Talk:Mornington: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
===Ambiguity about the BP===
===Ambiguity about the BP===
There are now at least three copies of the BP, and I know that they aren't completely consistent (at least about Pullman Building at [10,65]):
There are now at least three copies of the BP, and I know that they aren't completely consistent (at least about Pullman Building at [10,65]):
*[[Mornington Barricade Plan]]
 
*[[Mornington#Barricade Plan]]
*[[Mornington#Barricade Plan]]
*and the one below, in this very discussion page.
*and the one below, in this very discussion page.
Line 17: Line 17:
If anyone knows how to clarify which one is best accepted, please do.  In the lack of other evidence, I would assume the one in the main article to be the "correct" one. [[User:Lomd|Lomd]] 17:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
If anyone knows how to clarify which one is best accepted, please do.  In the lack of other evidence, I would assume the one in the main article to be the "correct" one. [[User:Lomd|Lomd]] 17:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
:The one in the main article is the correct one. --[[User:Maverick Farrant|Maverick]] 20:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
:The one in the main article is the correct one. --[[User:Maverick Farrant|Maverick]] 20:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
:I removed the one on the discussion page and am in the process of trying to edit the one on the main page to reflect the correct info. Wiki seems to be fighting with me right now, but I will get it corrected. Too items to update made errors after barricade plan discussions. Our apologies... [[User:Pandoras emptiness|Pandoras emptiness]] 14:15, 2 April 2009 (BST)
:I removed the one on the discussion page and am in the process of trying to edit the one on the main page to reflect the correct info. Wiki seems to be fighting with me right now, but I will get it corrected. Too items to update made errors after barricade plan discussions. Our apologies...OH, AND GIVE THAT MAN A QUATER FOR TODAY FOR USING "AMBIGUITY". LOL [[User:Pandoras emptiness|Pandoras emptiness]] 14:15, 2 April 2009 (BST)


== REVIVES ==
== REVIVES ==

Revision as of 13:21, 2 April 2009

Please sign your edits on the wiki. You can do this either by typing ~~~~ (four tildes), or by pressing the Sign.png button in the editing toolbar. Signing your edits in the standard format makes it much easier to identify when and who has made changes, and creates less work for sysops and other wiki users.

-- boxy T L ZS Nuts2U DA 13:11, 26 March 2007 (BST)




ISSUES

Ambiguity about the BP

There are now at least three copies of the BP, and I know that they aren't completely consistent (at least about Pullman Building at [10,65]):

If anyone knows how to clarify which one is best accepted, please do. In the lack of other evidence, I would assume the one in the main article to be the "correct" one. Lomd 17:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

The one in the main article is the correct one. --Maverick 20:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
I removed the one on the discussion page and am in the process of trying to edit the one on the main page to reflect the correct info. Wiki seems to be fighting with me right now, but I will get it corrected. Too items to update made errors after barricade plan discussions. Our apologies...OH, AND GIVE THAT MAN A QUATER FOR TODAY FOR USING "AMBIGUITY". LOL Pandoras emptiness 14:15, 2 April 2009 (BST)

REVIVES

Sheridan St and the Cemetary are the revive points currently. Pandoras emptiness 14:17, 2 April 2009 (BST)

WARRIORS

Right now this is the division:

Lisey: Delamont, Leay, Bulford, Priscott, Hope & Pring http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=796163

Pandora: Club, Catcott, Noakes, Chidley, Woodyatt & Junkyard 18 http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=598011

M2: (is not an alt) Hagger, Buck, Merewether, Mainstone, Question http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=609129

Totallyfubar: Curme, Dye, Davies, Cooksley, Colerage, Tsarevna's. http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=606289

Mourning13: Pyle, Shepard, Pincher, Warehouse 13, Pullman, Ripley, Edgecombe & Ashenden http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=698573

Drop Dead Fred 13: Perratt, Megamax, Millington, Sixtus, Andrew's. http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=793886

Myself: Olding, Rodman, Basil, Plummer, Warehouse 12, Factory & Warehouse 10 http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=599238

Filthnails: goes around and takes care of things as he sees fit. Keeps important buildings under a watchful eye.

http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=517271

anthonwy : Combat http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1037936

Gibbsey16: Combat http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1106762

f8l3rr0r: Combat http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=159406

Beatlefan131: http://www.urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1069469

== DO NOT REVIVE / KOS'S / PKERS ==

Clean slate... except for Virginia creeper... http://urbandead.com/profile.cgi?id=1354051



UBP Discussion

This is a first template of the barricading plan. All suggestions from local groups are greatly appreciated to make improvements concerning the barricading policy. Please note that current cade levels have been generated by this generator, so it will probably make no sense at all at this moment... hence the discussion *grin*

Rather than generating a different BP for each proposal, feel free to edit the map above. It may seem a bit daunting at first, but after studying the code a bit it starts to make sense... - Kind regards, --John Cannonfodder 14:18, 14 June 2007 (BST)


I edited the BP to show the BP as described on the suburb page; if I missed something, just slap me. *grins* --John Cannonfodder 14:45, 14 June 2007 (BST)

I'm thinking we should change "the Curme Building" to EHB and make one or both schools near it VSB to better conform to the Uniform Barricading Policy. I won't make the edit to the template above until this weekend, so that will give a few days for discussion first.--Maverick Farrant 22:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Policy for POV News items

Do we currently have a policy in place for news items that are not NPOV? There was one posted to the main mornington page that is about as far from NPOV as realistically possible, and I think it could be made NPOV while leaving any recognizable shred of the original post behind. If such a policy does not exist, perhaps something should be written/agreed upon/made up on the spot. --Joe McO'Robertson UD 02:35, 30 August 2007 (BST)

Thus far, no consensus has been reached on this wiki's policy on NPOV. However, you may contribute here. For now, most wiki user are encouraged to abide by the NPOV site on Wikipedia. On personal policy, if I see an extremely POV statement made, such as claiming someone is a PKer without hard and fast proof, I remove it. --Banana reads Scoundrell for all of Yesterday's News, Today! 03:25, 30 August 2007 (BST)