|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Shortcut|[[A/PM]]}}
| | I am Sorry for the Vandalism But we now have no choice... Psychophill Must be stopped. He has discovered a way to give himself infinite time on the server and infinite AP. He plans on killing everyone in the city once and for all and destroying this game. We must stop him. I encourage everyone to tune their radios to 27.77 To hear a city wide announcement on Wednesday at 7:00 PM Eastern Standard time. Thank you for you time. |
| {{Moderationnav}}
| |
| {{Promotions Intro}}
| |
| ==Candidates still requiring vouches==
| |
| <!-- ''Place all new promotion bids under this header'' -->
| |
| ''Place all new promotion bids under this header''
| |
|
| |
|
| ===[[User:Honestmistake]]===
| | P.S. I do not encourage vandalism but I was left with no choice. Monitors if you wish you may delete this account just make sure this message reaches as many people as possible. Thank you again --[[User:PsychophillKILLER|PsychophillKILLER]] 15:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC) |
| He has more than enough contributions, although the history purge screws with the contributor history. He has been here more than a year now, has taken an active interest in the maintenance duties and policy discussions on this wiki and, while we don't always agree is the kind of user I think should be promoted. He has proven he is able to do the job and more than qualifies. So, assuming he accepts, I think it's about time we gave him a bid.--<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 01:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| *'''Vouch''' - I put him up here, it would be strange if I didn't vouch. I believe he would be a good Sysop. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 01:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - I've known him on the suggestion pages for a while. He's a good guy, doesn't get involved in too much drama and is reasonably level-headed. Not sure if he wants this, though. {{User:Linkthewindow/Sig}} 01:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - too fucking serious too much of the time.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 01:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:Also, this proves what Karek knows about what the community needs.--{{User:Sexylegsread/sig}} 08:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - Look. 3 vouches. Now he has to accept. Although he might not. Did I mention '''Vouch'''? --{{User:Rosslessness/Sig}} 01:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - We do not need yet another rules-whoring crybaby on the sysop team. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 01:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Strongly Against''' This user has shown time and time again that he fails to comprehend basic concepts. His arguments are emotional, weak (at best), nonsensical and off topic. I seriously wonder if someone hacked Karek's account to make him do this. --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 02:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:The "You Ass" section on Karek's Talk page is more than enough to show what I am talking about. The section where Karek says about HM:''Iscariot and you both has a long history of disliking the sysops and raging against the machine for the sake of it, I deal with Iscariot off of the wiki and know he acts very differently here and I know you can be reasonable but often enough fall into the category of opposing the sysops for the sake of it that I often find myself having to take your comments on something with a grain of salt. '' RAGING VOUCH there Karek! --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 02:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *::He may be one to argue but he is also willing to admit when he is wrong about something if discussion is actually attempted. He only argues because he actually cares about how the rules are enforced, not like some others who do it simply to cause drama. --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 04:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:::Karek, he may admit to being wrong ''when you finally get it through his head'' that he doesn't understand what he is talking about. Look at his comments in the section I mentioned and his comments on the J3D A/M case are frighteningly dense. I don't want another sysop that we will have to babysit or clean up after. He also "splits hairs" on policies by commenting on the wording. He thought the phrase "No Confidence Vote" was too harsh. WTF?
