User talk:DangerReport/Houldenbank: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Sarkomance (talk | contribs) m (raising to moderate cant call that burb safe) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====[[User:Sarkomance|Sarkomance]] 05:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)==== | |||
Very active zombies, with a zombie group that keeps attacking since monthes and with the arrival of new zombies, they can happen to make groups over 12, often hideing inside buildings. Dead bodies almost always raise again and ruin around 3 EHB TRP everyday, plus the dense gker pker population, Houldenbank doesnt fit for green burb anymore. | |||
Updating from '''Safe''' to '''Moderate''' | |||
--[[User:Sarkomance|Sarkomance]] 05:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Updating from '''Ghost Town''' to '''Moderate'''. Few zombies (less than 50). Few survivors present, but most buildings well barricaded, resource points lit. | Updating from '''Ghost Town''' to '''Moderate'''. Few zombies (less than 50). Few survivors present, but most buildings well barricaded, resource points lit. | ||
Latest revision as of 05:46, 26 December 2008
Sarkomance 05:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Very active zombies, with a zombie group that keeps attacking since monthes and with the arrival of new zombies, they can happen to make groups over 12, often hideing inside buildings. Dead bodies almost always raise again and ruin around 3 EHB TRP everyday, plus the dense gker pker population, Houldenbank doesnt fit for green burb anymore. Updating from Safe to Moderate
--Sarkomance 05:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Updating from Ghost Town to Moderate. Few zombies (less than 50). Few survivors present, but most buildings well barricaded, resource points lit.
--Father Mayfield 22:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Downgrading from Very Dangerous to Dangerous. The MOB's moved on and this burb's real quiet--only a handful of zeds and a small group of survivors reclaiming the buildings one by one.
--Father Mayfield 17:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
