Talk:Malton Skinz: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Formatting of Recruitment Advertisement== | ==Formatting of Recruitment Advertisement== | ||
Hey, I was looking through the [[Recruitment]] page, and I noticed that the Table of Contents for the page seemed to be a little off. I did some poking around, and I noticed that [[Malton Skinz/recruit|your group's advertisement]] seems to be the cause of the problem. Specifically, if you check the [[Recruitment#Format_for_Advert_Content|formatting rules]] for the page, you'll notice that it says you shouldn't use any subheadings in your advertisements. Unfortunately, your advertisement uses two level-two (i.e. the "<nowiki>==</nowiki>") subheadings, which seems to be responsible for those problems I mentioned in the table of contents. I'm certainly not in any position to require that you change it, but I'm sure that the other people reading that page will appreciate having a table of contents that accurately reflects the contents of the page. If you need any help replacing them with alternative formatting that looks essentially the same but doesn't disrupt the page, let me know and I'll be happy to help. (cross-posted on [[User talk:PunXnSkinz]]) {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | Hey, I was looking through the [[Recruitment]] page, and I noticed that the Table of Contents for the page seemed to be a little off. I did some poking around, and I noticed that [[Malton Skinz/recruit|your group's advertisement]] seems to be the cause of the problem. Specifically, if you check the [[Recruitment#Format_for_Advert_Content|formatting rules]] for the page, you'll notice that it says you shouldn't use any subheadings in your advertisements. Unfortunately, your advertisement uses two level-two (i.e. the "<nowiki>==</nowiki>") subheadings, which seems to be responsible for those problems I mentioned in the table of contents. I'm certainly not in any position to require that you change it, but I'm sure that the other people reading that page will appreciate having a table of contents that accurately reflects the contents of the page. If you need any help replacing them with alternative formatting that looks essentially the same but doesn't disrupt the page, let me know and I'll be happy to help. (cross-posted on [[User talk:PunXnSkinz]]) {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 22:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{RecruitWarning|using subheadings}} | |||
It's just been commented out for now, so simply remove the HTML comments to add it back in once you fix it. Otherwise, the maintainers of the list will remove it entirely in two weeks, I believe. {{User:Aichon/Signature}} 17:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:18, 3 November 2009
Formatting of Recruitment Advertisement
Hey, I was looking through the Recruitment page, and I noticed that the Table of Contents for the page seemed to be a little off. I did some poking around, and I noticed that your group's advertisement seems to be the cause of the problem. Specifically, if you check the formatting rules for the page, you'll notice that it says you shouldn't use any subheadings in your advertisements. Unfortunately, your advertisement uses two level-two (i.e. the "==") subheadings, which seems to be responsible for those problems I mentioned in the table of contents. I'm certainly not in any position to require that you change it, but I'm sure that the other people reading that page will appreciate having a table of contents that accurately reflects the contents of the page. If you need any help replacing them with alternative formatting that looks essentially the same but doesn't disrupt the page, let me know and I'll be happy to help. (cross-posted on User talk:PunXnSkinz) —Aichon— 22:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
 |
Recruitment |
| Your ad has been removed from the Recruitment page because of rules violation, specifically using subheadings. There is a guide here. Please re-add it if you are still active and recruiting. |
It's just been commented out for now, so simply remove the HTML comments to add it back in once you fix it. Otherwise, the maintainers of the list will remove it entirely in two weeks, I believe. —Aichon— 17:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
