samfibian|Samfibian]] 20:51, 15 May 2009 (BST) | |||
Revision as of 19:51, 15 May 2009
I was wondering, is it okay to kill a gker, provided you have the evidence? -- User:Synth X 15:00 (PST), 11 May 2007
Is it okay to destroy a genny so you can put up another one, especially if it's one hit away from becoming "broken beyond repair", and if you're fully encumbered? VFD642 21:50, 5 July 2007 (BST)
- I'd like to add that with the advent of the halved hit-rate in Dark Buildings, GKing in Darks is a smart survival choice. This makes the issue of GKing a little less clear-cut. IMO, as long as the dark is EHB and the cades are clear, GKing is the way to go. GKing in a TRP, or a non-Dark, is another thing, entirely (outright griefing). --Samfibian 20:51, 15 May 2009 (BST)
