UDWiki talk:Administration/Policy Discussion/VB Case Requirements: Difference between revisions

From The Urban Dead Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Replacing page with 'Hopefully we can come to an agreement about what needs to be reported right away and what can be discussed first.--~~~~')
(Bad idea)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hopefully we can come to an agreement about what needs to be reported right away and what can be discussed first.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 20:05, 6 September 2009 (BST)
Hopefully we can come to an agreement about what needs to be reported right away and what can be discussed first.--{{User:Nubis/sig}} 20:05, 6 September 2009 (BST)
== Bad idea ==
Would this reduce the amount of VB cases?  Sure.  But there is an important side effect that I think you have missed.  The only think this does is make bad edits stay up for 24 hours.  So lets say someone makes an edit to a page that is considered "bad".  Normally such an edit would be fixed almost instantly.  With this policy you have to wait for the original owner to fix said edit, which goes completely against the entire point of a wiki.  Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what kind of edits this policy covers.  [[User:Stale 2000|Stale 2000]] 20:22, 6 September 2009 (BST)

Revision as of 19:22, 6 September 2009

Hopefully we can come to an agreement about what needs to be reported right away and what can be discussed first.--– Nubis NWO 20:05, 6 September 2009 (BST)

Bad idea

Would this reduce the amount of VB cases? Sure. But there is an important side effect that I think you have missed. The only think this does is make bad edits stay up for 24 hours. So lets say someone makes an edit to a page that is considered "bad". Normally such an edit would be fixed almost instantly. With this policy you have to wait for the original owner to fix said edit, which goes completely against the entire point of a wiki. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what kind of edits this policy covers. Stale 2000 20:22, 6 September 2009 (BST)