Talk:Malton Skinz: Difference between revisions
(GSGM 2010) |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== GSGM 2010 == | == GSGM 2010 == | ||
{{Group | {{Group Inactive?}}Just our yearly group census to see who is still active. If you are, reply below. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 06:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:If you are still active, just add yourself back to whichever suburb(s) you are still active in. --{{User:Maverick Farrant/sig}} 07:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:23, 12 February 2010
Formatting of Recruitment Advertisement
Hey, I was looking through the Recruitment page, and I noticed that the Table of Contents for the page seemed to be a little off. I did some poking around, and I noticed that your group's advertisement seems to be the cause of the problem. Specifically, if you check the formatting rules for the page, you'll notice that it says you shouldn't use any subheadings in your advertisements. Unfortunately, your advertisement uses two level-two (i.e. the "==") subheadings, which seems to be responsible for those problems I mentioned in the table of contents. I'm certainly not in any position to require that you change it, but I'm sure that the other people reading that page will appreciate having a table of contents that accurately reflects the contents of the page. If you need any help replacing them with alternative formatting that looks essentially the same but doesn't disrupt the page, let me know and I'll be happy to help. (cross-posted on User talk:PunXnSkinz) —Aichon— 22:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Recruitment | |
Your ad has been removed from the Recruitment page because of rules violation, specifically using subheadings. There is a guide here. Please re-add it if you are still active and recruiting. |
It's just been commented out for now, so simply remove the HTML comments to add it back in once you fix it. Otherwise, the maintainers of the list will remove it entirely in two weeks, I believe. —Aichon— 17:18, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
GSGM 2010
Just our yearly group census to see who is still active. If you are, reply below. --Maverick Talk - OBR 404 06:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)