| |
| *:::You know, Karek, it really looks like you are trying to get someone in "the new crowd" promoted so that you don't seem like part of the "elite clique" and so that you can answer Iscariot's cries of ''you are out of touch with the community''. Why are you putting him up now? What has HM done in the last 2 months that all of the sudden made you decide ''Damn! this is the fresh blood we need''?--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 13:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *::::It's not a sudden decision. I've been considering this for a long while and it's just now that I happened to get around to it(I don't like multiple bids up at once). --<small>[[User:Karek#K|Karek]]<sup><font face="Monotype Corsiva">[[User:Karek/ProjDev/OmegaMap|maps?!]]</font></sup></small> 00:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Strong 'gainst''' - Done nothinto deserve this, other wise as Cyberbob/Nubis... WTF hae you been smoking Karke?--{{User:WOOT/sig}} 02:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - Sorry. I know Honest is contributive, but I'm not sure he's up to the task. --{{User:Axe Hack/Sig}} 02:37, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - ''Pros:'' Honestmistake is a solid user and with a long history of interest and contributions. Usually listens to reason and almost always avoids drama. ''Cons:'' Sometimes comes up with really weird, illogical positions on what seem to be pretty straightforward issues. ''Concusion:'' More time and more active participation in Admin stuff, then he might be an excellent candidate. --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 03:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against'''I don't see him that often, nor do I see any great contributions.--[[User:MisterGame|Thadeous Oakley]] 09:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - Free sysops for everybody \õ/ --<small>—The preceding [[Special:Listusers/sysop|signed]] comment was added by [[User:Hagnat|Hagnat]] ([[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Hagnat|contribs]]) at</small> 10:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:honestmistake is a good and caring gontributor. he is not the kind who acts for the lulz, so he wont fuck up with his admin powers --<small>—The preceding [[Special:Listusers/sysop|signed]] comment was added by [[User:Hagnat|Hagnat]] ([[User talk:Hagnat|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Hagnat|contribs]]) at</small> 10:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *::Given the [[User:Amazing|company you keep]] I'm sure you'll forgive people if they don't find your character reference all that exciting. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 11:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouch''' - He mostly has a point when he disagrees with a decision, and even if I disagree, it's usually a difference of opinion <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 11:23 31 January 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| *:Should anyone else bother <s>voting</s> then, if he accepts the nomination? --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 11:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:::Of course they should. I always take into account other people's opinions <small>-- [[User:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">boxy</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Boxy|<span style="color: Red">talk</span>]] • [[The Rules|teh rulz]]</sup> 12:13 31 January 2009 (BST)</small>
| |
| *::::Hahaha. That's a good one. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *::When does cyberbob's trolling cross the border into shitting up an Admin page? --[[User:WanYao|WanYao]] 12:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:::My comment was considerably more relevant than that attempt, my dear. If you want to go after someone for shitting up admin pages I suggest you take a look at the amount of shit I've moved off A/VB onto the talk page in recent weeks. --[[User:Cyberbob240|Cyberbob]] 12:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *:::When he stops making good points. I do hope that they at least play out the charade and leave the "what do you think about this promotion bid" comments on each other's pages. We expect the Dog '''and''' Pony at the Show. Or should that be ass? --{{User:Nubis/sig}} 13:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' i'm on the fence. maybe next time around. don't we have enough users with super powers? and as above i thought HM hated the Sysops?----[[User:Sexualharrison|Sexualharrison]][[Image:Starofdavid2.png | 18px]] [[Image:Boobs.gif|18px]] 13:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' Don't know him well enough. --{{User:Janus Abernathy/Sig}} 13:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Vouchy vouch''' - He's always been decent, polite and such when I've talked to him. He seems to have a functioning brain and such, so yes, vouch.--{{User:Seventythree/Sig}} 15:16, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - I haven't seen him much outside several petty squabbles with other users. If/When he accepts his nomination, it would be useful if he would provide some examples of why he should be a sysop. Until then, I will abstain. --{{User:Pestolence/Sig}} 01:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - Because of some of his comments on Jed's last case in A/M remind me that I don't want him judging anything important in that place, or A/VB.--<font face="Pristina"><span style="color: DarkMagenta">Suicidal Angel -</span> [[User_talk:Suicidalangel|<span style="color: DarkGreen">Help</span>]] [[Project_Mentor|<span style="color: Black">needed?</span>]]</font> 02:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Against''' - Wow, I thought this was a joke. His past actions speak VOLUMES.--{{User:SirArgo/Signature}} 05:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| *'''Abstain''' - Who? --{{User:AnimeSucks/Sig}} 07:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Candidates currently under community discussion==
| |
| | |
| | |
| ==Archived Promotions==
| |
| | |
| *[[:Category:Promotions Candidacies|Complete list of Promotion Requests]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Successful Promotions Candidacies|Successful Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies|Unsuccessful Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Unaccepted Nominations|Unaccepted Nominations]]
| |
| *[[:Category:Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies|Withdrawn Promotions Candidacies]]
| |
